Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Brazilian Real-Life Experience

Presence of positive skin prick tests to inhalant allergens and markers of T2 inflammation in subjects with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU): a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Current guidelines do not recommend performing aeroallergen skin prick testing (SPT) in chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU).

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review was to investigate the presence of aeroallergen sensitization and markers of T2 inflammation in subjects with CSU.

METHODS

Systematic literature reviews to identify all studies that evaluated the presence of T2 markers of allergic inflammation in CSU subjects were performed.

RESULTS

In 16 studies that assessed the prevalence of positive SPT to multiple aeroallergens in CSU, 38.5% of CSU subjects had positive SPT. In three controlled studies, 34.2% of CSU subjects had positive SPT to multiple aeroallergens, compared to 13.6% of controls (p = 0.047). In 18 studies that assessed the prevalence of house dust mite (HDM) positive SPT in CSU, 27.5% of CSU subjects had positive SPT. In three controlled studies, 27.5% of CSU subjects had positive SPT to HDM, compared to 2.1% of controls (p = 0.047). Overall, CSU subjects were 3.1 times more likely to be aeroallergen-sensitized (95% CI 1.7-5.8, p = 0.0002) and 6.1 times more likely to be HDM-sensitized (95% CI 3.7-9.9, p < 0.00001) than controls. Mean total serum IgE (tIgE) levels were 238 kU/L and median tIgE levels were 164 kU/L, which was greater than the upper 90th percentile of normal (< 137 kU/L). Compared to healthy controls, CSU subjects were 6.5 times more likely to have IgG autoantibody against FcεR1α (p = 0.001), 2.4 times more likely to have IgG anti-IgE antibody (p = 0.03) and 5 times more likely to have anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) antibody (p = 0.02). When corticosteroids were withheld for ≥ 28 days, mean blood eosinophil percentage was elevated at 5.9% (normal < 4%), but other studies reporting absolute count found the mean was in the normal range, 239 × 10 6 / L (normal < 400 × 10 6 / L).

CONCLUSION

Increased aeroallergen sensitization, tIgE, autoantibodies and blood eosinophil percentage in the CSU subjects indicates the possible importance of T2 inflammation in the pathogenesis of CSU. Further studies may be warranted to determine if specific allergen avoidance, desensitization or improvement in the mucosal allergic inflammation present in asthma and/or rhinitis has any benefit in the management of CSU.

Experience with Omalizumab for the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria in a tertiary center: real life experience

PURPOSE

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as urticaria and/or angioedema that appears spontaneously due to known or unknown causes and lasts for at least 6 weeks. Omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody that binds circulating free IgE, has recently emerged as a promising treatment for CSU, a condition which impairs patients' quality of life. We aimed to contribute real life data by reporting our experience with omalizumab in the treatment of intractable CSU.

METHODS

Of 140 patients treated with omalizumab in our clinic between September 2013 and January 2018, 86 CSU patients with available current data were retrospectively evaluated in terms of sex, age, urticaria duration, urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) before and after omalizumab, relapses and time to relapse, length of remission after omalizumab cessation, adverse events, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 45.5 ± 14.3 years and 73.3% were women. Mean duration of urticaria before initiation of omalizumab therapy was 54.5 ± 67 months. All patients had used antihistamines before starting omalizumab treatment. The mean number of omalizumab doses was 11.9 ± 9.3. The mean duration of omalizumab treatment was 13.3 ± 10.4 months. Mean UAS7 score was 38.9 ± 4.1 before the start of omalizumab treatment, and 7.9 ± 10.5 after treatment. Treatment was discontinued in 10 patients (11.6%) due to nonresponse or loss of effect. Four patients (4.65%) experienced adverse events. Treatment was discontinued in 1 patient (1.16%) due to side effects. Of the 55 patients whose treatment was discontinued after their symptoms resolved, 31 (56.3%) relapsed after omalizumab cessation. Twenty-four patients (43.6%) did not relapse after omalizumab cessation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that omalizumab was an effective treatment for intractable CSU and did not cause any serious adverse effects other than asthenia, vertigo, and injection site reaction in four patients. These findings are relevant because they reflect real-life data.

