Communicating neurological prognosis in the prenatal period: a narrative review and practice guidelines

Clinicians may face an array of challenges in conducting fetal neurological consultations including prognostic uncertainty, a lack of training in fetal counseling, and limited opportunity to build rapport with families. In this setting, it is critical to employ high-quality, family-centered care to allow expectant parents to make informed decisions. Despite the challenges and gravity of these consultations, there remains limited data outlining best conduct and communication practices. This narrative review aims to summarize relevant literature around counseling within fetal neurology, focusing on three key themes: (1) discussing neurological prognosis and uncertainty, (2) navigating evolving decision making, (3) recognizing bias and understanding patient context. We provide practical recommendations to clinicians conducting fetal neurological counseling and outline future research priorities. IMPACT: Fetal neurological conditions can have a significant impact on child short- and long-term health outcomes. Prenatal consultations are an important venue to discuss information regarding fetal prognosis and decision making with expectant parents. However, there is limited evidence supporting best communication practices within this setting. This review summarizes current literature around expectant parent prognostic communication preferences and outlines practical recommendations and priorities for future research.

Advances in Fetal Surgical Repair of Open Spina Bifida

Spina bifida remains a common congenital anomaly of the central nervous system despite national fortification of foods with folic acid, with a prevalence of 2-4 per 10,000 live births. Prenatal screening for the early detection of this condition provides patients with the opportunity to consider various management options during pregnancy. Prenatal repair of open spina bifida, traditionally performed by the open maternal-fetal surgical approach through hysterotomy, has been shown to improve outcomes for the child, including decreased need for cerebrospinal fluid diversion surgery and improved lower neuromotor function. However, the open maternal-fetal surgical approach is associated with relatively increased risk for the patient and the overall pregnancy, as well as future pregnancies. Recent advances in minimally invasive prenatal repair of open spina bifida through fetoscopy have shown similar benefits for the child but relatively improved outcomes for the pregnant patient and future childbearing.

Fetal MRI Neuroradiology: Indications

Fetal MRI is a safe, noninvasive examination of the fetus and placenta, a complement to ultrasonography. MRI provides detailed CNS evaluation, including depicting parenchymal architecture and posterior fossa morphology, and is key in prenatal assessment of spinal dysraphism, neck masses, and ventriculomegaly. Fetal MRI is typically performed after 22 weeks gestation, and ultrafast T1 and T2-weighted MRI sequences are the core of the exam, with advanced sequences such as diffusion weighted imaging used for specific questions. The fetal brain grows and develops rapidly, and familiarity with gestational age specific norms is essential to MRI interpretation.

Prevalence of supratentorial anomalies assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with open spina bifida

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of brain anomalies at the time of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment in fetuses eligible for prenatal open spina bifida (OSB) repair, and to explore the relationship between brain abnormalities and features of the spinal defect.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study, conducted in three fetal medicine centers, of fetuses eligible for OSB fetal surgery repair between January 2009 and December 2019. MRI images obtained as part of the presurgical assessment were re-evaluated by two independent observers, blinded to perinatal results, to assess: (1) the type and area of the defect and its anatomical level; (2) the presence of any structural central nervous system (CNS) anomaly and abnormal ventricular wall; and (3) fetal head and brain biometry. Binary regression analyses were performed and data were adjusted for type of defect, upper level of the lesion (ULL), gestational age (GA) at MRI and fetal medicine center. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed in order to identify lesion characteristics and brain anomalies associated with a higher risk of presence of abnormal corpus callosum (CC) and/or heterotopia.

RESULTS

Of 115 fetuses included, 91 had myelomeningocele and 24 had myeloschisis. Anatomical level of the lesion was thoracic in seven fetuses, L1-L2 in 13, L3-L5 in 68 and sacral in 27. Median GA at MRI was 24.7 (interquartile range, 23.0-25.7) weeks. Overall, 52.7% of cases had at least one additional brain anomaly. Specifically, abnormal CC was observed in 50.4% of cases and abnormality of the ventricular wall in 19.1%, of which 4.3% had nodular heterotopia. Factors associated independently with higher risk of abnormal CC and/or heterotopia were non-sacral ULL (odds ratio (OR), 0.51 (95% CI, 0.26-0.97); P = 0.043), larger ventricular width (per mm) (OR, 1.23 (95% CI, 1.07-1.43); P = 0.005) and presence of abnormal cavum septi pellucidi (OR, 3.76 (95% CI, 1.13-12.48); P = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the fetuses assessed for OSB repair had an abnormal CC and/or an abnormal ventricular wall prior to prenatal repair. The likelihood of brain abnormalities was increased in cases with a non-sacral lesion and wider lateral ventricles. These findings highlight the importance of a detailed preoperative CNS evaluation of fetuses with OSB. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Evaluation of medical malpractice claims in obstetric ultrasonography: Opinion of The Council of Forensic Medicine in Turkey

