Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Experience of 25 Cases

Amyloid-Rich Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: a Potential Diagnostic Pitfall in Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (EUS-FNAC)

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) are rare neoplasms that include even rarer variants that may pose different diagnostic problems, especially in fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). We describe the diagnostic clues of the amyloid-rich variant of PanNETs in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle aspiration cytology (EUS-FNAC). Three cases of PanNETs with an amyloid-rich stromal component were retrieved and retrospectively reviewed. For every case, the pancreatic lesion was investigated by a EUS-FNAC procedure. The final diagnosis was supported by immunocytochemistry and Congo red staining. All cases had similar EUS-FNAC features: neoplastic cells were entrapped in an eosinophilic, homogeneous dense and amorphous matrix. The neuroendocrine nature was confirmed by immunoexpression of synaptophysin and chromogranin A, while the amorphous stroma was characterized as amyloid based on positive Congo red staining. Regarding the hormonal profile, no insulin or proinsulin reactivity was observed, but all cases were diffusely positive for amylin. The diagnosis of uncommon variants of PanNETs, such as the amyloid-rich, is challenging especially in EUS-FNAC procedures because of a unique and misleading morphology, potentially mimicking fibrotic conditions and amyloid deposition within systemic amyloidosis. In cytology specimens, the presence of amorphous material requires amyloid deposition to be considered in the differential diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasms with neuroendocrine phenotype.

Cost-effectiveness of rapid on-site evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration in gastrointestinal lesions

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can improve adequacy rates of fine needle aspiration (FNA) and thus save operational costs. Our aim was to assess the cost-efficacy of ROSE performed during endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-FNA of gastrointestinal lesions.

METHOD

This was a retrospective cohort study of 156 patients who underwent EUS-FNA for pancreatic, submucosal upper gastrointestinal, and adjacent lesions at Galilee Medical Center between 2012 and 2017. The patient cohort was divided into group A (62 patients, 39.7%) who underwent EUS-FNA with ROSE, and group B (94 patients, 60.3%) without ROSE. Cost analysis was based on the additional expenditure of repeated EUS-FNA sessions needed to reach accurate and final diagnosis in the two groups.

RESULTS

The overall cost was significantly higher in group B ($121 422) as compared to group A ($72 861), including the ROSE cost. Additional EUS-FNA sessions were needed in 11.3% and 23.4% in groups A and B, respectively. The additional cost to achieve final pathological diagnosis was $7203 and $24 696 in groups A and B, respectively (P = .02), yielding a savings of $252 per EUS-FNA case by adding ROSE. Notably, adding ROSE to the EUS-FNA exam for gastrointestinal non-pancreatic lesions resulted in even higher savings per case ($682.40). Moreover, adding ROSE improved specimen adequacy to achieve final pathological diagnosis (odds ratio = 7.13, P = .0005).

CONCLUSIONS

EUS-FNA with ROSE was cost-effective. Incorporating ROSE into the clinical practice of EUS-FNA saves costs and improves specimen adequacy.

Clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasonography on the management of neuroendocrine tumors: lights and shadows

The incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms has increased in the recent decades. An extensive bibliographical search was performed in PubMed to identify guidelines and primary literature (retrospective and prospective studies, systematic reviews, case series) published mostly between year 1997 and June 2017, using both medical subject heading (MeSH) terms and free-language keywords about the accuracy and diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic ultrasound in the context of gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms. Endoscopic ultrasound is the modality of choice for diagnosing pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms and for the locoregional staging of gastric, duodenal, pancreatic and rectal neuroendocrine neoplasms; in particular, in the setting of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms it has demonstrated higher accuracy in tumor detection than other imaging modalities. Furthermore, the possibility of tattooing pancreatic lesions by endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration may help surgeons to locate the tumor and avoid any demolition surgery. Finally, endoscopic ultrasound-guided therapies have been proposed and used in several studies for patients unsuitable for surgery, with good results on the control of symptoms and the reduction of tumor burden.

