1
|
Sahakyan MA, Tholfsen T, Kleive D, Yaqub S, Kazaryan AM, Buanes T, Røsok BI, Labori KJ, Edwin B. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy Following Prior Upper Abdominal Surgery (Pancreatectomy and Prior Surgery). J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 25:1787-1794. [PMID: 33170476 PMCID: PMC8275495 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-020-04858-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/31/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Previous abdominal surgery can be a risk factor for perioperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic procedures. Today, distal pancreatectomy is increasingly performed laparoscopically. This study investigates the consequences of prior upper abdominal surgery (PUAS) for laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). METHODS Patients who had undergone LDP from April 1997 to January 2020 were included. Based on the history and type of PUAS, these were categorized into three groups: minimally invasive (I), open (II), and no PUAS (III). To reduce possible confounding factors, the groups were matched in 1:2:4 fashion based on age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and American Society of Anesthesiology grade. RESULTS After matching, 30, 60, and 120 patients were included in the minimally invasive, open and no PUAS groups, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found in terms of intraoperative outcomes. Postoperative morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay were similar. Open PUAS was associated with higher Comprehensive Complication Index (33.7 vs 20.9 vs 26.2, p = 0.03) and greater proportion of patients with ≥ 2 complications (16.7 vs 0 vs 6.7%, p = 0.02) compared with minimally invasive and no PUAS. Male sex, overweight (BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2), diagnosis of neuroendocrine neoplasia, and open PUAS were risk factors for severe morbidity in the univariable analysis. Only open PUAS was statistically significant in the multivariable model. CONCLUSIONS PUAS does not impair the feasibility and safety of LDP as its perioperative outcomes are largely comparable to those in patients without PUAS. However, open PUAS increases the burden and severity of postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mushegh A Sahakyan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway.
| | - Tore Tholfsen
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dyre Kleive
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sheraz Yaqub
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Airazat M Kazaryan
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway
- Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Trond Buanes
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Ingvald Røsok
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Knut Jørgen Labori
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Center, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, 0027, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Research & Development, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo, Norway
- Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Pikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kazaryan AM, Solberg I, Aghayan DL, Sahakyan MA, Reiertsen O, Semikov VI, Shulutko AM, Edwin B. Does tumor size influence the outcome of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy? HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1280-1287. [PMID: 31843445 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2019] [Revised: 11/09/2019] [Accepted: 11/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is a safe procedure, but its role in resection of large pancreatic lesions has been questioned. METHODS Patients who underwent LDP for pancreatic solitary tumors in 1997-2017 were included in this study. The patients were divided into three groups in accordance with tumor size: <3.5 cm (group I); from 3.5 cm to 7.0 cm (group II), and ≥7 cm (group III). RESULTS 218, 146 and 58 patients were identified in the groups I, II and III. Median tumor size in the groups I, II and III was 20, 47 and 81.5 mm (p < 0.001). Nine procedures (2.1%) were converted including 1(0.5%), 5(3.4%) and 3(5.2%) in the groups I, II and III (p = 0.036). Median operative time was longer in the group III compared with the groups I and II - 195 vs 158 and 159 min (p = 0.005). Median blood loss did not differ. Regression analysis revealed correlation between tumor size and operative time (R = 0.103; P = 0.035) and no correlation between tumor size and blood loss (R = 0.075; P = 0.125). Hospital stay was 5 days, similar in all groups.Postoperative morbidity was similar - 38.5, 32 and 34% in the group I, II and III. CONCLUSION LDP can be safely performed laparoscopically with outcomes similar to those for smaller tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Airazat M Kazaryan
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Østfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway; Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.
| | | | - Davit L Aghayan
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mushegh A Sahakyan
- Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University After M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia; Department of General and Laparoscopic Surgery, Central Clinical Military Hospital, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Ola Reiertsen
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vasiliy I Semikov
- Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander M Shulutko
- Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital - Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miyamoto R, Sano N, Maeda M, Inagawa S, Ohkohchi N. Modified Reinforced Staple Closure Technique Decreases Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula After Distal Pancreatectomy. Indian J Surg Oncol 2019; 10:587-593. [PMID: 31866728 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-019-00958-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a serious complication that can occur following distal pancreatectomy (DP). Recent studies demonstrated that the use of reinforced staplers with bioabsorbable mesh significantly reduced the incidence of POPF, although the safety and efficacy of this approach remain controversial. Therefore, we originally developed a modified closure technique that combines the use of a reinforced stapler with bioabsorbable mesh with suture closure of the main pancreatic duct. The aim of this study was to determine whether our closure technique is predictive of POPF after DP. Fifty-nine consecutive patients who underwent DP were retrospectively enrolled. Based on the closure technique, we divided the cohort into a suture group (group A; n = 39) and a modified closure group (group B; n = 20). Using multivariate analysis, surgical closure techniques, including our method, and other well-known POPF risk factors were independently assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified no pathological fibrosis (odds ratio [OR], 5.41; p < 0.01), body mass index (> 25 kg/m2) (OR, 3.01; p = 0.02), and pancreatic stump closure technique (group A) (OR, 2.04; p = 0.01) as independent risk factors for POPF. The present study indicated that our modified closure technique is an additional useful technique to reduce POPF after DP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryoichi Miyamoto
- 1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558 Japan
- 2Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| | - Naoki Sano
- 1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558 Japan
| | - Michihiro Maeda
- 1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558 Japan
| | - Satoshi Inagawa
- 1Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tsukuba Medical Center Hospital, 1-3-1 Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8558 Japan
| | - Nobuhiro Ohkohchi