AIM

The Council of Forensic Medicine is an institution affiliated with the Ministry of Justice in the Republic of Turkey which acts in an official oversight capacity in cases of alleged medical malpractice in forensic medical science. Sonographers may face judicial sanctions as a result of ultrasonography examinations that they do not perform according to current guidelines. In this study we focused our attention to claims of medical malpractice related to obstetric ultrasonography that had been referred to the Council of Forensic Medicine. Our aim was to investigate the causes of malpractice claims related to obstetric ultrasonography and to present the expert opinions of our council about these claims in the light of literature. We have also planned to discuss what can be done with current guideline information to prevent situations that cause malpractice claims.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study herein was performed on 73 claims of medical malpractice in obstetric ultrasonography findings, all of which were referred by forensic authorities to the Second Specialization Board of Council Forensic Medicine from 2014 to 2018. A retrospective review of the reports generated from information contained within case files illuminates the reasoning behind medical error claims. Among the reasons examined are features of the ultrasonographic evaluation (number, week of examination, health institution), the traits of the evaluating physicians (institutions, branches, academic titles), congenital anomalies detected after birth, and maternal age.

RESULTS

Analysis of the data shows that 79.5% of ultrasonographic examinations leading to claims of medical malpractice were performed in private health institutions. All cases of medical malpractice claims were associated with undiagnosed congenital anomalies, and that the form for informed consent was obtained for only 19.1% of cases that underwent second level ultrasonographic examination. Further, 53.3% of cases with congenital anomalies subject to litigation were anomalies of the extremities, and all four cases of alleged malpractice within obstetric ultrasonography were associated with extremity anomalies. The variety of academic titles of physicians performing the ultrasonographic examinations was not statistically significant. It was concluded that two ultrasonography examinations performed by two nuclear medicine specialists were not in accordance with medical norms.

CONCLUSION

Although organizations such as AIUM, ACR, and ACOG try to set standards for ultrasound examination through practice guidelines, it is difficult to establish optimal standards for ultrasonographic examination. In light of the guidelines created by the above organizations, each country should set its own standard based on their own socioeconomic and health data. We conclude that it is not appropriate for obstetric ultrasonographic examinations to be performed by specialists in fields such as nuclear medicine, where ultrasonographic examinations are not a part of the core training curriculum. Obtaining a signed informed consent form from the patient prior to the second level ultrasonography examination will be useful for medicolegal defense purposes should a subsequent claim of malpractice be filed.

Imaging of fetal ventriculomegaly

Fetal ventriculomegaly is the most common central nervous system abnormality detected by prenatal imaging. It has a high association with other anomalies. Etiologies and prognoses for fetal ventriculomegaly range from normal outcomes to significant neurodevelopmental sequelae. In this paper, we review the development, terminology, pathogenesis, imaging and prognosis of fetal ventriculomegaly.

Myelomeningocele sac associated with worse lower-extremity neurological sequelae: evidence for prenatal neural stretch injury?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the presence of a myelomeningocele (MMC) sac and sac size correlate with compromised lower-extremity function in fetuses with open spinal dysraphism.

METHODS

A radiology database search was performed to identify cases of MMC and myeloschisis (MS) diagnosed prenatally in a single center from 2013 to 2017. All cases were evaluated between 18 and 25 weeks. Ultrasound reports were reviewed for talipes and impaired lower-extremity motion. In MMC cases, sac volume was calculated from ultrasound measurements. Magnetic resonance imaging reports were reviewed for hindbrain herniation. The association of presence of a MMC sac and sac size with talipes and impaired lower-extremity motion was assessed. Post-hoc analysis of data from the multicenter Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) randomized controlled trial was performed to confirm the study findings.

