Robot-assisted stereoencephalography vs subdural electrodes in the evaluation of temporal lobe epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Invasive video-electroencephalography (iVEEG) is the gold standard for evaluation of refractory temporal lobe epilepsy before second stage resective surgery (SSRS). Traditionally, the presumed seizure onset zone (SOZ) has been covered with subdural electrodes (SDE), a very invasive procedure prone to complications. Temporal stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) with conventional frame-based stereotaxy is time-consuming and impeded by the geometry of the frame. The introduction of robotic assistance promised a simplification of temporal SEEG implantation. However, the efficacy of temporal SEEG in iVEEG remains unclear. The aim of this study was therefore to describe the efficiency and efficacy of SEEG in iVEEG of temporal lobe epilepsy.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 60 consecutive patients with medically intractable epilepsy who underwent iVEEG of a potential temporal SOZ by SDE (n = 40) or SEEG (n = 20). Surgical time efficiency was analyzed by the skin-to-skin time (STS) and the total procedure time (TPT) and compared between groups (SDE vs SEEG). Surgical risk was depicted by the 90-day complication rate. Temporal SOZ were treated by SSRS. Favorable outcome (Engel°1) was assessed after 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Robot-assisted SEEG significantly reduced the duration of surgery (STS and TPT) compared to SDE implantations. There was no significant difference in complication rates. Notably, all surgical revisions in this study were attributed to SDE. Unilateral temporal SOZ was detected in 34/60 cases. Of the 34 patients, 30 underwent second stage SSRS. Both SDE and SEEG had a good predictive value for the outcome of temporal SSRS with no significant group difference.

SIGNIFICANCE

Robot-assisted SEEG improves the accessibility of the temporal lobe for iVEEG by increasing surgical time efficiency and by simplifying trajectory selection without losing its predictive value for SSRS.

Sensing local field potentials with a directional and scalable depth electrode array

Objective. A variety of electrophysiology tools are available to the neurosurgeon for diagnosis, functional therapy, and neural prosthetics. However, no tool can currently address these three critical needs: (a) access to all cortical regions in a minimally invasive manner; (b) recordings with microscale, mesoscale, and macroscale resolutions simultaneously; and (c) access to spatially distant multiple brain regions that constitute distributed cognitive networks.Approach.We modeled, designed, and demonstrated a novel device for recording local field potentials (LFPs) with the form factor of a stereo-electroencephalographic electrode and combined with radially distributed microelectrodes.Main results. Electro-quasistatic models demonstrate that the lead body amplifies and shields LFP sources based on direction, enablingdirectional sensitivity andscalability, referred to as thedirectional andscalable (DISC) array.In vivo,DISC demonstrated significantly improved signal-to-noise ratio, directional sensitivity, and decoding accuracy from rat barrel cortex recordings during whisker stimulation. Critical for future translation, DISC demonstrated a higher signal to noise ratio (SNR) than virtual ring electrodes and a noise floor approaching that of large ring electrodes in an unshielded environment after common average referencing. DISC also revealed independent, stereoscopic current source density measures whose direction was verified after histology.Significance. Directional sensitivity of LFPs may significantly improve brain-computer interfaces and many diagnostic procedures, including epilepsy foci detection and deep brain targeting.

Delayed hemorrhage after pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: delayed occurrence or delayed diagnosis?

BACKGROUND

Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is a well-known invasive diagnostic method for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). Its rate of complications is relatively low, being the intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) the most relevant. Most centers perform immediate imaging studies after SEEG to rule out complications. However, delayed intracranial hemorrhages (DIH) can occur despite normal imaging studies in the immediate postoperative period.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of DRE pediatric patients operated on SEEG between April 2016 and December 2020 in our institution. After implantation, an immediate postoperative CT was performed to check electrode placement and rule out acute complications. An additional MRI was performed 24 h after surgery. We collected all postoperative hemorrhages and considered them as major or minor according to Wellmer´s classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 DRE patients were operated on SEEG with 316 electrodes implanted. Three ICHs were diagnosed on postoperative imaging. Two of them were asymptomatic requiring no treatment, while the other needed surgical evacuation after clinical worsening. The total risk of hemorrhage per procedure was 12%, but just one third of them were clinically relevant. Two hemorrhages were not visible on immediate postoperative CT, being incidentally diagnosed in the 24 h MRI. We recorded them as DIH and are reported in detail.

