Effect of laparoscopic antireflux surgery on esophageal motility

Laparoscopic fundoplication improves esophageal motility in patients with GERD - A high-volume single-center controlled study in the era of high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH-impedance

BACKGROUND

Most of the existing literature demonstrates that Laparoscopic Fundoplication (LF) is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis, however the effect of the wrap on esophageal motility is still debated. This study aimed to assess how a functioning and effective fundoplication could impact the esophageal motility in patients with GERD.

METHODS

We analyzed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) or Toupet (LT) fundoplication for GERD at our Department between 2010-2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Patients were evaluated with the GerdQ questionnaire, barium swallow, endoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM) and 24-hour pH-Impedance (pH-MII) before and after surgery. The HRM were reviewed by 2 experts, following the criteria of the Chicago Classification v4.0. LF failure was objectively defined in case of abnormal postoperative pH-MII according to Lyon 2.0 criteria with/without an abnormal GerdQ.

RESULTS

During the study period 124 (M:F=89:35) GERD patients were recruited. Fifty-eight patients underwent LN and 66 underwent LT. All procedures were completed laparoscopically, and the 90-day postoperative mortality was nil. At the postoperative pH-MII, we recorded a good outcome in 103 patients and a failure in 21 patients. There was a significant association between a successful LF and the normalization of esophageal motility (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our data confirmed that LF is an effective treatment in patients with GERD independently from with an esophageal motility status. Moreover, our results indicate that LF could determine a normalization of motility abnormalities in patients with GERD.

Magnetic sphincter augmentation and high-resolution manometry: impact of biomechanical properties on esophageal motility and clinical significance for selection and outcomes

Magnetic sphincter augmentation (MSA)was introduced as an alternative to laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF). This reproducible, outpatient procedure addresses the etiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease by implanting a ring of magnetic beads across the esophagogastric junction (EGJ). MSA is designed to resist effacement of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and, similar to LNF, results in restoration of anti-reflux barrier competency by increasing overall length, intraabdominal length and resting pressure of the sphincter. However, the novel use of magnets to augment the physiology of the LES poses unique challenges to the physiology of the EGJ and esophagus. These impacts are best revealed through manometry. The degree of restrictive forces at the EGJ, as measured by intrabolus pressure and integrated relaxation pressure, is higher after MSA compared with LNF. In addition, contrary to the LNF, which retains neurohormonal relaxation capability during deglutition, the magnetic forces remain constant until forcibly opened. Therefore, the burden of overcoming EJG resistance is placed solely on the esophageal body contractile force, as measured by distal contractile integral and distal esophageal amplitude. The main utility of preoperative manometry is in determining whether a patient's esophagus has sufficient contractility or peristaltic reserve to adapt to the challenge of an MSA. Manometric thresholds predictive of MSA outcomes deviate from those used to define named Chicago Classification motility disorders. Therefore, individual preoperative manometric characteristics should be analyzed to aid in risk stratification and patient selection prior to MSA.

Multi-society consensus conference and guideline on the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most common diseases in North America and globally. The aim of this guideline is to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the most utilized and available endoscopic and surgical treatments for GERD.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews were conducted for 4 key questions regarding the surgical and endoscopic treatments for GERD in adults: preoperative evaluation, endoscopic vs surgical or medical treatment, complete vs partial fundoplication, and treatment for obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 35 kg/m²) and concomitant GERD. Evidence-based recommendations were formulated using the GRADE methodology by subject experts. Recommendations for future research were also proposed.

RESULTS

The consensus provided 13 recommendations. Through the development of these evidence-based recommendations, an algorithm was proposed for aid in the treatment of GERD. Patients with typical symptoms should undergo upper endoscopy, manometry, and pH-testing; additional testing may be required for patients with atypical or extra-esophageal symptoms. Patients with normal or abnormal findings on manometry should consider undergoing partial fundoplication. Magnetic sphincter augmentation or fundoplication are appropriate surgical procedures for adults with GERD. For patients who wish to avoid surgery, the Stretta procedure and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF 2.0) were found to have better outcomes than proton pump inhibitors alone. Patients with concomitant obesity were recommended to undergo either gastric bypass or fundoplication, although patients with severe comorbid disease or BMI > 50 should undergo Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the additional benefits that follow weight loss.

CONCLUSION

Using the recommendations an algorithm was developed by this panel, so that physicians may better counsel their patients with GERD. There are certain patient factors that have been excluded from included studies/trials, and so these recommendations should not replace surgeon-patient decision making. Engaging in the identified research areas may improve future care for GERD patients.

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease-which factors are important?

