Cochlear implant electrode design for safe and effective treatment

The optimal placement of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode inside the scala tympani compartment to create an effective electrode-neural interface is the base for a successful CI treatment. The characteristics of an effective electrode design include (a) electrode matching every possible variation in the inner ear size, shape, and anatomy, (b) electrically covering most of the neuronal elements, and (c) preserving intra-cochlear structures, even in non-hearing preservation surgeries. Flexible electrode arrays of various lengths are required to reach an angular insertion depth of 680° to which neuronal cell bodies are angularly distributed and to minimize the rate of electrode scalar deviation. At the time of writing this article, the current scientific evidence indicates that straight lateral wall electrode outperforms perimodiolar electrode by preventing electrode tip fold-over and scalar deviation. Most of the available literature on electrode insertion depth and hearing outcomes supports the practice of physically placing an electrode to cover both the basal and middle turns of the cochlea. This is only achievable with longer straight lateral wall electrodes as single-sized and pre-shaped perimodiolar electrodes have limitations in reaching beyond the basal turn of the cochlea and in offering consistent modiolar hugging placement in every cochlea. For malformed inner ear anatomies that lack a central modiolar trunk, the perimodiolar electrode is not an effective electrode choice. Most of the literature has failed to demonstrate superiority in hearing outcomes when comparing perimodiolar electrodes with straight lateral wall electrodes from single CI manufacturers. In summary, flexible and straight lateral wall electrode type is reported to be gentle to intra-cochlear structures and has the potential to electrically stimulate most of the neuronal elements, which are necessary in bringing full benefit of the CI device to recipients.

The Effect of Electrode Position on Behavioral and Electrophysiologic Measurements in Perimodiolar Cochlear Implants

BACKGROUND

The shape and position of cochlear implant electrodes could potentially influence speech perception, as this determines the proximity of implant electrodes to the spiral ganglion. However, the literature to date reveals no consistent association between speech perception and either the proximity of electrode to the medial cochlear wall or the depth of insertion. These relationships were explored in a group of implant recipients receiving the same precurved electrode.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of adults who underwent cochlear implantation with Cochlear Ltd.'s Slim Perimodiolar electrode at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital between 2015 and 2018 (n = 52). Postoperative images were obtained using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and analyzed by multi-planar reconstruction to identify the position of the electrode contacts within the cochlea, including estimates of the proximity of the electrodes to the medial cochlear wall or modiolus and the angular depth of insertion. Consonant-vowel-consonant (CVC) monosyllabic phonemes were determined preoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) thresholds and impedance were measured from the implant array immediately after implantation. The relationships between electrode position and speech perception, electrode impedance, and ECAP threshold were an analyzed by Pearson correlation.

RESULTS

Age had a negative impact on speech perception at 3 months but not 12 months. None of the electrode-wide measures of proximity between electrode contacts and the modiolus, nor measures of proximity to the medial cochlear wall, nor the angular depth of insertion of the most apical electrode correlated with speech perception. However, there was a moderate correlation between speech perception and the position of the most basal electrode contacts; poorer speech perception was associated with a greater distance to the modiolus. ECAP thresholds were inversely related to the distance between electrode contacts and the modiolus, but there was no clear association between this distance and impedance.

CONCLUSIONS

Speech perception was significantly affected by the proximity of the most basal electrodes to the modiolus, suggesting that positioning of these electrodes may be important for optimizing speech perception. ECAP thresholds might provide an indication of this proximity, allowing for its optimization during surgery.

The impact of the size and angle of the cochlear basal turn on translocation of a pre-curved mid-scala cochlear implant electrode

Scalar translocation is a severe form of intra-cochlear trauma during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion. This study explored the hypothesis that the dimensions of the cochlear basal turn and orientation of its inferior segment relative to surgically relevant anatomical structures influence the scalar translocation rates of a pre-curved CI electrode. In a cohort of 40 patients implanted with the Advanced Bionics Mid-Scala electrode array, the scalar translocation group (40%) had a significantly smaller mean distance A of the cochlear basal turn (p < 0.001) and wider horizontal angle between the inferior segment of the cochlear basal turn and the mastoid facial nerve (p = 0.040). A logistic regression model incorporating distance A (p = 0.003) and horizontal facial nerve angle (p = 0.017) explained 44.0-59.9% of the variance in scalar translocation and correctly classified 82.5% of cases. Every 1mm decrease in distance A was associated with a 99.2% increase in odds of translocation [95% confidence interval 80.3%, 100%], whilst every 1-degree increase in the horizontal facial nerve angle was associated with an 18.1% increase in odds of translocation [95% CI 3.0%, 35.5%]. The study findings provide an evidence-based argument for the development of a navigation system for optimal angulation of electrode insertion during CI surgery to reduce intra-cochlear trauma.

Preservation of Residual Hearing: Long-Term Results With a Mid-Scala Electrode

OBJECTIVE

The long-term preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation has become a major goal over the past few years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate residual hearing in the long-term follow-up using mid-scala electrodes.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected data from 27 patients who were implanted between 2014 and 2015 with residual hearing in the low-frequency range using a mid-scala electrode. Measurements of the hearing thresholds were carried out directly postoperatively (day 1 after surgery) and in the long-term follow-up 43.7 ± 6.9 months. The calculation of the extent of audiological hearing preservation was determined using the HEARRING group formula by Skarsynski.