CONCLUSION

Few reports of DIH after SEEG exist in the literature. It remains unclear whether these cases are late occurring hemorrhages or immediate postoperative hemorrhages undiagnosed on initial imaging. According to our findings, we recommend to perform additional late postoperative imaging to diagnose these cases and manage them accurately.

Pediatric stereo-electroencephalography: effects of robot assistance and other variables on seizure outcome and complications

OBJECTIVE

The safety of stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) has been investigated; however, most studies have not differentiated pediatric and adult populations, which have different anatomy and physiology. The purpose of this study was to assess SEEG safety in the pediatric setting, focusing on surgical complications and the identification of patient and surgical risk factors, if any. The authors also aimed to determine whether robot assistance in SEEG was associated with a change in practice, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively studied all SEEG cases performed in their department from December 2014 to March 2020. They analyzed both demographic and surgical variables and noted the types of surgery-related complications and their management. They also studied the clinical outcomes of a subset of the patients in relation to robot-assisted and non-robot-assisted SEEG.

RESULTS

Sixty-three children had undergone 64 SEEG procedures. Girls were on average 3 years younger than the boys (mean age 11.1 vs 14.1 years, p < 0.01). The overall complication rate was 6.3%, and the complication rate for patients with left-sided electrodes was higher than that for patients with right-sided electrodes (11.1% vs 3.3%), although the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. The duration of recording was positively correlated to the number of implanted electrodes (r = 0.296, p < 0.05). Robot assistance was associated with a higher number of implanted electrodes (mean 12.6 vs 7.6 electrodes, p < 0.0001). Robot-assisted implantations were more accurate, with a mean error of 1.51 mm at the target compared to 2.98 mm in nonrobot implantations (p < 0.001). Clinical outcomes were assessed in the first 32 patients treated (16 in the nonrobot group and 16 in the robot group), 23 of whom proceeded to further resective surgery. The children who had undergone robot-assisted SEEG had better eventual seizure control following subsequent epilepsy surgery. Of the children who had undergone resective epilepsy surgery, 42% (5/12) in the nonrobot group and 82% (9/11) in the robot group obtained an Engel class IA outcome at 1 year (χ2 = 3.885, p = 0.049). Based on Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the robot group had a higher seizure-free rate than the nonrobot group at 30 months postoperation (7/11 vs 2/12, p = 0.063). Two complications, whose causes were attributed to the implantation and head-bandaging steps, required surgical intervention. All complications were either transient or reversible.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest single-center, exclusively pediatric SEEG series that includes robot assistance so far. SEEG complications are uncommon and usually transient or treatable. Robot assistance enabled implantation of more electrodes and improved epilepsy surgery outcomes, as compared to those in the non-robot-assisted cases.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of invasive EEG monitoring in drug-resistant epilepsy

PURPOSE

Our aim was to determine the cost-effectiveness of two intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) interventions: 1) stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and 2) placement of subdural grid electrodes (SDGs) both followed by resective surgery in patients with drug-resistant, partial-onset epilepsy, compared with medical management (MM) in Hungary from payer's perspective.

METHODS

The incremental health gains and costs of iEEG interventions have been determined with a combination of a decision tree and prevalence Markov process model over a 30-year time horizon in a cost-utility analysis (CUA). To address the effect of parameter uncertainty on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Our results showed that both SEEG and SDG interventions represent a more expensive but more effective strategy than MM representing the current standard of care. The total discounted cost of SEEG and SDG were € 32,760 and € 25,028 representing € 18,108 and € 10,375 additional cost compared with MM, respectively. However, they provide an additional 3.931 (in SEEG group) and 3.444 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; in SDG group), correspondingly. Thus, the ICER of SEEG is € 4607 per QALY gain, while the ICER for SDG is € 3013 per QALY gain, compared with MM. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of € 41,058 per QALY in Hungary, both subtypes of iEEG interventions are cost-effective and provide good value for money.

SIGNIFICANCE

Because of the high cost of implanting electrodes and monitoring, the invasive EEG for patients with refractory epilepsy is currently not available in the Hungarian national healthcare system. Our study demonstrated that these procedures in Hungary are cost-effective compared with the MM. As a result, the introduction of iEEG interventions to the reimbursement list of the National Health Insurance Fund Administration was initiated.

A study of medial and lateral temporal lobe epilepsy based on stereoelectroencephalography

BACKGROUND

Patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) originating from different seizure onset zones had distinct electrophysiological characteristics and surgical outcomes. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between the origin and prognosis of TLE, and the stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) features.