RESULTS

In total, 283 MMC and 121 MS cases were identified. MMC was associated with a lower incidence of hindbrain herniation than was MS (80.9% vs 100%; P < 0.001). Compared with MS cases, MMC cases with hindbrain herniation had a higher rate of talipes (28.4% vs 16.5%, P = 0.02) and of talipes or lower-extremity impairment (34.9% vs 19.0%, P = 0.002). Although there was a higher rate of impaired lower-extremity motion alone in MMC cases with hindbrain herniation than in MS cases, the difference was not statistically significant (6.6% vs 2.5%; P = 0.13). Among MMC cases with hindbrain herniation, mean sac volume was higher in those associated with talipes compared with those without talipes (4.7 ± 4.2 vs 3.0 ± 2.6 mL; P = 0.002). Review of the MOMS data demonstrated similar findings; cases with a sac on baseline imaging had a higher incidence of talipes than did those without a sac (28.2% vs 7.5%; P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In fetuses with open spinal dysraphism, the presence of a MMC sac was associated with fetal talipes, and this effect was correlated with sac size. The presence of a larger sac in fetuses with open spinal dysraphism may result in additional injury through mechanical stretching of the nerves, suggesting another acquired mechanism of injury to the exposed spinal tissue. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Structured MRI reporting in spinal dysraphism

Magnetic resonance evaluation of spinal dysraphism can be confusing for inexperienced radiologists and a detailed, step-by-step evaluation of the normal and abnormal imaging findings can help garner the diagnosis. The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature and to provide a comprehensive, structured, template checklist-style format for reporting spinal dysraphism that can help inexperienced radiologists to systematically analyze and report all the significant and ancillary findings in cases of spinal dysraphism and efficiently communicate the findings to the treating physician/surgeon.

Myelomeningocele Versus Myelocele on Fetal MR Images: Are There Differences in Brain Findings?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to examine differences between patients with myelomeningocele and those with myelocele with respect to brain imaging findings at fetal MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A single-center retrospective analysis was performed of fetal MRI examinations revealing open spinal dysraphism from 2004 through 2016 with available diagnostic postnatal spinal MR images in conjunction with neurosurgical follow-up findings. Images were reviewed by two board-certified fellowship-trained pediatric neuroradiologists. Relevant clinical data were recorded.

RESULTS

The study included 119 fetal MRI examinations of patients with open spinal dysraphism. Myeloceles were found in 29.4% (35/119) of these examinations and myelomeningoceles in the others. All (35/35) myeloceles showed grade 3 (severe) Chiari II malformations. Only 73.8% (62/84) of myelomeningoceles showed grade 3 Chiari II malformation. Clinically significant spinal kyphosis was found in 5.0% (6/119) of fetuses, and all of these fetuses had grade 3 Chiari II malformations. The size of the spinal dysraphic defect had significant positive correlation with lateral (p < 0.0001) and third (p = 0.006) ventricular size. Mean volume of the myelomeningocele sac was significantly different among Chiari II grades and inversely proportional to Chiari II grade (p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSION

Larger spinal dysraphic defects correlated with increased ventricular size at fetal MRI. All of the fetuses with myelocele or kyphosis had severe Chiari II malformations. Larger myelomeningocele sac size was associated with lower grade of Chiari II malformation, suggesting that myelomeningocele sac formation may be protective against hindbrain herniation.

Decreased rectal meconium signal on MRI in fetuses with open spinal dysraphism

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate rectal meconium signal in fetuses with open spinal dysraphism and correlate findings with postnatal exam.

METHODS

This is a single-institution Institutional Review Board-approved Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) compliant retrospective analysis of fetal MRIs of open spinal dysraphism from 2004 to 2016. Fetuses with diagnostic T1-weighted images and postnatal follow-up at our institution were included.

RESULTS

A total of 115 fetuses (average gestational age 23.9 ± 3.6 weeks) met inclusion criteria. Of these, 80% (92/115) had T1 hyperintense rectal meconium signal. Average height of the meconium column, measured from the base of the bladder to its most inferior extent, was 9.2 ± 4.3 mm in fetuses ≥20-week gestational age and 11.1 ± 4.4 mm in fetuses ≥23-week gestational age (n = 110) . None had bowel dilation. One of 115 fetuses had a simple form of anorectal malformation allowing complete repair in the neonatal period, but this fetus had a normal meconium column height on fetal MRI of 22 mm. The remaining 23/115 fetuses with lack of normal rectal meconium signal were born without evidence of anorectal malformation.

CONCLUSION

Decreased or absent T1-hyperintense rectal meconium signal in fetuses with open spinal dysraphism does not correlate with imperforate anus postnatal and may be a reflection of neurogenic bowel in this patient population.

The role of intrauterine magnetic resonance in the management of myelomenigocele

OBJECTIVE

To assess the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of myelomenigocele.