RESULTS

Postoperative preservation of residual hearing was achieved in 69.2% of the cases in the low-frequency range between 250 Hz and 1 kHz, of which 89.5% of the patients had frequencies that suggested using electroacoustic stimulation (EAS). In the long-term follow-up, 30.8% of the patients showed residual hearing; however, 57.1% had apparently benefited from EAS.

CONCLUSION

Preservation of residual hearing is feasible in the long term using mid-scala electrodes. Postoperatively, there is over the half of patients who benefit from an EAS strategy. The long-term follow-up shows a certain decrease in residual hearing. However, these results are comparable to studies relating to other types of electrodes. Further research should be conducted in future to better evaluate hearing loss in long-term follow-up, compared to direct postoperative audiological results.

Effect of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth on Speech Perception Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Objective

The suitable electrode array choice is broadly discussed in cochlear implantation surgery. Whether to use a shorter electrode length under the aim of structure preservation versus choosing a longer array to achieve a greater cochlear coverage is a matter of debate. The aim of this review is to identify the impact of the insertion depth of a cochlear implant (CI) electrode array on CI users' speech perception outcomes.

Databases Reviewed

PubMed was searched for English-language articles that were published in a peer-reviewed journal from 1997 to 2022.

Methods

A systematic electronic search of the literature was carried out using PubMed to find relevant literature on the impact of insertion depth on speech perception. The review was conducted according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines of reporting. Studies in both, children and adults with pre- or postlingual hearing loss, implanted with a CI were included in this study. Articles written in languages other than English, literature reviews, meta-analyses, animal studies, histopathological studies, or studies pertaining exclusively to imaging modalities without reporting correlations between insertion depth and speech outcomes were excluded. The risk of bias was determined using the "Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions" tool. Articles were extracted by 2 authors independently using predefined search terms. The titles and abstracts were screened manually to identify studies that potentially meet the inclusion criteria. The extracted information included: the study population, type of hearing loss, outcomes reported, devices used, speech perception outcomes, insertion depth (linear insertion depth and/or the angular insertion depth), and correlation between insertion depth and the speech perception outcomes.

Results

A total of 215 relevant studies were assessed for eligibility. Twenty-three studies met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed further. Seven studies found no significant correlation between insertion depth and speech perception outcomes. Fifteen found either a significant positive correlation or a positive effect between insertion depth and speech perception. Only 1 study found a significant negative correlation between insertion depth and speech perception outcomes.

Conclusion

Although most studies reported a positive effect of insertion depth on speech perception outcomes, one-third of the identified studies reported no correlation. Thus, the insertion depth must be considered as a contributing factor to speech perception rather than as a major decisive criterion.

Registration

This review has been registered in PROSPERO, the international prospective register of systematic reviews (CRD42021257547), available at https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/.

Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials

OBJECTIVES

Many studies have assessed the performance of individuals with cochlear implants (CIs) with electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs). These eCAP-based studies have focused on the amplitude information of the response, without considering the temporal firing properties of the excited auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), such as neural latency and synchrony. These temporal features have been associated with neural health in animal studies and, consequently, could be of importance to clinical CI outcomes. With a deconvolution method, combined with a unitary response, the eCAP can be mathematically unraveled into the compound discharge latency distribution (CDLD). The CDLD reflects both the number and the temporal firing properties of excited ANFs. The present study aimed to determine to what extent the CDLD derived from intraoperatively recorded eCAPs is related to speech perception in individuals with CIs.

DESIGN

This retrospective study acquired data on monosyllabic word recognition scores and intraoperative eCAP amplitude growth functions from 124 adult patients with postlingual deafness that received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K device. The CDLD was determined for each recorded eCAP waveform by deconvolution. Each of the two Gaussian components of the CDLD was described by three parameters: the amplitude, the firing latency (the average latency of each component of the CDLD), and the variance of the CDLD components (an indication of the synchronicity of excited ANFs). Apart from these six CDLD parameters, the area under the CDLD curve (AUCD) and the slope of the AUCD growth function were determined as well. The AUCD was indicative of the total number of excited ANFs over time. The slope of the AUCD growth function indicated the increases in the number of excited ANFs with stimulus level. Associations between speech perception and each of these eight CDLD-related parameters were investigated with linear mixed modeling.

RESULTS

In individuals with CIs, larger amplitudes of the two CDLD components, greater AUCD, and steeper slopes of the AUCD growth function were all significantly associated with better speech perception. In addition, a smaller latency variance in the early CDLD component, but not in the late, was significantly associated with better speech recognition scores. Speech recognition was not significantly dependent on CDLD latencies. The AUCD and the slope of the AUCD growth function provided a similar explanation of the variance in speech perception (R 2 ) as the eCAP amplitude, the slope of the amplitude growth function, the amplitude, and variance of the first CDLD component.

CONCLUSION

The results demonstrate that both the number and the neural synchrony of excited ANFs, as revealed by CDLDs, are indicative of postimplantation speech perception in individuals with a CI. Because the CDLD-based parameters yielded a higher significance than the eCAP amplitude or the AGF slope, the authors conclude that CDLDs can serve as a clinical predictor of the survival of ANFs and that they have predictive value for postoperative speech perception performance. Thus, it would be worthwhile to incorporate the CDLD into eCAP measures in future clinical applications.

Dynamic Current Focusing Compared to Monopolar Stimulation in a Take-Home Trial of Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the performance of a dynamic partial tripolar cochlear implant speech encoding strategy termed dynamic current focusing (DCF) to monopolar stimulation (MP) using spectro-temporal, temporal, and speech-in-noise recognition testing.