METHODS

Thirty patients with TLE, who underwent surgical treatment in our functional neurosurgery department from January 2016 to December 2017, were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent anterior temporal lobectomy after an invasive pre-operative evaluation with SEEG. Depending on the epileptic focus location, patients were divided into those with medial temporal lobe seizures (MTLS) and those with lateral temporal lobe seizures (LTLS). The Engel classification was used to evaluate operation effectiveness, and the Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to detect seizure-free duration.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 25.7 ± 4.8 months. Effectiveness was 63.3% for Engel I (n = 19), 13.3% for Engel II, 3.3% for Engel III, and 20.0% for Engel IV. According to the SEEG, 60.0% (n = 18) had MTLS, and 40.0% (n = 12) had LTLS. Compared with the MTLS group, the operation age of those with LTLS was significantly greater (26.9 ± 6.9 vs. 29.9 ± 12.5 years, t = -0.840, P = 0.009) with longer epilepsy duration (11.9 ± 6.0 vs. 17.9 ± 12.1 years, t = -1.801, P = 0.038). Patients with MTLS had a longer time interval between ictal onset to seizure (67.3 ± 59.1 s vs. 29.3 ± 24.4 s, t = 2.017, P = 0.008). The most common SEEG ictal pattern was a sharp/spike-wave rhythm in the MTLS group (55.6%) and low-voltage fast activity in the LTLS group (58.3%). Compared with the LTLS group, patients with MTLS had a more favorable prognosis (41.7% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.049). Post-operative recurrence was more likely to occur within three months after the operation for both groups, and there appeared to be a stable long-term outcome.

CONCLUSION

Patients with MTLS, who accounted for three-fifths of patients with TLE, showed a more favorable surgical outcome.

On the Use of Digital Subtraction Angiography in Stereoelectroencephalography Surgical Planning to Prevent Collisions with Vessels

OBJECTIVE

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) consists of the implantation of microelectrodes for the electrophysiological characterization of epileptogenic networks. To reduce a possible risk of intracranial bleeding by vessel rupture during the electrode implantation, the stereotactic trajectories must follow avascular corridors. The use of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for vascular visualization during planning is controversial due to the additional risk related to this procedure. Here we evaluate the utility of this technique for planning when the neurosurgeon has it available together with gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance sequence (T1-Gd) and computed tomography angiography (CTA).

METHODS

Twenty-two implantation plans for SEEG were initially done using T1-Gd imaging (251 trajectories). DSA was only used later during the revision process. In 6 patients CTA was available at this point as well. We quantified the position of the closest vessel to the trajectory in each of the imaging modalities.

RESULTS

Two thirds of the trajectories that appeared vessel free in the T1-Gd or CTA presented vessels in their proximity, as shown by DSA. Those modifications only required small shifts of both the entry and target point, so the diagnostic aims were preserved.

CONCLUSIONS

T1-Gd and CTA, despite being the most commonly used techniques for SEEG planning, frequently fail to reveal vessels that are dangerously close to the trajectories. Higher-resolution vascular imaging techniques, such as DSA, can provide the neurosurgeon with crucial information about vascular anatomy, resulting in safer plans.

The Brain is Not Flat: Conformal Electrode Arrays Diminish Complications of Subdural Electrode Implantation, A Series of 117 Cases

BACKGROUND

Intracranial recordings are integral to evaluating patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy whom noninvasive testing fails to localize seizure focus. Although stereo-electroencephalography is the preferred method of intracranial recordings in most centers, subdural electrode (SDE) implantation is necessary in selected cases.

OBJECTIVE

To identify imaging correlates that predict SDE complications (extra-axial fluid collections [EFCs]), and determine if modifications that diminish stiffness of electrode sheets reduce complications.

METHODS

A prospective epilepsy surgery database was used to identify adults undergoing craniotomy for SDE implantation over a 14-year period. EFCs and midline shift were measured via magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography imaging. Correlation analyses and multivariable logistic regression explored associations between use of conformal arrays, serial order of patients, previous ipsilateral intracranial surgery, midline shift, number of SDEs, and neurologic complications.