Long-term follow-up effect of omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria and its association with serum C-reactive protein levels

This study aims to determine the efficacy of omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to conventional therapy, together with the evaluation of serum CRP levels. All the patients with a diagnosis of CSU who were continuously treated with omalizumab (300 mg/mo) for at least 3 months between June 2016 and July 2019 were included in this study. Urticaria activity score (UAS-7) was used for assessment of disease activity. Serum CRP levels were also retrospectively analyzed. When UAS-7 scores before the initiation of therapy were compared to the week 4, 12, 24, and 36 scores after the treatment, each were significantly different from the pretreatment results (P < .01). CRP level prior to treatment was found to be strongly correlated with baseline UAS scores of the patients' (P = .00). At the 12th week of treatment, decline of CRP level was positively and strongly correlated with the decline of UAS (P = .037). In this study, mean UAS decreased, mean rescue medication use declined, and overall therapeutic response improved with omalizumab treatment. Additionally, significant correlation between the decline of CRP levels and treatment response was found.

The KAAACI/KDA Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Korean Adults and Children: Part 2. Management of H1-Antihistamine-Refractory Chronic Urticaria

Quite a few patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) are refractory to H₁-antihistamines, even though the dose of H₁-antihistamines is increased up to 4-fold. CSU that is not controlled with H₁-antihistamines results in increased disease burden. Several immunomodulators have been used to manage these patients. The guidelines reported herein are connected to Part 1 of the KAAACI/KDA Evidence-Based Practice Guidelines for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria in Korean Adults and Children, and aimed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of H₁-antihistamine-refractory CSU. Part 2 focuses on the more commonly used additional treatment options for refractory CSU, including omalizumab, cyclosporine, leukotriene receptor antagonist, dapsone, methotrexate, and phototherapy. The evidence to support their efficacy, dosing, safety, and selection of these agents is systematically reviewed. To date, for patients with refractory CSU, the methodologically sound data to evaluate the use of omalizumab has been growing; however, the evidence of other immunomodulators and phototherapy is still insufficient. Therefore, an individualized stepwise approach with a goal of achieving complete symptom control and minimizing side effects can be recommended. Larger controlled studies are needed to elevate the level of evidence to select a rational therapeutic agent for patients with refractory CSU.

Benefits and Harms of Omalizumab Treatment in Adolescent and Adult Patients With Chronic Idiopathic (Spontaneous) Urticaria: A Meta-analysis of "Real-world" Evidence

Importance

Omalizumab is indicated for the management of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) (also known as chronic spontaneous urticaria) in adolescents and adults with persistent hives not controlled with antihistamines. The effectiveness of omalizumab in the real-world management of CIU is largely unknown.

Objective

To quantitatively synthesize what is known about the benefits and harms of omalizumab in the real-world clinical management of CIU regarding urticaria activity, treatment response, and adverse events.

Data Sources

Published observational studies (January 1, 2006, to January 1, 2018) and scientific abstracts on the effectiveness of omalizumab in CIU were identified using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane search engines; references were searched to identify additional studies.

Study Selection

Included studies were observational in design and included at least 1 outcome in common with other studies and at a concurrent time point of exposure to omalizumab. A total of 67 articles (35.2% of those screened) were included in the analysis.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines were followed; independent selection and data extraction were completed by 2 observers. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Main outcomes were change in weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7; range, 0-42), change in Urticaria Activity Score (UAS; range 0-6) (higher score indicating worse outcome in both scales), complete and partial response rates (percentages), and adverse event rate (percentage).

