The Presence of Intra- or Subretinal Fluid during the Loading Phase in the Treatment of Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Intravitreal Ranibizumab Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

Association Between Visual Acuity and Residual Retinal Fluid Following Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Importance

The association between residual subretinal fluid (SRF) and intraretinal fluid (IRF) and visual acuity following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment is not well understood.

Objective

To examine the association of residual retinal fluid, SRF, and IRF with visual acuity following anti-VEGF treatment in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).

Data Sources

A systematic literature search was performed from January 2005 to August 2021 using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library.

Study Selection

Peer-reviewed articles reporting on visual acuity stratified by the presence or absence of any residual SRF, IRF, or any retinal fluid at last study observation after intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, aflibercept, or brolucizumab in patients with nAMD were included. Studies that were noncomparative, included fewer than 10 eyes, or reported on other anti-VEGF agents were excluded.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers conducted data extraction and synthesis. The Cochrane risk of bias tool 2 and ROBINS-I were used to assess risk of bias and GRADE evaluation was conducted to assess certainty of evidence.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary outcomes were BCVA at last study observation, change in BCVA from baseline, and retinal thickness at last study observation.

Results

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, 11 studies (6 randomized clinical trials [RCTs]) comprising 3092 eyes were included in our analysis. Across all included studies, the BCVA of eyes with residual SRF was better than eyes without SRF (weighted mean difference [WMD], 3.1 letter score; 95% CI, 0.05 to 6.18; P = .05; GRADE, low certainty of evidence; 6 studies; 1931 eyes) but similar in RCTs (WMD, 2.7 letter score; 95% CI, -2.40 to 7.84; P = .30; GRADE, low certainty of evidence; 3 studies; 1406 eyes). The BCVA of eyes with residual IRF was worse than that of eyes without IRF (WMD, -8.2 letter score; 95% CI, -11.79 to -4.50; P < .001; GRADE, low; 7 studies; 2114 eyes).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that the presence of residual SRF was associated with slightly better BCVA at last study observation; however, baseline differences in BCVA existed and this conclusion was primarily driven by 1 study. The presence of residual IRF was associated with substantially worse BCVA at last study observation and less improvement of BCVA from baseline. The conclusions are limited by the inclusion of data from observational studies, heterogeneity, and a low certainty of evidence.

IMPACT OF FLUID COMPARTMENTS ON FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOR PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Systematic Literature Review

PURPOSE

Understanding the impact of fluid in different retinal compartments is critical to developing treatment paradigms that optimize visual acuity and reduce treatment burden in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. This systematic review aimed to determine the impact of persistent/new subretinal fluid, intraretinal fluid, and subretinal pigment epithelial fluid on visual acuity over 1 year of treatment.

METHODS

Publication eligibility and data extraction were conducted according to Cochrane methods: 27 of the 1,797 screened records were eligible.

RESULTS

Intraretinal fluid negatively affected visual acuity at baseline and throughout treatment, with foveal intraretinal fluid associated with lower visual acuity than extrafoveal intraretinal fluid. Some studies found that subretinal fluid (particularly subfoveal) was associated with higher visual acuity at Year 1 and longer term, and others suggested subretinal fluid did not affect visual acuity at Years 1 and 2. Data on the effects of subretinal pigment epithelial fluid were scarce, and consensus was not reached. Few studies reported numbers of injections associated with fluid status.

CONCLUSION

To optimally manage neovascular age-related macular degeneration, clinicians should understand the impact of fluid compartments on visual acuity. After initial treatment, antivascular endothelial growth factor regimens that tolerate stable subretinal fluid (if visual acuity is stable/improved) but not intraretinal fluid may enable patients to achieve their best possible visual acuity. Confirmatory studies are required to validate these findings.

Predominantly Persistent Subretinal Fluid in the Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials

OBJECTIVE

To describe predominantly persistent subretinal fluid (SRF) in eyes receiving ranibizumab or bevacizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration and to compare visual acuity (VA) to eyes with nonpersistent SRF.

DESIGN

Cohort within randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials patients assigned to pro re nata treatment.

