Endoscopic lung volume reduction with endobronchial valves in patients with severe emphysema and established pulmonary hypertension

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction in emphysema: a review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) poses a substantial burden on the healthcare system and is currently considered the sixth leading cause of death in the United States. Emphysema, as evidenced by severe air-trapping in patients with COPD, leads to significant dyspnea and morbidity. Lung volume reduction via surgery or minimally invasive endobronchial interventions are currently available, which improve lung function and quality of life.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer studies have noted a survival benefit in patients post bronchoscopic lung volume reduction vs. those subjected to standard of care. The presence of collateral ventilation is one of the most common impeding factors to placing endobronchial valves, and if placed, these patients might not achieve lobar atelectasis; however, there are newer modalities that are now available for patients with collateral ventilation which we have described.

SUMMARY

Combining standard of care treatment that includes smoking cessation, bronchodilators, preventive care including vaccinations, pulmonary rehabilitation, and endobronchial treatment using various interventions in decreasing hyperinflation improves quality of life and may improve survival and hence significantly reduce the burden of COPD on healthcare.

By deflating the lungs pulmonologists help the cardiologists. A literature review

In this review, we present the effects of lung hyperinflation on the cardiovascular system (CVS) and the beneficial outcomes of different deflation treatment modalities. We discuss the effects of long-acting bronchodilator drugs, medical and surgical lung volume reduction on the performance of the CVS. Although there is a small number of studies investigating lung deflation and the CVS, the short-term improvement in heart function was clearly demonstrated. However, more studies, with longer duration, are needed to verify these significant beneficial effects of deflation of the lungs on the CVS. Dynamic hyperinflation during exercise could be a research model to investigate further the effects of lung hyperinflation and/or deflation on the CVS.

Response to endobronchial valve treatment: it's all about the target lobe

Background

Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial valves (EBV) has been shown to be beneficial for severe emphysema patients. The most important predictor of treatment response is absence of collateral ventilation between the treatment target and ipsilateral lobe. However, there are still a substantial number of nonresponders and it would be useful to improve the pre-treatment identification of responders. Presumably, predictors of response will be multifactorial, and therefore our aim was to explore whether we can identify response groups using a cluster analysis.

Methods

At baseline and 1 year follow-up, pulmonary function, exercise capacity and quality of life were measured. A quantitative chest computed tomography scan analysis was performed at baseline and 2-6 months follow-up. The cluster analysis was performed using a hierarchical agglomerative method.

Results

In total, 428 patients (69% female, mean±sd age 61±8 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s 27±8% predicted, residual volume 254±50% pred) were included in our analysis. Three clusters were generated: one nonresponder cluster and two responder clusters. Despite solid technical procedures, the nonresponder cluster had significantly less clinical response after treatment compared to the other clusters. The nonresponder cluster was characterised by significantly less emphysematous destruction, less air trapping and a higher perfusion of the target lobe, and a more homogeneous distribution of emphysema and perfusion between the target and ipsilateral lobe.

Conclusions

We found that target lobe characteristics are the discriminators between responders and nonresponders, which underlines the importance of visual and quantitative assessment of the potential treatment target lobe when selecting patients for EBV treatment.

Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Reduces Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated With Severe Lung Emphysema and Hypercapnia

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) represents a standard surgical approach for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema. One of the relevant risk factors for LVRS is the presence of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The aim of this study is to assess the postoperative changes in pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) after LVRS for patients with severe pulmonary emphysema compared with preoperative measures. N = 61 consecutive patients with severe pulmonary emphysema and preoperative evidence for PAH (pulmonary arterial systolic pressure [PASP] ≥ 35 mmHg) were prospectively included into this study. In all patients, thoracoscopic LVRS was performed. PASP was assessed by echocardiography before surgery, early postoperatively, and 3 months after surgery. Data were prospectively recorded and analyzed retrospectively. Primary end points were the postoperative changes in PASP as well as the 90 day mortality rate. Secondary endpoints included: pulmonary function test, exercise capacity, quality of life, and dyspnea symptoms (Borg scale). Early after surgery, a significant reduction in PASP was observed at the day of discharge and at 3 month follow-up. In n = 34 patients, no tricuspid valve regurgitation was detectable anymore suggesting normal PAP. In n = 3 patients, venovenous extracorporeal lung support (VV ECLS) was already implemented preoperatively. In the remaining cases, VV ECLS was applied intraoperatively and continued postoperatively. Mean duration of postoperative ECLS support was 2 days. Four patients died due to acute right heart failure, two patients from sepsis with multiorgan failure, and one patient from acute pulmonary embolism. Ninety day mortality was 11.5 %. A significant improvement was postoperatively observed regarding the performance status, dyspnea scale, as well as quality of life. This study suggests a beneficial effect of LVRS on PAP, which may ultimately help to protect and stabilize right ventricular function. Further studies, implementing pre- and postoperative right heart catheterizations including invasive PAP evaluation, are necessary to support the findings in this study in greater detail.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction for Emphysema: Review and Update