DESIGN

DCF is a strategy that utilizes tripolar or high partial tripolar stimulation at threshold level and increases loudness by slowly widening current spread towards most comfortable level. Thirteen cochlear implant users were fitted with DCF and a non-steered MP matched on pulse rate, pulse width, and active electrodes. Nine participants completed the single-blinded within-subject crossover trial. Repeated testing consisted of four sessions. Strategies were allocated in a DCF-MP-DCF-MP or MP-DCF-MP-DCF design. Three-week adaptation periods ended with a test session in which speech-in-noise recognition (matrix speech-in-noise sentence test), spectro-temporal ripple tests (SMRT and STRIPES) and a temporal amplitude modulation detection test were conducted. All participants recorded their subjective experiences with both strategies using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire.

RESULTS

Participants' SMRT thresholds improved 0.40 ripples per octave ( p = 0.02, Bonferroni-corrected: p = 0.1) with DCF over MP at 65 dB SPL. No significant differences between the strategies were found on speech-in-noise recognition at conversational (65 dB SPL) and soft (45 dB SPL) loudness levels, temporal testing, STRIPES, or the SMRT at 45 dB SPL. After Bonferroni correction, a learning effect remained on the matrix speech-in-noise sentence test at both loudness levels (65 dB SPL: p = 0.01; 45 dB SPL: p = 0.02). There was no difference in learning effects over time between DCF and MP. Similarly, no significant differences were found in subjective experience on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. DCF reduced average battery life by 48% (5.1 hours) ( p < 0.001) compared to MP.

CONCLUSIONS

DCF may improve spectral resolution over MP at comfortable loudness (65 dB SPL) in cochlear implant users. However, the evidence collected in this study was weak and the significant result disappeared after Bonferroni correction. Also, not all spectral tests revealed this improvement. As expected, battery life was reduced for DCF. Although the current study is limited by its small sample size, considering previous studies, DCF does not consistently improve speech recognition in noise over MP strategies.

Toward neural health measurements for cochlear implantation: The relationship among electrode positioning, the electrically evoked action potential, impedances and behavioral stimulation levels

Introduction

Estimating differences in neural health across different sites within the individual cochlea potentially enables clinical applications for subjects with a cochlear implant. The electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) is a measure of neural excitability that possibly provides an indication of a neural condition. There are many factors, however, that affect this measure and increase the uncertainty of its interpretation. To better characterize the ECAP response, its relationship with electrode positioning, impedances, and behavioral stimulation levels was explored.

Methods

A total of 14 adult subjects implanted with an Advanced Bionics cochlear electrode array were prospectively followed up from surgery to 6 months postoperative. Insertion depth, distance to the modiolus, and distance to the medial wall were assessed for each electrode by postoperative CT analysis. ECAPs were measured intraoperatively and at three visits postoperatively on all 16 electrodes using the NRI feature of clinical programming software and characterized using multiple parameters. Impedances and behavioral stimulation levels were measured at every fitting session.

Results

Patterns in ECAPs and impedances were consistent over time, but high variability existed among subjects and between different positions in the cochlea. Electrodes located closer to the apex of the cochlea and closer to the modiolus generally showed higher neural excitation and higher impedances. Maximum loudness comfort levels were correlated strongly with the level of current needed to elicit a response of 100 μV ECAP.

Conclusion

Multiple factors contribute to the ECAP response in subjects with a cochlear implant. Further research might address whether the ECAP parameters used in this study will benefit clinical electrode fitting or the assessment of auditory neuron integrity.

The effect of the surgical approach and cochlear implant electrode on the structural integrity of the cochlea in human temporal bones

Cochlear implants (CI) restore hearing of severely hearing-impaired patients. Although this auditory prosthesis is widely considered to be very successful, structural cochlear trauma during cochlear implantation is an important problem, reductions of which could help to improve hearing outcomes and to broaden selection criteria. The surgical approach in cochlear implantation, i.e. round window (RW) or cochleostomy (CO), and type of electrode-array, perimodiolar (PM) or lateral wall (LW), are variables that might influence the probability of severe trauma. We investigated the effect of these two variables on scalar translocation (STL), a specific type of severe trauma. Thirty-two fresh frozen human cadaveric ears were evenly distributed over four groups receiving either RW or CO approach, and either LW or PM array. Conventional radiological multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) was compared with a reconstruction method that uncoils the spiral shape of the cochlea (UCR). Histological analysis showed that RW with PM array had STL rate of 87% (7/8), CO approach with LW array 75% (6/8), RW approach with LW array 50% (4/8) and CO approach with PM array 29% (2/7). STL assessment using UCR showed a higher inter-observer and histological agreement (91 and 94% respectively), than that using MPR (69 and 74% respectively). In particular, LW array positions were difficult to assess with MPR. In conclusion, the interaction between surgical approach and type of array should be preoperatively considered in cochlear implant surgery. UCR technique is advised for radiological assessment of CI positions, and in general it might be useful for pathologies involving the inner ear or other complex shaped bony tubular structures.

Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life after Cochlear Implantation in Patients with Long-Term Deafness

Background: Hearing-related quality of life (QoL) after cochlear implantation (CI) is as important as audiological performance. We evaluated the functional results and QoL after CI in a heterogeneous patient cohort with emphasis on patients with long-term deafness (>10 years). Methods: Twenty-eight patients (n = 32 implanted ears, within n = 12 long-term deaf ears) implanted with a mid-scala electrode array were included in this retrospective mono-centric cohort study. Speech intelligibility for monosyllables (SIM), speech reception thresholds (SRT50) and QoL with Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ) were registered. Correlation of SIM and QoL was analyzed. Results: SIM and SRT50 improved significantly 12 months postoperatively up to 54.8 ± 29.1% and 49.3 ± 9.6 dB SPL, respectively. SIM progressively improved up to 1 year, but some early-deafened, late implanted patients developed speech understanding several years after implantation. The global and all subdomain QoL scores increased significantly up to 12 months postoperatively and we found a correlation of SIM and global QoL score at 12 months postoperatively. Several patients of the “poor performer” (SIM < 40%) group reported high improvement of hearing-related QoL. Conclusions: Cochlear implantation provides a benefit in hearing-related QoL, even in some patients with low postoperative speech intelligibility results. Consequently, hearing-related QoL scores should be routinely used as outcome measure beside standard speech understanding tests, as well. Further studies with a prospective multi-centric design are needed to identify factors influencing post-implantation functional results and QoL in the patient group of long-term deafness.

Predicting Cochlear Implant Electrode Placement Using Monopolar, Three-Point and Four-Point Impedance Measurements

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between cochlear implant (CI) electrode distances to the cochleas inner wall (the modiolus) and electrical impedance measurements made at the CIs electrode contacts. We introduced a protocol for three-point impedances in which we recorded bipolar impedances in response to monopolar stimulation at a neighboring electrode. We aimed to assess the usability of three-point impedances and two existing CI impedance measurement methods (monopolar and four-point impedances) for predicting electrode positioning during CI insertion.

METHODS

Impedances were recorded during stepwise CI electrode array insertions in cadaveric human temporal bones. The positioning of the electrodes with respect to the modiolus was assessed at each step using cone beam computed tomography. Linear mixed regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between the impedances and electrode-modiolar distances. The experimental results were compared to clinical impedance data and to an existing lumped-element model of an implanted CI.

RESULTS

Three-point and four-point impedances strongly correlated with electrode-modiolar distance. In contrast, monopolar impedances were only minimally affected by changes in electrode positioning with respect to the modiolus. An overall model specificity of 62% was achieved when incorporating all impedance parameters. This specificity could be increased beyond 73% when prior expectations of electrode positioning were incorporated in the model.

CONCLUSION

Three-point and four-point impedances are promising measures to predict electrode-modiolar distance in real-time during CI insertion.

SIGNIFICANCE

This work shows how electrical impedance measurements can be used to predict the CIs electrode positioning in a biologically realistic model.

The Relationship Between Impedance, Programming and Word Recognition in a Large Clinical Dataset of Cochlear Implant Recipients

Cochlear implant programming typically involves measuring electrode impedance, selecting a speech processing strategy and fitting the dynamic range of electrical stimulation. This study retrospectively analyzed a clinical dataset of adult cochlear implant recipients to understand how these variables relate to speech recognition. Data from 425 implanted post-lingually deafened ears with Advanced Bionics devices were analyzed. A linear mixed-effects model was used to infer how impedance, programming and patient factors were associated with monosyllabic word recognition scores measured in quiet. Additional analyses were conducted on subsets of data to examine the role of speech processing strategy on scores, and the time taken for the scores of unilaterally implanted patients to plateau. Variation in basal impedance was negatively associated with word score, suggesting importance in evaluating the profile of impedance. While there were small, negative bivariate correlations between programming level metrics and word scores, these relationships were not clearly supported by the model that accounted for other factors. Age at implantation was negatively associated with word score, and duration of implant experience was positively associated with word score, which could help to inform candidature and guide expectations. Electrode array type was also associated with word score. Word scores measured with traditional continuous interleaved sampling and current steering speech processing strategies were similar. The word scores of unilaterally implanted patients largely plateaued within 6-months of activation. However, there was individual variation which was not related to initially measured impedance and programming levels.

Evaluating cochlear insertion trauma and hearing preservation after cochlear implantation (CIPRES): a study protocol for a randomized single-blind controlled trial

Background

In order to preserve residual hearing in patients with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive a cochlear implant (CI), insertion trauma to the delicate structures of the cochlea needs to be minimized. The surgical approach comprises the conventional mastoidectomy-posterior tympanotomy (MPT) to arrive at the middle ear, followed by either a cochleostomy (CO) or the round window (RW) approach. Both techniques have their benefits and disadvantages. Another important aspect in structure preservation is the design of the electrode array. Two different designs are used: a “straight” lateral wall lying electrode array (LW) or a “pre-curved” perimodiolar lying electrode array (PM). Interestingly, until now, the best surgical approach and design of the implant is uncertain. Our hypothesis is that there is a difference in hearing preservation outcomes between the four possible treatment options.

Methods

We designed a monocenter, multi-arm, randomized controlled trial to compare insertion trauma between four groups of patients, with each group having a unique combination of an electrode array type (LW or PM) and surgical approach (RW or CO). In total, 48 patients will be randomized into one of these four intervention groups. Our primary objective is the comparison of postoperative hearing preservation between these four groups. Secondly, we aim to assess structure preservation (i.e., scalar translocation, with basilar membrane disruption or tip fold-over of array) for each group. Thirdly, we will compare objective outcomes of hearing and structure preservation by way of electrocochleography (ECochG).

