1
|
Jiang X, Zuo X, Zhu H. Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Technique Contrasted with Conventional Laparoscopy in Cystectomy for Benign Ovarian Cysts. CURRENT THERAPEUTIC RESEARCH 2023; 99:100713. [PMID: 37519420 PMCID: PMC10372162 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2023.100713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective To compare the laparoendoscopic single-site (LESS) technique with conventional laparoscopy in cystectomy for benign ovarian cysts. Materials and methods A retrospective analysis was performed at Yixing People's Hospital from April 2020 until December 2021. Results Thirty-seven patients using the LESS technique were compared with a control group of 45 patients who underwent a traditional laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. There was no statistically significant difference in the perioperative hemoglobin level changes, cyst rupture rate, postoperative recovery of exhausting time, or pain score at 24 hours after surgery between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The mean operating time was significantly longer in the LESS group than that of the control group (88.38 ± 30.57 minutes vs 59.44 ± 24.22 minutes; P = 0.001). However, the length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the LESS group (3.70 ± 0.57 days vs 4.38 ± 0.86 days; P = 0.001). In addition, total hospitalization expenses were higher in the LESS group (14,709.78 ± 1618.63 yuan vs 12,676.73 ± 1411.78 yuan; P = .001) and the satisfaction score was also significantly higher in the LESS group (z = -2.272; P = 0.023). After a follow-up time of 12 to 24 months, no patient in either group showed wound infection, umbilical hernia, or recurrent cysts. Conclusions The LESS technique for benign ovarian cystectomy is safe, feasible, and equally effective compared with the multiport laparoscopic oophorocystectomy. Although it currently costs more, patients with benign ovarian cysts are highly satisfied with the LESS technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinru Jiang
- Address correspondence to: Xinru Jiang, MM, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Yixing People's Hospital, 75 Tongzhenguan St, Wuxi, Jiangsu 214200, China
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tan W, Deng Y, Deng L, Tang S, Yao Y, Wei H, Zhong K, Wang Y. A preoperative scoring system to predict the probability of laparoendoscopic single-site extracorporeal cystectomy in patients with benign ovarian cysts. Front Surg 2022; 9:991450. [DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.991450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveTo develop a preoperative scoring system (PSS) to predict whether laparoendoscopic single-site extracorporeal (LESS-E) cystectomy can be performed in patients with benign ovarian cysts.MethodWe reviewed data on patients who underwent LESS cystectomy between August 2016 and October 2019 at the first Affiliated Hospital, Army Medical University. The independent predictors of LESS-E cystectomy in patients with benign ovarian cysts were identified using multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram for predicting LESS-E cystectomy in patients with benign ovarian cysts was developed, and to simplify the score, we establish a preoperative scoring system to guide the choice of surgical approach in patients with highly probable benign ovarian cysts.ResultsOur analysis showed that age, BMI, height and the diameter of ovarian cysts were independent predictors of LESS-E cystectomy. A nomogram was developed based on these four factors, which had a concordance index of 0.838 and R2 = 0.415. To simplify the score, the predicted indicators in the regression model were scored by dividing the beta coefficient by the absolute value of the minimum beta coefficient, and the sum of each predictor score established a PSS. In the total set, the selected cutoff value according to the maximum point of the Youden index was 8, and a preoperative score ≥ 8 identified patients undergoing LESS-E cystectomy with a positive predictive value of 67.4% and a negative predictive value of 88.6%.ConclusionA PSS to predict the chances of LESS-E cystectomy was established. This system could be helpful for selecting the appropriate surgical strategy for patients with benign ovarian cysts.
Collapse
|
3
|
Paratubal Cystectomy in a Pregnant Woman Using the Single-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Technique. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2022; 2022:2802767. [PMID: 35875340 PMCID: PMC9303160 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2802767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The proliferation of prenatal ultrasound has enhanced the detection of adnexal masses during pregnancy. The presentation necessitates a clear approach to investigation and treatment that balances both maternal and fetal risk. Laparoscopy is a safe approach to surgical management in the pregnant patient, and SILS may contribute to minimising perioperative complications. Case Presentation. We present the case of a 21-year-old female in her second trimester of pregnancy presenting with a large 20 cm right adnexal cyst. We proceeded with laparoscopic cystectomy via the SILS technique. There were no intraoperative complications, and she recovered well postoperatively. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection of adnexal lesions is safe during pregnancy and should be favoured over the open approach. SILS minimises incision sites and has potential for reduction in perioperative morbidity.