METHODS

Graders evaluated monthly OCT scans for SRF. Predominantly persistent SRF through week 12 was defined as SRF at baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12. Predominantly persistent SRF through 1 or 2 years was defined as SRF in 80% or more of visits by years 1 or 2, respectively. Linear regression models including baseline predictors of VA and predominantly persistent intraretinal fluid (IRF) were used to evaluate mean differences in vision outcomes.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Predominantly persistent SRF through year 1, adjusted VA score and VA change, and foveal SRF thickness.

RESULTS

Among 406 eyes with baseline SRF, SRF persisted in 108 eyes (26.6%) through week 12, in 94 eyes (23.2%) through year 1, and in 77 eyes (19.0%) through year 2. Adjusted VA means at year 1 were similar between eyes with predominantly persistent versus non persistent SRF by week 12 (68.1 vs. 70.2 letters; P = 0.18), year 1 (67.6 vs. 70.2 letters; P = 0.11), and year 2 (71.4 vs. 70.9 letters; P = 0.78). Adjusted changes in mean VA at year 1 were similar between eyes with predominantly persistent versus nonpersistent SRF by week 12 (6.3 vs. 7.6 letters; P = 0.38), year 1 (5.5 vs. 7.8 letters; P = 0.14), and year 2 (8.1 vs. 7.7 letters; P = 0.78). Among eyes with predominantly persistent SRF through year 1, foveal SRF was absent in 46 eyes (48.9%), thickness was 1 to 200 μm in 48 eyes (50.0%) and more than 200 μm in 1 eye (1.1%) at year 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Eyes with predominantly persistent and nonpersistent SRF through week 12, year 1, or year 2 showed similar VA outcomes after adjustment for baseline covariates and persistent IRF. At the foveal center, predominantly persistent SRF was most commonly absent or present in small quantities.

ASSESSMENT OF EARLY CHANGES IN SPECTRAL DOMAIN-OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AFTER INITIATION OF TREATMENT WITH INTRAVITREAL AFLIBERCEPT (EYLEA) OVER A 12-WEEK PERIOD FOR PATIENTS WITH NEOVASCULAR AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION: A Multicenter French Study (START)

PURPOSE

To assess early changes in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography during the loading phase with intravitreal aflibercept therapy in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

METHODS

In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study, patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration, who were antivascular endothelial growth factor treatment-naïve, received three monthly initial doses of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with dry spectral-domain optical coherence tomography at 12 weeks, defined as an absence of intraretinal edema, intraretinal cysts, subretinal fluid, and subretinal pigment epithelium fluid.

RESULTS

Fifty eyes of 50 patients were investigated. At 12 weeks, 34.0% (17/50) had dry spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Marked reductions were observed for all other spectral-domain optical coherence tomography parameters. The mean macular central thickness fell significantly from 463.2 ± 184.3 µm at baseline to 288.9 ± 76.8 µm at Week 12 (P < 0.0001). The mean best-corrected visual acuity also improved significantly from 61.0 ± 16.0 letters at baseline to 66.6 ± 19.0 letters at Week 12 (P = 0.0006).

CONCLUSION

The anatomic and functional outcomes improved over the 12-week study period. All outcome variables peaked after the third aflibercept injection, confirming the benefit of three initial doses.

Optical Coherence Tomography for Ophthalmology Imaging

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a depth-resolved imaging modality, which is able to achieve micrometer-scale resolution within biological tissue noninvasively. In the past 30 years, researchers all around the world had made several essential efforts on techniques relevant to OCT. OCT has become a routine process for eye diseases with different types. In this chapter, the three important stages in the development of OCT are briefly illustrated, including the time domain OCT (TD-OCT), the frequency domain OCT (FD-OCT) and the optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Each of the technique has made great progress for use on living human eye imaging in clinical applications. TD-OCT was first proposed and commercialized, which is able to achieve acceptable 2D depth-resolved cross-sectional images of human retina in vivo. FD-OCT was the upgraded OCT technique compared with TD-OCT. By capturing the coherent signal within the Fourier space, the FD-OCT could improve the image sensitivity compared with TD-OCT, and achieve dozens of kilo hertz imaging speed. OCTA is the newest developments of OCT technique, which is able to visualize the micro vasculature networks of human retina in vivo. With OCTA technique, the newest ophthalmologic OCT system is able to achieve detailed diagnosis for both micro-structure and vasculature abnormalities for clinical applications. The further development of OCT technique on imaging speed, contrast, resolution, field of view, and so on will make OCT to be a more powerful tool for clinical usages.