Placement accuracy of the second electrode in bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery

PURPOSE

Due to brain shift during bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, placement of the second electrode may be subjected to more error than that of the first electrode. The authors aimed to investigate the accuracy of second electrode placement in this setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-five patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent bilateral DBS surgery (110 electrodes) were retrospectively evaluated. The targets were subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus interna (GPi) in 40 and 15 cases, respectively. Preoperative planning and postoperative electrode images were co-registered to compare the error margin between the two sides.

RESULTS

There is a statistically significant difference in the directional axis error along the y axis only when comparing each laterality (posterior 0.04 ± 1.21 mm vs anterior 0.41 ± 1.07 mm, p = 0.006). There is no significant difference of other error parameters, final track location, and number of microelectrode recording passes between the two sides. In a subgroup analysis, there is a significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis only in the STN subgroup (posterior 0.40 ± 1.05 mm vs anterior 0.18 ± 1.04 mm, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Although a statistically significant difference in directional axis error along the y axis was found between first and second electrode placements in the STN group but not in the GPi group, its magnitude is well below the clinically significant threshold.

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: Targeting differences between the first and second side

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a recognized treatment for drug-refractory Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the therapeutic success depends on the accuracy of targeting. This study aimed to evaluate potential accuracy differences in the placement of the first and second electrodes implanted, by comparing chosen electrode trajectories, STN activity detected during microelectrode recording (MER), and the mismatch between the initially planned and final electrode positions on each side.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed data from 30 patients who underwent one-stage bilateral DBS. For most patients, three arrays of microelectrodes were used to determine the physiological location of the STN. Final target location depended also on the results of intraoperative stimulation. The choice of central versus non-central channels was compared. The Euclidean vector deviation was calculated using the initially planned coordinates and the final position of the tip of the electrode according to a CT scan taken at least a month after the surgery.

RESULTS

The central channel was chosen in 70% of cases on the first side and 40% of cases on the second side. The mean length of high-quality STN activity recorded in the central channel was longer on the first side than the second (3.07±1.85mm vs. 2.75±1.94mm), while in the anterior channel there were better MER recordings on the second side (1.59±2.07mm on the first side vs. 2.78±2.14mm on the second). Regarding the mismatch between planned versus final electrode position, electrodes on the first side were placed on average 0.178±0.917mm lateral, 0.126±1.10mm posterior and 1.48±1.64mm inferior to the planned target, while the electrodes placed on the second side were 0.251±1.08mm medial, 0.355±1.29mm anterior and 2.26±1.47mm inferior to the planned target.

CONCLUSION

There was a tendency for the anterior trajectory to be chosen more frequently than the central on the second side. There was also a statistically significant deviation of the second electrodes in the anterior and inferior directions, when compared to the electrodes on the first side, suggesting that another cause other than brain shift may be responsible. We should therefore factor this during planning for the second implanted side. It might be useful to plan the second side more anteriorly, possibly reducing the number of MER trajectories tested and the duration of surgery.

ESM-CT: a precise method for localization of DBS electrodes in CT images

BACKGROUND

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus produces variable effects in Parkinson disease. Variation may result from different electrode positions relative to target. Thus, precise electrode localization is crucial when investigating DBS effects.

NEW METHOD

We developed a semi-automated method, Electrode Shaft Modeling in CT images (ESM-CT) to reconstruct DBS lead trajectories and contact locations. We evaluated methodological sensitivity to operator-dependent steps, robustness to image resampling, and test-retest replicability. ESM-CT was applied in 56 patients to study electrode position change (and relation to time between scans, postoperative subdural air volume, and head tilt during acquisition) between images acquired immediately post-implantation (DBS-CT) and months later (DEL-CT).

RESULTS

Electrode tip localization was robust to image resampling and replicable to within ∼ 0.2 mm on test-retest comparisons. Systematic electrode displacement occurred rostral-ventral-lateral between DBS-CT and DEL-CT scans. Head angle was a major explanatory factor (p < 0.001,Pearson's r = 0.46, both sides) and volume of subdural air weakly predicted electrode displacement (p = 0.02,r = 0.29:p = 0.1,r = 0.25 for left:right). Modeled shaft curvature was slightly greater in DEL-CT. Magnitude of displacement and degree of curvature were independent of elapsed time between scans.

COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS

Comparison of ESM-CT against two existing methods revealed systematic differences in one coordinate (1 ± 0.3 mm,p < 0.001) for one method and in three coordinates for another method (x:0.1 ± 0.1 mm, y:0.4 ± 0.2 mm, z:0.4 ± 0.2 mm, p < 10-10). Within-method coordinate variability across participants is similar.

CONCLUSION

We describe a robust and precise method for CT DBS contact localization. Application revealed that acquisition head angle significantly impacts electrode position. DBS localization schemes should account for head angle.

Sequence of electrode implantation and outcome of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease

INTRODUCTION

The effect of the variability of electrode placement on outcomes after bilateral deep brain stimulation of subthalamic nucleus has not been sufficiently studied, especially with respect to the sequence of hemisphere implantation.

METHODOLOGY

We retrospectively analysed the clinical and radiographic data of all the consecutive patients with Parkinson's disease who underwent surgery at our centre and completed at least 1 year follow-up. The dispersion in electrode location was calculated by the square of deviation from population mean, and the direction of deviation was analysed by comparing the intended and final implantation coordinates. Linear regression analysis was performed to analyse the predictors of postoperative improvement of the motor condition, also controlling for the sequence of implanted hemisphere.

RESULTS

76 patients (mean age 58±7.2 years) were studied. Compared with the first side, the second side electrode tip had significantly higher dispersion as an overall effect (5.6±21.6 vs 2.2±4.9 mm(2), p=0.04), or along the X-axis (4.1±15.6 vs 1.4±2.4 mm(2), p=0.03) and Z-axis (4.9±11.5 vs 2.9±3.6 mm(2), p=0.02); the second side stimulation was also associated with a lower threshold for side effects (contact 0, p<0.001 and contact 3, p=0.004). In the linear regression analysis, the significant predictors of outcome were baseline activities of daily living (p=0.010) and dispersion of electrode on the second side (p=0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a higher dispersion for the electrode on the second implanted side, which also resulted to be a significant predictor of motor outcome at 1 year.