1
|
Toshima T, Inada R, Sakamoto S, Takeda E, Yoshioka T, Kumon K, Mimura N, Takata N, Tabuchi M, Oishi K, Sato T, Sui K, Okabayashi T, Ozaki K, Nakamura T, Shibuya Y, Matsumoto M, Iwata J. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix: Six case reports. World J Clin Cases 2024; 12:5217-5224. [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i22.5217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2024] [Revised: 05/21/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) of the appendix is a rare tumor characterized by neuroendocrine and adenocarcinoma features. Accurate preoperative diagnosis is very difficult, with most patients complaining mainly of abdominal pain. Computed tomography shows swelling of the appendix, so diagnosis is usually made incidentally after appendectomy based on a preoperative diagnosis of appendicitis. Even if a patient undergoes preoperative colonoscopy, accurate endoscopic diagnosis is very difficult because GCC shows a submucosal growth pattern with invasion of the appendiceal wall.
CASE SUMMARY Between 2017 and 2022, 6 patients with GCC were treated in our hospital. The presenting complaint for 5 of these 6 patients was abdominal pain. All 5 patients underwent appendectomy, including 4 for a preoperative diagnosis of appendicitis and the other for diagnosis and treatment of an appendiceal tumor. The sixth patient presented with vomiting and underwent ileocecal resection for GCC diagnosed from preoperative biopsy. Although 2 patients with GCC underwent colonoscopy, no neoplastic changes were identified. Two of the six patients showed lymph node metastasis on pathological examination. As of the last follow-up (median: 15 mo), all cases remained alive without recurrence.
CONCLUSION As preoperative diagnosis of GCC is difficult, this possibility must be considered during surgical treatments for presumptive appendicitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshiaki Toshima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Ryo Inada
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Shinya Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Eri Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Takahiro Yoshioka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Kento Kumon
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Naoki Mimura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Nobuo Takata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Motoyasu Tabuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Oishi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Takuji Sato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Kenta Sui
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Takehiro Okabayashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Kazuhide Ozaki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Toshio Nakamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Yuichi Shibuya
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Manabu Matsumoto
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| | - Jun Iwata
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi 781-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakashima K, Hashimoto M, Kitamura Y, Shinohara M, Yamaguchi M, Hamaoka M, Miguchi M, Misumi T, Fujikuni N, Ikeda S, Matsugu Y, Nishisaka T, Nakahara H. Peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma mimicking white pus caused by peritonitis following appendicitis: an instructive case report. Surg Case Rep 2024; 10:45. [PMID: 38383872 PMCID: PMC10881908 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-024-01847-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell adenocarcinoma is an extremely rare tumor in which the same cells exhibit both mucinous and neuroendocrine differentiation. It is considered more aggressive compared to conventional carcinoids and more likely to cause metastasis. CASE PRESENTATION We report a case of goblet cell adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases. A 62-year-old man underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Intraoperatively, inflammatory white pus and a small amount of dirty ascites were observed in the lower abdomen with severely inflamed appendix. Histopathological examination of the specimen collected during appendectomy revealed goblet cell adenocarcinoma with a positive surgical margin. One month later, additional ileal resection was planned. Laparoscopic examination revealed disseminated nodules throughout the abdominal cavity. Therefore, the patient underwent resection of the peritoneal nodules. The peritoneal specimens confirmed the histopathological findings. Thus we diagnosed the patient with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS In cases wherein white pus is observed during surgery for acute appendicitis, considering the possibility of dissemination, collecting samples for histopathological examination, and initiating early treatment are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keigo Nakashima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Masakazu Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan.
| | - Yoshihito Kitamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinohara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Mizuki Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Michinori Hamaoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Masashi Miguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Misumi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Fujikuni
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsugu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishisaka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang N, Lu Y, Wang R, Gao P, Liu G. Clinical benefits of FOLFOXIRI combined with bevacizumab for advanced-stage primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2023; 102:e34412. [PMID: 37543827 PMCID: PMC10402943 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000034412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Signet-ring cell carcinoma, which is an infrequent type of colorectal cancer. Abdominal pain is the primary presenting complaint of patients with acute appendicitis. It is difficult to diagnose patients with appendiceal carcinomas accompanying with symptoms of acute appendicitis. PATIENT CONCERNS A 33-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital, with chief complaints of "bilateral pelvic space-occupying lesions for 1 month, aggravated abdominal distension, and she accompanied with diarrhea for 3 days." DIAGNOSIS The patient was with primary signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix, presented with acute appendicitis, as well as bilateral ovarian metastasis and peritoneal implantation metastasis. INTERVENTIONS She was then treated with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, calcium folinate, 5-FU combined with bevacizumab, surgical treatment, and postoperative adjuvant treatment with oxaliplatin, capecitabine regimen to consolidate the efficacy. OUTCOMES The patient is in good conditions, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy is in progress as well. CONCLUSION The outcomes highlighted the importance of strict histopathologic assessment for appendiceal adenocarcinoma, and provided new ideas for the diagnosis and treatment of advanced-stage signet ring cell carcinoma of the appendix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nana Huang
- The Second Ward of Gastroenterology, Cancer Hospital of Liaoning Provience
| | - Yishan Lu
- Department of Dermatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ping Gao
- Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Ge Liu