Background

Pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) shows a multifactorial background. Different anatomical and functional alterations can be determined such as weakness of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES), changes in anatomy by a hiatal hernia (HH), an impaired esophageal motility (IEM), and/or an associated gastric motility problem with either duodeno-gastro-esophageal reflux (DGER) or delayed gastric emptying (DGE). The purpose of this study is to assess a large GERD-patient population to quantitatively determine different pathophysiologic factors contributing to the disease.

Methods

For this analysis only patients with documented GERD (pathologic esophageal acid exposure) were selected from a prospectively maintained databank. Investigations: history and physical, body mass index, endoscopy, esophageal manometry, 24 h-pH-monitoring, 24 h-bilirbine-monitoring, radiographic-gastric-emptying or scintigraphy, gastrointestinal quality of life index (GIQLI).

Results

In total, 728 patients (420 males; 308 females) were selected for this analysis. Mean age: 49.9 years; mean BMI: 27.2 kg/m² (range, 20-45 kg/m²); mean GIQLI of 91 (range: 43-138; normal level: 121); no esophagitis: 30.6%; minor esophagitis (Savary-Miller type 1 or Los Angeles Grade A): 22.4%; esophagitis [2-4]/B-D: 36.2%; Barrett's esophagus 10%. Presence of pathophysiologic factors: HH 95.4%; LES-incompetence 88%, DGER 55%, obesity 25.6%, IEM 8.8%, DGE 6.8%.

Conclusions

In our evaluation of GERD patients, the most important pathophysiologic components are anatomical alterations (HH), LES-incompetence and DGER.

Does the nissen fundoplication procedure improve esophageal dysmotility in patients with barrett's esophagus?

OBJECTIVE

to evaluate esophageal dysmotility (ED) and the extent of Barrett's esophagus (BE) before and after laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (LNF) in patients previously diagnosed with BE and ED.

METHODS

twenty-two patients with BE diagnosed by upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy with biopsies and ED diagnosed by conventional esophageal manometry (CEM) were submitted to a LNF, and followed up with clinical evaluations, upper GI endoscopy with biopsies and CEM, for a minimum of 12 months after the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

: sixteen patients were male (72.7%) and six were females (27.3%). The mean age was 55.14 (± 15.52) years old. and the mean postoperative follow-up was 26.2 months. The upper GI endoscopy showed that the mean length of BE was 4.09 cm preoperatively and 3.91cm postoperatively (p=0.042). The evaluation of esophageal dysmotility through conventional manometry showed that: the preoperative median of the lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (LESRP) was 9.15 mmHg and 13.2 mmHg postoperatively (p=0.006). The preoperative median of the esophageal contraction amplitude was 47.85 mmHg, and 57.50 mmHg postoperatively (p=0.408). Preoperative evaluation of esophageal peristalsis showed that 13.6% of the sample presented diffuse esophageal spasm and 9.1% ineffective esophageal motility. In the postoperative, 4.5% of patients had diffuse esophageal spasm, 13.6% of aperistalsis and 22.7% of ineffective motor activity (p=0.133).

CONCLUSION

LNF decreased the BE extension, increased the LES resting pressure, and increased the amplitude of the distal esophageal contraction; however, it was unable to improve ED.

Patients with ineffective esophageal motility benefit from laparoscopic antireflux surgery

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common chronic disorder of the gastrointestinal tract, affecting more than 50% of Americans. The development of GERD may be associated with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). The impact of esophageal motility on outcomes post laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), including quality of life (QOL), remains to be defined. The purpose of this study is to analyze and compare QOL outcomes following LARS among patients with and without ineffective esophageal motility (IEM).

METHODS

This is a single-institution, retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent LARS, from January 2012 to July 2019, for treatment of GERD at our institution. Patients undergoing revisional surgery were excluded. Patients with normal peristalsis (non-IEM) were distinguished from those with IEM, defined using the Chicago classification, on manometric studies. Four validated QOL surveys were used to assess outcomes: Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related QOL (GERD-HRQL), Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Health-Related QOL (LPR-HRQL), and Swallowing Disorders (SWAL) survey.

