Factors Related to Rejection of Care and Behaviors Directed towards Others: A Longitudinal Study in Nursing Home Residents with Dementia

Reducing refusals of care through improved personal care interactions between caregivers and people with dementia: protocol for a realist synthesis

INTRODUCTION

People with dementia develop progressive difficulties conducting basic activities of daily living, often requiring considerable assistance from caregivers. Many people with dementia, particularly in the advanced stages, can refuse assistance with care leading to difficult interactions. The ways in which refusals of care can be best reduced are unknown. Using a realist approach, this study aims to develop and refine evidence-based programme theories showing which mechanisms of interventions contribute to reducing refusals of care between caregivers and people with dementia, in which contexts, how and why.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The realist synthesis will be conducted in three iterative stages.Stage 1 will develop initial programme theories through secondary analysis of caregivers and persons with dementia interviews and observations, a preliminary exploratory literature review and team discussions. After initial programme theory development, the focus of the synthesis will be decided by the study team.Stage 2 will involve conducting focused, iterative and targeted literature searches to test and refine our initial programme theories considering the evidence for each setting: hospital, care home, home care and family. Data synthesis will use a realist lens to examine what works for whom in what circumstances and how, and organise related evidence to context-mechanism-outcome configurations whenever possible.Stage 3 will use stakeholder interviews to explore reactions to the programme theories and enhance validity after integration of these findings, recommendations and conclusions will be developed.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The NHS Social Care Research Ethics Committee has approved the interview stage of this study (REC reference: 24/IEC08/0007; IRAS project ID: 338274). Informed consent will be obtained from all interviewees prior to data collection. Findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications, conference presentations and accessible information for key stakeholders.

PROPSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42024496072.

[Refusal of care by the elderly]

Refusal of care is a frequent occurrence in geriatric medicine, especially among people with neurocognitive diseases, particularly in the advanced stages. These refusals of care are a daily burden, not only for the patients themselves, but also for their carers and caregivers. Although they can be prevented, the absence of a single, simple strategy for overcoming them is a real challenge for professionals and carers alike. Their management calls for an approach that is essentially non-pharmacological, always interdisciplinary, humanistic and ethically grounded.

Most Common Refusals of Personal Care in Advanced Dementia: Psychometric Properties of the Refusal of Care Informant Scale

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Refusals of care in dementia can be a source of distress for people with dementia and their caregivers. Informant-based measures to examine refusals of care are limited and often measure other behaviors such as agitation. We aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the newly developed, 14-item, Refusal of Care Informant Scale (RoCIS) and then use the scale to verify the most common refusal behaviors.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Data from 129 dyads were analyzed. Dyad was defined as a person with advanced dementia either living in a care home or supported in their own home and their caregiver. Data about the person with dementia were gathered using informant-based questionnaires. The psychometric properties of the RoCIS were investigated using Rasch analysis to determine validity and reliability.

RESULTS

Following Rasch analysis, the item "upset" was removed from the RoCIS. The reduced 13-item RoCIS is unidimensional and achieved a reliability index of 0.85 (Cronbach's alpha 0.88). Sixty-eight percent of people with dementia had refused care in the last month, with "verbally refused" the most common type of refusal behavior. People in the "very severe/profound" stage of dementia showed more refusal behaviors than those in the "severe" stage.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Results provide initial evidence that the RoCIS is a valid and reliable informant-based scale measuring refusals of care in advanced dementia. Results indicate a need to develop new approaches and techniques to make assistance with personal care more acceptable to people with dementia.

What are the factors associated with people with advanced dementia refusing assistance with personal care?

BACKGROUND

People with dementia sometimes refuse assistance with personal care activities such as washing or dressing. We aimed to investigate the factors associated with refusals of care in advanced dementia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study using informant-based measures. Participants were people with advanced dementia and their caregivers (family carers or care-home staff) (n = 260, 130 dyads) in the UK. Mixed effects linear models were used to examine the effects of neuropsychiatric behaviours, ability with activities of daily living, professional input, co-morbidities, psychotropic medications, environment modifications, and caregiver factors including type and training status on refusals of care. The Refusal of Care Informant Scale was used, range 1-13; higher scores indicate more refusal behaviours.