- Department of Anorectal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gaillard M, Van Eyken P, Verswijvel G, Van der Speeten K. Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoma: Role of Cytoreductive Surgery (CRS) and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC). Indian J Surg Oncol 2023; 14:240-249. [PMID: 37359931 PMCID: PMC10284751 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-023-01748-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Goblet cell carcinoma (GCC) encompasses a separate entity in appendiceal neoplasms with mixed glandular and neuro-endocrine pathological features. GCC mostly presents as an acute appendicitis duo to luminal obstruction or as an incidental finding on the surgical appendectomy specimen. In case of tumour perforation or presence of other risk factors, guidelines suggest additional treatment with a completing right hemicolectomy or cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). We report the case of a 77-year-old male with symptoms of appendicitis for which an appendectomy was performed. The appendix was ruptured during the procedure. There was an incidental finding of GCC on the pathological specimen. Because of possible tumour soiling, the patient received a prophylactic CRS-HIPEC. A literature review was performed to investigate the potential role for CRS-HIPEC as a curative treatment in patients with GCC. GCC of the appendix is an aggressive type of tumour with a high risk of peritoneal and systemic dissemination. CRS and HIPEC is a treatment option: both in a prophylactic setting and in patients with established peritoneal metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M. Gaillard
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
| | - P. Van Eyken
- Department of Pathology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
| | - G. Verswijvel
- Department of Radiology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
| | - K. Van der Speeten
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Schiepse Bos 6, 3600 Genk, Belgium
- Department of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
The Incidental Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:1301-1304. [PMID: 36228498 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
6
|
Cho YM, Abidoye O, Wang J, Bhushan S, Miyara SJ, Guevara S, Molmenti EP, LoCicero RJ, Ilyas JA. A rare case of advance goblet cell carcinoma and a narrative review. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER: CASE REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpccr.2022.100181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
|
7
|
Palmer K, Weerasuriya S, Chandrakumaran K, Rous B, White BE, Paisey S, Srirajaskanthan R, Ramage JK. Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix: A Systematic Review and Incidence and Survival of 1,225 Cases From an English Cancer Registry. Front Oncol 2022; 12:915028. [PMID: 35903705 PMCID: PMC9314749 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.915028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundGoblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) of the appendix is a rare and aggressive tumour with varying nomenclature and classification systems. This has led to heterogeneity in published data, and there is a lack of consensus on incidence, survival, and management.MethodsWe provide an overview of GCA with a comprehensive systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and a retrospective analysis of all cases recorded in the English National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database between 1995 and 2018. The Kaplan–Meier estimator was used to calculate overall survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors.ResultsThe systematic review demonstrated an incidence of 0.05–0.3 per 100,000 per year among North American registry studies. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate was 95.5%, 85.9%–87.6%, and 76.0%–80.6%, respectively. Age, stage, and grade were identified as prognostic factors for survival. Our analysis included 1,225 cases. Age-standardised incidence was 0.0335 per year in 1995 and gradually rose to 0.158 per year in 2018. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate was 90.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 85.4–94.0], 76.0% (95% CI: 73.8–80.9), and 68.6% (95% CI: 65.9–72.2), respectively. On univariate Cox regression analyses, female sex, stage, and grade were associated with worse overall survival. On multivariate analysis, only stage remained a statistically significant prognostic factor.ConclusionsGCA of the appendix is rare, but incidence is increasing. We report a lower incidence and survival than North American registry studies. Higher stage was associated with decreased survival. Further prospective studies are required to establish optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran Palmer
- Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Kieran Palmer,
| | - Scott Weerasuriya
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King’s College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kandiah Chandrakumaran
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Rous
- National Health Service (NHS) Digital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin E. White
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Sangeeta Paisey
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King’s College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John K. Ramage
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gangi A, Shah R. The Landmark Series: Appendiceal Primary Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:2056-2068. [PMID: 34853944 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10856-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Appendiceal primary peritoneal surface malignancies are rare and include a broad spectrum of pathologies ranging from indolent disease to aggressive disease. As such, the data that drive the management of appendiceal peritoneal surface malignancies is generally not based on prospective clinical trial data, but rather consists of level 1 data based on retrospective studies and high-volume institutional experiences. Complete surgical debulking typically offers the best chance for long-term survival. This review highlights the landmark articles on which management of primary appendiceal peritoneal surface malignancies are based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Rupen Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tamiya M, Matsuda K, Iwamoto H, Mitani Y, Mizumoto Y, Nakamura Y, Sakanaka T, Takemoto N, Hyo T, Iwamoto R, Yamaue H. Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma with peritoneal recurrence 9 years after surgery. Int Cancer Conf J 2021; 11:57-61. [DOI: 10.1007/s13691-021-00519-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
10
|
Alabraba E, Pritchard DM, Griffin R, Diaz-Nieto R, Banks M, Cuthbertson DJ, Fenwick S. Appendiceal goblet cell carcinomas have poor survival despite completion surgery. Endocrine 2021; 73:734-744. [PMID: 33891259 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02727-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Appendiceal goblet cell carcinomas (aGCCs) are rare but aggressive tumours associated with significant mortality. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of aGCC patients treated at our tertiary referral centre. METHODS We analysed aGCC patients, diagnosed between 1990-2016, assessing the impact of completion surgery and tumour factors on survival. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS We identified 41 patients (23 F, 18 M); median age 61 (range 27-79) years. Mean tumour size was 10.5 (range 0.5-50) mm; most tumours were located in the appendiceal tip (n = 18, 45%). Appendicectomy was the index surgery in 32 patients, 24 of whom subsequently underwent completion surgery at median 3 (range 1.3-13.3) months later. Histology from completion surgery showed residual disease in 8 patients: nodal disease (n = 2) or residual tumour (n = 6). Index surgery for the rest was either colectomy (n = 7) or cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) (n = 1). Index and completion surgery had 0% mortality and 2.5% morbidity. Overall and recurrence-free survival were not significantly affected by tumour grade or completion surgery. Disease recurred in 9 patients after a median follow-up of 57.0 (4.6-114.9) months; 7 of these patients died during follow-up. Recurrences were treated with CRS-HIPEC (n = 1), palliative chemotherapy (n = 3) or supportive care (n = 5). Five- and ten- year overall survival were 85.3% and 62.3% respectively; 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival were 73.6% and 50.6%. CONCLUSION The prognosis of aGCCs remains relatively poor. Completion surgery did not prevent recurrence or improve survival, but this needs to be verified with a larger patient cohort. The high mortality associated with tumour recurrence questions current treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Alabraba