RESULTS

203 patients with complete manometric data were identified (75.4% female) and divided into two groups, IEM (n = 44) and non-IEM (n = 159). IEM and Non-IEM groups were parallel in age (58.1 ± 15.3 vs. 62.2 ± 12 years, p = 0.062), body mass index (27.4 ± 4.1 vs. 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m², p = 0.288), distribution of comorbid disease, sex, and ASA scores. The groups differed in manometry findings and Johnson-DeMeester score (IEM: 38.6 vs. Non-IEM: 24.0, p = 0.023). Patients in both groups underwent similar rates of Nissen fundoplication (IEM: 84.1% vs. Non-IEM: 93.7%, p = 0.061) with greater improvements in dysphagia (IEM: 27.4% vs. 44.2%) in Non-IEM group but comparable benefit in reflux reduction (IEM: 80.6% vs. 72.4%) in both groups at follow-up. There were no differences in postoperative outcomes. Satisfaction rates with LARS were similar between groups (IEM: 80% vs. non-IEM: 77.9%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ineffective esophageal motility derive significant benefits in perioperative and QOL outcomes after LARS. Nevertheless, as anticipated, their baseline dysmotility may reduce the degree of improvement in dysphagia rates post-surgery compared to patients with normal motility. Furthermore, the presence of preoperative IEM should not be a contraindication for complete fundoplication. Key to optimal outcomes after LARS is careful patient selection based on objective perioperative data, including manometry evaluation, with the purpose of tailoring surgery to provide effective reflux control and improved esophageal clearance.

Electrical lower esophageal sphincter augmentation in patients with GERD and severe ineffective esophageal motility-a safety and efficacy study

Background

Laparoscopic fundoplication (LF), even if performed in specialized centers, can be followed by long-term side effects such as dysphagia, gas bloating or inability to belch. Patients with an ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and concurrent GERD are prone to postoperative dysphagia after LF. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of electrical lower esophageal sphincter stimulation in patients with IEM and GERD.

Methods

This is a prospective, open-label single center study. Patients with PPI-refractory GERD and ineffective esophageal motility were included for lower esophageal sphincter electrical stimulation (LES-EST). Patients underwent prospective follow-up including physical examination, interrogation of the device and were surveyed for changes in the health-related quality of life score.

Results

According to power analysis, 17 patients were included in this study. Median distal contractile integral (DCI) was 64 mmHg s cm (quartiles 11.5–301). Median total % pH < 4 was 8.9 (quartiles 4–21.6). Twelve patients (70.6%) underwent additional hiatal repair. At 1-month follow-up, none of the patients showed any clinical or radiological signs of dysphagia. There were no procedure related severe adverse events. Mean total HQRL improved from baseline 37.53 (SD 15.07) to 10.93 (SD 9.18) at follow-up (FUP) (mean difference 24.0 CI 15.93–32.07) p < 0.001.

Conclusions

LES-EST was introduced as a potential technique to avoid side effects of LF. LES-EST significantly improved health related quality of life and does not impair swallowing in patients with GERD and ineffective esophageal motility.

Surgical Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Patients with Severe Esophageal Dysmotility

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and esophageal dysmotility are often disqualifying criteria for fundoplication due to dysphagia complications. A tailored partial fundoplication may improve GERD in patients with severe esophageal motility disorders. We evaluate this approach on GERD improvement in non-achalasia esophageal dysmotility patients.

METHODS

A single-institution prospective database was reviewed (2007-2016), with inclusion criteria of GERD, previous diagnosis of non-achalasia esophageal motility disorder, and laparoscopic partial fundoplication. Diagnosis of previous achalasia diagnosis or diffused esophageal spasm was excluded. Motility studies, pre- and post-upper gastrointestinal imaging (UGI), esophageal symptom scores, antacid, and PPI use were collected pre-op, 6 months, 12 months, and long-term (LT). Statistical analysis was made using SPSS v.23.0.0, α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients met the inclusion criteria. A total of 17.3% had esophageal body amotility, 79.6% had severe esophageal dysmotility. A total of 65.9% women (mean age 64 ± 15.7), mean peristalsis 45.3 ± 32.6%, and failed peristalsis 36.0 ± 32.2%. Mean LES residual pressure was 15.0 ± 18.0 mmHg, and 40.7% had hypotensive LES. Mean follow-up time was 25 months [1-7 years], with significant improvement in symptoms and reduction in PPI and antacid use at all time-points compared to pre-op. A total of 74% had UGI studies at 12 months; all showed persistent dysmotility. Six patients had radiographic hiatal hernia recurrence, with only one being clinically symptomatic postoperatively. Three required dilation for persistent dysphagia.

CONCLUSIONS

A tailored partial fundoplication may be effective in symptom relief for non-achalasia patients with esophageal motility disorders and GERD. Significant symptom improvement, low HHR, and PPI use clearly indicate this approach to be effective for this population.