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang X, Li Y. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of single-port laparoscopy, three-port laparoscopy and conventional laparotomy in removing giant ovarian cysts larger than 15 cm. BMC Surg 2021; 21:205. [PMID: 33882918 PMCID: PMC8061010 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-021-01205-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although conventional laparoscopy has gradually accepted as a surgical treatment for ovarian cancer, reducing the port numbers of laparoscopy still has great challenge for larger ovarian tumors. Thus, this study aims to explore the surgical outcomes of single-port laparoscopy for removing giant ovarian cysts (≥ 15 cm) and compare with laparotomy and three-port laparoscopy. Methods This study enrolled 95 patients with giant ovarian cysts (> 15 cm) who underwent single-port laparoscopy, three-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. Their medical records, perioperative surgical outcomes, and postoperative pain score and complications were analyzed and compared retrospectively. Results Single-port laparoscopy showed better perioperative outcomes and less postoperative pain than three-port laparoscopy and laparotomy. The time between post-surgery and getting out of bed in single-port laparoscopy was significant shorter than that in the laparotomy and three-port laparoscopy (17.53 ± 7.26 vs 29.40 ± 9.57 vs 24.56 ± 7.76, P < 0.01). The length of hospital stay in single-port laparoscopy was significantly shorter than that in other two groups (4.06 ± 0.5 vs 5.46 ± 1.63 vs 4.81 ± 0.83, P < 0.001). In addition, single-port laparoscopy had the lowest postoperative pain scores than in the laparotomy and three-port laparoscopy. There were no significant differences of total hospital cost, postoperative complications and time until gas passing among the three surgical groups. Importantly, in the removal of giant ovarian cysts, the proportion of cyst rupture in single-port laparoscopy was far lower than that in three-port laparoscopy (3.0 vs 22.2%). Conclusions For giant ovarian cysts, single-port laparoscopy is still a safe and efficient technique with the advantages of short operation time, less estimated blood loss, short hospital stay, lower spillage rate, and less postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No.36 Sanhao Street, Shenyang, China
| | - Yan Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, No.36 Sanhao Street, Shenyang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments versus two-port laparoscopic surgery for adnexal lesions. Sci Rep 2021; 11:4118. [PMID: 33602951 PMCID: PMC7892849 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-82204-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has emerged as least invasive interventions for gynecologic disease. However, SILS is slow to gain in popularity due to difficulties in triangulation and instrument crowding. Besides, the costly instruments may influence patients' will to have this procedure, and limit other medical expense as well. To optimize outcome and reduce cost, the objective of this study is to evaluate the feasibility and safety for patients undergoing adnexal surgeries using conventional laparoscopic instruments with SILS (SILS-C), and to compare with those of patients subject to TP using conventional laparoscopic instruments (TP-C). This is a retrospective case-control study. The data dated from April 2011 to April 2018. Patients who received concomitant multiple surgeries, were diagnosed with suspected advanced stage ovarian malignancy, or required frozen sections for intraoperative pathologic diagnosis were excluded. Demographic data, including the age, body weight, height, previous abdominal surgery were obtained. The surgical outcomes were compared using conventional statistical methods. 259 patients received SILS-C. The operating time was 63.83 ± 25.31 min. Blood loss was 2.38 ± 6.09 c.c. 58 patients (24.38%) needed addition of port to complete surgery. 384 patients received TP-C. Compared with SILS-C, the operating time was shorter (57.32 ± 26.38 min, OR = 0.984, CI = 0.975-0.992). The patients were further divided into unilateral or bilateral adnexectomy, and unilateral or bilateral cystectomy. Other than the operating time in unilateral cystectomy (66.12 ± 19.5 vs. 58.27 ± 23.92 min, p = .002), no statistical differences were observed in the subgroup analysis. Single incision laparoscopic surgery using conventional laparoscopic instruments is feasible and safe as initial approach to adnexal lesions. In complex setting as unilateral cystectomy or pelvic adhesions, two-port access may be considered.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ma J, Yang J, Cheng S, Jin Y, Zhang N, Wang C, Wang Y. The Learning Curve of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery in Benign Gynecological Diseases. J INVEST SURG 2021; 35:363-370. [PMID: 33395538 DOI: 10.1080/08941939.2020.1867673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze and draw the learning curve of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) in various benign gynecological diseases, so as to provide a reference for applying this cutting-edge technique. METHODS A retrospective analysis of LESS was conducted. Factors influencing the LESS learning process were assessed using Cox's proportional hazards regression. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) value and the learning curve were calculated and visualized based on operation time (OT), blood loss (BL), conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS), conversion rate (CV), and complications (CP). The CUSUM value was defined as the sum of CUSUMOT, CUSUMBL, CUSUMCV, and CUSUMCP. RESULTS A total of 445 cases, including adnexectomies (n = 147), ovarian cystectomies (n = 175), and myomectomies (n = 123) were analyzed. Multivariate regression analysis indicated that adhesion grade (HR, 1.462; 95% CI, 1.016-1.994; p = .045), surgical type (HR, 1.283; 95% CI, 1.042-1.429; p = .024), and surgeon CLS experience (HR, 1.372; 95% CI, 1.097-2.246; p = .012) were independent factors predicting surgeons' mastery of the LESS technique. Among gynecologists with CLS experience, the cutoff points were 17, 20, and 27 cases for adnexectomy, ovarian cystectomy, and myomectomy, respectively. For those without CLS experience, the corresponding cutoff values were 19, 27, and 35 cases. CONCLUSION The learning curve of LESS for benign gynecological diseases indicates a stepwise process, during which the surgeon's CLS experience is the key, especially in ovarian cystectomy and myomectomy. For the training of young gynecologists, CLS should be emphasized in the early stage, and LESS should be introduced gradually.