Discussion

Cochlear implantation by way of a cochleostomy or round window approach, using different electrode array types, is the standard medical care for patients with severe to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, as it is a relatively simple and low-risk procedure that greatly benefits patients. However, loss of residual hearing remains a problem. This trial is the first randomized controlled trial that evaluates the effect of cochlear insertion trauma of several CI treatment options on hearing preservation.

Trial registration

Netherlands Trial Register (NTR) NL8586. Registered on 4 May 2020. Retrospectively registered; 3/48 participants were included before registration.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-021-05878-2.

Detection of Translocation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Arrays by Intracochlear Impedance Measurements

OBJECTIVES

Misplacement of the electrode array is associated with impaired speech perception in patients with cochlear implants (CIs). Translocation of the electrode array is the most common misplacement. When a CI is translocated, it crosses the basilar membrane from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli. The position of the implant can be determined on a postoperative CT scan. However, such a scan is not obtained routinely after CI insertion in many hospitals, due to radiation exposure and processing time. Previous studies have shown that impedance measures might provide information on the placement of the electrode arrays. The electrode impedance was measured by dividing the plateau voltage at the end of the first phase of the pulse by the injected current. The access resistance was calculated using the so-called access voltage at the first sampled time point after the start of the pulse divided by the injected current. In our study, we obtained the electrode impedance and the access resistance to detect electrode translocations using electrical field imaging. We have investigated how reliably these two measurements can detect electrode translocation, and which method performed best.

DESIGN

We calculated the electrode impedances and access resistances using electrical field imaging recordings from 100 HiFocus Mid-Scala CI (Advanced Bionics, Sylmar, CA) recipients. We estimated the normal values of these two measurements as the baselines of the implant placed in the cochlea without translocation. Next, we calculated the maximal electrode impedance deviation and the maximal access-resistance deviation from the respective baselines as predictors of translocation. We classified these two predictors as translocations or nontranslocations based on the bootstrap sampling method and receiver operating characteristics curves analysis. The accuracy could be calculated by comparing those predictive results to a gold standard, namely the clinical CT scans. To determine which measurement more accurately detected translocation, the difference between the accuracies of the two measurements was calculated.

RESULTS

Using the bootstrap sampling method and receiver operating characteristics-based optimized threshold criteria, the 95% confidence intervals of the accuracies of translocation detections ranged from 77.8% to 82.1% and from 89.5% to 91.2% for the electrode impedance and access resistance, respectively. The accuracies of the maximal access-resistance deviations were significantly larger than that of the maximal electrode impedance deviations. The location of the translocation as predicted by the access resistance was significantly correlated with the result derived from the CT scans. In contrast, no significant correlation was observed for the electrode impedance.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the electrode impedance and access resistance proved reliable metrics to detect translocations for HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode arrays. The access resistance had, however, significantly better accuracy and it also reliably detected the electrode-location of translocations. The electrode impedance did not correlate significantly with the location of translocation. Measuring the access resistance is, therefore, the recommended method to detect electrode-array translocations. These measures can provide prompt feedback for surgeons after insertion, improving their surgical skills, and ultimately reducing the number of translocations. In the future, such measurements may allow near-real-time monitoring of the electrode array during insertion, helping to avoid translocations.

Interaction Between Electric and Acoustic Stimulation Influences Speech Perception in Ipsilateral EAS Users

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine electric-acoustic masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing and different electrode insertion depths and to investigate the influence on speech reception. The effects of different fitting strategies-meet, overlap, and a newly developed masking adjusted fitting (UNMASKfit)-on speech reception are compared. If electric-acoustic masking has a detrimental effect on speech reception, the individualized UNMASKfit map might be able to reduce masking and thereby enhance speech reception.

DESIGN

Fifteen experienced MED-EL Flex electrode recipients with ipsilateral residual hearing participated in a crosssover design study using three fitting strategies for 4 weeks each. The following strategies were compared: (1) a meet fitting, dividing the frequency range between electric and acoustic stimulation, (2) an overlap fitting, delivering part of the frequency range both acoustically and electrically, and (3) the UNMASKfit, reducing the electric stimulation according to the individual electric-on-acoustic masking strength. A psychoacoustic masking procedure was used to measure the changes in acoustic thresholds due to the presence of electric maskers. Speech reception was measured in noise with the Oldenburg Matrix Sentence test.

RESULTS

Behavioral thresholds of acoustic probe tones were significantly elevated in the presence of electric maskers. A maximum of masking was observed when the difference in location between the electric and acoustic stimulation was around one octave in place frequency. Speech reception scores and strength of masking showed a dependency on residual hearing, and speech reception was significantly reduced in the overlap fitting strategy. Electric- acoustic stimulation significantly improved speech reception over electric stimulation alone, with a tendency toward a larger benefit with the UNMASKfit map. In addition, masking was significantly inversely correlated to the speech reception performance difference between the overlap and the meet fitting.

CONCLUSIONS

(1) This study confirmed the interaction between ipsilateral electric and acoustic stimulation in a psychoacoustic masking experiment. (2) The overlap fitting yielded poorer speech reception performance in stationary noise especially in subjects with strong masking. (3) The newly developed UNMASKfit strategy yielded similar speech reception thresholds with an enhanced acoustic benefit, while at the same time reducing the electric stimulation. This could be beneficial in the long-term if applied as a standard fitting, as hair cells are exposed to less possibly adverse electric stimulation. In this study, the UNMASKfit allowed the participants a better use of their natural hearing even after 1 month of adaptation. It might be feasible to transfer these results to the clinic, by fitting patients with the UNMASKfit upon their first fitting appointment, so that longer adaptation times can further improve speech reception.

Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements

Importance

Cochlear implants are a treatment option for individuals with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive little or no benefit from hearing aids; however, cochlear implantation in adults is still not routine.

Objective

To develop consensus statements regarding the use of unilateral cochlear implants in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a modified Delphi consensus process that was informed by a systematic review of the literature and clinical expertise. Searches were conducted in the following databases: (1) MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE, (2) Embase, and (3) the Cochrane Library. Consensus statements on cochlear implantation were developed using the evidence identified. This consensus process was relevant for the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL. The literature searches were conducted on July 18, 2018, and the 3-step Delphi consensus method took place over the subsequent 9-month period up to March 30, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A Delphi consensus panel of 30 international specialists voted on consensus statements about cochlear implantation, informed by an SR of the literature and clinical expertise. This vote resulted in 20 evidence-based consensus statements that are in line with clinical experience. A modified 3-step Delphi consensus method was used to vote on and refine the consensus statements. This method consisted of 2 rounds of email questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting of panel members at the final round. All consensus statements were reviewed, discussed, and finalized at the face-to-face meeting.

Results

In total, 6492 articles were identified in the searches of the electronic databases. After removal of duplicate articles, 74 articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and were used to create the 20 evidence-based consensus statements. These 20 consensus statements on the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL were relevant to the following 7 key areas of interest: level of awareness of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement); best practice clinical pathway from diagnosis to surgery (3 consensus statements); best practice guidelines for surgery (2 consensus statements); clinical effectiveness of cochlear implantation (4 consensus statements); factors associated with postimplantation outcomes (4 consensus statements); association between hearing loss and depression, cognition, and dementia (5 consensus statements); and cost implications of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement).

Conclusions and Relevance

These consensus statements represent the first step toward the development of international guidelines on best practices for cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL. Further research to develop consensus statements for unilateral cochlear implantation in children, bilateral cochlear implantation, combined electric-acoustic stimulation, unilateral cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, and asymmetrical hearing loss in children and adults may be beneficial for optimizing hearing and quality of life for these patients.

The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants

Cochlear implants (CIs) are neuroprostheses that partially restore hearing for people with severe-to-profound hearing loss. While CIs can provide good speech perception in quiet listening situations for many, they fail to do so in environments with interfering sounds for most listeners. Previous research suggests that this is due to detrimental interaction effects between CI electrode channels, limiting their function to convey frequency-specific information, but evidence is still scarce. In this study, an experimental manipulation called spectral blurring was used to increase channel interaction in CI listeners using Advanced Bionics devices with HiFocus 1J and MS electrode arrays to directly investigate its causal effect on speech perception. Instead of using a single electrode per channel as in standard CI processing, spectral blurring used up to 6 electrodes per channel simultaneously to increase the overlap between adjacent frequency channels as would occur in cases with severe channel interaction. Results demonstrated that this manipulation significantly degraded CI speech perception in quiet by 15% and speech reception thresholds in babble noise by 5 dB when all channels were blurred by a factor of 6. Importantly, when channel interaction was increased just on a subset of electrodes, speech scores were mostly unaffected and were only significantly degraded when the 5 most apical channels were blurred. These apical channels convey information up to 1 kHz at the apical end of the electrode array and are typically located at angular insertion depths of about 250 up to 500°. These results confirm and extend earlier findings indicating that CI speech perception may not benefit from deactivating individual channels along the array and that efforts should instead be directed towards reducing channel interaction per se and in particular for the most-apical electrodes. Hereby, causal methods such as spectral blurring could be used in future research to control channel interaction effects within listeners for evaluating compensation strategies.

Audiometric Profile of Cochlear Implant Recipients Demonstrates Need for Revising Insurance Coverage

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To describe the pre-implant audiometric profile of adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients to investigate whether current binaural candidacy requirements prevent access to patients who could benefit from CI.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

Retrospective review from 2016 to 2018 evaluating preoperative pure-tone thresholds and speech perception scores in the ipsilateral and contralateral ear.

RESULTS

A total of 252 adult CI recipients undergoing 270 implants were identified. Median age at time of implantation was 70.5 years (IQR 61.3-78.3) for those undergoing unilateral implantation and 59.0 (IQR 48.0-72.3) for those undergoing bilateral implantation (P < .01). For unilateral implantation, median pre-implantation speech perception performance in the ear to be implanted was 8.0% (IQR 0%-26.0%) for CNC word scores, and 9.0% (IQR 0%-34.0%) for AzBio sentence scores in quiet. Median speech perception performance in the contralateral ear was 36.0% (IQR 14.0%-60.0%) on CNC word scores, and 48.5% (IQR 17.5%-76.0%) on AzBio sentence tests. Speech perception scores were significantly different between ears for word and sentence tests (P < .01). Patients older than age 65 were significantly less likely to undergo bilateral implantation (P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

Adult CI recipients exhibit substantially poorer pre-implant speech perception scores than the commonly utilized ipsilateral qualifying threshold of 50% on sentence testing. Yet, existing insurance paradigms limit patients by excessively stringent binaural best-aided requirements. This limitation likely leads to worse device performance as patients often wait years for their binaural hearing to qualify while their ear to be implanted potentially experiences an unnecessarily extended duration of deafness. Older patients also experience a unique delay in referral for cochlear implantation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3- Retrospective review Laryngoscope, 131:E2007-E2012, 2021.

