Can We State Stable Bladder? How Many Repetitions Should We Do for an Appropriate Demonstration of Involuntary Detrusor Contraction?

False-negative finding in urodynamic study for the chief complaint. Does it interfere with the clinical outcomes for the treatment of SUI or OAB syndromes?

Purpose:

False-negative urodynamic findings may mislead or prevent planned treatments due to unmatched findings with the clinical presentation. We hypothesized that the absence of urodynamic demonstration of SUI or OAB on urodynamics would interfere with clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods:

Materials and Methods: We prospectively studied 124 women with (94) or without (30) demonstrable SUI after sling operations. Similarly, 64 women with OAB syndrome with (38) or without (26) demonstrable DO were also compared after treatment with anticholinergic agents. Patients were assessed with the UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires 3 and 6 months after treatment.

Results:

Only 76% of SUI patients demonstrated urine leakage during urodynamics. The UDI-6 score was higher in the demonstrable-SUI and demonstrable-DO groups, while the IIQ-7 score was comparable within the incontinence or urgency/frequency groups. Demonstrable and non-demonstrable SUI-operated patients showed similar outcomes. Patients with urgency syndromes with or without demonstrable DO had a similar rate of improvement with anticholinergic therapy.

Conclusions:

Women with clinical complaints of SUI objectively demonstrated on urodynamics presented the same subjective clinical outcome as those with SUI lacking objective demonstration when measured by the UDI-6 and IIQ-7 questionnaires. Similarly, patients with OAB syndrome with or without demonstrable DO had similar clinical improvement when treated with anticholinergics and measured using the same questionnaires.

Advances in Ambulatory Urodynamics

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This manuscript reviews recent technological advances in ambulatory urodynamics.

RECENT FINDINGS

Ambulatory urodynamics is currently recommended by the International Continence Society as a second-line diagnostic tool in patients with nondiagnostic traditional urodynamics. Novel techniques involving telemetric monitoring are in development, which utilize catheter-free wireless systems to address several recognized shortcomings of inoffice urodynamic studies. Current research in catheter-free bladder pressure measurements involves either an intravesical, intradetrusor, or transdetrusor approach. Real-time bladder volume estimation may be performed using ultrasonography, near-infrared spectroscopy, or bladder volume conductance measurement. Ambulatory urodynamics can measure bladder function in the "real world" setting, capturing physiological bladder filling and emptying and allowing patients to reproduce the activities that may trigger their symptoms. Telemetric devices being developed represent further advances in this field and focus upon improving diagnostic capabilities, evaluating patient response to treatment, and facilitating closed-loop bladder control with neuroprosthetic integration.

Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: state of the art and future directions

Urodynamic studies are a key component of the clinical evaluation of lower urinary tract dysfunction and include filling cystometry, pressure-flow studies, uroflowmetry, urethral function tests and electromyography. However, pitfalls of traditional urodynamics include physical and emotional discomfort, artificial test conditions with catheters and rapid retrograde filling of the bladder, which result in variable diagnostic accuracy. Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring (AUM) uses physiological anterograde filling and, therefore, offers a longer and more physiologically relevant evaluation. However, AUM methods rely on traditional catheters and pressure transducers and do not measure volume continuously, which is required to provide context for pressure changes. Novel telemetric AUM (TAUM) methods that use wireless, catheter-free, battery-powered devices to monitor bladder pressure and volume while patients carry out their daily activities are currently being investigated. TAUM devices under current development are innovating in the areas of remote monitoring, rechargeable energy sources, device deployment and retrieval and materials engineering to provide increased diagnostic accuracy and improved comfort for patients with incontinence or voiding dysfunction. These devices hold promise for improving the diagnosis and management of patients with lower urinary tract disorders.