Development and external validation of a radiomics model for assessment of HER2 positivity in men and women presenting with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

To develop and externally validate a conventional CT-based radiomics model for identifying HER2-positive status in gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

950 GC patients who underwent pretreatment CT were retrospectively enrolled and assigned into a training cohort (n = 388, conventional CT), an internal validation cohort (n = 325, conventional CT) and an external validation cohort (n = 237, dual-energy CT, DECT). Radiomics features were extracted from venous phase images to construct the "Radscore". On the basis of univariate and multivariate analyses, a conventional CT-based radiomics model was built in the training cohort, combining significant clinical-laboratory characteristics and Radscore. The model was assessed and validated regarding its diagnostic effectiveness and clinical practicability using AUC and decision curve analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Location, clinical TNM staging, CEA, CA199, and Radscore were independent predictors of HER2 status (all p < 0.05). Integrating these five indicators, the proposed model exerted a favorable diagnostic performance with AUCs of 0.732 (95%CI 0.683-0.781), 0.703 (95%CI 0.624-0.783), and 0.711 (95%CI 0.625-0.798) observed for the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Meanwhile, the model would offer more net benefits than the default simple schemes and its performance was not affected by the age, gender, location, immunohistochemistry results, and type of tissue for confirmation (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The conventional CT-based radiomics model had a good diagnostic performance of HER2 positivity in GC and the potential to generalize to DECT, which is beneficial to simplify clinical workflow and help clinicians initially identify potential candidates who might benefit from HER2-targeted therapy.

Phase I Clinical Trial of an Autologous Dendritic Cell Vaccine Against HER2 Shows Safety and Preliminary Clinical Efficacy

BACKGROUND

Despite recent advances, there is an urgent need for agents targeting HER2-expressing cancers other than breast cancer. We report a phase I study (NCT01730118) of a dendritic cell (DC) vaccine targeting HER2 in patients with metastatic cancer or bladder cancer at high risk of relapse.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Part 1 of the study enrolled patients with HER2-expressing metastatic cancer that had progressed after at least standard treatment and patients who underwent definitive treatment for invasive bladder cancer with no evidence of disease at the time of enrollment. Part 2 enrolled patients with HER2-expressing metastatic cancer who had progressed after anti-HER2 therapy. The DC vaccines were prepared from autologous monocytes and transduced with an adenoviral vector expressing the extracellular and transmembrane domains of HER2 (AdHER2). A total of five doses were planned, and adverse events were recorded in patients who received at least one dose. Objective response was evaluated by unidimensional immune-related response criteria every 8 weeks in patients who received at least two doses. Humoral and cellular immunogenicity were assessed in patients who received more than three doses.

RESULTS

A total of 33 patients were enrolled at four dose levels (5 × 10⁶, 10 × 10⁶, 20 × 10⁶, and 40 × 10⁶ DCs). Median follow-up duration was 36 weeks (4-124); 10 patients completed five doses. The main reason for going off-study was disease progression. The main adverse events attributable to the vaccine were injection-site reactions. No cardiac toxicity was noted. Seven of 21 evaluable patients (33.3%) demonstrated clinical benefit (1 complete response, 1 partial response, and 5 stable disease). After ≥3 doses, an antibody response was detected in 3 of 13 patients (23.1%), including patients with complete and partial responses. Lymphocytes from 10 of 11 patients (90.9%) showed induction of anti-HER2 responses measured by the production of at least one of interferon-gamma, granzyme B, or tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and there were multifunctional responses in 8 of 11 patients (72.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

The AdHER2 DC vaccine showed evidence of immunogenicity and preliminary clinical benefit in patients with HER2-expressing cancers, along with an excellent safety profile. It shows promise for further clinical applications, especially in combination regimens.

Dual-Energy CT-Based Nomogram for Decoding HER2 Status in Patients With Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a dual-energy CT (DECT)-based nomogram for noninvasive identification of the status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2; also known as ERBB2) expression in gastric cancer (GC). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 206 patients with histologically proven GC who underwent pretreatment DECT were retrospectively recruited and randomly allocated to a training cohort (n = 144) or a test cohort (n = 62). Information on clinical characteristics, qualitative imaging features, and quantitative DECT parameters was collected. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were implemented to screen independent predictors of HER2 status. An individualized nomogram was built, and its discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness were assessed. RESULTS. Tumor location, the iodine concentration of the tumor in the venous phase, and the normalized iodine concentration of the tumor in the venous phase were significant factors predictive of HER2 status (all p < .05). After these three indicators were integrated, the proposed nomogram showed a favorable diagnostic performance, with AUCs of 0.807 (95% CI, 0.718-0.897) in the training cohort and 0.815 (95% CI, 0.661-0.968) in the test cohort. The nomogram showed a preferable fitting (all p > .05 by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test) and would offer more net benefits than simple default strategies within a wide range of threshold probabilities in both cohorts. CONCLUSION. The DECT-based nomogram has great application potential in terms of detecting HER2 status in GC, and can serve as a novel substitute for invasive testing.