- 2Department of Surgery, Division of Gastroenterological and Hepatobiliary Surgery and Organ Transplantation, University of Tsukuba, 1-1-1 Tennodai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8575 Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sivasanker M, Desouza A, Bhandare M, Chaudhari V, Goel M, Shrikhande SV. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for all pancreatic body and tail tumors: rationale and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:183-190. [PMID: 30790046 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01763-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2018] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) has been propagated as the standard of care for pancreatic cancers involving the body and tail of the pancreas. This procedure has been shown to have promising results in enhancing the microscopically negative tangential resection margins as well as the lymph node yield. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively maintained database on the resections performed for all pancreatic body and tail tumors at Tata Memorial Centre. RESULTS Sixty-five patients underwent RAMPS without any perioperative mortality. The various pathologies comprised of adenocarcinoma (41.5%), neuroendocrine tumors (12.3%), solid pseudopapillary epithelial neoplasm (15.3%), cystic neoplasms (15.2%), etc. The R0 resection rate was 87.7%. Among this cohort, 27 patients had pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The 3-year OS and DFS for distal pancreatic cancers were 56% and 38%, respectively, but 3-year OS and DFS for other distal pancreatic tumors were 97% and 73%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, R0 resection significantly improved disease-free survival (p = 0.023) for pancreatic cancer. CONCLUSION RAMPS procedure aids to achieve high negative tangential margins for all tumors involving the body and tail of the pancreas and not just pancreatic cancer in isolation. Since preoperative histologic diagnosis is not routinely indicated and also a number of other distal pancreatic tumors carry a relatively better prognosis compared with pancreatic cancer, our results provide further evidence that RAMPS should be considered as the procedure of choice for all operable tumors involving body and tail of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masillamany Sivasanker
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Pondicherry, India
| | - Ashwin Desouza
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Manish Bhandare
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Vikram Chaudhari
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Mahesh Goel
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India
| | - Shailesh V Shrikhande
- Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Department of Gastrointestinal and HPB Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai, 400012, India.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peng YP, Zhu XL, Yin LD, Zhu Y, Wei JS, Wu JL, Miao Y. Risk factors of postoperative pancreatic fistula in patients after distal pancreatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7:185. [PMID: 28298641 PMCID: PMC5428241 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00311-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2016] [Accepted: 02/20/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a common complication following distal pancreatectomy (DP). However, the risk factors of this complication in patients after DP still remain controversial. The aim of our study is to estimate the association between potential risk factors and POPF. Relevant articles published up to June 21, 2016 were identified via PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library. Studies that examined the risk factors of POPF following DP were enrolled. 20 articles (2070 patients) were finally included in this study. The pooled data suggested that patients with soft pancreas, higher Body Mass Index (BMI), blood transfusion, elevated intraoperative blood loss, and longer operative time had a decreased risk for POPF. However, age, gender, malignant pathology, types of stump closure, octreotide therapy, history of diabetes and chronic pancreatitis, splenectomy, multiorgan resection, main duct ligation, preoperative serum albumin levels, PGA felt wrapping, and extended lymphadenectomy could not be regarded as risk factors for POPF. Our analytic data demonstrated that pancreas texture, BMI, blood transfusion, intraoperative blood loss, and operative time were clinical predictor for POPF. This study may assist surgeons to screen patients with high risk of POPF and select appropriate treatment measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun-Peng Peng
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiao-Le Zhu
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China
| | - Ling-Di Yin
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Zhu
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China
| | - Ji-Shu Wei
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun-Li Wu
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Miao
- Pancreas Institute of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China. .,Pancreas Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China. .,Department of General Surgery, The first Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, People's Republic of China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laparoscopic surgery for pancreatic neoplasms: the European association for endoscopic surgery clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc 2017; 31:2023-2041. [PMID: 28205034 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5414-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Introduced more than 20 years ago, laparoscopic pancreatic surgery (LAPS) has not reached a uniform acceptance among HPB surgeons. As a result, there is no consensus regarding its use in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. This study, organized by the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES), aimed to develop consensus statements and clinical recommendations on the application of LAPS in these patients. METHODS An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreatic surgery. Each panelist performed a critical appraisal of the literature and prepared evidence-based statements assessed by other panelists during Delphi process. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting followed by the second round of Delphi. Modified statements were presented at the plenary session of the 24th International Congress of the EAES in Amsterdam and in a web-based survey. RESULTS LAPS included laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD), enucleation, central pancreatectomy, and ultrasound. In general, LAPS was found to be safe, especially in experienced hands, and also advantageous over an open approach in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative recovery, and quality of life. Eighty-five percent or higher proportion of responders agreed with the majority (69.5%) of statements. However, the evidence is predominantly based on retrospective case-control studies and systematic reviews of these studies, clearly affected by selection bias. Furthermore, no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been published to date, although four RCTs are currently underway in Europe. CONCLUSIONS LAPS is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. LDP is feasible and safe, performed in many centers, while LPD is limited to few centers. RCTs and registry studies are essential to proceed with the assessment of LAPS.
Collapse
|
7
|
Iacono C. Pancreatic Surgery: Past, Present, and Future. Dig Surg 2016; 33:257-8. [PMID: 27216417 DOI: 10.1159/000445004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Calogero Iacono
- Department of Surgery, Unit of Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, University of Verona Medical School, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|