14 Years of Polish Experience in Non-Invasive Prenatal Blood Group Diagnosis

Antenatal RHD screening to guide antenatal anti-D immunoprophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women

In pregnancy, D- pregnant women may be at risk of becoming immunized against D when carrying a D+ fetus, which may eventually lead to hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Administrating antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis decreases the risk of immunization substantially. Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping, based on testing cell-free DNA extracted from maternal plasma, offers a reliable tool to predict the fetal RhD phenotype during pregnancy. Used as a screening program, antenatal RHD screening can guide the administration of antenatal prophylaxis in non-immunized D- pregnant women so that unnecessary prophylaxis is avoided in those women who carry a D- fetus. In Europe, antenatal RHD screening programs have been running since 2009, demonstrating high test accuracies and program feasibility. In this review, an overview is provided of current state-of-the-art antenatal RHD screening, which includes discussions on the rationale for its implementation, methodology, detection strategies, and test performance. The performance of antenatal RHD screening in a routine setting is characterized by high accuracy, with a high diagnostic sensitivity of ≥99.9 percent. The result of using antenatal RHD screening is that 97-99 percent of the women who carry a D- fetus avoid unnecessary prophylaxis. As such, this activity contributes to avoiding unnecessary treatment and saves valuable anti-D immunoglobulin, which has a shortage worldwide. The main challenges for a reliable noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping assay are low cell-free DNA levels, the genetics of the Rh blood group system, and choosing an appropriate detection strategy for an admixed population. In many parts of the world, however, the main challenge is to improve the basic care for D- pregnant women.

Noninvasive diagnostics of fetal KEL*01.01 allele from maternal plasma of immunized women using digital PCR protocols

Allo-antibodies produced by K-negative pregnant women against a fetal K antigen from the Kell blood group system may cause hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN). Predicting the fetal K antigen using noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is important for decisions concerning management of pregnancies. Digital and droplet digital PCR techniques permit the detection of fetal single nucleotide variant with a higher specificity and sensitivity than real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

AIM

The aim was to evaluate and compare protocols for fetal KEL*01.01 genotyping using different assays and digital PCR platforms.

METHODS

DNA isolated from 59 pregnant women (9-39 weeks of gestation, 49 with anti-K) was tested using home-made and custom-ordered KEL*01.01/KEL*02 assays with Droplet Digital™ and QuantStudio™3D. The results were compared with fetal/neonatal genotypes/phenotypes.

RESULTS

Fetal KEL*01.01 results using all tested protocols were concordant with fetal/neonatal KEL*01.01 genotypes/phenotypes. None of the tested combinations of assays or digital PCR platforms gave false KEL*01.01-negative results, but inconclusive KEL*01.01 reads were observed in all tested protocols. For 36 cases compared using two digital PCR platforms and assays, there were not statistically significant differences in a level of fetal KEL*01.01 fraction (p < .72).

CONCLUSION

Independent of the applied dPCR and ddPCR platforms and KEL*01.01 assays, prediction of the fetal KEL*01.01 is highly reliable. Before implementation in routine practice further validation of the KEL*01.01 protocol with a larger group of pregnant women should be performed.

Recommendation for validation and quality assurance of non-invasive prenatal testing for foetal blood groups and implications for IVD risk classification according to EU regulations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Non-invasive assays for predicting foetal blood group status in pregnancy serve as valuable clinical tools in the management of pregnancies at risk of detrimental consequences due to blood group antigen incompatibility. To secure clinical applicability, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups need to follow strict rules for validation and quality assurance. Here, we present a multi-national position paper with specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance for such assays and discuss their risk classification according to EU regulations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the literature covering validation for in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) assays in general and for non-invasive foetal RHD genotyping in particular. Recommendations were based on the result of discussions between co-authors.

RESULTS

In relation to Annex VIII of the In-Vitro-Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation 2017/746 of the European Parliament and the Council, assays for non-invasive prenatal testing of foetal blood groups are risk class D devices. In our opinion, screening for targeted anti-D prophylaxis for non-immunized RhD negative women should be placed under risk class C. To ensure high quality of non-invasive foetal blood group assays within and beyond the European Union, we present specific recommendations for validation and quality assurance in terms of analytical detection limit, range and linearity, precision, robustness, pre-analytics and use of controls in routine testing. With respect to immunized women, different requirements for validation and IVD risk classification are discussed.

CONCLUSION

These recommendations should be followed to ensure appropriate assay performance and applicability for clinical use of both commercial and in-house assays.

Prediction of fetal blood group antigens from maternal plasma using Ion AmpliSeq HD technology

BACKGROUND

Fetal blood group (BG) and platelet (HPA) antigens may trigger maternal immunization, causing a fetal disease. Noninvasive prenatal diagnostics (NIPT) predicts fetal genotype, identifying pregnancies with no risk. All current techniques detect fetal antigen alleles with unspecific background and without estimation of fetal fraction, thus new protocols for detection of fetal BG/HPA alleles with ultrahigh sensitivity still need to be tested to improve NIPT.