Results

Omalizumab therapy was associated with an improvement in UAS7 scores (-25.6 points, 95% CI, -28.2 to -23.0; P < .001; 15 studies, 294 patients), an improvement in UAS scores (-4.7 points, 95% CI, -5.0 to -4.4, P < .001; 10 studies, 1158 patients), an average complete response rate of 72.2% (95% CI, 66.1%-78.3%; P < .001; 45 studies, 1158 patients) with an additional average partial response rate of 17.8% (95% CI, 11.7%-23.9%; P < .001; 37 studies, 908 patients), and an average adverse event rate of 4.0% (95% CI, 1.0%-7.0%; P < .001; any level of severity, 47 studies, 1314 patients).

Conclusions and Relevance

Benefits and safety of omalizumab in the real-world treatment of CIU meet or exceed results gleaned from clinical trials. These real-world data on omalizumab in CIU may help inform both clinical treatment expectations and policy decision making.

Management of chronic urticaria in children: a clinical guideline

The aim of this guidance is to provide recommendations to clinicians and other interested parties on chronic urticaria in children. The Italian Society for Pediatrics (SIP), the Italian Society for Allergy and Immunology (SIAIP), the Italian Society for Pediatric dermatology (SIDerP) convened a multidisciplinary panel that prepared clinical guidelines for diagnosis and management of chronic urticaria in childhood. Key questions on epidemiology, natural history, diagnosis, and management were developed. The literature was systematically searched and evaluated, recommendations were rated and algorithms for diagnosis and treatment were developed. The recommendations focus on identification of diseases and comorbidities, strategies to recognize triggering factors, improvement of treatment by individualized care.

Learnings from real-life experience of using omalizumab for chronic urticaria in Latin America

Background

Updated urticaria guidelines recommend that patients should be assessed for disease activity, severity, control, and quality of life at baseline and follow up. Regarding treatment, guidelines consider second generation antihistamines as the cornerstone in therapy for chronic urticaria (CU), while other drugs, such as omalizumab, are conceived as second-line alternatives. In regards to omalizumab, despite advances in the management of CU, there are still open questions about timing, dosing, and objective measures for clinical response. This study was designed to portray the use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in chronic urticaria management, as well as the effectiveness and treatment patterns of omalizumab in CU, as seen in a real-life setting in Latin America.

Methods

This is a retrospective observational study, involving 72 Latin American patients with chronic urticaria treated with omalizumab. Patient reported outcomes and treatment patterns, response, quality of life improvement and discontinuation were analyzed.

Results

From the 72 patients, 91.7% (n = 66) were assessed through PROs, where urticaria control test (UCT) was the most used (79.2%; n = 57). Overall, 80.0% (n = 44) responded to omalizumab at some point of the treatment. Omalizumab 300 mg was associated with earlier response compared to lower doses. Regardless of dosage, most patients assessed with CU-Q2oL improved quality of life (80.8%; n = 21). With respect to omalizumab discontinuation, 20.8% (n = 15) patients interrupted omalizumab before the 3rd month of treatment (p = .000).

Conclusions

The present study highlights how the use of PROs and omalizumab in Latin America differ from guidelines' recommendations and clinical trials. Even though most patients were initiated under omalizumab 300 mg, most of them finished with lower doses. Regardless of dosage, most patients responded to omalizumab and improved quality of life at some point during treatment. However, such features were seen earlier with omalizumab 300 mg. Regarding treatment discontinuation, one-fifth of patients interrupted omalizumab before the third month.

[Omalizumab for the treatment of chronic urticaria: Real-life findings]

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of the efficacy and safety of omalizumab in chronic urticaria refractory to conventional treatment (H1-antihistamines at high dosage and montelukast) in real-life practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive, single-centre study was performed of the data for all patients presenting refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria or inducible urticaria and receiving omalizumab (300mg every four weeks) from November 2012 to June 2016.