RESULTS

Higher independence in activities of daily living was associated with less refusal behaviours (coefficient = -0.11, p < 0.001 [95% confidence interval -0.15, -0.07]). Higher agitation was associated with more refusal behaviours (0.11, p < 0.001 [0.06, 0.15]). No other statistically significant differences were found. There was no demonstrable evidence of differences in number of refusals of care between family and care-home caregivers or between dementia-trained or -untrained caregivers.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest refusals of care have similar prevalence regardless of caregiver type (family or care home) or dementia training status, indicating that current dementia training has no impact on refusals of care or may not be implemented as intended. Improving independence in activities of daily living and reducing agitations may help prevent refusals of care. To establish causality, future research should consider embedding these factors into interventions targeting refusal of care.

How do family carers and care-home staff manage refusals when assisting a person with advanced dementia with their personal care?

Background and objectives

Caregivers may encounter, or inadvertently cause, refusals of care by a care recipient. Managing refusals of care can be challenging and have potential negative consequences. We aimed to examine caregivers’ (care-home staff and family carers) experiences of managing refusals of personal care in advanced dementia.

Research design and methods

One-to-one semi-structured interviews with 12 care assistants from six care homes and 20 family carers who were physically assisting a person with advanced dementia with their personal care in the UK. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, with data analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Findings

Core to the caregiver experience of refusals of care was knowing the person. This underpinned five key themes identified as caregivers’ strategies used in preventing or managing refusals of care: (1) finding the right moment to care; (2) using specific communication strategies; (3) being tactful: simplifying, leaving, or adapting care; (4) having confidence in care; and (5) seeking support from others when safety is at risk.

Discussion and implications

Different caregiver relationships with the person with dementia influenced how they managed refusals of care. Refusals of care can place caregivers in tough situations with tensions between providing care when it is seemingly not wanted and leaving care incomplete. Both caregiver groups require support such as coaching, mentoring and/or advice from other health and social care practitioners to manage difficult personal care interactions before crisis points occur.

Elderspeak communication and pain severity as modifiable factors to rejection of care in hospital dementia care

Background

Rejection of care (RoC) occurs when persons living with dementia (PLWD) withstand or oppose the efforts of their caregiver. Improvements in hospital dementia care are needed, and one way to address this need is by identifying factors that lead to RoC, particularly those that are modifiable. Elderspeak communication is an established antecedent to RoC among PLWD in nursing homes. The purpose of this study was to extend these results to acute care settings by determining the impact of elderspeak communication by nursing staff on RoC by hospitalized PLWD.

Methods

Care encounters between nursing staff and PLWD were audio‐recorded, transcribed verbatim, and coded for semantic, pragmatic, and prosodic features of elderspeak. RoC behaviors was scored in real‐time using the Resistiveness to Care Scale. A Bayesian repeated‐measures hurdle model was used to evaluate the association between elderspeak and both the presence and severity of RoC.

Results

Eighty‐eight care encounters between 16 PLWD and 53 nursing staff were audio‐recorded for elderspeak and scored for RoC. Nearly all (96.6%) of the encounters included some form of elderspeak. Almost half of the care encounters (48.9%) included RoC behaviors. A 10% decrease in elderspeak was associated with a 77% decrease in odds of RoC (OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.68) and a 16% decrease (eβ= 0.84, CI = 0.73, 0.96) in the severity of RoC. A one‐unit decrease in pain severity was associated with 73% reduced odds of RoC (OR = 0.27, CI = 0.12, 0.45) and a 28% decrease (eβ= 0.72, CI = 0.64, 0.80) in the severity of RoC.

Conclusions

Both elderspeak by nursing staff and RoC by PLWD are present and pervasive in acute care. Pain and elderspeak are two modifiable factors of RoC in hospitalized PLWD. Person‐centered interventions are needed that address communication practices and pain management for hospitalized PLWD.