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | - David Mark Pritchard
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine; Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Griffin
- Liverpool Clinical and Cancer Research UK Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Banks
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel James Cuthbertson
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Fenwick
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kowalsky SJ, Nassour I, AlMasri S, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH, Choudry HA, Pingpank JF. Omission of Right Hemicolectomy May be Safe for Some Appendiceal Goblet Cell Adenocarcinomas: A Survival Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8916-8925. [PMID: 34409541 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10191-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCC) are rare tumors with clinical behavior between classic carcinoids and adenocarcinomas. Current guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy for all GCCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried for appendiceal GCCs undergoing appendectomy or right hemicolectomy between 2004 and 2016. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and post-operative outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was examined by surgical type and tumor T stage. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS In total, 1083 GCCs were included, and 81.8% underwent right hemicolectomy. Mean age was 57 years, and 89% were White. Patients undergoing hemicolectomy had higher T-stage tumors (66.6%/14.4% T3/T4 vs. 55.8%/8.1%, p < 0.001). Lymph node positivity increased with T stage (1.1%, 2.1%, 9.9%, and 29.1% for T1-T4). GCCs undergoing colectomy were more frequently moderately or poorly differentiated (16.7%/9.0% vs. 12.2%/6.6%, p = 0.011). Appendectomy surgical margins were positive in 17.3% (3.4% hemicolectomy, p < 0.001). In T3/T4 tumors, a significant survival benefit at 5 years was observed in patients undergoing colectomy as compared with appendectomy (85.4% vs. 82.0%, p = 0.028). On multivariate analysis, lymph node positivity markedly decreased survival overall for the entire cohort (HR 7.58, p < 0.001) and for T3/T4 tumors (HR 7.63, p < 0.001). In patients with T3/T4 tumors, there was a trend towards improved survival with right hemicolectomy (HR 0.42, p = 0.068). CONCLUSION Omitting right hemicolectomy can be considered for select T1/T2 appendiceal GCCs with negative appendectomy margins, given low rates of lymph node metastases and lack of survival benefit with right hemicolectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy J Kowalsky
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Samer AlMasri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang G, Li Q, Chen W. Chemotherapy in the treatment of different histological types of appendiceal cancers: a SEER based study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:778. [PMID: 34225672 PMCID: PMC8259079 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08502-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Due to its rarity and high heterogeneity, neither established guidelines nor prospective data are currently available for using chemotherapy in the treatment of appendiceal cancer. This study was to determine the use of chemotherapy and its potential associations with survival in patients with different histological types of the cancer. Methods Patients with histologically different appendiceal cancers diagnosed during 1998–2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The role and effect of chemotherapy were examined in the treatment of the disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to construct survival curves and significance was examined by Log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were used to analyze the impact of chemotherapy and other variables on survival in these patients. Results A total of 8733 appendiceal cancer patients were identified from the database. Chemotherapy was administrated at highly variable rates in different histological types of appendiceal cancer. As high as 64.0% signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), 46.4% of mucinous adenocarcinomas (MAC), 40.6% of non-mucinous adenocarcinoma (NMAC) and 43.9% of mixed neuroendocrine non-neuroendocrine neoplasms (MiNENs) were treated with chemotherapy, whereas only 14.7% of goblet cell carcinoma (GCC), 5% neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and 1.6% carcinomas (NEC) received chemotherapy. In all patients combined, chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival during the entire study period and cancer-specific survival was improved during in cases from 2012–2016. Further multivariate analysis showed that both cancer-specific and overall survival was significantly improved with chemotherapy in patients with MAC, NMAC and SRCC, but not for patients with GCC, MiNENs, NETs and NECs. Number (> 12) of lymph node sampled was associated with survival of patients with most histological types of cancer under study. Other prognostic factors related to individual histological types were identified. Conclusions Chemotherapy is administrated at highly variable rates in different histological types of appendiceal cancer. Efficacy of chemotherapy in the treatment of these cancers has been improved in recent years and is significantly associated with better survival for patients with NMAC, MAC, and SRCC. Adequate lymph node sampling may result in a survival benefit for most of these patients. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08502-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Wang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Qiken Li
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China
