Continuous arteriovenous hemodialysis: experience in twenty-six intensive care patients

The outcome of critically ill elderly patients with severe acute renal failure treated by continuous hemodiafiltration

Objectives

To study the outcome of critically ill elderly patients with severe acute renal failure managed by continuous hemodiafiltration.

Design

Prospective study.

Setting

Intensive Care Unit of tertiary institution

Patients

Seventy-two consecutive critically ill patients of 65 years or older admitted to the ICU with severe acute renal failure. Seventy similar control patients of age < 65 years.

Intervention

Treatment of all patients with continuous hemodiafiltration. Measurements and main results: Safety and effectiveness of therapy were assessed. Main outcome measures were duration of oliguria, of ICU stay, and hospital stay for survivors, and survival to ICU discharge and to hospital discharge. Mean APACHE II score on admission was 29.8 (95% confidence interval: 28.5 to 31.1) and mean organ failure score prior to initiation of continuous hemodiafiltration was 3.9 (95% confidence interval: 3.6 to 4.2). Sepsis was present in 51 cases (70.8%) and bacteremia or fungemia in 24 (33.3%). Fifty-three (73.6%) required mechanical ventilation for > 3 days. Vasopressor drugs were used in 65 (90.2%). Continuous hemodiafiltration controlled azotemia in all patients and was only associated with minor complications. Thirty-four patients (47.2%) survived to ICU discharge and 30 (41.6%) to hospital discharge. Among survivors, duration of oliguria was 11.6 days (95% confidence interval: 9.1 to 14.1), mean duration of ICU stay 8.6 days (95% confidence interval: 6.1 to 11.) and mean duration of hospital stay 33.1 days (95% confidence interval: 28.8 to 37.4). No statistically significant difference in survival was found when these patients were compared to a control group of similar but younger patients who also received ICU care and continuous hemodiafiltration for the treatment of severe acute renal failure.

Conclusions

A greater than 40% survival was achieved in critically ill elderly patients with severe acute renal failure by the use of continuous hemodiafiltration. These patients had an in hospital survival comparable to that of younger patients. These findings support an aggressive renal replacement approach in such patients and suggest that continuous hemodiafiltration may be ideally suited to their management.

Management of acute renal failure: new perspectives

Despite major developments in medicine, surgery, and intensive care, acute renal failure (ARF) still remains a common problem affecting approximately 5% of all general hospital patients. Mortality of all forms of ARF continues to be greater than 50%, and this percentage has not decreased significantly over the last 30 years. There are multiple factors, which may explain the persistence of such high mortality; the most important of these is probably the evolution of the disease spectrum underlying the development of ARF. At present, ARF is more often observed in older or more complex patients frequently in association with multiorgan system failure. The annual cost of managing ARF is staggering. This article reviews several of the new strategies and approaches that have been developed to aid in the management and prevention of ARF. For example, the use of biocompatible membranes has been proven to positively influence the course of ARF, which necessitates renal replacement therapy. Although continuous renal replacement therapy has a theoretical advantage compared with intermittent hemodialysis in critically ill and hemodynamically unstable patients, there are no well-controlled clinical studies to support a beneficial effect on mortality. There is, however, good evidence that calcium channel blockers play a positive role in the management of ARF, especially that associated with cadaveric kidney transplantation. Vasoactive agents, such as dopamine, may have the advantage of increasing the urine output in patients with oliguric ARF; however, their efficacy in otherwise altering the course of ARF is not well substantiated. Finally, growth factors and atrial natriuretic peptide appear to have the potential for accelerating renal recovery and decreasing morbidity and mortality from this commonly encountered medical problem. Prospective randomized clinical studies are the key to many of the dilemmas encountered with ARF.

Continuous renal replacement therapy for critically ill patients: an update

Despite continuous progress in intensive care during the last decades, the outcome of critically ill patients in whom acute renal failure (ARF) develops is still poor. This outcome may be explained partially by the frequent occurrence of ARF as part of multiple organ systems failure (MOSF). In this complex and unstable patient population, the provision of adequate renal support with either intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis may pose major problems. Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is now increasingly accepted as the preferred treatment modality in the management of ARF in these patients. The technique offers adequate control of biochemistry and fluid balance in hemodynamically unstable patients, thereby enabling aggressive nutritional and inotropic support without the risk of exacerbating azotemia or fluid overload. In addition, experimental and clinical data suggest that CRRT may have a beneficial influence on hemodynamics and gas exchange in patients with septic shock and (nonrenal) MOSF, independent of an impact on fluid balance. We review both technical and clinical aspects of various continuous therapies, including their impact on serum drug levels and nutrient balance. In addition, an attempt is made to clarify the possible beneficial role of CRRT in reducing patient morbidity and mortality in the ICU.

A review of continuous renal replacement therapy

Patients in the Intensive Care Unit commonly develop acute renal failure (ARF). The kidneys are rarely the only organs failing in these patients. Frequently ARF is part of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The choice of dialytic therapy should consider, not only the efficacy of the therapy, but also the undesirable effects such therapy may have on the other failing organs. Intermittent Haemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis were the conventional forms of dialysis available. Both are associated with complications which may make them unsuitable for use in the haemodynamically unstable, hypercatabolic patients, seen in the Intensive Care setting. Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (CRRT) has been introduced in many Intensive Care Units to provide a more stable, flexible form of dialysis. The purpose of this article is to give an overview of the various forms of CRRT and to discuss the advantages of this form of therapy.

Acute continuous hemodiafiltration: a prospective study of 110 patients and a review of the literature

One hundred ten critically ill patients with acute renal failure receiving acute continuous hemodiafiltration (ACHD) in our intensive care unit were studied prospectively. Acute continuous hemodiafiltration consisted either of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration or of continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration, and was used for 17,817 hours (mean duration of patient treatment, 161.9 hours), resulting in a fall from a mean pre-ACHD urea of 35.7 mmol/L to a plateau value of 16.8 mmol/L at 72 hours of treatment. The mean urea clearance achieved was 24.9 mL/min. Eighty of these patients (72.7%) were receiving artificial ventilation at the time of ACHD and 45 (40.9%) had more than four failing organs. The mean APACHE II score was 27.7. Despite the degree of illness severity, 42 patients (32.2%) survived to discharge from hospital. The use of ACHD was associated with hemodynamic stability, rapid normalization of electrolytes, and the ability to freely administer drugs, blood, and/or blood products. It also allowed for maintenance of an aggressive, nitrogen-rich, nutritional regimen. Support of these critically ill patients with acute renal failure using ACHD was achieved safely and without the employment of additional dialysis-trained nursing staff. Our own experience and a review of the available literature strongly suggest that the advantages associated with the use of ACHD therapies are clinically significant and support the view that ACHD is a modality of renal replacement most suited to critically ill patients with acute renal failure.