RESULTS

A total of 111 consecutive patients (59 female) underwent 117 craniotomies (mean, 115 electrode contacts) for SDE implantation. There were 8 surgical complications, 3 in the first 17 (17.7%). and 5 (after electrode modifications) in a subsequent 100 craniotomies (5.0%). We noted an increase in electrode numbers implanted over time (P < 0.001) and decreased midline shift with conformal grids (ρ = - 0.32; P < 0.001). A multivariable regression showed that midline shift correlated with complications (odds ratio, 2.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-4.78; P = 0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Hemorrhagic complications after SDE implantation are difficult to detect because of artifact from electrodes, but predictable by prominent midline shift (>4 mm). Risks inherent to SDE implantation may be minimized using conformal grids. With symptomatic EFCs, a single electrode cable exit site allows hematoma evacuation without terminating intracranial recordings.

Oblique trajectory angles in robotic stereo-electroencephalography

OBJECTIVE

Traditional stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) entails the use of orthogonal trajectories guided by seizure semiology and arteriography. Advances in robotic stereotaxy and computerized neuronavigation have made oblique trajectories more feasible and easier to implement without formal arteriography. Such trajectories provide access to components of seizure networks not readily sampled using orthogonal trajectories. However, the dogma regarding the relative safety and predictability of orthogonal and azimuth-based trajectories persists, given the absence of data regarding the safety and efficacy of oblique sEEG trajectories. In this study, the authors evaluated the relative accuracy and efficacy of both orthogonal and oblique trajectories during robotic implantation of sEEG electrodes to sample seizure networks.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive procedures in 134 patients, accounting for 2040 electrode implantations. Of these, 837 (41%) were implanted via oblique trajectories (defined as an entry angle > 30°). Accuracy was calculated by comparing the deviation of each electrode at the entry and the target point from the planned trajectory using postimplantation imaging.

RESULTS

The mean entry and target deviations were 1.57 mm and 1.89 mm for oblique trajectories compared with 1.38 mm and 1.69 mm for orthogonal trajectories, respectively. Entry point deviation was significantly associated with entry angle, but the impact of this relationship was negligible (-0.015-mm deviation per degree). Deviation at the target point was not significantly affected by the entry angle. No hemorrhagic or infectious complications were observed in the entire cohort, further suggesting that these differences were not meaningful in a clinical context. Of the patients who then underwent definitive procedures after sEEG, 69 patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, of whom 58 (84%) achieved an Engel class I or II outcome during a median follow-up of 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of stereotactic errors in this study falls squarely within the range reported in the sEEG literature, which primarily features orthogonal trajectories. The patient outcomes reported in this study suggest that seizure foci are well localized using oblique trajectories. Thus, the selective use of oblique trajectories in the authors' cohort was associated with excellent safety and efficacy, with no patient incidents, and the findings support the use of oblique trajectories as an effective and safe means of investigating seizure networks.

Stereoelectroencephalography Versus Subdural Strip Electrode Implantations: Feasibility, Complications, and Outcomes in 500 Intracranial Monitoring Cases for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Both stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural strip electrodes (SSE) are used for intracranial electroencephalographic recordings in the invasive investigation of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare SEEG and SSE with respect to feasibility, complications, and outcome in this single-center study.

METHODS

Patient characteristics, periprocedural parameters, complications, and outcome were acquired from a pro- and retrospectively managed databank to compare SEEG and SSE cases.

RESULTS

A total of 500 intracranial electroencephalographic monitoring cases in 450 patients were analyzed (145 SEEG and 355 SSE). Both groups were of similar age, gender distribution, and duration of epilepsy. Implantation of each SEEG electrode took 13.9 ± 7.6 min (20 ± 12 min for each SSE; P &lt; .01). Radiation exposure to the patient was 4.3 ± 7.7 s to a dose area product of 14.6 ± 27.9 rad*cm2 for SEEG and 9.4 ± 8.9 s with 21 ± 22.4 rad*cm2 for SSE (P &lt; .01). There was no difference in the length of stay (12.2 ± 7.2 and 12 ± 6.3 d). The complication rate was low in both groups. No infections were seen in SEEG cases (2.3% after SSE). The rate of hemorrhage was 2.8% for SEEG and 1.4% for SSE. Surgical outcome was similar.

CONCLUSION

SEEG allows targeting deeply situated foci with a non-inferior safety profile to SSE and seizure outcome comparable to SSE.

Analysis of Morbidity and Outcomes Associated With Use of Subdural Grids vs Stereoelectroencephalography in Patients With Intractable Epilepsy

Importance

A major change has occurred in the evaluation of epilepsy with the availability of robotic stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) for seizure localization. However, the comparative morbidity and outcomes of this minimally invasive procedure relative to traditional subdural electrode (SDE) implantation are unknown.