In carefully selected patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, characterized by emphysema and hyperinflation, lung volume reduction is an option to reduce lung hyperinflation, improve lung function, quality of life, and exercise capacity. Currently, there are several bronchoscopic and surgical treatment options to achieve lung volume reduction. It is important to carefully phenotype these patients, to select the optimal treatment option, with consideration of possible adverse events or contraindications, and it is highly recommended to discuss these treatment strategies in a multidisciplinary team. The treatment with one-way endobronchial valves has been investigated most extensively and more data are available regarding the treatment of more "marginal cases," or subsequent lung volume reduction surgery. Other bronchoscopic lung volume reduction options include treatment with coils, thermal vapor ablation, and sclerosant agents. In this review, we aim to summarize the current clinical evidence on the bronchoscopic lung volume reduction therapies and important aspects regarding optimal patient selection.

The Effects of Endobronchial Coil Therapy on Right Ventricular Functions

Lung hyperinflation is an important therapeutic target in symptomatic emphysema patients. Endobronchial therapies that reduce end-expiratory lung volume are increasingly being used in advanced cases. However, there is paucity of data regarding the effects of these therapies on the heart functions. The aim of this study is to evaluate the right ventricular functions before and after the procedure in patients who underwent endobronchial coil therapy (EBCT).Patients who were between 18 and 80 years of age and scheduled for EBCT with GOLD 3-4 were enrolled in the study. Right heart functions were evaluated using MPI, TAS, TAPSE. Right atrium area and maximum velocity of tricuspid regurgitation were also noted.A total of 23 patients were enrolled in the study. 21 patients underwent bilateral intervention, while only 2 patients received unilateral treatment. There was an improvement in MPI (0.49 ± 0.15 vs 0.39 ± 0.11, p < 0.001) and TAS (11.6 (9 - 15) vs 13.2 (9.80 - 17.0), p = 0.001). Peak TRV (2.52 ± 0.6, 2.38 ± 0.6, p = 0.02) and PASP values were lower in the post-operative period (41.15 ± 5.94 vs 36.83 ± 8.01 p = 0.019).In this current study, we found improved echocardiographic RtV parameters in patients who received EBCT treatment.

Cardio-Pulmonary Changes After Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Endobronchial One-Way Valves

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the cardio-pulmonary hemodynamics changes before and after valve treatment, and their correlation with lobe volume reduction.

METHODS

This retrospective multicentre study included consecutive patients undergoing bronchoscopic valve treatment for heterogeneous emphysema. In addition to standard functional evaluation, patients underwent cardiac evaluation by Doppler trans-thoracic echocardiography. The difference in respiratory and cardio-pulmonary hemodynamics indexes before and 3-month after the procedure, and their relationship with changes in lobar volume were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seventy-seven patients were included in the study; of these 13 (17%) presented pulmonary hypertension. Only patients with target lobar volume reduction ≥ 563 mL (n = 50) presented a significant improvement of forced expiratory volume in one second, residual volume, 6 min-walk test, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire score; a significant reduction of pulmonary artery pressure, and an improvement of left and right ventricle end-systolic volume; of left and right ventricle end-diastolic volume, and of left and right ventricle stroke volume. The change in residual volume was significantly correlated with changes in forced expiratory volume in one second (r = 0.68; p < 0.001); in 6 min-walk test (r = 0.71; p < 0.001); in St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (r = 0.54; p < 0.001); in pulmonary artery pressure (r = 0.39; p = 0.001), in left (r = 0.28; p = 0.01) and right (r = 0.33; p = 0.002) ventricle end-systolic volume, in left (r =  - 0.29; p = 0.008) and right (r =  - 0.34; p = 0.007) end-diastolic volume, and in left (r =  - 0.76; p = 0.009) and right (r =  - 0.718; p = 0.001) ventricle stroke volume.