Targeted Interdisciplinary Model for Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (TIME) in home care services: a cluster randomized feasibility trial

Background

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) occur frequently in people with dementia and can contribute to an increased need for help and a reduced quality of life, but also predict early institutionalization. The Targeted Interdisciplinary Model for Evaluation and Treatment of Neuropsychiatric Symptoms (TIME) might be a useful personalized approach to BPSD in people with dementia. The main objective of this feasibility trial was to explore the trial design and methods along with the patients’ and the home care staff’s acceptance of the TIME intervention before developing a definitive trial. Additionally, we wanted to explore whether TIME could be appropriate for staff in home care services in their approach towards people with dementia with anxiety and depression.

Methods

This was a 18-month feasibility trial using a parallel cluster randomized controlled design. Nine municipalities from the eastern part of Norway (clusters) — 40 people with dementia and 37 of their next of kin— were randomized to the TIME intervention or to treatment as usual. In addition, qualitative data as field notes were collected and summarized.

Results

The staff in home care services experienced TIME as an appropriate method; in particular, the systematic approach to the patient’s BPSD was experienced as useful. However, the completion of the assessment phase was considered exhaustive and time-consuming, and some of the staff found it challenging to find time for the case conferences.

Conclusions

We consider that TIME, with some adjustments, could be useful for staff in home care services in cases where they face challenges in providing care and support to people with dementia. This feasibility trial indicates that we can move forward with a future definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the effect of TIME in people with dementia receiving home care services.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: SI0303150608.

Factor Analysis of the Short-Form Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory and the Measurement Invariance by Gender

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) is a widely used measure of agitation. The purpose of this study was to test the internal consistency, reliability, and validity of short-form CMAI in a sample of nursing home residents with cognitive impairment and examine if it is invariant across gender.

METHODS

This study utilized baseline data from a randomized trial including 553 residents from 55 nursing homes. Data was analyzed using structural equation modeling.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factory analysis supported the three-factor structure including aggressive (α = .794), physically nonaggressive (α = .617), and verbally agitated (α = .718) behaviors. Invariance testing confirmed that the shortened measure is invariant across gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide validity evidence of short-form CMAI to assess agitation and gender differences in agitation in nursing home population.

Importance of Distinguishing Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Dementia Care

Aggressive behavior is one of the most disturbing symptoms of Alzheimer disease and other progressive neurodegenerative dementias. Development of strategies for management of aggressive behaviors in people with dementia is hindered by a lack of recognition that aggression is not a uniform behavioral construct. It is possible to distinguish 2 types of aggression: reactive or impulsive aggression and proactive or premeditated aggression. Research concerning aggressive behaviors in people with dementia is hindered by scales describing behavioral symptoms of dementia which do not distinguish between reactive and proactive aggressions because they do not consider the factors leading to these behaviors. Reactive aggression is caused by lack of understanding, leading to rejection of care, while proactive aggression could be caused by a psychopathic personality, hallucinations or delusions, and other determinants. It is difficult to underestimate the importance of distinguishing reactive and proactive aggressions in people with dementia because there are different strategies that can be used for management of these behaviors. For reactive aggression, delayed treatment, distraction, improved communication, and change in treatment strategy is useful, while antipsychotic medication may be needed for treatment of proactive aggression. Dementia is increasing the risk of both types of aggressions and antidepressant treatment can be helpful. Most importantly, persons exhibiting reactive aggression should not be labeled "aggressors" because this behavior could be caused by unmet persons' needs, pain and poor communication with care providers.

Rejection of Care and Aggression among Older Veterans with Dementia: The Influence of Background Factors and Interpersonal Triggers

OBJECTIVES

To test relationships among background factors, interpersonal triggers, rejection of care, and aggression among veterans living with dementia in residential long-term care settings, based on the need-driven dementia-compromised behavior model.

DESIGN

A mixed methods secondary analysis of program evaluation data from the Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration intervention implemented by the US Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

In total, 315 older veterans who participated in the 2013‒2016 Staff Training in Assisted Living Residences-Veterans Health Administration program at 76 Community Living Centers (Veterans Affairs-operated nursing homes).