| | - Weiping Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, 310022, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Pathology is central to the management of peritoneal surface malignancy. This article highlights some recent advances that have had an impact on patient management or could do so in the near future. Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma, particularly the epithelioid subtype, is amenable to radical therapy in selected cases, and factors such as ki67 proliferation index, expression of BAP1 and mutation in CDKN2A show promise as prognostic indicators. Our understanding of multicystic mesothelioma has improved in recent years; it is a true neoplasm for which surgery may be indicated. Serous carcinomas involving the peritoneum are now known to originate from tubal epithelium. They are of two distinct types, high grade and low grade, which are now recognized as different neoplasms with distinctive features, oncogenesis and behavior. Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an unusual condition that usually arises from an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Recent consensus in the classification and nomenclature of these lesions is discussed, including the distinction between low grade and high grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (HAMN), and the diagnostic criteria for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. PMP is divided into four prognostic groups: acellular mucin, low grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei, high grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei, and high grade mucinous carcinoma peritonei with signet ring cells. The pseudomyxoma microbiome is a promising area for clinical intervention but has been the subject of little research activity. Goblet cell adenocarcinoma (previously known as 'goblet cell carcinoid') is a distinctive type of appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Its behavior correlates with histologic features, but no general consensus for classification has been reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norman John Carr
- Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sigley K, Franklin M, Welch S. Appendiceal Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma Case Report and Review of the Literature. Cureus 2021; 13:e13511. [PMID: 33786220 PMCID: PMC7992912 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.13511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Acute appendicitis is a common presentation to the emergency department. The common pathogenesis thereof relates to obstruction of the appendiceal lumen by an appendicolith, which leads to an increase in intraluminal and intramural pressure. This is followed by distension of the appendix, subsequent small vessel occlusion and lymphatic stasis, and appendiceal wall ischemia and necrosis, eventually leading to rupture if not treated. Occasionally tumors at the base of the appendix can lead to appendicitis via the same process as an appendicolith. Goblet cell adenocarcinoma (alternatively named goblet cell carcinoid) is amongst the most rare appendiceal tumors, with a reported incidence rate of 0.05 cases per 100,000 population per year in the United States. These tumors contain features of both neuroendocrine tumors as well as adenocarcinomas, but behave more similarly to adenocarcinomas. Consensus regarding management of these tumors is lacking, likely due to the rarity of the disease. In this paper, we present a case of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma causing appendicitis and review the literature regarding these rare epithelial tumors.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zakka K, Williamson S, Jiang R, Reid MD, Alese OB, Shaib WL, Wu C, Behera M, El-Rayes BF, Akce M. Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial for stage II-III goblet cell carcinoid/goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix? Surg Oncol 2020; 36:120-129. [PMID: 33360118 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoma (GCC), formerly known as goblet cell carcinoid, of the appendix constitutes less than 14% of all primary appendiceal neoplasms. Surgical resection is the main treatment and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is not established. This study aims to evaluate the impact of AC in stage II-III appendiceal GCC. METHODS Patients with pathological stage II and III GCC who underwent surgical resection between 2006 and 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8243/3 (goblet cell carcinoid) and C18.1. Patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic and/or radiation therapy and adjuvant radiation were excluded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier Curves were used to compare overall survival (OS) based on treatment received with Log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 619 patients were identified. 54.4% males and 89.0% Caucasian; median age 56 (range, 23-90) years. Distribution across pathological stages II-III was 82.7% (N = 512) and 17.3% (N = 107) respectively. AC was administered in 9.4% (N = 48) of stage II and 47.7% (N = 51) of stage III patients. For stage II patients, AC was not associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.04-2.34; p = 0.261) or multivariable analyses (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.04-2.12; p = 0.221). By contrast, in stage III patients, AC was associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-0.71; p = 0.004) and multivariable analyses (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.88; p = 0.031). In the entire cohort 5-year OS for patients that received AC was 85.5% (74.0%, 92.1%) versus 82.7% (77.5%, 86.8%) (p = 0.801) with no AC. For stage II patients, 5-year OS was 96.9% with AC vs. 89.1% with no AC (p = 0.236). For stage III patients, 5-year OS was 77.1% with AC vs. 42.8% with no AC (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION AC was associated with improved OS in patients with pathological stage III GCC of the appendix, but not with pathological stage II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Zakka
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shayla Williamson
- Winship Research Informatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Renjian Jiang
- Winship Research Informatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Olatunji B Alese
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Walid L Shaib
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christina Wu
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Madhusmita Behera
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Winship Research Informatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bassel F El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mehmet Akce
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
AlMasri S, Nassour I, Kowalsky SJ, Hrebinko K, Singhi AD, Lee KK, Choudry HA, Bartlett D, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the Appendix: An 11-Year Experience from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3873-3881. [PMID: 33231767 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09389-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoids (GCC) are an aggressive, albeit rare, subtype of appendiceal tumors that exhibit distinct histologic features and lack clear treatment guidelines. We aimed to ascertain the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for GCC in a national cohort of patients. METHODS Patients who underwent a right hemicolectomy for stage I-III GCC of the appendix between 2006 and 2016 were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Stratification based on AC receipt was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to identify predictors of overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 867 patients were identified, of whom 124 (14%) received AC. Patients in the AC group were significantly younger (54 vs. 57 years; p = 0.006) and were predominantly of male sex (60 vs. 48%; p = 0.012). On histopathology, patients in the AC group had a higher proportion of poorly/undifferentiated grade (27 vs. 5%; p < 0.001), T4 disease (35 vs. 11%; p < 0.001), and lymph node-positive disease (45 vs. 7%; p < 0.001) than patients who did not receive AC. After excluding patients diagnosed in 2016 due to a lack of follow-up data (n = 162), a survival advantage for the AC group was detected only after stratification for lymph node-positive disease (p = 0.007). On Cox proportional hazard regression, AC demonstrated an independent association with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.084-0.683; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION The current analysis from the NCDB supports the role of AC for GCC of the appendix, chiefly for patients with lymph node metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stacy J Kowalsky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Hrebinko