Simultaneous laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring (Restech) and conventional esophageal pH monitoring-correlation using a large patient cohort of more than 100 patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease

24-hour esophageal pH-metry is not designed to detect laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). The new laryngopharyngeal pH-monitoring system (Restech) may detect LPR better. There is no established correlation between these two techniques as only small case series exist. The aim of this study is to examine the correlation between the two techniques with a large patient cohort. All patients received a complete diagnostic workup for gastroesophageal reflux including symptom evaluation, endoscopy, 24-hour pH-metry, high resolution manometry, and Restech. Consecutive patients with suspected gastroesophageal reflux and disease-related extra-esophageal symptoms were evaluated using 24-hour laryngopharyngeal and concomitant esophageal pH-monitoring. Subsequently, the relationship between the two techniques was evaluated subdividing the different reflux scenarios into four groups. A total of 101 patients from December 2013 to February 2017 were included. All patients presented extra-esophageal symptoms such as cough, hoarseness, asthma symptoms, and globus sensation. Classical reflux symptoms such as heartburn (71%), regurgitation (60%), retrosternal pain (54%), and dysphagia (32%) were also present. Esophageal 24-hour pH-metry was positive in 66 patients (65%) with a mean DeMeester Score of 66.7 [15-292]. Four different reflux scenarios were detected (group A-D): in 39% of patients with abnormal esophageal pH-metry, Restech evaluation was normal (group A, n = 26, mean DeMeester-score = 57.9 [15-255], mean Ryan score = 2.6 [2-8]). In 23% of patients with normal pH-metry (n = 8, group B), Restech evaluation was abnormal (mean DeMeester-score 10.5 [5-13], mean Ryan score 63.5 [27-84]). The remaining groups C and D showed corresponding results. Restech evaluation was positive in 48% of cases in this highly selective patient cohort. As demonstrated by four reflux scenarios, esophageal pH-metry and Restech do not necessarily need to correspond. Especially in patients with borderline abnormal 24-hour pH-metry, Restech may help to support the decision for or against laparoscopic anti-reflux surgery.

Clinical and pH study characteristics in reflux patients with and without ineffective oesophageal motility (IEM)

Background

The aetiology and clinical impact of ineffective oesophageal motility (IEM) remain poorly understood, but the condition is thought to worsen supine gastro-oesophageal acid reflux (GERD).

Aims

In this retrospective cohort analysis of symptomatic patients with abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, we sought to determine any clinical or functional characteristics that would distinguish those with normal peristalsis from those with IEM, defined using the Chicago classification. We hypothesised that the impaired oesophageal clearance in IEM would be contributing to more severe degrees of pathological acid exposure, as well as clinical and endoscopic GERD severity.

Methods

Consecutive symptomatic patients with GERD underwent clinical, endoscopic and functional evaluation that included high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) and ambulatory pH monitoring performed ‘off’ acid suppressive therapy.

Results

Of the 114 patients with abnormal oesophageal acid exposure, 71 had normal oesophageal motility by HRIM and 43 were diagnosed with IEM (38% prevalence). Age, gender and symptom duration were similar between the two groups. Both groups had similar magnitude and frequency of symptoms, making a distinction clinically impossible. Endoscopically, the two groups had similar rates of erosive disease, hiatal hernia and Barrett's oesophagus. Ambulatory pH, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) dosage and PPI response rates were also similar. Nevertheless, patients with IEM had significantly more impairment of oesophageal clearance (mean 56.9±6.4) than those with normal motility (mean 32.4±5.0) (p<0.003).

Conclusions

Symptomatic patients with IEM exhibit significant impairment of oesophageal clearance but are otherwise clinically indistinguishable from those with normal oesophageal motility and have a similar prevalence of erosive disease and pathological acid exposure.

Over 250 Laparoendoscopic Single Site (LESS) Fundoplications: Lessons Learned

Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) surgery is a more recent advance in the progression of minimally invasive surgery. This study was undertaken to assess lessons learned after our first 250 LESS fundoplications for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). All patients undergoing LESS fundoplications were prospectively followed from 2008 to 2014. Patients scored the frequency/severity of their symptoms before/after LESS fundoplication using a Likert scale (0 = never/not bothersome to 10 = always/very bothersome). Patients also scored satisfaction with their incision using a Likert scale (1 = revolting to 10 = beautiful). A total of 300 patients undergoing LESS fundoplication for GERD were not different by age or gender. Surgeons undertook 190 Nissen fundoplications and 110 Toupet fundoplications; 28 of which were “redo” fundoplications. Preoperative symptoms were notable, especially heartburn (frequency = 8, severity = 7). Symptoms were ameliorated postoperatively (e.g., heartburn: frequency = 0, severity = 0, P < 0.01). Postoperatively, patients scored satisfaction of their incisions with a median score of 10. Eighty-three per cent of patients were at least satisfied with their overall experience; 92 per cent would undergo the operation again knowing what they know now. Patients report significant symptom relief, high satisfaction, and excellent cosmesis after LESS fundoplication. LESS fundoplication safely ameliorates symptoms of GERD with pronounced satisfaction, in part, because of the cosmetic outcome (i.e., lack of scaring), and its application is encouraged.