Next-generation molecular diagnosis: single-cell sequencing from bench to bedside

Single-cell sequencing (SCS) is a fast-growing, exciting field in genomic medicine. It enables the high-resolution study of cellular heterogeneity, and reveals the molecular basis of complicated systems, which facilitates the identification of new biomarkers for diagnosis and for targeting therapies. It also directly promotes the next generation of genomic medicine because of its ultra-high resolution and sensitivity that allows for the non-invasive and early detection of abnormalities, such as aneuploidy, chromosomal translocation, and single-gene disorders. This review provides an overview of the current progress and prospects for the diagnostic applications of SCS, specifically in pre-implantation genetic diagnosis/screening, non-invasive prenatal diagnosis, and analysis of circulating tumor cells. These analyses will accelerate the early and precise control of germline- or somatic-mutation-based diseases, particularly single-gene disorders, chromosome abnormalities, and cancers.

Surgery management for sporadic small (≤2 cm), non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a consensus statement by the Chinese Study Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (CSNET)

The incidence of small (≤2 cm), non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs) increased in the last decades. Before making appropriate strategy for patients with NF-pNETs ≤2 cm, pathological confirmation is vital. Incidentally diagnosed, sporadic small NF-pNETs may bring aggressive behavior and poor prognosis, such as extrapancreatic extension, lymph nodal metastasis, distant metastasis and recurrence, even causing disease-related death. Understanding and formulating an appropriate strategy for the patients with sporadic small, non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors have been controversial for some time. Although several studies have reported that patients with NF-pNETs ≤2 cm had less rate of malignant behavior compared with larger ones (>2 cm); and the surgery approach may leading to surgery-related pancreatic complications; but there is still a lack of level I evidence to convince surgeons to abandon all cases with sporadic small NF-pNETs. Based on an updated literature search and review, the members of the Chinese Study Group for Neuroendocrine Tumors (CSNET) from high-volume centers have reached a consensus on the issue of the management strategy for the sporadic small NF-pNETs. We recommend that, except for some selected patients with NF-pNETs <1 cm, incidentally discovered and unacceptable surgical risks, all others with NF-pNETs ≤2 cm should undergo tumor resection with lymph node dissection or at least lymph node sampling and careful postoperative surveillance.

Rapid On-Site Evaluation Does Not Improve Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration Adequacy in Pancreatic Masses: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background and Objectives

Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) during endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS–FNA) of pancreatic masses has been reported to be associated with improved adequacy and diagnostic yield. However, recent observational data on the impact of ROSE have reported conflicting results. A meta-analysis and systematic review was therefore conducted to evaluate the contribution of ROSE during EUS-FNA of pancreatic masses.

Method

A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE/Pubmed and EMBASE databases for studies comparing the efficacy of ROSE between patients in two cohorts. Outcomes considered included diagnostic adequate rate, diagnostic yield, number of needle passes, pooled sensitivity and specificity. Findings from a random-effects model were expressed as pooled risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

A total of 7 studies (1299 patients) was finally included and further analyzed in the current meta-analysis. EUS-FNA with ROSE could not improve diagnostic adequacy (RD = 0.05, 95% CI: -0.01–0.11) and diagnostic yield (RD = 0.04 95%CI: -0.05, 0.13). The number of needle passes showed no statistically significant difference with and without ROSE (RD = -0.68 95%CI: -2.35, 0.98). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of ROSE group were 0.91 (95%CI: 0.87, 0.94) and 1 (95%CI: 0.94, 1.00). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of non-ROSE group were 0.85 (95%CI: 0.80, 0.89) and 1 (95%CI: 0.95, 1.00). ROSE group and non-ROSE group showed comparable sensitivity and specificity.

Conclusion

Compared to historical reports of its clinical efficacy in patients with pancreatic lesions, ROSE may be not associated with an improvement of diagnostic yield, adequate rate, pooled sensitivity and specificity.