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Haroon A Choudry
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sluiter NR, van der Bilt JD, Croll DMR, Vriens MR, de Hingh IHJT, Hemmer P, Aalbers AGJ, Bremers AJA, Ceelen W, D'Hoore A, Schoonmade LJ, Coupé V, Verheul H, Kazemier G, Tuynman JB. Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Versus Surgery Without HIPEC for Goblet-Cell Carcinoids and Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Centers in the Netherlands and Belgium. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19:e87-e99. [PMID: 32651131 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneally metastasized goblet-cell carcinoids (GCCs) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) is currently unclear. We compared outcomes of CRS-HIPEC to surgery alone for peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two cohorts were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 569): patients with peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs treated with CRS-HIPEC in Dutch and Belgian centers (n = 45), and patients treated with surgery alone. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were morbidity and hospital mortality. After propensity score matching, OS was compared in univariate and multivariate analyses. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines from database inception to June 25, 2018. RESULTS After matching for sex, tumor stage, lymph node stage, and liver metastases, CRS-HIPEC was associated with improved median OS in the combined GCC and MANEC group and the separate GCC subgroup in univariate (GCC + MANEC: 39 vs. 12 months, P < .001; GCC: 39 vs. 12 months, P = .017) and multivariate analysis (GCC + MANEC: hazard ratio 4.27, 95% confidence interval 1.88-9.66, P = .001; GCC: hazard ratio 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.06-7.26, P = .038). Acceptable grade III-IV morbidity (17.5%) and mortality (0) were seen after CRS-HIPEC. The literature review supported these findings. CONCLUSION CRS-HIPEC is associated with substantial survival benefit in patients with peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs compared to surgery alone and is a safe treatment option. These data support centralized care of GCC and MANEC patients with peritoneal spread in expert centers offering CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Dorothée M R Croll
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Patrick Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Andre D'Hoore
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Linda J Schoonmade
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
The Chicago Consensus on peritoneal surface malignancies: Management of appendiceal neoplasms. Cancer 2020; 126:2525-2533. [PMID: 32282073 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of appendiceal neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts, including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
-
- Chicago Consensus Working Group, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
The Chicago Consensus on Peritoneal Surface Malignancies: Management of Appendiceal Neoplasms. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:1753-1760. [PMID: 32285275 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08316-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The Chicago Consensus Working Group provides multidisciplinary recommendations for the management of appendiceal neoplasms specifically related to the management of peritoneal surface malignancies. These guidelines are developed with input from leading experts including surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, pathologists, radiologists, palliative care physicians, and pharmacists. These guidelines recognize and address the emerging need for increased awareness in the appropriate management of peritoneal surface disease. They are not intended to replace the quest for higher levels of evidence.
Collapse
|
20
|
Coevoet D, Maenhoudt W, Beaurang J, Bontinck J, Lockefeer F, Vandenabeele L, Rondou T, Bontinck H. A goblet cell carcinoma of the appendix presenting as an acute appendicitis: a case report. Acta Chir Belg 2020; 120:124-128. [PMID: 30081726 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2018.1500801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
Background: A goblet cell carcinoma of the appendix is a rare neoplasm with histological features of both adenocarcinomas and carcinoid tumours. It has a more aggressive behaviour in comparison to the more common classic neuroendocrine appendiceal tumours. Clinical presentation is variable and a significant proportion of patients present with an acute appendicitis. The aggressive evolution of these tumours makes the management more challenging.Case report: We report the case of a 43-year-old man with acute right iliac fossa pain who was initially diagnosed with an acute appendicitis. Histological analysis of the resected appendix demonstrated the presence of a goblet cell carcinoma with perineural and lymphovascular invasion. No distant metastasis was present. A right hemicolectomy was performed and adjuvant chemotherapy was administered.Conclusion: Goblet cell carcinomas is a distinct entity which should be delineated from the classical appendiceal carcinoids. Its clinical evolution obliges a more aggressive therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D. Coevoet
- Department of Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Gent, Belgium
| | - W. Maenhoudt
- Department of General Surgery, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
| | - J. Beaurang
- Department of General Surgery, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
| | - J. Bontinck
- Department of General Surgery, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
| | - F. Lockefeer
- Department of Pathology, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
| | - L. Vandenabeele
- Department of Gastro-enterology, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
| | - T. Rondou
- Department of Gastro-enterology, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
| | - H. Bontinck
- Department of General Surgery, AZ Sint Jozef Hospital, Bornem, Belgium
- Surgical Unit, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To synthesize the current knowledge and guidelines on the management of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANENs). RECENT FINDINGS Most recent guidelines are essentially based on heterogeneous retrospective series. With the advent of a more precise classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, this heterogeneity is rightly criticized and many 'grey areas' are now debated in expert literature. The only way to solve these issues is through the conduct of large prospective multicentre studies, but this seems somewhat utopian, given the rarity of this disease. SUMMARY ANENs are rare tumours with a favourable prognosis, and mainly diagnosed in young patients. They are predominantly localized, and diagnosed incidentally on appendectomy. This procedure is curative for the vast majority of patients but ANENs can relapse even a significant time after the first diagnosis. Identifying the risks for recurrence is challenging, with some factors thought to be predictive of nodal involvement. The presence of one or more of these factors justifies an oncological radicalization of the surgical procedure (right hemicolectomy with lymphadenectomy). However, the beneficial impact of this surgical procedure on survival is still unproven.
