Hydration and kidney health

Ultrasound Shear Wave Elastography and Doppler Sonography to Assess the Effect of Hydration on Human Kidneys: A Preliminary Observation

To assess the feasibility of ultrasound imaging in depicting the changes in kidney size, hemodynamics and cortex viscoelasticity after hydration, we prospectively performed 2-D ultrasound shear wave elastography (SWE) and Doppler sonography of bilateral kidneys in 30 volunteers. Kidney length, cortex shear wave velocity (SWV), shear wave dispersion (SWD), interlobar artery peak systolic velocity (PSV), end-diastolic velocity (EDV) and resistive index (RI) were measured before and 60 min after with and without drinking water (1 L). The differences in kidney length, SWV, PSV, EDV and color pixel intensity before and after hydration were significant (p < 0.001), whereas these differences were not significant without hydration (p > 0.05). SWD and RI did not significantly differ with or without hydration. Inter- and intra-observer reliability in performing SWE and Doppler sonography was good. The use of Doppler sonography and ultrasound SWE to evaluate the effect of hydration on kidney size, hemodynamics and viscoelasticity seem to be feasible.

Water Intake, Water Balance, and the Elusive Daily Water Requirement

Water is essential for metabolism, substrate transport across membranes, cellular homeostasis, temperature regulation, and circulatory function. Although nutritional and physiological research teams and professional organizations have described the daily total water intakes (TWI, L/24h) and Adequate Intakes (AI) of children, women, and men, there is no widespread consensus regarding the human water requirements of different demographic groups. These requirements remain undefined because of the dynamic complexity inherent in the human water regulatory network, which involves the central nervous system and several organ systems, as well as large inter-individual differences. The present review analyzes published evidence that is relevant to these issues and presents a novel approach to assessing the daily water requirements of individuals in all sex and life-stage groups, as an alternative to AI values based on survey data. This empirical method focuses on the intensity of a specific neuroendocrine response (e.g., plasma arginine vasopressin (AVP) concentration) employed by the brain to regulate total body water volume and concentration. We consider this autonomically-controlled neuroendocrine response to be an inherent hydration biomarker and one means by which the brain maintains good health and optimal function. We also propose that this individualized method defines the elusive state of euhydration (i.e., water balance) and distinguishes it from hypohydration. Using plasma AVP concentration to analyze multiple published data sets that included both men and women, we determined that a mild neuroendocrine defense of body water commences when TWI is ˂1.8 L/24h, that 19⁻71% of adults in various countries consume less than this TWI each day, and consuming less than the 24-h water AI may influence the risk of dysfunctional metabolism and chronic diseases.

Am I Drinking Enough? Yes, No, and Maybe

Adequate fluid intake can be dually defined as a volume of fluid (from water, beverages, and food) sufficient to replace water losses and provide for solute excretion. A wide range of fluid intakes are compatible with euhydration, whereby total body water varies narrowly from day to day by 600 to 900 mL (<1% body mass). One measure of fluid intake adequacy involves enough fluid to prevent meaningful body water deficits outside this euhydration range (i.e., dehydration). Another measure of fluid intake adequacy involves enough fluid to balance the renal solute load, which can vary widely inside the euhydration range. The subtle but important distinction between the 2 types of adequacy may explain some of the ambiguity surrounding the efficacy of hydration status markers. Both perspectives of fluid intake adequacy are discussed in detail and a simple tool is reviewed that may help healthy, active, low-risk populations answer the question, "Am I drinking enough?" Key Teaching Points • Adequate fluid intake can be dually defined as a volume of fluid (from water, beverages, and food) sufficient to replace water losses and provide for solute excretion. • Fluid needs can differ greatly among individuals due to variation in the factors that influence both water loss and solute balance; thus, adequacy is consistent with a wide range of fluid intakes and is better gauged using hydration assessment methods. • Adequacy of fluid intake for replacing meaningful water losses (dehydration) can be assessed simply, inexpensively, and with reasonable fidelity among healthy, active, low-risk individuals. • Adequacy of fluid intake for solute excretion per se can also be assessed among individuals but is more difficult to define and less practical to measure.