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Ma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiani Yang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shanshan Cheng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yue Jin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chao Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yu Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laparoscopic Vessel Endometriosis Resection Surgery: A Case Report and Review of Literature. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2019; 2019:1375208. [PMID: 31915556 PMCID: PMC6930385 DOI: 10.1155/2019/1375208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Revised: 04/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Endometriosis usually occurs in the pelvis and often involves the ovaries, the uterosacral and broad ligaments, and the pelvic peritoneum. In rare instances, it can occur in the vasculature of the pelvis. Patients with endometriosis present with abnormal pain, menstrual cycle disruption and infertility. Management of endometriosis is usually surgical with excision of the tissue via laparoscopic means. Case A 42-year-old Gravida 5, Para 2-0-3-2 patient with a 22 year history of endometriosis, who had had multiple laparoscopic endometriosis resections, total abdominal hysterectomy, and an exploratory laparotomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, presented with left pelvic pain when standing, dyspareunia, and a 3.7 cm cyst on ultrasound. The patient underwent laparoscopic vessel endometriosis resection and excision of endometriotic nodules from external iliac vessels. Final pathology report showed evidence of old endometriosis in all locations. On interval follow-up, the patient reported sustained relief from pain. Conclusion Complete resection of endometriosis from large vessels can be successfully achieved laparoscopically by a well-experienced surgeon with delicate, proper techniques.
Collapse
|
8
|
Single-Port Laparoscopy vs Conventional Laparoscopy in Benign Adnexal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24:1083-1095. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2017] [Revised: 06/26/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
9
|
Moulton LJ, Jernigan AM, Michener CM. Postoperative Outcomes after Single-port Laparoscopic Removal of Adnexal Masses in Patients Referred to Gynecologic Oncology at a Large Academic Center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017; 24:1136-1144. [PMID: 28673874 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2017] [Revised: 06/27/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To report surgical and pathologic outcomes after single-port laparoscopy (SPL) for adnexal masses in patients referred to a gynecologic oncology practice at a single academic institution. DESIGN A retrospective analysis (Canadian Task Force Classification II.2). SETTING A single academic institution with multiple hospital centers. PATIENTS Women who underwent at least 1 single-port laparoscopic surgery for the treatment of an adnexal mass from 2009 to 2015 after referral to a gynecologic oncology practice. INTERVENTION Data were collected on the surgical procedure, patient demographic variables, 30-day surgical outcomes, and hernia development. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Three hundred twenty-five surgeries were performed in 322 patients with a median follow-up of 42.7 months. The median age was 54.5 years, and the median body mass index was 28.1 kg/m2. All patients underwent unilateral or bilateral salpingectomy or oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy (26.5%). The median operative time was 90.0 minutes. The median mass dimension was 6.4 cm with 17.9% (n = 60) greater than 10 cm. Masses were categorized as simple (11.4%) and complex (69.5%). Although the majority (87.4%) of masses were benign, 7.4% were malignant, and 5.2% were borderline. Benign masses were physiologic (16.6%), serous cystadenomas (19.1%), mucinous cystadenomas (6.8%), endometriomas (12.3%), myomas (12.3%), and mature teratomas (9.2%). In malignant cases (7.4%), serous carcinoma was the most frequent histology (58.3%). The rate of adverse outcomes within 30 days, including reoperation (0.0%), intraoperative injury (1.5%), venous thromboembolism (0.3%), and transfusion (0.6%), was low. The development of incisional cellulitis was 4.6%. The rate of incisional hernia was 4.0%, with a median occurrence of 18.3 months. Diabetes mellitus (p = .03) and obesity (p = .04) were significant predictors for a hernia, but mass complexity (p = .28), American Society of Anesthesiologists class (p = .83), and smoking (p = .82) were not. CONCLUSION In patients undergoing SPL for the removal of adnexal masses in a gynecologic oncology practice, the rate of benign disease is high. SPL removal of adnexal masses is feasible and safe with favorable surgical outcomes, rare short-term adverse outcomes, and a low incisional hernia rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura J Moulton
- Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Amelia M Jernigan
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louisiana State University Healthcare Network, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Chad M Michener