Collapse
|
22
|
Livoff A, Asna N, Gallego-Colon E, Daum AZ, Harkovsky T, Schaffer M. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix: Two case reports and a review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 2019; 11:493-497. [PMID: 31620280 PMCID: PMC6787945 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2019.1921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Goblet cell carcinoid or carcinoma (GCC) is a rare tumor found incidentally during routine management of acute appendicitis. GCCs are more aggressive compared with conventional appendiceal tumors but less aggressive compared with adenocarcinomas, and they often present with serosal and mesoappendiceal involvement. We herein report two cases of acute appendicitis in a 45-year-old female and a 60-year-old male with varied clinical symptoms. Pathological examination of the appendix revealed the presence of adenocarcinoma with goblet cells and a Ki-67 index of 25% (grade 3) and 15% (grade 2), respectively. Subsequent right hemicolectomy was performed according to the current guidelines. No signs of disease recurrence or metastasis were detected during regular follow-up. However, the lack of a standardized classification system for GCC and the discrepancies in specific reliable markers renders their prognostic and predictive value in GCC at diagnosis insufficient. The present study also aimed to address current concerns regarding the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GCC, as well as the need to review and update current guidelines. To conclude, proper clinical management and the prediction of outcome for patients with GCC varies according to the classifications or staging criteria used by the clinicians; hence, a review of the current guidelines should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Livoff
- Department of Pathology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel
| | - Noam Asna
- Department of Oncology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel
| | | | - Aner Zeev Daum
- Department of Pathology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel
| | | | - Moshe Schaffer
- Department of Oncology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva 8410501, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) or goblet cell carcinoma is a unique mixed endocrine-exocrine neoplasm that is almost exclusively seen in the appendix. The hallmark of GCC is the concentric infiltration of the appendiceal wall by small tight clusters, nests or cords of tumor cells that exhibit a goblet cell morphology with a small compressed nucleus and conspicuous intracytoplasmic mucin. The coexistence of high-grade adenocarcinoma with GCC has been increasingly recognized as a common finding, which has been called adenocarcinoma ex GCC or mixed GCC-adenocarcinoma. A number of studies have shown that it is the high-grade adenocarcinomatous component that dictates the prognosis. Several histologic classification/grading systems have been proposed, which correlate with overall patient survival. Treatment options are primarily based on tumor stage and the presence or absence of a high-grade adenocarcinomatous component.
Collapse
|
24
|
Tsang ES, Kennecke HF. ASO Author Reflections: Outcomes of Appendiceal Goblet Cell Carcinoid Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:759-760. [PMID: 30465217 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6980-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Erica S Tsang
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Virginia Mason Hospital and Seattle Medical Center, Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gilmore G, Jensen K, Saligram S, Sachdev TP, Arekapudi SR. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix - diagnostic challenges and treatment updates: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Rep 2018; 12:275. [PMID: 30244681 PMCID: PMC6151924 DOI: 10.1186/s13256-018-1789-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 08/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoid is a rare but distinct entity of appendiceal tumors which is a hybrid or mixed tumor consisting of both epithelial (glandular) and neuroendocrine elements containing goblet cells. This entity is important to recognize and appropriately grade as it tends to be more aggressive than typical carcinoid tumors, often presenting with metastatic disease. As a result, the 5-year overall survival is 14-22% in stage III-IV disease. GCC therefore warrants more aggressive surgical and medical (chemotherapy) interventions than typical carcinoid tumors. Through this case report we give a brief update on GCC pathological features, staging, surgical management, and review the literature as a guide to indications for chemotherapy and choice of agents. CASE PRESENTATION We present the case of a 77-year-old Caucasian man with a history of stage I adenocarcinoma of transverse colon status post transverse colectomy who was incidentally found on surveillance colonoscopy to have an abnormal appendiceal orifice lesion. A biopsy revealed an appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid and he underwent a right hemicolectomy which revealed a pathologic stage III GCC for which he received eight cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine. CONCLUSIONS It is essential that patients who have tumors > 2 cm, are pT3 or pT4, have higher grade histology with signet ring (Tang grade B or grade C), locally advanced, or with positive surgical margins on appendectomy undergo a right hemicolectomy. Although there is no category 1 evidence, consensus recommendations are that patients with stage II (particularly Tang B and C) and stage III GCC be offered adjuvant chemotherapy with a regimen based on 5-fluorouracil, as these patients are known to have high rates of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Gilmore
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Central California Health Care System, University of California San Francisco, 2615 E Clinton Ave, Fresno, CA, 93703, USA
| | - Kristin Jensen
- Department of Pathology, Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA
| | - Shreyas Saligram
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Central California Health Care System, University of California San Francisco, 2615 E Clinton Ave, Fresno, CA, 93703, USA
| | - Thomas P Sachdev
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Central California Health Care System, University of California San Francisco, 2615 E Clinton Ave, Fresno, CA, 93703, USA
| | - Subramanyeswara R Arekapudi
- Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Central California Health Care System, University of California San Francisco, 2615 E Clinton Ave, Fresno, CA, 93703, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tsang ES, McConnell YJ, Schaeffer DF, Lee L, Yin Y, Zerhouni S, Schaff K, Speers C, Kennecke HF. Outcomes of Surgical and Chemotherapeutic Treatments of Goblet Cell Carcinoid Tumors of the Appendix. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:2391-2399. [PMID: 29916007 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6560-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoids (GCCs) of the appendix are rare mucinous neoplasms, for which optimal therapy is poorly described. We examined prognostic clinical and treatment factors in a population-based cohort. METHODS Patients diagnosed with GCC from 1984 to 2014 were identified from the British Columbia Cancer Agency and the Vancouver Lower Mainland Pathology Archive. RESULTS Of 88 cases with confirmed appendiceal GCCs, clinical data were available in 86 cases (annual population incidence: 0.66/1,000,000). Median age was 54 years (range 25-91) and 42 patients (49%) were male. Metastasis at presentation was the strongest predictor of overall survival (OS), with median OS not reached for stage I-III patients, and measuring 16.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-29] for stage IV patients. In 67 stage I-III patients, 51 (76%) underwent completion hemicolectomy and 9 (17%) received adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. No appendicitis at initial presentation and Tang B histology were the only prognostic factors, with inferior 5-year recurrence-free survival (53 vs. 83% with appendicitis, p = 0.02; 45% Tang B vs. 89% Tang A, p < 0.01). Of 19 stage IV patients, 10 (62.5%) received 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy and 11 (61%) underwent multiorgan resection (MOR) ± hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Low mitotic rate and MOR ± HIPEC were associated with improved 2-year OS, but only MOR ± HIPEC remained significant on multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 5.4, 95% CI 1.4-20.9; p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS In this population-based cohort, we demonstrate excellent survival outcomes in stage I-III appendiceal GCCs and clinical appendicitis. Hemicolectomy remains the standard treatment. In metastatic disease, outcomes remain poor, although MOR ± HIPEC may improve survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica S Tsang