BACKGROUND

Spinal dysraphism or neural tube defects (NTD) encompass a heterogeneous group of congenital spinal anomalies that result from the defective closure of the neural tube early in gestation. Myelomeningocele is the most common type of NTD that is compatible with life, with high survival rates but lifelong physical impairments.

CONCLUSION

MRI is an important adjunct to ultrasound in assessing NTD, as it pertains to pre-surgical planning and perinatal management. However, it should not be considered a replacement for ultrasonography, which continues to be the gold standard for fetal anatomic evaluation.

Fetal MRI of the central nervous system: State-of-the-art

Prenatal ultrasonographic (US) examination is considered as the first tool in the assessment of fetal abnormalities. However, several large-scale studies point out that some malformations, in particular central nervous system (CNS) anomalies, are not well characterized through US. Therefore, the actual malformation severity is not always related to prenatal ultrasound (US) findings. Over the past 20 years, ultrafast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has progressively increased as a prenatal 3rd level diagnostic technique with a good sensitivity, particularly for the study of fetal CNS malformations. In fact, CNS anomalies are the most common clinical indications for fetal MRI, representing about 80% of the total examinations. This review covers the recent literature on fetal brain MRI, with emphasis on techniques, safety and indications.

Fetoscopic versus Open Repair for Spina Bifida Aperta: A Systematic Review of Outcomes

Objective: To compare outcomes of fetoscopic spina bifida aperta repair (FSBAR) with the results of the open approach (OSBAR) as in the Management Of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Methods: This was a systematic comparison of reports on FSBAR with data from the MOMS (n = 78). Inclusion criteria were studies of spina bifida aperta patients who underwent FSBAR and were followed for ≥12 months. Primary outcome was perinatal mortality. Secondary outcomes included operative, maternal, fetal, neonatal and infant outcomes. Results: Out of 16 reports, we included 5 from 2 centers. Due to bias and heterogeneity, analysis was restricted to two overlapping case series (n = 51 and 71). In those, FSBAR was technically different from OSBAR, had comparable perinatal mortality (7.8 vs. 2.6%, p = 0.212) and shunt rate at 12 months (45 vs. 40%, p = 0.619), longer operation time (223 vs. 105 min, p < 0.001), higher preterm prelabor membrane rupture rate (84 vs. 46%, p < 0.001), earlier gestational age at birth (32.9 vs. 34.1 weeks, p = 0.03), higher postnatal reoperation rate (28 vs. 2.56%, p < 0.001) and absence of uterine thinning or dehiscence (0 vs. 36%, p < 0.001). Functional outcomes were not available. Conclusion: FSBAR utilizes a different neurosurgical technique, takes longer to complete, induces more prematurity, requires additional postnatal procedures, yet has a comparable shunt rate and is not associated with uterine thinning or dehiscence. Long-term functional data are awaited.

Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of segmental level of neurological lesion in fetuses with myelomeningocele: development of a new technique

OBJECTIVES

To report our preliminary experience in the use of prenatal ultrasound examination to assess lower-limb movements in fetuses with myelomeningocele. We aimed to determine the accuracy of this method to establish the segmental level of neurological lesion, as this is the best known predictor of the future ability to walk.

METHODS

This was a preliminary, observational study including fetuses with myelomeningocele operated on prenatally. The patterns of movements present and absent in the affected fetuses' lower limbs were evaluated systematically by ultrasound examination. According to the known nerve function associated with each muscle group, the segmental level of neurological lesion was established before birth. The agreement for the segmental levels assigned, between the prenatal ultrasound technique and the classical neurological clinical examination after birth (gold standard), was tested using the weighed kappa (wκ) index.

RESULTS

Seventy-one fetuses with myelomeningocele were evaluated at the Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. After counseling, the parents opted for prenatal surgery (26 cases), termination of pregnancy (43 cases) or postnatal repair (two cases). Five patients did not fulfil the inclusion criteria for prenatal surgery and three were excluded after birth. In the 18 fetuses that underwent surgery and were analyzed, the agreement between prenatal and postnatal segmental levels assigned was 91.7% for the right limb (wκ = 0.80) and 88.9% for the left limb (wκ = 0.73).

CONCLUSIONS

The agreement found between prenatal and postnatal assignment of level of lesion in this preliminary study suggests that neurological sonographic evaluation is feasible before birth. This may provide accurate individualized information about the motor function and future ambulation prognosis of fetuses with myelomeningocele.