METHODS

Text data that captured the interdisciplinary team observations of distressed behaviors of concern and their circumstances were coded into categorical variables and then combined with existing quantitative data to test hypothesized relationships using structural equation modeling.

RESULTS

Rejection of care was directly affected by interpersonal triggers (β = 0.32, P < .005) and background factors such as depression (β = 0.29, P < .018), anxiety (β = -0.18, P < .023), and cognitive status (β = 0.10, P < .049). Depression also had an indirect effect on rejection of care through interpersonal triggers (α × β = 0.13 × 0.32 = 0.04, P < .012). Aggression was directly affected by both interpersonal triggers (β = 0.19, P < .009) and functional status (β = 0.17, P < .011). Both function (α × β = 0.12 × 0.19 = 0.02, P < .035) and depression (α × β = 0.13 × 0.19 = 0.03, P < .005) had indirect effects on aggression through interpersonal triggers.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Interpersonal triggers influenced rejection of care and aggression in veterans with dementia. Background factors such as depression and severity of functional impairment increased the likelihood of these symptoms. Study findings emphasize the importance of developing and implementing interventions that improve interpersonal relationships and developing targeted interventions for those with depressive symptoms.

Effects of Mental Health Disorders on Nursing Home Residents' Nine-Month Pain Trajectories

OBJECTIVE

To determine the key classes of nursing home residents' nine-month pain trajectories, the influence of residents' mental health disorders on membership in these classes, and nine-month health-related outcomes associated with pain trajectory class membership.

METHODS

Four times over a nine-month period, the MDS 3.0 resident assessment instrument was used to record the demographic characteristics, mental health disorder diagnoses, pain characteristics, and health and functioning outcomes of 2,539 Department of Veterans Affairs Community Living Center (VA CLC) residents. Growth mixture modeling was used to estimate the key classes of residents' nine-month pain trajectories, the influence of residents' mental health disorders on their pain trajectory class membership, and the associations of class membership with residents' health and functioning outcomes at nine-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Four-class solutions best described nursing home residents' nine-month trajectories of pain frequency, severity, and interference. Residents with dementia and severe mental illness diagnoses were less likely, and those with depressive disorder, PTSD, and substance use disorder diagnoses more likely, to belong to adverse nine-month pain trajectory classes. Membership in adverse pain frequency and pain severity trajectory classes, and in trajectory classes characterized by initially high but steeply declining pain interference, portended more depressive symptoms but better cognitive and physical functioning at nine-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Nursing home residents' mental health disorder diagnoses help predict their subsequent pain frequency, severity, and interference trajectories. This may be clinically useful information for improving pain assessment and treatment approaches for nursing home residents.

Aggressive Behaviors Among Nursing Home Residents: Association With Dementia and Behavioral Health Disorders

OBJECTIVES

We measured the prevalence and severity of aggressive behaviors (ABs) among nursing home (NH) residents and examined whether individuals with behavioral health disorders were more likely to exhibit aggressive behaviors than others.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

The analytical sample included 3,270,713 first Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for residents in 15,706 NHs in 2015.

MEASURES

Individuals were identified as having (1) behavioral health disorders only (hierarchically categorized as schizophrenia/psychosis, bipolar disorder, personality disorder, substance abuse, depression/anxiety); (2) dementia only; (3) behavioral health disorders and dementia; or (4) neither. The Aggressive Behavior Scale (ABS) measured the degree of aggressive behaviors exhibited, based on 4 MDS items (verbal, physical, other behavioral symptoms, and rejection of care). The ABS scores ranged from 0 to 12 reflecting symptom severity as none (ABS score = 0), mild (ABS score = 1-2), moderate (ABS score = 3-5), and severe (ABS score = 6-12). Bivariate comparisons and multinomial logistic regressions were performed.