CONCLUSION

Bronchoscopic valve treatment seemed to have positive effects on cardio-pulmonary hemodynamics, and these changes were correlated with reductions of lobar volume.

Screening for Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Reasons for Not Receiving Interventional Treatment

BACKGROUND

Evidence for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) is based on phase 2 studies and small randomized controlled trials with in- and exclusion criteria defining a therapeutic window and contraindications. Little is known about the applicability in routine clinical practice.

AIM

Which percentage of patients with severe emphysema referred to a specialized treatment center for BLVR is ultimately suitable for interventional bronchoscopic treatment? What is the relevance of the different contraindications?

METHODS

Retrospective evaluation of emphysema patients referred to Asklepios Fachkliniken Munich-Gauting for BLVR between January 2014 and June 2015.

RESULTS

138 patients were referred for evaluation of BLVR. 38 patients (27.5%) underwent BLVR procedures (valves n = 18; coils n = 18; thermal vapor ablation n = 2). 100 patients (72.5%) were deemed not eligible for BLVR based on the following contraindications: 34% emphysema morphology and emphysema-related findings (severe homogeneous emphysema, extensive pleuropulmonary adhesions, postinflammatory scaring with natural volume reduction, giant bullae), 16% active smoking; 9% pulmonary function not within indication range; 8% unexpected CT findings (nodules, cancer, interstitial disease); 8% chronic ventilatory failure; 8% patient refused BLVR; 5% relevant comorbidity; 5% frequent exacerbations, 3% preserved quality of life, 4% other.

CONCLUSION

BLVR is a therapeutic option for highly selected patients. In our cohort, one in four could be treated. These data highlight the limitations of BLVR under real-life conditions.

Lung volume reduction surgery in selected patients with emphysema and pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVES

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is considered a contraindication for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). Because, it has been reported that endobronchial lung volume reduction may have a beneficial effect without increased mortality in patients with emphysema and PH, we evaluated its effect on PH in patients undergoing LVRS.

METHODS

From January 2014 until June 2016, 119 LVRSs were performed at Zurich University Hospital. PH was a contraindication for patients with homogeneous emphysema but was acceptable for those with heterogeneous emphysema. Thirty patients underwent echocardiography before and after LVRS, 10 of whom had preoperative systolic pulmonary artery pressures >35 mmHg and 20 of whom had normal systolic pulmonary artery pressure. The effect of LVRS on pulmonary artery pressure, lung function and survival was analysed.

RESULTS

Ninety-day mortality for all 30 patients was 0, and the postoperative course did not differ significantly between the 2 groups. In patients with PH, the median systolic pulmonary artery pressure decreased from 41 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) 39-47] to 37 mmHg (IQR 36-38, P = 0.04). These patients had an improvement of forced expiratory volume in 1 s from the median 27% predicted (IQR 23-34) to 33% (IQR 28-40, P = 0.007) 3 months postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

If further confirmed in other cohorts, mild to moderate PH may no longer be considered a contraindication for LVRS in patients with heterogeneous emphysema.

Bronchoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Since the publication of the National Emphysema Treatment Trial study, lung volume reduction (LVR) has been considered a therapeutic alternative for patients with advanced obstructive lung disease. The high complication rate of surgical LVR has led to the development of bronchoscopic LVR (BLVR). Of the currently available BLVR alternatives, coils and unidirectional endobronchial valves lead the list. The choice of each device depends on emphysema characteristics and presence of collateral ventilation. Evaluation of these patients at centers with expertise in interventional pulmonology and management of BLVR is strongly recommended.

Right Heart Catheterization During Exercise in Patients with COPD-An Overview of Clinical Results and Methodological Aspects

While right heart catheterization (RHC) at rest is the gold standard to assess pulmonary hemodynamics in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), the invasive measurement of exercise hemodynamics is less well established in this group. Since exercise hemodynamics are increasingly recognized as important clinical information in patients with PH, our goal was to review the literature in this field to provide a basis for clinical use, further studies, and future recommendations. We identified 69 studies (published since 1968) reporting RHC data in 2819 patients with COPD, of whom 2561 underwent exercise testing. Few studies simultaneously measured gas exchange during exercise. Overall, these studies showed large variations in the patient populations and research questions studied and the methods and definitions employed. Despite these limitations, the data consistently demonstrated the presence of precapillary PH at rest in up to 38% of patients with COPD. With exercise, a relevant proportion of patients developed an abnormal hemodynamic response, depending on the definition used. Furthermore, some studies assessed right ventricular function during exercise and showed a blunted increase in right ventricular ejection fraction. Drug effects and the impact of interventional procedures were also studied. Again, due to large variations in the patients studied and the methods used, firm conclusions are difficult to derive. Despite the limitations of this dataset, several recommendations with respect to technical aspects (body position, exercise protocol, and data acquisition) can be inferred for this challenging patient population and may be helpful for further studies or recommendations.

Pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema patients: prevalence, therapeutic options and pulmonary circulatory effects of lung volume reduction surgery

The exact prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and cor pulmonale (CP) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown, and varies considerably from 20-91%. Usually, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) does not exceed 30 mmHg, and PH is not severe. However, PH and CP are important predictors of mortality in COPD and contribute to disability in this disease. Many factors contribute to the development of PH in chronic lung disease, including reduction of the pulmonary vascular cross-sectional area due to parenchymal loss and accompanying hypoxia, effects of abnormal pulmonary mechanics due to hyperinflation, but also vascular remodeling processes. So far, PH associated with chronic lung disease cannot be treated medically. Therefore, it is indicated to treat the underlying pulmonary disease. Patients with severe PH should be referred to centers experienced in the management of PH and enrollment in clinical trials should be considered. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) theoretically further increases pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by reducing the vascular bed when resecting lung tissue, however, this might be compensated by better pulmonary mechanics through reduction of hyperinflation, which will be discussed in the present article.

Valve therapy in patients with emphysematous type of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): from randomized trials to patient selection in clinical practice

In recent years a number of endoscopic methods have emerged to treat patients with severe emphysematous type of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), who are primarily symptomatic due to hyperinflation despite optimal medical management. Of these techniques, implantation of endobronchial one-way valves into targeted airways of isolated emphysematous lobes appears to be one of the most promising innovations. Results from randomized controlled trials of valve therapy for emphysema show consistent benefits in terms of lung function, exercise capacity, symptoms, and quality of life. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the currently available scientific data, discussion of typical treatment related side effects, and recommendations for patient selection in clinical practice.

[Not Available]

Zusammenfassung. Die endoskopische Lungenvolumenreduktion (ELVR) hat sich in den vergangenen Jahren in ausgewählten Patienten mit schwerem Lungenemphysem als valable Alternative zur chirurgischen Lungenvolumenreduktion etabliert. Die Wahl der ELVR-Technik richtet sich danach, ob zwischen dem zu behandelnden und dem benachbarten Lungenlappen Kollateralventilation vorhanden ist, was mittels computertomografischer und endoskopischer Techniken festgestellt werden kann. Als Vorteile der ELVR-Verfahren sind die geringe Invasivität mit entsprechend geringer Mortalität und Morbidität bei niedrigen Kosten zu nennen, zudem ist die Ventileinlage bei Bedarf reversibel. Die Wirksamkeit der ELVR-Verfahren (Ventile, Coils) wurde in mehreren prospektiven, randomisierten Studien belegt. Die Wahl des für den Patienten geeigneten Verfahrens zur Lungenvolumenreduktion sollte weiterhin in einer interdisziplinären Besprechung mit Thoraxchirurgen und spezialisierten Pneumologen erfolgen. La réduction du volume pulmonaire par endoscopie est devenue une importante alternative à la chirurgie chez les malades présentant un emphysème pulmonaire sévère. Le choix de la technique au niveau individuel dépend principalement de l’intégrité de la fissure interlobaire et de la présence d’une ventilation collatérale, cette dernière pouvant être déterminée par tomographie computérisée quantitative et des techniques endoscopiques. Les avantages de la réduction du volume pulmonaire par endoscopie consistent en son caractère minimalement invasif ( procédure utilisant un orifice naturel) et des coûts potentiellement réduits. Par ailleurs ce mode de réduction du volume pulmonaire permet de restaurer la ventilation en cas de besoin. Le choix de la technique appropriée chez un malade donné devrait être discuté de manière interdisciplinaire dans le cadre d’un groupe comportant des pneumologues interventionnels et des chirurgiens thoraciques.

Endobronchial Valve Therapy in Patients with Homogeneous Emphysema. Results from the IMPACT Study

RATIONALE

Endobronchial valves (EBVs) have been successfully used in patients with severe heterogeneous emphysema to improve lung physiology. Limited available data suggest that EBVs are also effective in homogeneous emphysema.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EBVs in patients with homogeneous emphysema with absence of collateral ventilation assessed with the Chartis system.