RESULTS

In all, 23 patients were included. Omalizumab led to complete or significant remission in 19 patients (83%) with chronic urticaria, with remission in 9 patients (47%) occurring within 72hours of the first injection. One patient had a partial response and 3 (13%) showed no response. Only 2 patients (9%) in complete remission stopped their treatment at 1 and 3 years. 52% of patients presented non-serious adverse events, which in one case resulted in treatment withdrawal.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab exhibited good real-life efficacy in a small series of chronic urticaria patients in France.

Omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria: steroid sparing effect

Omalizumab has been recognized to be effective in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). The Italian Medicines Agency authorizes two omalizumab courses, only for patients with CSU unresponsive to antihistamines, and this schedule may limit omalizumab use. Unfortunately, in the majority of CSU, the schedule is unsatisfactory because symptoms usually recur shortly after discontinuation of treatment. A case of a patient needing more than two treatment courses with omalizumab is reported, in order to discuss the rationale for its long-term use. Patient had needed systemic steroids almost continuously for 4 years. Two severe glucocorticoid-associated adverse events (GAEs) occurred during long-term treatment. Omalizumab 300 mg monthly was started with immediate disappearance of the urticarial lesions. Beneficial effects waned shortly after discontinuation of treatment, and further steroid use was needed. A second omalizumab course showed the same clinical pattern, with prompt response and recurrence of symptoms after suspension. Therefore, we decided to repeat the 6 months omalizumab treatment as soon as symptoms recurred, to avoid further emergency steroid treatments and GAEs. This experience suggests that long-term use of omalizumab could be useful. Evidences show that omalizumab is effective and safe for re-treatment and long-term use of responding patients after recurrence.

Recent Advances in Clinical Allergy and Immunology

Allergic diseases are of great concern because of their high prevalence, which is still rising in several regions, their impact on patients' physical and psychological health, the huge burden they place on patients' quality of life, as well as the socioeconomic consequences that they cause. Recent research has provided new data on both genetic and environmental risk factors of atopic/allergic diseases. The application of new technologies such as "omics" has allowed a better understanding of the pathogenesis and has helped with the identification of therapeutic targets. Immense progress has been made in developing and applying novel, targeted therapies, for example for asthma and urticaria. Intensive efforts are being made to find biomarkers that help to classify patients, to identify their potential responsiveness to specific therapies, and to monitor the disease severity. Based on recent insights in the pathogenesis of food allergy and drug hypersensitivity, novel strategies for diagnostics, allergen avoidance, and induction of tolerance have been developed. Here, we summarize important findings in the field of clinical allergy and immunology with a special focus on asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, food allergy, urticaria, angioedema, and drug hypersensitivity.

Omalizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria Refractory to Conventional Therapy: An Italian Retrospective Clinical Analysis with Suggestions for Long-Term Maintenance Strategies

INTRODUCTION

Omalizumab is indicated for the treatment of patients affected by chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) refractory to antihistamines. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and recurrence of symptoms in a real-life experience of omalizumab as an add-on therapy for H₁-antihistamine-refractory CSU patients (refractory CSU).

METHODS

A retrospective review of the clinical records of all refractory CSU treated with omalizumab at our dermatology center from June 2014 to April 2017 was performed. Patients previously treated with second-generation antihistamines at a fourfold increased dose without clinical responses at 4 weeks of treatment were selected. Omalizumab was administered at a single dosage of 300 mg every 4 weeks for 6 months. Disease severity was assessed using the 7-day Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7).

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (14 women; mean age 51 years, range 25-74) were enrolled. Mean UAS7 at baseline was 27.3 (range 15-38). Symptoms improved in all patients at 4 weeks (UAS7 = 16.1, range 0-36). Treatment was completed in 17 patients (94.4%), and among these, a complete response (UAS7 = 0) was registered in 10 patients (58.8%). Adverse events included thrombocytopenia in 1 patient (5.6%) at 16 weeks; therapy was suspended after 20 weeks and the complication was resolved, resulting in a freedom from major adverse events of 94.4%. Symptom recurrence occurred in 3 patients (17.6%) at 4, 5, and 7 months from the end of the primary therapy. Retreatment with omalizumab was successful without any adverse effects. Mean follow-up was 9.5 months (range 1-28).