AIM

To design NIPT of clinically important antigens using Ion AmpliSeq HD technology.

METHODS

Plasma DNA from 36 pregnant women (9-33 week of gestation, 24 immunized with anti-HPA-1a,-3b,-15a, -K, or -D+C+S), with known BG/HPA genotypes of their neonates/partners, was tested on Ion S5 System using the Ion AmpliSeq HD designer custom gene panel. NGS contained 25 rs-targets encoding relevant BG/HPA antigens and 10 markers.

RESULTS

Using the NGS protocol, 76 out of 85 differences in fetal/maternal BG/HPA genotypes were determined in concentration above 2% fetal paternally inherited allele chimerism. The level of unspecific reads for BG/HPA alleles was below 0.87%. In 24 immunized women NGS revealed feto-maternal incompatibility in 11 cases (from 2.44% to 7.41%) and excluded in 10 (<0.05%), three cases had inconclusive results (1.79%, 0.19%, 0.11%). The presence of fetal DNA was confirmed in each case by detecting markers with at least 2% chimerism.

CONCLUSION

The use of Ion AmpliSeq HD technology improves the prediction of feto-maternal incompatibility, increasing the sensitivity of BG/HPA NIPT and serving confirmation of the fetal DNA at the same workflow.

Prediction of fetal blood group and platelet antigens from maternal plasma using next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Fetuses whose mothers have produced antibodies to red blood cell (RBC) or platelet antigens are at risk of being affected by hemolytic disease or alloimmune thrombocytopenia, respectively, only if they inherit the incompatible antigen. Noninvasive diagnosis of the fetal antigen is employed for management of immunized pregnancies, but the specific detection of SNPs, encoding the majority of antigens, in maternal plasma is still a challenge. We applied targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) to predict the fetal antigen based on the detection of fetomaternal chimerism.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The DNA of 13 pregnant women (with anti-K [3] anti-k [1], anti-Fy^a [1], anti-D + C + Jk^a [1], anti-D + E + K [1], anti-HPA-1a [1], anti-HPA-3b [1], anti-HPA-5b [1], and nonimmunized [3]) was sequenced using primers for regions encoding RhD, RhC, Rhc, RhE/e, K/k, Fya/b, Jka/b, MN, Ss, and HPA-1, 2, 3, 5, 15, 4 X-polymorphisms on the Ion Torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

RESULTS

NGS results were in agreement with the phenotype/genotype of women and their neonates (except for the unsuccessful detection of MN and RhC). NGS determined fetal allele chimerism for K, k, Fya, Fyb, Jka, Jkb, S, RhE (from 0.42% to 6.08%); RhD, Rhc (100%); HPA-1a, -2b, -3a, 3b, -5b, -15a, 15b (from 0.23% to 4.11%). NGS revealed fetal chimerism for incompatible antigens (from 0.7% to 4.8%) in 7 immunized cases, excluded in 3 (with anti-K, anti-Fy^a , anti-HPA-3b).

CONCLUSION

The designed NGS predicts the fetal RBC and platelet antigen status universally in cases with various clinically significant antibodies as well as providing confirmation of the presence of fetal DNA. However, some improvement of the unsuccessful primers is required.

Noninvasive prenatal HPA-1 typing in HPA-1a negative pregnancies selected in the Polish PREVFNAIT screening program

BACKGROUND

Anti-HPA-1a alloantibodies in HPA-1a negative mothers can lead to fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). Noninvasive prenatal testing (NIPT) of HPA-1a determines fetuses at risk and the course of maternal antenatal treatment.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The aim was to develop and validate HPA-1a NIPT by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a high-throughput screening setting. DNA from 328 plasma samples of 299 HPA-1a negative pregnant women was examined for HPA-1a by real-time PCR and in two cases also by NGS (Ion Torrent). The results were compared with neonatal HPA-1a genotyping in 281 cases.

RESULTS

HPA-1a NIPT was negative in 44 of 51 HPA-1a negative fetuses, inconclusive in five, and false positive in two. In 228 of 229 HPA-1a positive fetuses, the NIPT results were positive (mean threshold cycle 36.0 ± 1.7) and inconclusive in one. In 22 cases with HPA-1a positive fetuses analyzed twice, the sensitivity of HPA-1a detection was significantly higher at 28 weeks compared with 16 to 20 weeks. NGS efficiently detected the ITGB3 coding HPA-1a/b (1% and 5% fetal HPA-1a reads).

CONCLUSION

Real-time PCR is reliable to predict the fetal HPA-1a positive genotype in a screening study, but false-positive results are reported in 4%, with unnecessary prenatal treatment if anti-HPA-1a is detected.