Mitochondrial Dysfunction in a Patient with 8q21.11 Deletion and Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease Type 2K due to GDAP1 Haploinsufficiency

Whole genome sequencing followed by functional analysis of genomic deletion encompassing ERCC8 and NDUFAF2 genes in a non-consanguineous Indian family reveals dysfunctional mitochondrial bioenergetics leading to infant mortality

Genomic investigations on an infant who presented with a putative mitochondrial disorder led to identification of compound heterozygous deletion with an overlapping region of ∼142 kb encompassing two nuclear encoded genes namely ERCC8 and NDUFAF2. Investigations on fetal-derived fibroblast culture demonstrated impaired bioenergetics and mitochondrial dysfunction, which explains the phenotype and observed infant mortality in the present study. The genetic findings from this study extended the utility of whole-genome sequencing as it led to development of a MLPA-based assay for carrier screening in the extended family and the prenatal testing aiding in the birth of two healthy children.

T-cell Lymphoblastic Lymphoma in a Patient With Chromosome 8q21.11 Microdeletion

The chromosome 8q21.11 deletion syndrome is an extremely rare genetic condition characterized by facial dysmorphic features, Peters anomaly and impaired intellectual development. We report a case of a 2-year-old female with chromosome 8q21.11-q21.2 microdeletion complicated by T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma. Whole genome single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray detected an interstitial deletion of 8q21.11 to q.21.2, including 16 genes. Autopsy findings revealed a T-cell lymphoblastic lymphoma presenting as an anterior mediastinal mass, encroaching upon the aortic arch, left subclavian artery, left carotid bifurcation and trachea. The genes that may contribute to a neoplastic process are identified (PKIA, IL7, TPD52, PAG1, and FABP5) and discussed in this article.

8q21.11 microdeletion syndrome: Delineation of HEY1 as a candidate gene in neurodevelopmental and cardiac defects

BACKGROUND

8q21.11 microdeletion syndrome is a rare chromosomal disorder characterized by recurrent dysmorphic features, a variable degree of intellectual disability and ocular, cardiac and hand/feet abnormalities. To date, ZFHX4 is the only candidate gene implicated in the ocular findings. In this study, we evaluated a patient with a de novo 8q21.13-21.3 deletion to define a new small region of overlap (SRO) for this entity.

METHODS

We conducted a clinical evaluation and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) 4x44K microarrays in a patient with de novo unbalanced translocation t(8;16)(q21; q11.2).

RESULTS

The case, a 6-year-old boy, presented dysmorphic features including an elongated face, brachycephaly with a high forehead, an underdeveloped ala, thin upper lip, micrognathia, low-set ears, hypotonia, mild intellectual disability, cortical atrophy with thin corpus callosum defect, and an atrial septal defect. No ocular abnormalities were found. Microarray analysis revealed a 9.6 Mb interstitial 8q21.11-21.3 deletion, not including the ZFHX4 gene. This microdeletion was confirmed in our patient through qPCR analysis, and both parents had a normal profile. Alignment analysis of our case defined a new SRO encompassing five genes. Among them, the HEY1 gene is involved in the embryonic development of the heart, central nervous system, and vascular system. Hrt1/Hey1 null mice show perinatal lethality due to congenital malformations of the aortic arch and its branch arteries. HEY1 has also been linked to the maintenance of neural stem cells, inhibition of oligodendrocyte differentiation, and myelin gene expression.

CONCLUSION

HEY1 is a candidate gene for both neurological and cardiac features of the 8q21.11 microdeletion syndrome and might, therefore, explain specific components of its pathophysiology.

Identification of novel pathogenic copy number variations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a hereditary sensory-motor neuropathy characterized by a strong clinical and genetic heterogeneity. Over the past few years, with the occurrence of whole-exome sequencing (WES) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS), the molecular diagnosis rate has been improved by allowing the screening of more than 80 genes at one time. In CMT, except the recurrent PMP22 duplication accounting for about 60% of pathogenic variations, pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) are rarely reported and only a few studies screening specifically CNVs have been performed. The aim of the present study was to screen for CNVs in the most prevalent genes associated with CMT in a cohort of 200 patients negative for the PMP22 duplication. CNVs were screened using the Exome Depth software on next generation sequencing (NGS) data obtained by targeted capture and sequencing of a panel of 81 CMT associated genes. Deleterious CNVs were identified in four patients (2%), in four genes: GDAP1, LRSAM1, GAN, and FGD4. All CNVs were confirmed by high-resolution oligonucleotide array Comparative Genomic Hybridization (aCGH) and/or quantitative PCR. By identifying four new CNVs in four different genes, we demonstrate that, although they are rare mutational events in CMT, CNVs might contribute significantly to mutational spectrum of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and should be searched in routine NGS diagnosis. This strategy increases the molecular diagnosis rate of patients with neuropathy.