RESULTS

Residents with behavioral health disorders and dementia had the highest prevalence of ABs (23.1%), followed by dementia only (15.3%), behavioral health disorders only (9.3%), and neither (5.3%). After controlling for individual risk factors and facility covariates, the relative risk of exhibiting severe ABs was 2.47, 5.50, and 9.42 for residents with behavioral health disorders only, dementia only, and behavioral health disorders and dementia, respectively, with a similar pattern for moderate or mild ABs.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents with behavioral health disorders were less likely than residents with dementia to exhibit aggressive behaviors in nursing homes. Thus, anecdotally reported concerns that aggressive behaviors are primarily an issue for residents with behavioral health disorders, rather than those with dementia, were not empirically justified.

Behavioral Problems and Dementia

Behavioral problems decrease quality of life of people with dementia and their care providers. Three main consequences of dementia are functional impairment and in some cases also mood disorders and psychosis. These consequences, alone or in combination, result in 3 main behavioral problems: apathy, agitation, and rejection of care/aggression. Nonpharmacologic management strategies include meaningful activities and individualized comfort care, for example, Namaste Care. If needed, pharmacologic management should concentrate on treatment of main dementia consequences, especially depression, instead of treating secondary symptoms, for example, insomnia. Use of antipsychotics should be minimized but antipsychotics may be necessary for augmentation of antidepressants.

Measurement of agitation and aggression in adult and aged neuropsychiatric patients: review of definitions and frequently used measurement scales

Agitation and aggression in adult psychiatric patients with psychoses and in persons with dementia increase the burden of disease and frequently cause hospitalization. The implementation of currently available management strategies and the development of new ones is hindered by inconsistent terminology that confuses agitation with aggression. This confusion is maintained by many rating scales that fail to distinguish between these two syndromes. We review the frequently used rating scales with a particular focus on their ability to separate agitation from aggression. Agitation and aggression are two different syndromes. For example, reactive aggression is often precipitated by rejection of care and may not be associated with agitation per se. We propose, in treatment studies of behavioral symptoms of dementia and challenging behaviors in psychoses, that outcomes should be evaluated separately for agitation and aggression. This is important for investigation of drug effectiveness since the medication may be effective against one syndrome but not the other. Separate assessments of agitation and aggression should be a general principle of trial design with particular salience for registration studies of medications proposed for approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and other regulatory bodies.

Characteristics Associated with Quality of Life in Long-Term Care Residents with Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

To determine which characteristics are associated with quality of life (QOL) in residents with moderate to very severe dementia in long-term care facilities (LTCFs).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a cross-sectional analysis of a cluster randomized controlled study in 12 Dutch LTCFs that enrolled 288 residents, with moderate to severe dementia assessed with the Reisberg Global Deterioration Scale (Reisberg GDS) and QOL with the QUALIDEM. Characteristics that were hypothesized to be associated with the six domains of QOL (applicable to very severe dementia) included demographic variables, activities of daily living (Katz ADL), cognitive performance (Cognitive Performance Scale; CPS), pain (Pain Assessment Checklist for Seniors with Limited Ability to Communicate; PACSLAC-D), neuropsychiatric symptoms (Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version; NPI-NH) and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Multivariate logistic regression modelling showed associations with age in the domain Social isolation [odds ratio, OR, 0.95 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.91-0.99)], ADL level in the domain Positive affect [OR 0.89 (95% CI 0.83-0.95)] and the domain Social relations [OR 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.93)], severity of dementia in the domain Social relations [OR 0.28 (95% CI 0.12-0.62)] and in the domain Social isolation [OR 2.10 (95% CI 1.17-3.78)], psychiatric disorders in the domain Positive affect [OR 0.39 (95% CI 0.17-0.87)] and pulmonary diseases in the domain Negative affect [OR 0.14 (95% CI 0.03-0.61)] of the QUALIDEM. Neuropsychiatric symptoms were independently associated with all six domains of the QUALIDEM [OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.90-0.96) to OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99)]. Pain was associated with the domains Care relationship [OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.84-1.00)] and Negative affect [OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.85-1.00)].

CONCLUSION

QOL in dementia is independently associated with age, ADL, dementia severity, pain, psychiatric disorders, pulmonary diseases and neuropsychiatric symptoms. It is possible to detect persons with dementia at risk for a lower QOL. This information is important for developing personalized interventions to improve QOL in persons with dementia in LTCFs.