CONCLUSION

Add-on omalizumab therapy for refractory CSU in a real-life setting seems to be effective and safe with a relatively low incidence of symptom recurrence. Further research should investigate personalized omalizumab treatment dosages and administration intervals, and the identification of biomarkers for future treatment algorithms.

Update on Omalizumab for Urticaria: What's New in the Literature from Mechanisms to Clinic

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since omalizumab has been approved for urticaria, numerous randomized and real-life observational trials have been published. We reviewed the period January 2017-February 2018.

RECENT FINDINGS

Omalizumab is effective for the control of urticaria recalcitrant to antihistamines in different populations globally. The ratio of total serum IgE 4-week/baseline ≥2 can predict response with a high likelihood. In observational real-life trials, doses have been adjusted on an individual basis: in some populations, up to two-thirds of the patients can be controlled with 150 mg/month; however, others are still not controlled with 300 mg/month. In these, 150 mg bimonthly could be tried, before up-dosing to 450 mg/month. On the long run (up to 3 years) omalizumab kept its efficacy. In many patients, dosing intervals could be augmented (6-8 weeks, some even more). After a 12-month treatment, about 20% showed long-term remission without relapse. Some biomarkers are being detected. Adjusting omalizumab doses in urticaria patients could enhance efficacy (shortening dosing interval and/or augmenting dose) and save costs (after 12 months: extending dosing interval and/or reducing dose).

Effectiveness of omalizumab in adolescent and adult patients with chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review of 'real-world' evidence

INTRODUCTION

Chronic idiopathic/spontaneous urticaria (CIU/CSU) is a dermatological condition characterized by itchy wheals and/or angioedema of continuous or intermittent duration of ≥6 weeks with a high burden of disease and impact on quality of life. Omalizumab is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that inhibits the binding of IgE to high affinity receptors, and is approved for the CIU/CSU indication. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate and synthesize the evidence on the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in CIU/CSU in daily clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

This review of 84 observational effectiveness studies covers treatments (dosing, medication use), clinical outcomes (treatment response, disease activity, quality of life), and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

The clinical outcomes observed across studies underscore the real-world effectiveness of omalizumab in the management of CIU/CSU. Continued treatment may assist patients showing an initial response to achieve a complete treatment response. Response rates are aligned with observed changes in disease activity, symptom experience, and quality of life, and this across subtypes of CIU/CSU. The positive therapeutic profile is complemented by a positive safety profile. The real-world evidence summarized here points convincingly at the high degree of effectiveness of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU/CSU in daily clinical practice.

The clinical response to omalizumab in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients is linked to and predicted by IgE levels and their change

BACKGROUND

Omalizumab is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). Markers and predictors of response are largely unknown, but needed to optimize omalizumab treatment. Omalizumab targets IgE, and IgE levels may be linked to the effects of treatment. We evaluated whether response rates to treatment with omalizumab in patients with CSU are linked to their baseline IgE levels, their IgE levels after omalizumab treatment, and the ratio of on treatment IgE and baseline IgE levels.

METHODS

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients (n = 113) were treated with omalizumab 300 mg/4 weeks for 12 weeks, when their treatment responses, that is, no, partial, or complete response, were assessed by use of the urticaria activity score, physician and patient visual analog scale, and treatment effectiveness score. Total IgE levels were measured before treatment (bIgE) with omalizumab and 4 weeks thereafter (w4IgE).

RESULTS

Nonresponders to omalizumab had significantly lower bIgE levels (17.9, 17.0-55.0 IU/mL) than partial responders (82.0, 46.2-126.5 IU/mL, P = .008) and complete responders (73.7, 19.45-153.8 IU/mL, P = .032). Nonresponders also had lower w4IgE levels and lower ratios of w4IgE/bIgE levels than partial and complete responders (P < .001). Nonresponse to omalizumab was best predicted by patients' w4IgE/bIgE ratios, significantly better than by bIgE levels (P = .016).