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kim JS, Lee IO, Eoh KJ, Chung YS, Lee I, Lee JY, Nam EJ, Kim S, Kim YT, Kim SW. Surgical technique for single-port laparoscopy in huge ovarian tumors: SW Kim's technique and comparison to laparotomy. Obstet Gynecol Sci 2017; 60:178-186. [PMID: 28344959 PMCID: PMC5364100 DOI: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.2.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2016] [Revised: 09/29/2016] [Accepted: 10/05/2016] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to introduce a method to remove huge ovarian tumors (≥15 cm) intact with single-port laparoscopic surgery (SPLS) using SW Kim's technique and to compare the surgical outcomes with those of laparotomy. METHODS Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent either SPLS (n=21) with SW Kim's technique using a specially designed 30×30-cm2-sized 3XL LapBag or laparotomy (n=22) for a huge ovarian tumor from December 2008 to May 2016. Perioperative surgical outcomes were compared. RESULTS In 19/21 (90.5%) patients, SPLS was successfully performed without any tumor spillage or conversion to multi-port laparoscopy or laparotomy. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics, including tumor diameter and total operation time, between both groups. The postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter for the SPLS group than for the laparotomy group (median, 2 [1 to 5] vs. 4 [3 to 17] days; P<0.001). The number of postoperative general diet build-up days was also significantly shorter for the SPLS group (median, 1 [1 to 4] vs. 3 [2 to 16] days; P<0.001). Immediate post-operative pain score was lower in the SPLS group (median, 2.0 [0 to 8] vs. 4.0 [0 to 8]; P=0.045). Patient-controlled anesthesia was used less in the SPLS group (61.9% vs. 100%). CONCLUSION SPLS was successful in removing most large ovarian tumors without rupture and showed quicker recovery and less immediate post-operative pain in comparison to laparotomy. SPLS using SW Kim's technique could be a feasible solution to removing huge ovarian tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Sook Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Ok Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Jin Eoh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Shin Chung
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Inha Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Yun Lee
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ji Nam
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sunghoon Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Tae Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Wun Kim
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Freschi L, Pluchino N, Angioni S, Simi G, Ruggiero M, Cela V. A Novel System for Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery: Preliminary Experience. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2016; 81:454-60. [PMID: 27198919 DOI: 10.1159/000443394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 12/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To present preliminary data of single-access laparoscopic surgery with a new device for the treatment of benign adnexal pathologies. METHODS Ten women with benign adnexal pathologies underwent salpingectomy (n = 4) and ovarian/para-ovarian cyst enucleation (n = 6) using a laparo-endoscopic single-port approach with an innovative advanced multiport reusable trocar inserted transumbilically through a small wound retractor. Trocar introduction time, operative time, estimated blood loss, conversion to standard laparoscopy, peri- and postoperative complications, hospital stay and Visual Analog Scale score (as assessment of pain and cosmesis) were analyzed. RESULTS Port placement was successful in all patients. Mean trocar introduction time was 4.4 min (range 3.4-5.3 min) and no intra or postoperative complication occurred. The mean operating time was 50.0 ± 9.2 min and mean blood loss was 28.5 ± 8.8 ml. The mean hospital stay following surgery was 1.6 ± 0.5 days and convalescence was complete in 1 week. Neither scores for postoperative incisional pain nor cosmesis side effects have been observed in any subjects. CONCLUSION We concluded that adnexal single-port surgery performed with this innovative advanced surgical instrumentation is a feasible, safe, and effective technique that drastically reduces postoperative pain and does not compromise cosmetic appearance. The isolation of the operative field by means of the drape prevents the contamination of the port site that occurs frequently, and mainly in adnexal pathologies of uncertain etiology. In addition, the ease of insertion and the conformation of the new port access also make the procedure feasible in obese patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Freschi
- Division of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Boruta DM. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in gynecologic oncology: An update. Gynecol Oncol 2016; 141:616-623. [PMID: 26980644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Revised: 03/09/2016] [Accepted: 03/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The preferred surgical approach for many gynecologic oncology procedures is now laparoscopy. Reduced morbidity, shorter hospitalization and a more rapid recovery have been associated with minimally invasive surgical approaches when compared to laparotomy. Incisional morbidity, including vascular and viscous injury, postoperative hernia, infection, and pain remain significant concerns. Use of fewer and smaller incisions during laparoscopy may be expected to further minimize these risks. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS), or single incision laparoscopy, describes the use of one small skin incision to complete laparoscopic surgical procedures. Recent advances in instrumentation have allowed increasingly complex procedures in gynecologic cancer patients to be completed. This review will serve as an update in regards to implementation of LESS in gynecologic oncology. Technical challenges encountered during performance of LESS as well as strategies to overcome these challenges will be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Boruta
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Yawkey Suite 9E, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|