HER2 genomic heterogeneity is a frequent event in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma and correlates with tumor morphology

AIM

To characterize a cohort of gastro-esophageal adenocarcinomas (GEA) evaluated for HER2 gene amplification using bright field in situ hybridization (ISH) following the 2016 guidelines for GEA and correlating the results with clinico-pathological features. It was also aimed to evaluate the effect of applying the ISH criteria from the 2018 guidelines for breast cancer (BC) in the same GEA cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

159 GEA cases collected in a period of 59 months were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification by ISH according to GEA and BC guidelines. All cases were reviewed for histological type, grading and presence of signet ring cells.

RESULTS

Most of the cases refereed to ISH were HER2 equivocal (57.9 %) by immunohistochemistry. According to the GEA guideline, 131 cases were HER2-negative (87.3 %) and 19 cases were HER2-positive (12.7 %). According to the BC guideline, 133 cases were HER2-negative (88.7 %) and 17 cases were HER2-positive (11.3 %), being statistically similar to the results obtained with the GEA guideline. HER2 genomic heterogeneity was detected in 31.6 % of the HER2-positive cases, almost exclusively in tubular adenocarcinoma. We observed a significant association between HER2 gene amplification and tubular adenocarcinomas, and absence of signet ring cells. The only case with HER2 gene amplification and presence of signet ring cells was a mixed carcinoma, where the signet ring cells represented the non-amplified component.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2 positivity rate was similar when applying the GEA or the BC guidelines. We also establish a tight association between morphology and HER2 gene amplification.

A CT-based radiomics nomogram for prediction of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status in patients with gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics nomogram for predicting human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 134 patients with gastric cancer (HER2-negative: n=87; HER2-positive: n=47) from April 2013 to March 2018, who were then randomly divided into training (n=94) and validation (n=40) cohorts. Radiomics features were obtained from the CT images showing gastric cancer. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression analysis was utilized for building the radiomics signature. A multivariable logistic regression method was applied to develop a prediction model incorporating the radiomics signature and independent clinicopathologic risk predictors, which were then visualized as a radiomics nomogram. The predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed in the training and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

The radiomics signature was significantly associated with HER2 status in both training (P<0.001) and validation (P=0.023) cohorts. The prediction model that incorporated the radiomics signature and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level demonstrated good discriminative performance for HER2 status prediction, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.799 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.704-0.894] in the training cohort and 0.771 (95% CI: 0.607-0.934) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve of the radiomics nomogram also showed good calibration. Decision curve analysis showed that the radiomics nomogram was useful.

CONCLUSIONS

We built and validated a radiomics nomogram with good performance for HER2 status prediction in gastric cancer. This radiomics nomogram could serve as a non-invasive tool to predict HER2 status and guide clinical treatment.

Clinicopathological features and endoscopic findings of HER2-positive gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in gastric cancer is highly heterogeneous. Therefore, it is important to take endoscopic samples from appropriate tumor sites.

METHODS

Between January 2008 and April 2015, patients with gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma were included. Surgical samples or endoscopic biopsy samples were examined for HER2 using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Tissues were considered to be HER2 positive when either assessment revealed either an IHC score of 3+ or an IHC score of 2+ accompanied by a positive FISH result. Endoscopic findings were retrieved in all cases where available, and we examined the portion from which a biopsy was obtained.

RESULTS

Out of the 612 patients included in the study, 104 (17%) were HER2 positive. The proportion of HER2-positive gastric tumors with differentiated (vs. undifferentiated) histology was significantly higher (29 vs. 6%, respectively; p < 0.001). The HER2-positive rate of papillary adenocarcinomas (vs. tubular) was particularly high (62%, 8/13; p = 0.023). The proportion of HER2-positive gastric tumors of Borrmann classification 0 or 1 was significantly higher than that of tumors of classified as 2, 3, or 4 (45 vs. 16%, respectively; p < 0.001). The HER2-positive rates per biopsy specimen from the superficial spreading portion, ulcer mound, ulcer bed, and mass portion were 100, 91, 45, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HER2-positive gastric cancer tends to be associated with a differentiated histology, particularly papillary adenocarcinoma, and a Borrmann classification of 0 or 1 tumors. Based on these endoscopic findings, it is important to recognize the superficial spreading portion and the mass portion of gastric malignancies.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status evaluation in advanced gastric cancer using immunohistochemistry versus silver in situ hybridization

Accurate identification of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) status in advanced gastric cancer patients is of utmost importance in terms of treatment planning. This study aimed to examine the HER-2 status in advanced gastric cancer patients using both immunohistochemistry (IHC) and silver in situ hybridization (SISH) techniques and to investigate concordance and diagnostic accuracy. In addition, associations between clinical parameters and HER 2 status were examined. A total of 313 patients diagnosed with locally advanced (Stage III: T3-4, N+) recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or esophagogastric junction, between 2009 and 2015, were included. HER-2 status was examined using both IHC and SISH techniques and the findings were compared. Overall SISH-confirmed HER-2 positivity rate was 22%. Multivariate analysis identified only well-differentiated tumor as a significant predictor of HER-2 positivity (OR: 2.9, 95% CI: 1.4-5.9, p = 0.003). When IHC 2+ and 3+ were considered positive for HER-2 status, sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rate (κ) was 95.7%, 93.8%, and 0.84, respectively. Corresponding figures when only IHC 3+ cases were considered positive were lower: 50%, 100%, and 0.61, respectively. The present method used for the identification of HER-2 positive gastric cancer patients provides satisfactory results. However, better categorization of IHC 2+ cases has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy, which is particularly important when more sophisticated methods are not readily available.

HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology

Context ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA. Objectives To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making. Design The College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA. Results The Panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open comment participants. Recommendations The Panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and an HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance. Conclusion This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.

HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

CONTEXT

- ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA.

OBJECTIVES

- To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, to formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making.

DESIGN

- The College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA.

RESULTS

- The panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open-comment participants.

RECOMMENDATIONS

- The panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and a HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance.

CONCLUSIONS

- This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.

HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology

CONTEXT

ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA.

OBJECTIVES

To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, to formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making.

DESIGN

The College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA.

RESULTS

The panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open-comment participants.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and a HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.

Concordance of HER2 expression in paired primary and metastatic sites of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers

HER2 is amplified/overexpressed in a subset of gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction cancers. Addition of anti-HER2 therapy has been shown to provide survival benefit in this setting. However, there are limited data assessing the concordance of HER2 status between primary and metastatic sites.A total of 113 samples from 43 paired primary and metastatic tumours were tested for HER2 status, by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for protein expression and silver in situ hybridisation (SISH) for gene amplification.Primary sites tested included endoscopic biopsies (n = 30) and resections (n = 24). Metastatic samples included lymph nodes (n = 29), peritoneal effusions (n = 21) and miscellaneous sites (n = 9). The overall HER2+ rate was 11%. Of 41 (95%; 95% CI 88.5-100%) concordant cases, 38 were HER2- and three were HER2+. There were two (5%) discordant cases, one of which showed heterogeneity of HER2 expression.This series confirms a high concordance rate of 95%, supporting that testing of primary tumours and metastases is equally valid and providing clinical rationale for the addition of anti-HER2 therapy in HER2+ disseminated disease.

Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction detection of HER2 amplification in formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast and gastric carcinoma samples

RATIONALE

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a key driver of tumorigenesis, and over-expression as a result of HER2 gene amplification has been observed in a number of solid tumors. Recently HER2 has become an important biomarker for the monoclonal antibody treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast and advanced gastric cancer. The HER2 targeting antibody trastuzumab treatment requires accurate measurement of HER2 levels for proper diagnosis. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) with highly direct, precise and absolute nucleic acid quantification could be used to detect HER2 amplification levels.

OBJECTIVES

Our objective was to evaluate a robust, accurate and less subjective application of ddPCR for HER2 amplification levels and test the assay performance in clinical formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast and gastric carcinoma samples.

METHODS

Genomic DNA from HER2 amplified cell line SK-BR-3 was used to set up the ddPCR assays. The copy number of HER2 was compared to the chromosome 17 centromere reference gene (CEP17), expressed as HER2:CEP17 ratio. Genomic DNAs of FFPE specimens from 145 Asian patients with breast and gastric carcinomas were assayed using both standard methods, immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and ddPCR.

RESULTS

Based on 145 clinical breast and gastric carcinoma cases, our study demonstrated a high concordance of ddPCR results to FISH and IHC. In breast cancer specimens, the ddPCR results had high concordance with FISH and IHC defined HER2 status with a sensitivity of 90.9% (30/33) and a specificity of 100% (77/77). In gastric cancer specimens that were concordant in both FISH and IHC, our assay was 95.5% concordant with FISH and IHC (21/22).

CONCLUSIONS

ddPCR has the advantage of automation and also allows levels of HER2 amplification to be easily evaluated in large numbers of samples, and presents a potential option to define HER2 status.

Fucosyltransferase IV (FUT4) as an effective biomarker for the diagnosis of breast cancer

Specific enzymes are involved in altered glycosylation of cancer. Fucosyltransferase IV (FUT4) is associated with the proliferation and metastasis of breast cancer. The application of FUT4 assay in the serum has not been reported yet. Here, the expression level of FUT4 in the breast cancer patient's tissues (n=60) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and the secreted FUT4 in blood serum samples (n=225) was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Using low metastatic MCF-7 and high metastatic MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines, FUT4 expression was also detected by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), Western blot and immunofluorescent staining. The conventional cancer biomarkers cancer antigen (CA15.3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) was analyzed by Elecsys-electrochemical immune assay (ECLIA) to compare specificity and sensitivity with that of FUT4. We have observed a significant high expression of FUT4 in breast cancer tissues and serums as compared to the normal tissues (P<0.01) and control serums (P<0.05). FUT4 expression was increased in MDA-MB-231 cells vs. that in MCF-7 cells. Furthermore, the results of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was shown, area under curve of FUT4 (AUC=0.784) was higher than that of CA15.3 (AUC=0.468) and CEA (AUC=0.563). The relation analysis is indicated FUT4 is significantly correlated with CA15.3 (r=0.234, P<0.05) and there is no significant correlation with CEA. In conclusion, this study suggests that FUT4 can serve as novel biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer.