From Development to Implementation: Adjusting the Hematocrit of Deglycerolized Red Cell Concentrates to Meet Regulatory Standards

Modification of deglycerolization procedure improves processing and post-thaw quality of cryopreserved sickle trait red cell concentrates

Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a critical therapy for those with sickle cell disease (SCD). Alloimmunization is frequent for those with SCD and may limit the availability of matched RBC. Cryopreserved RBCs, from family members or donors with a similar RBC antigen profile could provide a viable alternative to avoid further alloimmunization and prevent hemolytic transfusion-related events. However, cryopreserved SCD and Sickle Cell trait (S-trait) donor RBC units suffer from reduced recovery following deglycerolization. This study proposes and tests a modified deglycerolization protocol using an automated cell processor to mitigate RBC loss. Six red cell concentrates (RCC) from donors with S-trait and six control RCCs were glycerolized, frozen (<-65 °C) and deglycerolized on the ACP 215 using modified parameters (decreased hypertonic solution flow rate (100 mL/min) and hypertonic equilibration delay (120 s), and increased NaCl dilution volumes (500 mL). Quality testing included: hematocrit (HCT), hemolysis, indices, extracellular potassium, morphology, osmotic fragility, osmotic gradient ektacytometry, hemoglobin (HGB), and recovery. Canadian standards (CS) indicate that acceptable deglycerolized units for transfusion require a HCT ≤0.80 L/L, HGB ≥35 g/unit, and hemolysis <0.8 % in 90 % of units tested. No significant differences in HGB or RBC recovery were observed between study groups. Significant differences between study groups were identified in osmotic fragility and osmotic gradient ektacytometry parameters. Of the 6 S-trait RCCs, 3/6 units were within the HCT, HGB and hemolysis thresholds set by the CS. The modified deglycerolization protocol provides a path for the routine cryopreservation of S-trait RBCs.

Closed system processing variables affect post-thaw quality characteristics of cryopreserved red cell concentrates

BACKGROUND

Differences in manufacturing conditions using the Haemonetics ACP 215 cell processor result in cryopreserved red cell concentrates (RCCs) of varying quality. This work studied the effect of processing method, additive solution, and storage duration on RCC quality to identify an optimal protocol for the manufacture of cryopreserved RCCs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

RCCs were pooled-and-split and stored for 7, 14, or 21 days before cryopreservation. Units were glycerolized with the ACP 215 using a single or double centrifugation method. After thawing, the RCCs were deglycerolized, suspended in AS-3, SAGM, ESOL, or SOLX/AS-7, and stored for 0, 3, 7, 14, or 21 days before quality testing. Quality assessments included hemoglobin content, hematocrit, hemolysis, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), supernatant potassium, and mean cell volume.

RESULTS

Both glycerolization methods produced RCCs that met regulatory standards for blood quality. Dual centrifugation resulted in higher hemoglobin content, fewer processing alerts, and a shorter deglycerolization time than single centrifugation processing. Units processed with AS-3 and ESOL met regulatory standards when stored for up to 21 days pre-cryopreservation and 21 days post-deglycerolization. However, ESOL demonstrated superior maintenance of ATP over RBCs in AS-3. Some RCCs suspended in SAGM and SOLX exceeded acceptable hemolysis values after 7 days of post-deglycerolization storage regardless of pre-processing storage length.

CONCLUSIONS

When manufacturing cryopreserved RCCs using the ACP 215, dual centrifugation processing with AS-3 or ESOL additive solutions is preferred, with storage periods of up to 21 days both pre-processing and post-deglycerolization.

Evaluating the quality of red blood cell concentrates irradiated before or after cryopreservation

BACKGROUND

Cryopreserved red blood cell concentrates (RCCs) are often required for patients with rare blood groups. Although transfusions from blood relatives are irradiated before transfusion, research has yet to make clear if this is necessary in cryopreserved RCCs. Given insufficient evidence to the contrary, irradiation of cryopreserved RCCs has been recommended, but the effect of irradiation timing is unknown. Therefore, this study was performed to assess the effect of RCC irradiation pre- and postcryopreservation on RCC quality.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Nine whole blood units from healthy donors were processed into RCCs using the buffy coat method. ABO- and Rh-matched units were pooled and split into three groups: precryopreservation irradiation (pre-CIG), postcryopreservation irradiation (post-CIG), and nonirradiated controls. Hemoglobin, hematocrit, white blood cell (WBC) count, extracellular potassium, mean cell volume, red blood cell (RBC) morphology, and RBC deformability were measured.

RESULTS

Extracellular potassium was greater in the irradiated conditions when compared to the nonirradiated controls and was greater in the post-CIG group when compared to the pre-CIG group (p < 0.05). WBC counts decreased after cryopreservation in all groups to values lower than the sensitivity of the assay. RBC deformability was greater in the post-CIG group when compared to the pre-CIG group and control group. No other significant differences were observed between groups.

CONCLUSION

Irradiation of RCCs can be performed pre- or postcryopreservation with little effect on the RCC product, as both irradiated groups resulted in RCCs that were comparable to the nonirradiated cryopreserved RCCs.

Traditional and emerging technologies for washing and volume reducing blood products

Millions of blood components including red blood cells, platelets, and granulocytes are transfused each year in the United States. The transfusion of these blood products may be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in some patients due to residual proteins and other contaminants that accumulate in blood units during processing and storage. Blood products are, therefore, often washed in normal saline or other media to remove the contaminants and improve the quality of blood cells before transfusion. While there are numerous methods for washing and volume reducing blood components, a vast majority utilize centrifugation-based processing, such as manual centrifugation, open and closed cell processing systems, and cell salvage/autotransfusion devices. Although these technologies are widely employed with a relatively low risk to the average patient, there is evidence that centrifugation-based processing may be inadequate when transfusing to immunocompromised patients, neonatal and infant patients, or patients susceptible to transfusion-related allergic reactions. Cell separation and volume reduction techniques that employ centrifugation have been shown to damage blood cells, contributing to these adverse outcomes. The limitations and disadvantages of centrifugation-based processing have spurred the development of novel centrifugation-free methods for washing and volume reducing blood components, thereby causing significantly less damage to the cells. Some of these emerging technologies are already transforming niche applications, poised to enter mainstream blood cell processing in the not too distant future.