Immunotherapy of Melanoma

Oral melanoma: a multicenter study of 69 patients from Japan

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this multicenter retrospective study was to investigate the demographic characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with mucosal malignant melanoma (MM) of the oral cavity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a multicenter study involving 8 Japanese universities. The medical records of 69 patients who were diagnosed with primary oral MM between January 2000 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors for OS were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

There were 40 (58.0%) males and 29 (42.0%) females, and their mean (range) age was 69.8 ± 14.6 (22-96) years old. The most common primary site was the palate (30 patients, 43.5%). Stage IVA was the most common disease stage (36 patients, 52.2%). Radical therapy was performed in 55 patients (79.7%). The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the 69 patients were 64.6% and 42.5%, respectively. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the stage III patients were 85.9% and 72.5%, respectively, and those of the stage IVA patients were 56.3% and 26.0%, respectively. The 1-year OS rate of the stage IVB/IVC patients was 26.7%. The 2-year and 5-year OS rates of the radical therapy group were 74.1% and 50.5%, respectively, whereas the 2-year OS rate of the non-radical therapy group was 26.0%. An advanced T classification was the only identified prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: 6.312, 95% confidence interval: 1.133-38.522, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Early detection and radical treatment are essential for improving the prognosis of oral MM patients.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Early detection and adequate radical therapy leads to the better prognosis of oral MM patients.

Down-regulated expression of miR-582 predicts poor prognosis and facilitates melanoma progression by targeting FOXC1

Melanoma is one of the most common malignant tumors that originate from nerve sheath melanocytes and are produced in the skin and other organs. This paper mainly studied the role of miR-582 in melanoma. The expression of miR-582 in melanoma cell lines and tissues was evaluated by real-time quantitative PCR. Kaplan-Meier curve and Cox proportional hazards model analysis were used to investigate the prognostic value of miR-582 in melanoma. Cell proliferation, invasion, and migration were analyzed using CCK-8 and transwell assays. The results showed that miR-582 was significantly decreased in melanoma cells and tissues. Downregulation of miR-582 was associated with ulceration, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, and poor overall survival. The functional results showed that low expression of miR-582 can promote cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. FOXC1 was a direct target of miR-582. Overall, the expression of miR-582 is downregulated in melanoma tissues and cell lines. Low expression of miR-582 is associated with prognosis and progression of melanoma by targeting FOXC1. miR-582 may be a prognostic biomarker and a new therapeutic strategy for melanoma.

Antibody-Based Immunotherapy: Alternative Approaches for the Treatment of Metastatic Melanoma

Melanoma is the least common form of skin cancer and is associated with the highest mortality. Where melanoma is mostly unresponsive to conventional therapies (e.g., chemotherapy), BRAF inhibitor treatment has shown improved therapeutic outcomes. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) relies on a light-activated compound to produce death-inducing amounts of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Their capacity to selectively accumulate in tumor cells has been confirmed in melanoma treatment with some encouraging results. However, this treatment approach has not reached clinical fruition for melanoma due to major limitations associated with the development of resistance and subsequent side effects. These adverse effects might be bypassed by immunotherapy in the form of antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) relying on the ability of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to target specific tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) and to be used as carriers to specifically deliver cytotoxic warheads into corresponding tumor cells. Of late, the continued refinement of ADC therapeutic efficacy has given rise to photoimmunotherapy (PIT) (a light-sensitive compound conjugated to mAbs), which by virtue of requiring light activation only exerts its toxic effect on light-irradiated cells. As such, this review aims to highlight the potential clinical benefits of various armed antibody-based immunotherapies, including PDT, as alternative approaches for the treatment of metastatic melanoma.

Desensitization of metastatic melanoma cells to therapeutic treatment through repeated exposure to dacarbazine

Aberrant anti-cancer drug efflux mediated by membrane protein ABC transporters (ABCB5 and ABCG2) is thought to characterize melanoma heterogeneous chemoresistant populations, presumed to have unlimited proliferative and self-renewal abilities. Therefore, this study primarily aimed to investigate whether continuous exposure of melanoma cells to dacarbazine (DTIC) chemotherapeutic drug enriches cultures with therapy resistant cells. Thereafter, we sought to determine whether combining the genotoxic activity of DTIC with the oxidative insults of hypericin activated photodynamic therapy (HYP-PDT) could synergized to kill heterogenous chemoresistant melanoma populations. This study revealed that DTIC resistant (UCT Mel-1DTICR2) melanoma cells were less sensitive to all therapies than parental melanoma cells (UCT Mel-1), yet combination therapy was the most efficient. At the exception of DTIC treatment, both HYP-PDT and the combination therapy were effective in significantly reducing the Hoechst non-effluxing dye melanoma main populations (MP) compared to their side population (SP) counterparts. Likewise, HYP-PDT and combination therapy significantly reduced self-renewal capacity, increased expression of ABCB5 and ABCG2 transporters and differentially induced cell cycle arrest and cell death (apoptosis or necrosis) depending on the melanoma MP cell type. Collectively, combination therapy could synergistically reduce melanoma proliferative and clonogenic potential. However, further research is needed to decipher the cellular mechanisms underlying this resistance which would enable combination therapy to reach therapeutic fruition.