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yarrow J McConnell
- Puyallup General Surgery, Proliance Surgeons, Puyallup, WA, USA.,Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - David F Schaeffer
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Division of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lawrence Lee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Division of Anatomic Pathology, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Yaling Yin
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Outcomes Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Siham Zerhouni
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kimberly Schaff
- Provincial Pharmacy, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Caroline Speers
- Gastrointestinal Cancer Outcomes Unit, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Division of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada. .,Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Virginia Mason Hospital and Seattle Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Goretzki PE, Mogl MT, Akca A, Pratschke J. Curative and palliative surgery in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2018; 19:169-178. [PMID: 30280290 DOI: 10.1007/s11154-018-9469-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of neuroendocrine tumors (NET) increases with age. Lately, the diagnosis of NET was mainly caused by early detection of small NET (<1 cm) in the rectum and stomach, which are depicted by chance during routine and prophylactic endoscopy. Also in patients with large and metastatic pancreatic and intestinal tumors thorough pathologic investigation with use of different immunohistologic markers discovers more neuroendocrine tumors with low differentiation grade (G2-G3) and more neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC), nowadays, than in former times. While gastric and rectal NET are discovered as small (<1 cm in diameter) and mainly highly differentiated tumors, demonstrating lymph node metastases in less than 10% of the patients, the majority of pancreatic and small bowel NET have already metastasized at the time of diagnosis. This is of clinical importance, since tumor stage and differentiation grade not only influence prognosis but also surgical procedure and may define whether a combination of surgery with systemic biologic therapy, chemotherapy or local cytoreductive procedures may be used. The indication for surgery and the preferred surgical procedure will have to consider personal risk factors of each patient (i.e. general health, additional illnesses, etc.) and tumor specific factors (i.e. tumor stage, grade of differentiation, functional activity, mass and variety of loco regional as well as distant metastases etc.). Together they define, whether radical curative or only palliative surgery can be applied. Altogether surgery is the only cure for locally advanced NET and helps to increase quality of life and overall survival in many patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. The question of cure versus palliative therapy sometimes only can be answered with time, however. Many different aspects and various questions concerning the indication and extent of surgery and the best therapeutic procedure are still unanswered. Therefore, a close multidisciplinary cooperation of colleagues involved in biochemical and localization diagnostics and those active in various treatment areas is warranted to search for the optimal strategy in each individual patient. How far genetic screening impacts survival remains to be seen. Since surgeons do have a central role in the treatment of NET patients, they have to understand the need for integration into such an interdisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter E Goretzki
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Leiter Arbeitsbereich endokrine Chirurgie, Chirurgische Klinik, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Martina T Mogl
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Aycan Akca
- Surgical Clinic 1, Lukaskrankenhaus Neuss, Preußenstrasse 84, 41456, Neuss, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte | Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mutational landscape of goblet cell carcinoids and adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix is distinct from typical carcinoids and colorectal adenocarcinomas. Mod Pathol 2018; 31:989-996. [PMID: 29422640 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-018-0003-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Revised: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 11/24/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
There is limited data on the spectrum of molecular alterations in goblet cell carcinoids and adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix. We used next generation sequencing to determine mutations of potential pathogenetic and therapeutic significance in this rare group of tumors. Adequate DNA was successfully extracted in 34/46 cases and the final group included 18 goblet cell carcinoids and 16 adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids. Illumina TruSeq™ was used for sequencing exons of a custom 282 gene panel using an Illumina HiSeq 2000. All cases had a minimum coverage depth of at least 50 reads. After filtering through the Exome Sequencing Project, the number of mutations per case ranged from 0-9 (mean:3). The mutational burden in adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids was significantly higher than goblet cell carcinoids (mean 5 vs. 3; p < 0.05) but the spectrum of alterations overlapped between the two groups. The most frequent mutations included ARID1A (4/34), ARID2 (4/34), CDH1 (4/34), RHPN2 (4/34), and MLL2 (3/34). Some mutations typically seen in conventional colorectal adenocarcinomas were also identified but with much lower frequency (APC :4/34; KRAS :2/34). MLL2 and KRAS mutations were only seen in adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids and TP53 mutations were limited to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids (2/34). Copy number changes could be evaluated in 15/34 cases and showed low copy number gains in CDKN1B (6/15) and NFKBIA (6/15), among others. The overlapping molecular alterations suggest that goblet cell carcinoids and adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoids are best considered two grades of differentiation of the same tumor rather than two distinct histological types. Mutations in TP53, CDH1 and MLL2 mutations were predominantly present in the adenocarcinoma ex goblet cell carcinoid group consistent with transformation to a higher grade lesion. The unique mutational profile also offers an explanation for the poor chemosensitivity in these tumors and highlights the need for developing new targeted therapies.