Objective

To perform a comparative analysis of the relative efficacy, procedural morbidity, and epilepsy outcomes consequent to SEEG and SDE in similar patient populations and performed by a single surgeon at 1 center.

Design, Setting and Participants

Overall, 239 patients with medically intractable epilepsy underwent 260 consecutive intracranial electroencephalographic procedures to localize their epilepsy. Procedures were performed from November 1, 2004, through June 30, 2017, and data were analyzed in June 2017 and August 2018.

Interventions

Implantation of SDE using standard techniques vs SEEG using a stereotactic robot, followed by resection or laser ablation of the seizure focus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Length of surgical procedure, surgical complications, opiate use, and seizure outcomes using the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale.

Results

Of the 260 cases included in the study (54.6% female; mean [SD] age at evaluation, 30.3 [13.1] years), the SEEG (n = 121) and SDE (n = 139) groups were similar in age (mean [SD], 30.1 [12.2] vs 30.6 [13.8] years), sex (47.1% vs 43.9% male), numbers of failed anticonvulsants (mean [SD], 5.7 [2.5] vs 5.6 [2.5]), and duration of epilepsy (mean [SD], 16.4 [12.0] vs17.2 [12.1] years). A much greater proportion of SDE vs SEEG cases were lesional (99 [71.2%] vs 53 [43.8%]; P < .001). Seven symptomatic hemorrhagic sequelae (1 with permanent neurological deficit) and 3 infections occurred in the SDE cohort with no clinically relevant complications in the SEEG cohort, a marked difference in complication rates (P = .003). A greater proportion of SDE cases resulted in resection or ablation compared with SEEG cases (127 [91.4%] vs 90 [74.4%]; P < .001). Favorable epilepsy outcomes (Engel class I [free of disabling seizures] or II [rare disabling seizures]) were observed in 57 of 75 SEEG cases (76.0%) and 59 of 108 SDE cases (54.6%; P = .003) amongst patients undergoing resection or ablation, at 1 year. An analysis of only nonlesional cases revealed good outcomes in 27 of 39 cases (69.2%) vs 9 of 26 cases (34.6%) at 12 months in SEEG and SDE cohorts, respectively (P = .006). When considering all patients undergoing evaluation, not just those undergoing definitive procedures, favorable outcomes (Engel class I or II) for SEEG compared with SDE were similar (57 of 121 [47.1%] vs 59 of 139 [42.4%] at 1 year; P = .45).

Conclusions and Relevance

This direct comparison of large matched cohorts undergoing SEEG and SDE implantation reveals distinctly better procedural morbidity favoring SEEG. These modalities intrinsically evaluate somewhat different populations, with SEEG being more versatile and applicable to a range of scenarios, including nonlesional and bilateral cases, than SDE. The significantly favorable adverse effect profile of SEEG should factor into decision making when patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy are considered for intracranial evaluations.

Method of invasive monitoring in epilepsy surgery and seizure freedom and morbidity: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Invasive monitoring is sometimes necessary to guide resective surgery in epilepsy patients, but the ideal method is unknown. In this systematic review, we assess the association of postresection seizure freedom and adverse events in stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) and subdural electrodes (SDE).

METHODS

We searched three electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL [Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials]) from their inception to January 2018 with the keywords "electroencephalography," "intracranial grid," and "epilepsy." Studies that presented primary quantitative patient data for postresection seizure freedom with at least 1 year of follow-up or complication rates of SEEG- or SDE-monitored patients were included. Two trained investigators independently collected data from eligible studies. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) with 95% confidence interval (CIs) were used as a measure of the association of SEEG or SDE with seizure freedom and with adverse event outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 11 462 screened records, 48 studies met inclusion criteria. These studies reported on 1973 SEEG patients and 2036 SDE patients. Our systematic review revealed SEEG was associated with 61.0% and SDE was associated with 56.4% seizure freedom after resection (WMD = +5.8%, 95% CI = 4.7-6.9%, P = .001). Furthermore, SEEG was associated with 4.8% and SDE was associated with 15.5% morbidity (WMD = -10.6%, 95% CI = -11.6 to -9.6%, P = .001). SEEG was associated with 0.2% mortality and SDE was associated with 0.4% mortality (WMD = -0.2%, 95% CI = -0.3 to -0.1%, P = .001).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this systematic review of SEEG and SDE invasive monitoring techniques, SEEG was associated with fewer surgical resections yet better seizure freedom outcomes in those undergoing resections. SEEG was also associated with lower mortality and morbidity than SDE. Clinical studies directly comparing these modalities are necessary to understand the relative rates of seizure freedom, morbidity, and mortality associated with these techniques.