Scalar Translocation Comparison Between Lateral Wall and Perimodiolar Cochlear Implant Arrays - A Meta-Analysis

Objectives/Hypothesis

Two types of electrode arrays for cochlear implants (CIs) are distinguished: lateral wall and perimodiolar. Scalar translocation of the array can lead to intracochlear trauma by penetrating from the scala tympani into the scala vestibuli or scala media, potentially negatively affecting hearing performance of CI users. This systematic review compares the lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays with respect to scalar translocation.

Study Design

Systematic review.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were reviewed for studies published within the last 11 years. No other limitations were set. All studies with original data that evaluated the occurrence of scalar translocation or tip fold‐over (TF) with postoperative computed tomography (CT) following primary cochlear implantation in bilateral sensorineuronal hearing loss patients were considered to be eligible. Data were extracted independently by two reviewers.

Results

We included 33 studies, of which none were randomized controlled trials. Meta‐analysis of five cohort studies comparing scalar translocation between lateral wall and perimodiolar arrays showed that lateral wall arrays have significantly lower translocation rates (7% vs. 43%; pooled odds ratio = 0.12). Translocation was negatively associated with speech perception scores (weighted mean 41% vs. 55%). Tip fold‐over of the array was more frequent with perimodiolar arrays (X² = 6.8, P < .01).

Conclusions

Scalar translocation and tip fold‐overs occurred more frequently with perimodiolar arrays than with lateral wall arrays. In addition, translocation of the array negatively affects hearing with the cochlear implant. Therefore, if one aims to minimize clinically relevant intracochlear trauma, lateral wall arrays would be the preferred option for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 131:1358–1368, 2021

Evaluating hearing performance with cochlear implants within the same patient using daily randomization and imaging-based fitting - The ELEPHANT study

Background

Prospective research in the field of cochlear implants is hampered by methodological issues and small sample sizes. The ELEPHANT study presents an alternative clinical trial design with a daily randomized approach evaluating individualized tonotopical fitting of a cochlear implant (CI).

Methods

A single-blinded, daily-randomized clinical trial will be implemented to evaluate a new imaging-based CI mapping strategy. A minimum of 20 participants will be included from the start of the rehabilitation process with a 1-year follow-up period. Based on a post-operative cone beam CT scan (CBCT), mapping of electrical input will be aligned to natural place-pitch arrangement in the individual cochlea. The CI’s frequency allocation table will be adjusted to match the electrical stimulation of frequencies as closely as possible to corresponding acoustic locations in the cochlea. A randomization scheme will be implemented whereby the participant, blinded to the intervention allocation, crosses over between the experimental and standard fitting program on a daily basis, and thus effectively acts as his own control, followed by a period of free choice between both maps to incorporate patient preference. With this new approach the occurrence of a first-order carryover effect and a limited sample size is addressed.

Discussion

The experimental fitting strategy is thought to give rise to a steeper learning curve, result in better performance in challenging listening situations, improve sound quality, better complement residual acoustic hearing in the contralateral ear and be preferred by recipients of a CI. Concurrently, the suitability of the novel trial design will be considered in investigating these hypotheses.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03892941. Registered 27 March 2019.

Angular Electrode Insertion Depth and Speech Perception in Adults With a Cochlear Implant: A Systematic Review

Objective:

By discussing the design, findings, strengths, and weaknesses of available studies investigating the influence of angular insertion depth on speech perception, we intend to summarize the current status of evidence; and using evidence based conclusions, possibly contribute to the determination of the optimal cochlear implant (CI) electrode position.

Data Sources:

Our search strategy yielded 10,877 papers. PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to June 1, 2018. Both keywords and free-text terms, related to patient population, predictive factor, and outcome measurements were used. There were no restrictions in languages or year of publication.

Study Selection:

Seven articles were included in this systematic review. Articles eligible for inclusion: (a) investigated cochlear implantation of any CI system in adults with post-lingual onset of deafness and normal cochlear anatomy; (b) investigated the relationship between angular insertion depth and speech perception; (c) measured angular insertion depth on imaging; and (d) measured speech perception at, or beyond 1-year post-activation.

Data Extraction and Synthesis:

In included studies; quality was judged low-to-moderate and risk of bias, evaluated using a Quality-in-Prognostic-Studies-tool (QUIPS), was high. Included studies were too heterogeneous to perform meta-analyses, therefore, effect estimates of the individual studies are presented. Six out of seven included studies found no effect of angular insertion depth on speech perception.

Conclusion:

All included studies are characterized by methodological flaws, and therefore, evidence-based conclusions regarding the influence of angular insertion depth cannot be drawn to date.

Effectiveness of Phantom Stimulation in Shifting the Pitch Percept in Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVES

Phantom electrode stimulation was developed for cochlear implant (CI) systems to provide a lower pitch percept by stimulating more apical regions of the cochlea, without inserting the electrode array deeper into the cochlea. Phantom stimulation involves simultaneously stimulating a primary and a compensating electrode with opposite polarity, thereby shifting the electrical field toward the apex and eliciting a lower pitch percept. The current study compared the effect sizes (in shifts of place of excitation) of multiple phantom configurations by matching the perceived pitch with phantom stimulation to that perceived with monopolar stimulation. Additionally, the effects of electrode location, type of electrode array, and stimulus level on the perceived pitch were investigated.

