Vasodilation and Exercise Capacity in Patients with End-Stage Renal Disease: A Prospective Proof-of-Concept Study

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with end-stage kidney disease: principles, methodology and clinical applications of the optimal tool for exercise tolerance evaluation

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Exercise intolerance as well as reduced cardiovascular reserve is extremely common in patients with CKD. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a non-invasive, dynamic technique that provides an integrative evaluation of cardiovascular, pulmonary, neuropsychological and metabolic function during maximal or submaximal exercise, allowing the evaluation of functional reserves of these systems. This assessment is based on the principle that system failure typically occurs when the system is under stress and thus CPET is currently considered to be the gold standard for identifying exercise limitation and differentiating its causes. It has been widely used in several medical fields for risk stratification, clinical evaluation and other applications, but its use in everyday practice for CKD patients is scarce. This article describes the basic principles and methodology of CPET and provides an overview of important studies that utilized CPET in patients with ESKD, in an effort to increase awareness of CPET capabilities among practicing nephrologists.

Cardiopulmonary reserve examined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing in individuals with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) often present reduced physical activity and exercise tolerance due to factors relevant to co-existing disturbances of the cardiac, nervous and muscular systems. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used for clinical evaluation of exercise limitation and related symptoms (i.e., dyspnea, fatigue) in several medical fields.

OBJECTIVES

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies using CPET technology to examine cardiopulmonary reserve in individuals with versus without CKD.

METHODS

Literature search involved PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus databases; manual search of article references and of gray literature was also performed. Observational studies and randomized trials that used CPET for patients with CKD stage 1-5 versus controls were eligible. The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake (VO₂peak). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of retrieved studies.

RESULTS

From an initial 4944 literature records, we identified 29 studies fulfilling the inclusion criteria; of these, 25 studies (2,213 participants) with complete data were included in the final meta-analysis. VO₂peak was significantly lower in CKD patients than controls without CKD [standardized mean difference (SMD) -1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) -1.68; -1.13)]. Values were lower for CKD than non-CKD individuals for oxygen consumption at anaerobic threshold (SMD -1.06, 95% CI -1.34; -0.79) and maximum workload [weighted mean difference (WMD) -58.26, 95% CI 74.14; -42.38]. In 3 studies, CKD patients had higher VO₂peak than controls with heart failure without CKD (WMD 6.60, 95% CI 3.02; 10.18). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

VO₂peak and other commonly analyzed CPET variables were lower in patients with CKD than controls, which indicates reduced functional cardiopulmonary reserve in CKD. In contrast, patients with CKD performed better than controls with heart failure without CKD. Overall, rehabilitation programs should be more widely applied to individuals with CKD.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021227805.

Cardiorespiratory fitness in kidney transplant recipients compared to patients with kidney failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Patients with kidney failure often present with reduced cardiovascular functional reserve and exercise tolerance. Previous studies on cardiorespiratory fitness examined with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in kidney transplant recipients (KTR) had variable results. This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining cardiovascular functional reserve with CPET in KTR in comparison with patients with kidney failure (CKD-Stage-5 before dialysis, hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis), as well as before and after kidney transplantation. Literature search involved PubMed, Web-of-Science and Scopus databases, manual search of article references and grey literature. From a total of 4,944 identified records, eight studies (with 461 participants) were included in quantitative analysis for the primary question. Across these studies, KTR had significantly higher oxygen consumption at peak/max exercise (VO₂ peak/VO₂ max) compared to patients with kidney failure (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI [0.31, 1.10], I²  = 70%, P = 0.002). In subgroup analyses, similar differences were evident among seven studies comparing KTR and hemodialysis patients (SMD = 0.64, 95% CI [0.16, 1.12], I²  = 65%, P = 0.009) and two studies comparing KTR with peritoneal dialysis subjects (SMD = 1.14, 95% CI [0.19, 2.09], I²  = 50%, P = 0.16). Across four studies with relevant data, oxygen consumption during peak/max exercise showed significant improvement after kidney transplantation compared to pretransplantation values (WMD = 2.43, 95% CI [0.01, 4.85], I²  = 68%, P = 0.02). In conclusion, KTR exhibit significantly higher cardiovascular functional reserve during CPET compared to patients with kidney failure. Cardiovascular reserve is significantly improved after kidney transplantation in relation to presurgery levels.