Survival of oral mucosal melanoma according to treatment, tumour resection margin, and metastases

Because of the poor prognosis and of oral mucosal melanoma, and patients' short survival, large, randomised, clinical studies are difficult. We have investigated its demographic characteristics and analysed the effect of treatment, resection margins, and metastases on survival. We recorded age, sex, site of primary tumour, and types of treatment, survival, and metastases in 74 patients treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Survival was analysed based on bony invasion, depth of invasion, and resection margins, and we found that it varied depending on the primary site (p=0.002), and declined with liver (p=0.001) or brain (p=0.033) metastases. The two-year survival according to the primary site was as follows: palate 85% (n=32), anterior maxillary gingiva 53% (n=13), mandible 58% (n=13), and posterior maxillary gingival 74% (n=10) and buccal mucosa 50% (n=4). The two-year survival was 34% (n=8) in patients with liver metastases and 23% (n=7) in patients with brain metastases. In cases of bony invasion (p=0.005), depth of invasion (p=0.042), unclear resection margin (p=0.023), or higher T stages (p=0.009), the survival declined considerably. Neck dissection did not affect survival (p=0.343). Survival of the patients given chemotherapy was significantly lower (p=0.013) and the two-year survival was 54.0%. The patients given radiotherapy showed no significant difference in survival compared with those not given radiotherapy (p=0.107). In conclusion, primary site, bony invasion, resection margins, depth of invasion and systemic metastases were critical to predict prognosis and selection of treatment of oral mucosal melanoma.

Immune Cell Gene Signatures for Profiling the Microenvironment of Solid Tumors

The immune composition of the tumor microenvironment regulates processes including angiogenesis, metastasis, and the response to drugs or immunotherapy. To facilitate the characterization of the immune component of tumors from transcriptomics data, a number of immune cell transcriptome signatures have been reported that are made up of lists of marker genes indicative of the presence a given immune cell population. The majority of these gene signatures have been defined through analysis of isolated blood cells. However, blood cells do not reflect the differentiation or activation state of similar cells within tissues, including tumors, and consequently markers derived from blood cells do not necessarily transfer well to tissues. To address this issue, we generated a set of immune gene signatures derived directly from tissue transcriptomics data using a network-based deconvolution approach. We define markers for seven immune cell types, collectively named ImSig, and demonstrate how these markers can be used for the quantitative estimation of the immune cell content of tumor and nontumor tissue samples. The utility of ImSig is demonstrated through the stratification of melanoma patients into subgroups of prognostic significance and the identification of immune cells with the use of single-cell RNA-sequencing data derived from tumors. Use of ImSig is facilitated by an R package (imsig). Cancer Immunol Res; 6(11); 1388-400. ©2018 AACR.

Optimized dendritic cell vaccination induces potent CD8 T cell responses and anti-tumor effects in transgenic mouse melanoma models

Despite melanoma immunogenicity and remarkable therapeutic effects of negative immune checkpoint inhibitors, a significant fraction of patients does not respond to current treatments. This could be due to limitations in tumor immunogenicity and profound immunosuppression in the melanoma microenvironment. Moreover, insufficient tumor antigen processing and presentation by dendritic cells (DC) may hamper the development of tumor-specific T cells. Using two genetically engineered mouse melanoma models (RET and BRAF^V600E transgenic mice), in which checkpoint inhibitor therapy alone is not efficacious, we performed proof-of-concept studies with an improved, multivalent DC vaccination strategy based on our recently developed genetic mRNA cancer vaccines. The in vivo expression of multiple chimeric MHC class I receptors allows a simultaneous presentation of several melanoma-associated shared antigens tyrosinase related protein (TRP)-1, tyrosinase, human glycoprotein 100 and TRP-2. The DC vaccine induced a significantly improved survival in both transgenic mouse models. Vaccinated melanoma-bearing mice displayed an increased CD8 T cell reactivity indicated by a higher IFN-γ production and an upregulation of activation marker expression along with an attenuated immunosuppressive pattern of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC) and regulatory T cells (Treg). The combination of DC vaccination with ultra-low doses of paclitaxel or anti-PD-1 antibodies resulted in further prolongation of mouse survival associated with a stronger reduction of MDSC and Treg immunosuppressive phenotype. Our data suggest that an improved multivalent DC vaccine based on shared tumor antigens induces potent anti-tumor effects and could be combined with checkpoint inhibitors or targeting immunosuppressive cells to further improve their therapeutic efficiency.