METHODS

Prospective, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial of EBV plus standard of care (SoC) or SoC alone. Primary outcome was the percentage change in FEV₁ (liters) at 3 months relative to baseline in the EBV group versus the SoC group. Secondary outcomes included changes in FEV₁, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD), and target lobe volume reduction.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Ninety-three subjects (age, 63.7 ± 6.1 yr [mean ± SD]; FEV₁, % predicted, 29.3 ± 6.5; residual volume, % predicted, 275.4 ± 59.4) were allocated to either the EBV group (n = 43) or the SoC group (n = 50). In the intention-to-treat population, at 3 months postprocedure, improvement in FEV₁ from baseline was 13.7 ± 28.2% in the EBV group and -3.2 ± 13.0% in the SoC group (mean between-group difference, 17.0%; P = 0.0002). Other variables demonstrated statistically and clinically significant changes from baseline to 3 months (EBV vs. SoC, respectively: SGRQ, -8.63 ± 11.25 vs. 1.01 ± 9.36; and 6MWD, 22.63 ± 66.63 m vs. -17.34 ± 52.8 m). Target lobe volume reduction at 3 months was -1,195 ± 683 ml (P < 0.0001). Of the EBV subjects, 97.2% achieved volume reduction in the target lobe (P < 0.0001). Procedure-related pneumothoraces occurred in 11 subjects (25.6%). Five subjects required removal/replacement of one or more valves. One subject experienced two valve migration events requiring removal/replacement of valves.

CONCLUSIONS

EBV in patients with homogeneous emphysema without collateral ventilation results in clinically meaningful benefits of improved lung function, exercise tolerance, and quality of life.

Endobronchial Valves for Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Best Practice Recommendations from Expert Panel on Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) is being adopted as a treatment option for carefully selected patients suffering from severe emphysema. ELVR with the one-way endobronchial Zephyr valves (EBV) has been demonstrated to improve pulmonary function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with both heterogeneous and homogenous emphysema without collateral ventilation. In this "expert best practices" review, we will highlight the practical aspects of this therapy. Key selection criteria for ELVR are hyperinflation with a residual volume >175% of predicted, forced expiratory volume <50% of predicted, and a 6-min walking distance >100 m. Patients with repeated infectious complications, severe bronchiectasis, and those with unstable cardiovascular comorbidities should be excluded from EBV treatment. The procedure may be performed with either conscious sedation or general anesthesia and positive pressure mechanical ventilation using a flexible endotracheal tube or a rigid bronchoscope. Chartis and EBV placement should be performed in 1 procedure when possible. The sequence of valve placement should be orchestrated to avoid obstruction and delivery of subsequent valves. If atelectasis has not occurred by 1 month after procedure, evaluate valve position on CT and consider replacing the valves that are not optimally positioned. Pneumothorax is a common complication and typically occurs in the first 2 days following treatment. A management algorithm for pneumothorax has been previously published. Long-term sequelae from EBV therapy do occur but are easily manageable.

Recurrent Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbations after Endobronchial Valve Implantation Are Associated with the Presence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic lung volume reduction by means of endobronchial valve implantation is an established therapy in patients with severe emphysema. However, long-term complications such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations are a limitation of this method.

OBJECTIVES

As the mechanisms underlying increased rates of COPD exacerbations are unknown, the aim of our study was to determine whether infectious or inflammatory factors may contribute to these events and to investingate the consequent need for valve explantation.

METHODS

Tissue surrounding explanted endobronchial Zephyr valves was examined by microbiological, histological and cytological methods. Additionally, we performed a microbiological analysis of tracheal aspirates before both valve implantation and valve explantation. Moreover, blood samples were collected for the analysis of inflammatory markers.

RESULTS

Endobronchial valves were explanted from 16 patients. Reasons for explantation were frequent postprocedural COPD exacerbations (group 1: 8 patients) or loss of clinical benefit (group 2: 8 patients). Compared to group 2, the microbiological examinations of valve lavage and tracheal aspirates from patients in group 1 showed a higher detection of Gram-negative bacteria. In particular, infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa was more predominant in group 1, while no presence could be detected in group 2. Blood inflammatory markers tended to be slightly higher in group 1 than in group 2; however, without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased rates of COPD exacerbations after endobronchial valve implantation are associated with the presence of P. aeruginosa. The finding warrants further investigation.