[Analysis of GDAP1 gene mutation in a pedigree with autosomal dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the molecular genetic mechanism of Charcot- Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease in a pedigree.

METHODS

Genomic DNA was extracted from the peripheral blood of the family members of a pedigree with autosomal dominant CMT disease, and 65 candidate genes of the proband were screened using target exon capture and the next generation sequencing, and the suspicious genes were verified using Sanger sequencing. PolyPhen-2, PROVEAN and SIFT software were used to predict the function of the mutant genes, and PyMOL-1 software was used to simulate the mutant protein structure.

RESULTS

A heterozygous missense mutation [c.371A>G (p.Y124C)] was detected in exon 3 of GDAP1 gene of the proband. This heterozygous mutation was also detected in both the proband's mother and her brother, but not in her father. Multiple sequence alignment analysis showed that tyrosine at codon 124 of GDAP1 protein was highly conserved. All the 3 prediction software predicted that the mutation was harmful. Molecular structure simulation showed a weakened interaction force between the amino acid residues at codon 124 and the surrounding amino acid residues to affect the overall stability of the protein.

CONCLUSIONS

The mutation of GDAP1 gene may be related to the pathogenesis of autosomal dominant AD-CMT in this pedigree. The newly discovered c.371A>G mutation (p.Y124C) expands the mutation spectrum of GDAP1 gene, but further study is needed to clarify the underlying pathogenesis.

Clinical and mutational spectrum of Japanese patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease caused by GDAP1 variants

BACKGROUND

Mutations in GDAP1 are responsible for heterogeneous clinical and electrophysiological phenotypes of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), with autosomal dominant or recessive inheritance pattern. The aim of this study is to identify the clinical and mutational spectrum of CMT patients with GDAP1 variants in Japan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 2007 to October 2014, using three state-of-art technologies, we conducted gene panel sequencing in a cohort of 1,030 patients with inherited peripheral neuropathies (IPNs), and 398 mutation-negative cases were further analyzed with whole-exome sequencing.

RESULTS

We identified GDAP1 variants from 10 patients clinically diagnosed with CMT. The most frequent recessive variant in our cohort (5/10), c.740C>T (p.A247V), was verified to be associated with a founder event. We also detected three novel likely pathogenic variants: c.928C>T (p.R310W) and c.546delA (p.E183Kfs*23) in Case 2 and c.376G>A (p.E126K) in Case 8. Nerve conduction study or sural nerve biopsy of all 10 patients indicated axonal type peripheral neuropathy.

CONCLUSION

We identified GDAP1 variants in approximately 1% of our cohort with IPNs, and established a founder mutation in half of these patients. Our study originally described the mutational spectrum and clinical features of GDAP1-related CMT patients in Japan.

Primary Mitochondrial Disease and Secondary Mitochondrial Dysfunction: Importance of Distinction for Diagnosis and Treatment

Mitochondrial disease refers to a heterogeneous group of disorders resulting in defective cellular energy production due to abnormal oxidative phosphorylation (oxphos). Primary mitochondrial disease (PMD) is diagnosed clinically and ideally, but not always, confirmed by a known or indisputably pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) or nuclear DNA (nDNA) mutation. The PMD genes either encode oxphos proteins directly or they affect oxphos function by impacting production of the complex machinery needed to run the oxphos process. However, many disorders have the 'mitochondrial' phenotype without an identifiable mtDNA or nDNA mutation or they have a variant of unknown clinical significance. Secondary mitochondrial dysfunction (SMD) can be caused by genes encoding neither function nor production of the oxphos proteins and accompanies many hereditary non-mitochondrial diseases. SMD may also be due to nongenetic causes such as environmental factors. In our practice, we see many patients with clinical signs of mitochondrial dysfunction based on phenotype, biomarkers, imaging, muscle biopsy, or negative/equivocal mtDNA or nDNA test results. In these cases, it is often tempting to assign a patient's phenotype to 'mitochondrial disease', but SMD is often challenging to distinguish from PMD. Fortunately, rapid advances in molecular testing, made possible by next generation sequencing, have been effective at least in some cases in establishing accurate diagnoses to distinguish between PMD and SMD. This is important, since their treatments and prognoses can be quite different. However, even in the absence of the ability to distinguish between PMD and SMD, treating SMD with standard treatments for PMD can be effective. We review the latest findings regarding mitochondrial disease/dysfunction and give representative examples in which differentiation between PMD and SMD has been crucial for diagnosis and treatment.