CONCLUSIONS

In CSU, total IgE levels and their change predict the response to treatment with omalizumab. The assessment of pre- and post-treatment IgE levels and their ratio may help to improve the management of CSU in patients who require omalizumab treatment.

Long-term management of chronic spontaneous urticaria with omalizumab

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials have shown the efficacy of omalizumabs efficacy in refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU), but real-life management strategies are lacking.

AIM

To assess the long-term efficacy and safety of omalizumab, and to identify predictive factors and optimum dosage regimens.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 13 patients (11 women, 2 men) with severe CSU [weekly urticaria activity score (UAS7) > 28] resistant to anti-H1 antihistamines. Patients were started on omalizumab 150 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks. Dose and interval between administrations were adjusted according to clinical response (189 administrations; treatment duration range 2-38 months).

RESULTS

Mean UAS7 was 36.3 ± 5.4. Of the 13 patients, all had experienced angio-oedema, while in addition, 7 had delayed pressure urticaria (DPU) and 1 had solar urticaria (SU). After omalizumab treatment, 4 (30.8%) of the 13 patients had complete response (CR), and the remaining 8 (61.5%) had partial response. CR was achieved with a dose of 150 mg every 4 (n = 2 patients) or 5 (n = 2) weeks. One of these patients remained disease-free after stopping treatment. Partial responses were achieved with 150 mg every 4 weeks (n = 4) and with 300 mg (n = 4) at intervals of 5 weeks (n = 1), 4 weeks (n = 2) or 3 weeks (n = 1). Only one patient (7.7%) did not show significant improvement, despite a dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks. There were no significant differences in epidemiological, clinical and laboratory data between the different response groups. Only two adverse events were observed: one was mild headache and the other was severe angio-oedema and aggravation of urticaria within 6 h of omalizumab administration.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab dose and interval between administrations could be individualized for long-term management of CSU.

Omalizumab for chronic urticaria in Latin America

BACKGROUND

Chronic urticaria (CU) is defined as the spontaneous appearance of wheals, with or without angioedema, persisting for ≥6 weeks. Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is a type of CU which affects 0.5-1 % of the global population, but it represents a high burden to patients. In recent years, omalizumab is available as treatment of disease. Our aim is to extend previous findings, analyzing effects of omalizumab on symptoms in Latin American patients with CSU.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of patients treated with omalizumab in Cuenca-Ecuador. 150 mg omalizumab was administered every 4 weeks, and its effects were measured by Urticaria Activity Score (UAS) at baseline and each month in follow up. Complete response was defined as a UAS of 0 or 1, and partial response was classified as a UAS of 2 or more. Also, demographic and clinical variables were collected. Descriptive analyses were employed. Response rates were summarized as counts and percentages after 3 and 5 months. Related Samples Wilcoxon signed rank tests were used to compare UAS at baseline and after 3 months. P values <0.05 indicated statistical significance.

RESULTS

26 subjects were enrolled, almost half were female individuals (57.7 %), with mean age 47.8 years (range, 18-81 years). Mean duration of CU after diagnosis was 23.3 months (range, 2-180 months). Mean UAS at baseline was 5.7 points (range, 4-6 points). Nine patients (34.6 %) completed 3 months of treatment (33 % reported a complete response), with a mean difference in UAS of 3.33 (p = 0.01). Four patients completed 5 months of treatment (75.0 % showed a complete response). All patients previously treated with first-generation antihistamines plus corticosteroids showed no responses at neither 3 nor 5 months of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Omalizumab is an effective treatment for patients with CU. It is necessary to conduct some future investigations where we can establish if 150 mg could be an option in developing countries.