RNA-transfection of γ/δ T cells with a chimeric antigen receptor or an α/β T-cell receptor: a safer alternative to genetically engineered α/β T cells for the immunotherapy of melanoma

Background

Adoptive T-cell therapy relying on conventional T cells transduced with T-cell receptors (TCRs) or chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) has caused substantial tumor regression in several clinical trials. However, genetically engineered T cells have been associated with serious side-effects due to off-target toxicities and massive cytokine release. To obviate these concerns, we established a protocol adaptable to GMP to expand and transiently transfect γ/δ T cells with mRNA.

Methods

PBMC from healthy donors were stimulated using zoledronic-acid or OKT3 to expand γ/δ T cells and bulk T cells, respectively. Additionally, CD8⁺ T cells and γ/δ T cells were MACS-isolated from PBMC and expanded with OKT3. Next, these four populations were electroporated with RNA encoding a gp100/HLA-A2-specific TCR or a CAR specific for MCSP. Thereafter, receptor expression, antigen-specific cytokine secretion, specific cytotoxicity, and killing of the endogenous γ/δ T cell-target Daudi were analyzed.

Results

Using zoledronic-acid in average 6 million of γ/δ T cells with a purity of 85% were generated from one million PBMC. MACS-isolation and OKT3-mediated expansion of γ/δ T cells yielded approximately ten times less cells. OKT3-expanded and CD8⁺ MACS-isolated conventional T cells behaved correspondingly similar. All employed T cells were efficiently transfected with the TCR or the CAR. Upon respective stimulation, γ/δ T cells produced IFNγ and TNF, but little IL-2 and the zoledronic-acid expanded T cells exceeded MACS-γ/δ T cells in antigen-specific cytokine secretion. While the cytokine production of γ/δ T cells was in general lower than that of conventional T cells, specific cytotoxicity against melanoma cell lines was similar. In contrast to OKT3-expanded and MACS-CD8⁺ T cells, mock-electroporated γ/δ T cells also lysed tumor cells reflecting the γ/δ T cell-intrinsic anti-tumor activity. After transfection, γ/δ T cells were still able to kill MHC-deficient Daudi cells.

Conclusion

We present a protocol adaptable to GMP for the expansion of γ/δ T cells and their subsequent RNA-transfection with tumor-specific TCRs or CARs. Given the transient receptor expression, the reduced cytokine release, and the equivalent cytotoxicity, these γ/δ T cells may represent a safer complementation to genetically engineered conventional T cells in the immunotherapy of melanoma (Exper Dermatol 26: 157, 2017, J Investig Dermatol 136: A173, 2016).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3539-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Downregulation of miR-493 promoted melanoma proliferation by suppressing IRS4 expression

Accumulating evidence indicated that aberrantly expressed microRNAs play critical roles in the initiation and progression of human cancers. However, the underlying functions of miR-493 in human melanoma remains unknown. Here, our study found that miR-493 expression was downregulated in human melanoma tissues and cells. Overexpression of miR-493 suppressed cell proliferation and cell cycle in human melanoma cell line A375. IRS4 was defined as a target for downregulation by miR-493 and was confirmed by luciferase assay. We also found that knockdown of IRS4 counteracted the proliferation promotion by miR-493 inhibitor. In summary, these results demonstrated that miR-493 acts as a tumor suppressor and inhibits cell proliferation and cell cycle in human melanoma by directly targeting IRS4.

Pharmacological interventions for melanoma: Comparative analysis using bayesian meta-analysis

We conducted a network meta-analysis in order to compare different strategies for managing melanoma patients. Electronic databases were searched for eligible randomized trials that compared different strategies in efficacy and tolerability. Five interventions were associated with a significant improvement in PFS over chemotherapy (all HR < 1): Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab, Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg and Ipilimumab + Nivolumab. Three interventions exhibited significantly improved OS results over chemotherapy (all HR < 1): Ipilimumab, Nivolumab and Ipilimumab + Chemotherapy. Four interventions were superior to chemotherapy in CR and PR (all OR > 1): Nivolumab, Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg, Pembrolizumab 2 mg/kg and Ipilimumab + Nivolumab. However, the other seven interventions were associated with an increased risk of pruritus compared to chemotherapy (all OR > 1). Ipilimumab, Tremelimumab, Ipilimumab + Nivolumab and Ipilimumab + Chemotherapy might result in a higher risk of diarrhea compared to chemotherapy (all OR > 1). Immune checkpoint therapy or combined interventions might be more effective than chemotherapy for managing melanoma patients. However, chemotherapy appears to be more tolerable than these combined strategies with respect to adverse events.