Collapse
|
29
|
Clift AK, Kornasiewicz O, Drymousis P, Faiz O, Wasan HS, Kinross JM, Cecil T, Frilling A. Goblet cell carcinomas of the appendix: rare but aggressive neoplasms with challenging management. Endocr Connect 2018; 7:268-277. [PMID: 29335251 PMCID: PMC5801558 DOI: 10.1530/ec-17-0311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Goblet cell carcinomas (GCC) are a rare, aggressive sub-type of appendiceal tumours with neuroendocrine features, and controversy exists with regards to therapeutic strategy. We undertook a retrospective review of GCC patients surgically treated at two tertiary referral centres. Clinical and histopathological data were extracted from a prospectively maintained database. Survival analyses utilised Kaplan-Meier methodology. Twenty-one patients were identified (9 females). Median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range 32-77). There were 3, 6 and 9 grade 1, 2 and 3 tumours, respectively. One, 10, 5 and 5 patients had stage I, II, III and IV disease at diagnosis, respectively. There were 8, 10 and 3 Tang class A, B and C tumours, respectively. Index operation was appendectomy (n = 12), right hemicolectomy (n = 6) or resections including appendix/right colon, omentum and the gynaecological system (n = 3). Eight patients underwent completion right hemicolectomy. Surgery for recurrence included small bowel resection (n = 2), debulking with peritonectomy and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy, and hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (all n = 1). Median follow-up was 30 months (range 2.5-123). One-, 3- and 5-year OS was 79.4, 60 and 60%, respectively. Mean OS (1-, 3-, and 5-year OS) for Tang class A, B and C tumours were 73.1 months (85.7, 85.7, 51.4%), 83.7 months (all 66.7%) and 28.5 months (66.7, 66.7%, not reached), respectively. Chromogranin A/B and 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT were not useful in follow-up, but CEA, CA 19-9, CA 125 and 18F-FDG PET/CT identified tumour recurrence. GCC must be clearly discriminated from relatively indolent appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms. 18F-FDG PET/CT and CEA/CA19-9/CA 125 are useful in detecting recurrence of GCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley K Clift
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, London, UK
| | - Oskar Kornasiewicz
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, London, UK
- Department of SurgeryWarsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | - Omar Faiz
- Department of SurgerySt Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Harpreet S Wasan
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, London, UK
| | - James M Kinross
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, London, UK
| | - Thomas Cecil
- Peritoneal Malignancy UnitBasingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK
| | - Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery and CancerImperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Madsen AH, Ladekarl M, Villadsen GE, Grønbæk H, Sørensen MM, Stribolt K, Verwaal VJ, Iversen LH. Effects of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the Treatment of Goblet Cell Carcinoma: A Prospective Cohort Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 25:422-430. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6272-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
31
|
Frilling A, Clift AK. Peritoneal Metastases from Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2017; 24:3466-3468. [PMID: 28815440 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6055-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Frilling
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| | - Ashley K Clift
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Clift AK, Frilling A. Neuroendocrine, goblet cell and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine tumours of the appendix: updates, clinical applications and the future. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 11:237-247. [PMID: 28081662 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2017.1282314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms are rare, clinically challenging tumours that are typically incidentally diagnosed, have a poorly understood biology and have controversy surrounding their management. Most are adequately treated with appendectomy, and although distant metastases are rare, the threat of disease dissemination remains and current guidelines possess poor accuracy in terms of selecting patients requiring more extensive surgery, i.e. oncological right-hemicolectomy. Areas covered: In this article, we discuss the presentation and diagnostic work-up of patients with appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms, and also examine the evidence base for existing management strategies. We highlight controversies within the management of these tumours, and anticipate avenues for further progress. Although no longer classified as neuroendocrine neoplasms, we also discuss two related forms of tumours with neuroendocrine features - goblet cell cancers and mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinomas. Expert commentary: Existing guidelines for the treatment of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms are derived from a limited evidence base and are unable to accurately predict which patients require extensive attempts at surgical disease control. Future advances in the field of improved patient selection for more extensive surgery may be possible with multi-factorial tumour assessment integrating morphological and molecular analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley K Clift
- a Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , London , UK
| | - Andrea Frilling
- a Department of Surgery and Cancer , Imperial College London , London , UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shenoy S. Goblet cell carcinoids of the appendix: Tumor biology, mutations and management strategies. World J Gastrointest Surg 2016; 8:660-669. [PMID: 27830037 PMCID: PMC5081547 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v8.i10.660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2016] [Revised: 07/30/2016] [Accepted: 08/29/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Malignant neoplasms of the appendix are rare and represent less than 1% of gastrointestinal cancers. Goblet cell carcinoids (GCC) tumors are a distinctive group of heterogeneous appendiceal neoplasm that exhibit unique clinical and pathologic features. This review focuses on the current diagnostic procedures, pathogenesis, possible signaling mechanisms and treatment options for GCC. Perspectives for future research are discussed. The tumor likely arises from pluripotent intestinal epithelial crypt base stem cells. Previous findings of Notch signaling as a tumor suppressor in Neuroendocrine tumors may have a similar role in this tumor too. Loss of Notch signaling may be the driver mutation with other successive downstream mutations likely favors them into progressing and behavior similar to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with minimal neuroendocrine differentiation. A multidisciplinary approach is suggested for optimal outcomes. Surgery remains the main treatment modality. Simple appendectomy may be sufficient in early stages while right hemicolectomy is recommended for advanced tumors. Cytoreductive surgery with heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy may improve survival in a select few with metastatic peritoneal disease. These tumors have an unpredictable behavior even in early stages and local recurrence and delayed metastases may be seen. Lifelong surveillance is warranted.
Collapse
|
34
|
Pape UF, Niederle B, Costa F, Gross D, Kelestimur F, Kianmanesh R, Knigge U, Öberg K, Pavel M, Perren A, Toumpanakis C, O'Connor J, Krenning E, Reed N, O'Toole D. ENETS Consensus Guidelines for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Appendix (Excluding Goblet Cell Carcinomas). Neuroendocrinology 2016; 103:144-52. [PMID: 26730583 DOI: 10.1159/000443165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- U-F Pape
- Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charitx00E9; Universitx00E4;tsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|