DESIGN

Fifteen adult advanced bionics CI users participated in this study, which included four experiments to eventually measure the shifts in place of excitation with five different phantom configurations. The proportions of current delivered to the compensating electrode, expressed as σ, were 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 for the symmetrical biphasic pulses (SBC0.5, SBC0.6, SBC0.7, and SBC0.8) and 0.75 for the pseudomonophasic pulse shape (PSA0.75). A pitch discrimination experiment was first completed to determine which basal and apical electrode contacts should be used for the subsequent experiments. An extensive loudness balancing experiment followed where both the threshold level (T-level) and most comfortable level (M-level) were determined to enable testing at multiple levels of the dynamic range. A pitch matching experiment was then performed to estimate the shift in place of excitation at the chosen electrode contacts. These rough shifts were then used in the subsequent experiment, where the shifts in place of excitation were determined more accurately.

RESULTS

Reliable data were obtained from 20 electrode contacts. The average shifts were 0.39, 0.53, 0.64, 0.76, and 0.53 electrode contacts toward the apex for SBC0.5, SBC0.6, SBC0.7, SBC0.8, and PSA0.75, respectively. When only the best configurations per electrode contact were included, the average shift in place of excitation was 0.92 electrode contacts (range: 0.25 to 2.0). While PSA0.75 leads to equal results as the SBC configurations in the apex, it did not result in a significant shift at the base. The shift in place of excitation was significantly larger at the apex and with lateral wall electrode contacts. The stimulus level did not affect the shift.

CONCLUSIONS

Phantom stimulation results in significant shifts in place of excitation, especially at the apical part of the electrode array. The phantom configuration that leads to the largest shift in place of excitation differs between subjects. Therefore, the settings of the phantom electrode should be individualized so that the phantom stimulation is optimized for each CI user. The real added value to the sound quality needs to be established in a take-home trial.

Incidence for Tip Foldover During Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVE

Incidence and clinical presentation of tip foldover during cochlear implantation (CI).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

PATIENTS

One thousand three hundred twenty CI recipients who underwent postoperative Stenvers view, digital computed tomography (CT), or digital volume tomography (DVT).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Tip foldover rates were evaluated with regard to perimodiolar (PM), lateral wall (LW), and mid-scalar (MS) electrode carriers; the electrode insertion angle was estimated and postoperative complications and the necessity for revisions were described.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred twenty CI recipients (1,722 ears) had detailed surgery reports and postoperative imaging available for review. Tip foldover occurred in 15 ears (0.87%) with the highest rate (1.67%) for PM electrodes. In three patients tip foldover was accompanied by costimulation of the facial nerve and one patient reported vertigo. Eleven patients underwent revision surgery. In two of them revision was performed in the same surgical intervention due to abnormality in spread of excitation measurement. In four patients no revision was conducted due to uncompromised aided speech perception.

CONCLUSION

In a large academic center with experienced surgeons, tip foldover verified by CT/DVT arose at a rate of 0.87%. PM electrode carriers inherited the highest risk for this electrode malposition. Revision surgery was feasible in these cases.

Dynamic current focusing for loudness encoding in cochlear implants: a take-home trial

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate a more energy-efficient dynamic current focussing (DCF) speech-processing strategy after long-term listening experience. In DCF, tripolar stimulation is used near the threshold and loudness is controlled by the compensation coefficient σ. A recent acute pilot study showed improved spectral-temporally modulated ripple test (SMRT) scores at low loudness levels, but battery life was reduced to 1.5-4 hours. Design: Within-subject comparisons were made for the clinical versus. DCF strategy after 5 weeks of at-home usage. Speech intelligibility in noise, spectral ripple discrimination, temporal modulation detection, loudness growth, and subjective ratings were assessed. Study sample: Twenty HiRes90K (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, USA) cochlear implant (CI) users. Results: Average battery life was 9 hours with the newly implemented DCF compared to 13.4 hours with the clinical strategy. Compared with measurements made at the beginning of the study, SMRT-scores and speech intelligibility in noise were significantly improved with DCF. However, both measures suffered from unexpected learning effects over time. The improvement disappeared and speech intelligibility in noise declined significantly relative to the final control measurement with the clinical strategy. Conclusion: Most CI users can adapt to the DCF strategy in a take-home setting. Although DCF has the potential to improve performance on the SMRT test, learning effects complicate the interpretation of the current results.

Test/Retest Variability of the eCAP Threshold in Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant Users

The reliability of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) threshold depends on its precision and accuracy. The precision of the eCAP threshold reflects its variability, while the accuracy of the threshold shows how close it is to the actual value. The objective of this study was to determine the test/retest variability of the eCAP threshold in Advanced Bionics cochlear implant users, which has never been reported before. We hypothesized that the test/retest variability is dependent on the presence of random noise in the recorded eCAP waveforms. If this holds true, the recorded error should be reduced by approximately the square-root of the number of averages. As secondary objectives, we assessed the effects of the slope of the amplitude growth function (AGF), cochlear location, and eCAP threshold on eCAP threshold precision. We hypothesized that steeper slopes should result in better precision of the linearly extrapolated eCAP threshold. As other studies have shown that apical regions have steeper slopes and larger eCAPs, we recorded eCAPs in three different cochlear locations. The difference of the precision between two commonly applied stimulus-artifact reduction paradigms on eCAP threshold precision was compared, namely averaging of alternating stimulus polarities (AP averaging) and forward masking (FM). FM requires the addition of more waveforms than AP averaging, and hence we expected FM to have lower precision than AP.