COPD-associated pulmonary hypertension: clinical implications and current methods for treatment

INTRODUCTION

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is the fourth leading cause of death worldwide, one serious complication being pulmonary hypertension, which occurs in up to 30% of patients and increases mortality drastically. Difficulties in diagnosis and the unclear beneficial effects of PH-specific therapy have hitherto resulted in the absence of approved therapies. Consequently, PH and right heart failure in COPD are still currently treated according to symptoms and not underlying cause Areas covered: This review focuses on the current knowledge of its pathogenesis, clinical picture, diagnosis as well as methods for treatment Expert commentary: Since PH-COPD is an orphan disease with grievous consequences, and diagnosis as well as the right choice of possible treatment is crucial, referral to an expert center in cases of suspicion is necessary. Hitherto there is no officially approved treatment available even though several studies have shown notable improvement in selected individuals, making diagnostics, prognostic markers, and the search for therapeutic agents key issues of interest in this field.

Endoscopic bronchial valve treatment: patient selection and special considerations

As well as lung volume reduction surgery, different minimally invasive endoscopic techniques are available to achieve lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema and significant hyperinflation. Lung function parameters and comorbidities of the patient, as well as the extent and distribution of the emphysema are factors to be considered when choosing the patient and the intervention. Endoscopic bronchial valve placement with complete occlusion of one lobe in patients with heterogeneous emphysema is the preferred technique because of its reversibility. The presence of high interlobar collateral ventilation will hinder successful treatment; therefore, endoscopic coil placement, polymeric lung volume reduction, or bronchoscopic thermal vapor ablation as well as lung volume reduction surgery can be used for treating patients with incomplete fissures. The effect of endoscopic lung volume reduction in patients with a homogeneous distribution of emphysema is still unclear and this subgroup should be treated only in clinical trials. Precise patient selection is necessary for interventions and to improve the outcome and reduce the risk and possible complications. Therefore, the patients should be discussed in a multidisciplinary approach prior to determining the most appropriate treatment for lung volume reduction.

An update on the efficacy of endobronchial valve therapy in the management of hyperinflation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Lung volume reduction surgery has been shown to be effective in patients with heterogeneous emphysema, but is also associated with a relatively high perioperative morbidity and mortality. Accordingly, several novel and potentially less invasive methods for bronchoscopic lung volume reduction have been developed. Endobronchial valve (EBV) therapy is one such therapeutic approach in patients with advanced emphysema. It has been the most widely studied technique over the past years and represents an effective treatment option for patients with severe heterogeneous upper- or lower-lobe-predominant emphysema. The choice of EBV therapy largely depends on the distribution of emphysema and the presence or absence of interlobar collateral ventilation. Adequate patient selection and technical success of valve implantation with the intention of lobar exclusion are predictive factors for positive outcomes. This review attempts to highlight the milestones in the development of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction with one-way valve implantation over the past few years.

Impact of endoscopic lung volume reduction on right ventricular myocardial function

Introduction

Endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR) provides a minimally invasive therapy for patients with severe lung emphysema. As its impact on right ventricular (R_tV) function is undefined, we examined the extent of R_tV functional changes following ELVR, as assessed by use of speckle tracking-based R_tV deformation analysis.

Methods

We enrolled 32 patients with severe emphysematous COPD scheduled for bronchoscopic LVR using endobronchial valves (Zephyr, PulmonX, Inc.), comprising 16 matched clinical responders and 16 non-responders. Echocardiography was conducted one day prior to ELVR and at an eight-week postprocedural interval.

Results

Patients were predominantly of late middle-age (65.8±8.7yrs), male (62.5%) and presented advanced COPD emphysema (means FEV1 and RV: 32.6% and 239.1% of predicted, respectively). After ELVR, R_tV apical longitudinal strain improved significantly in the total study cohort (-7.96±7.02% vs. -13.35±11.48%, p=0.04), whereas there were no significant changes in other parameters of R_tV function such as R_tV global longitudinal strain, TAPSE or pulmonary arterial systolic pressure. In responding patients, 6MWT-improvement correlated with a decrease in NT-proBNP (Pearson´s r: -0.53, p=0.03). However, clinical non-responders did not exhibit any R_tV functional improvement.

Discussion

ELVR beneficially impacts R_tV functional parameters. Speckle tracking-based R_tV apical longitudinal strain analysis allows early determination of R_tV contractile gain and identification of clinical responsiveness.