Stereoelectroencephalography in Pediatric Epilepsy Surgery

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an invasive technique used during the surgical management of medically refractory epilepsy. The utility of SEEG rests in its ability to survey the three-dimensional organization of the epileptogenic zone as well as nearby eloquent cortices. Once concentrated to specialized centers in Europe and Canada, the SEEG methodology has gained worldwide popularity due to its favorable morbidity profile, superior coverage of deep structures, and ability to perform multilobar explorations without the need for craniotomy. This rapid shift in practice represents both a challenge and an opportunity for pediatric neurosurgeons familiar with the subdural grid approach. The purpose of this review is to discuss the indications, technique, and safety of long-term SEEG monitoring in children. In addition to reviewing the conceptual and technical points of the diagnostic evaluation, attention will also be given to SEEG-based interventions (e.g., radiofrequency thermo-coagulation).

Stereoelectroencephalography in children: a review

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an intracranial diagnostic measure that has grown in popularity in the United States as outcomes data have demonstrated its benefits and safety. The main uses of SEEG include 1) exploration of deep cortical/sulcal structures; 2) bilateral recordings; and 3) 3D mapping of epileptogenic zones. While SEEG has gradually been accepted for treatment in adults, there is less consensus on its utility in children. In this literature review, the authors seek to describe the current state of SEEG with a focus on the more recent technology-enabled surgical techniques and demonstrate its efficacy in the pediatric epilepsy population.

The current place of epilepsy surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Three randomized controlled trials demonstrate that surgical treatment is safe and effective for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE), yet fewer than 1% of patients are referred for surgery. This is a review of recent trends in surgical referral for DRE, and advances in the field. Reasons for continued underutilization are discussed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent series indicate no increase in surgical referral for DRE over the past two decades. One study suggests that decreased referrals to major epilepsy centers can be accounted for by increased referrals to low-volume nonacademic hospitals where results are poorer, and complication rates higher. The increasing ability of high-resolution MRI to identify small neocortical lesions and an increase in pediatric surgeries, in part, explain a relative greater decrease in temporal lobe surgeries. Misconceptions continue to restrict referral. Consequently, advocacy for referral of all patients with DRE to epilepsy centers that offer specialized diagnosis and other alternative treatments, as well as psychosocial support, is recommended. Recent advances will continue to improve the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment and expand the types of patients who benefit from surgical intervention.

SUMMARY

Surgical treatment for epilepsy remains underutilized, in part because of persistent misconceptions. Rather than promote referral for surgery, it would be more appropriate to advocate that all patients with DRE deserve a consultation at a full-service epilepsy center that offers many options for eliminating or reducing disability.

Methodology, outcome, safety and in vivo accuracy in traditional frame-based stereoelectroencephalography

Background

Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is an established diagnostic technique for the localization of the epileptogenic zone in drug-resistant epilepsy. In vivo accuracy of SEEG electrode positioning is of paramount importance since higher accuracy may lead to more precise resective surgery, better seizure outcome and reduction of complications.

Objective

To describe experiences with the SEEG technique in our comprehensive epilepsy center, to illustrate surgical methodology, to evaluate in vivo application accuracy and to consider the diagnostic yield of SEEG implantations.

Methods

All patients who underwent SEEG implantations between September 2008 and April 2016 were analyzed. Planned electrode trajectories were compared with post-implantation trajectories after fusion of pre- and postoperative imaging. Quantitative analysis of deviation using Euclidean distance and directional errors was performed. Explanatory variables for electrode accuracy were analyzed using linear regression modeling. The surgical methodology, procedure-related complications and diagnostic yield were reported.

Results

Seventy-six implantations were performed in 71 patients, and a total of 902 electrodes were implanted. Median entry and target point deviations were 1.54 mm and 2.93 mm. Several factors that predicted entry and target point accuracy were identified. The rate of major complications was 2.6%. SEEG led to surgical therapy of various modalities in 53 patients (69.7%).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that entry and target point localization errors can be predicted by linear regression models, which can aid in identification of high-risk electrode trajectories and further enhancement of accuracy. SEEG is a reliable technique, as demonstrated by the high accuracy of conventional frame-based implantation methodology and the good diagnostic yield.