Dosage Calculation for Intravenous Thrombolysis of Ischemic Stroke: To Weigh or to Estimate

The accuracy of total body weight estimation in adults - A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Weight estimation is required in adult patients when weight-based medication must be administered during emergency care, as measuring weight is often impossible. Inaccurate estimations may lead to inaccurate drug doses, which may cause patient harm. Little is known about the relative accuracy of different methods of weight estimation that could be used during resuscitative care. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance and suitability of existing weight estimation methods for use in adult emergency care.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed for suitable articles that studied the accuracy of weight estimation systems in adults. The study characteristics, the quality of the studies, the weight estimation methods evaluated, the accuracy data, and any information on the ease-of-use of the method were extracted and evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 95 studies were included, in which 27 different methods of total body weight estimation were described, with 42 studies included in the meta-analysis. The most accurate methods, determined from the pooled estimates of accuracy (the percentage of estimates within 10% of true weight, with 95% confidence intervals) were 3-D camera estimates (88.8% (85.8 to 91.8%)), patient self-estimates (88.7% (87.7 to 89.7%)), the Lorenz method (77.5% (76.4 to 78.6%)) and family estimates (75.0% (71.5 to 78.6%)). However, no method was without significant potential limitations to use during emergency care.

CONCLUSION

Patient self-estimations of weight were generally very accurate and should be the method of choice during emergency care, when possible. However, since alternative estimation methods must be available when confused, or otherwise incapacitated, patients are unable to provide an estimate, alternative strategies of weight estimation should also be available.

Dosing Tissue Plasminogen Activator on a Mobile Stroke Unit: Comparison Between Estimated and Hospital-Measured Weights

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Prehospital tissue plasminogen activator dosing in a mobile stroke unit (MSU) is estimated by the paramedic and nurse. We aimed to determine the accuracy of the estimated weight method compared with the actual weight of patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator on the MSU. METHODS: We prospectively collected the estimated weight used on the MSU for treatment and the first-documented hospital-measured weight (bed scale) within 24 hours of hospital arrival. Median absolute and percent difference in weights were calculated; less than 10% of difference in weights was considered acceptable. To compare the estimated and measured weights, we conducted a Wilcoxon signed rank test and Fisher exact test to explore the association between weight difference of greater than 10% and patient outcomes. RESULTS: Among 337 patients, median estimated and hospital-measured weights were 79.0 kg (interquartile range [IQR], 66.0-94.5) and 78.5 kg (IQR, 65.0-91.7), respectively. The median of the absolute value of the difference in estimated versus measured weight was 2.7 kg (IQR, 0.6-7.6; P < .0001). The median percent difference in weight was 3.6% (IQR, 0.8%-9.4%). The median difference between the tissue plasminogen activator dosage administered on the MSU and the recommended dose based on the actual weight was 1.3 mg (IQR, 0.06-4.8) in absolute value. In 56 patients (16.6% of the entire sample) with overestimation of weight by greater than 10%, there were no symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages. There was no association between weight difference and discharge modified Rankin score (P = .59). CONCLUSION: Weight estimation on an MSU can lead to similar tissue plasminogen activator dosing for 83.4% of subjects compared with if dosing were determined based on actual weight. Weight overestimation or underestimation had no detected impact on tissue plasminogen activator outcomes.

Effect of erroneous body-weight estimation on outcome of thrombolyzed stroke patients

Intravenously administered tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA), dose determined by patients' body-weight, remains the only approved drug treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Since a shorter onset-to-treatment time results in better functional outcome, treatment is often initiated according to the estimated or last-known body-weight of the patient. This approach may result in underdosing or overdosing of tPA. In this multicenter retrospective study, we evaluated the extent of error in tPA dosing in our AIS cohort and its impact on functional outcome and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). Consecutive AIS patients, receiving IV-tPA, dose determined by the estimated body-weight, at three tertiary centers between January and December 2017 were included. Collected data included information about demographics, cardiovascular risk factors, stroke subtype and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score. Estimated and measured body-weights were recorded. Modified Rankin scale (mRS) of 2 or more defined unfavorable outcome. The study included 150 patients. Median age was 64 -years (IQR 55-75) with male preponderance (67%) and median NIHSS score of 9 points (IQR 6-17). Mean measured weight of our study population was 58 (SD 13) kg. Median difference between actual and estimated body-weight was 3 kg (IQR 1.5-6). Difference was more than 10% in 35 (23.3%) patients. Good functional outcome (mRS 0-1) was achieved by 74 (49.3%) patients and 10 (6.8%) developed SICH. NIHSS (OR 1.288; 95% CI 1.157-1.435, p < 0.001) and large artery atherosclerosis (OR 5.878; 95% CI 1.929-17.910, p = 0.002) were independent predictors of unfavorable functional outcome. Our finding of the statistically insignificant 2.5-fold increase in poor outcomes among patients where the estimated and actual weight differed by more than 10% should be interpreted with caution due to the limited sample size. Significant difference occurs between estimated and actual body-weight in a considerable proportion of thrombolysed AIS patients. However, this discrepancy does not affect functional outcome or the risk of SICH.

Body Weight Estimation for Dose-Finding and Health Monitoring of Lying, Standing and Walking Patients Based on RGB-D Data

This paper describes the estimation of the body weight of a person in front of an RGB-D camera. A survey of different methods for body weight estimation based on depth sensors is given. First, an estimation of people standing in front of a camera is presented. Second, an approach based on a stream of depth images is used to obtain the body weight of a person walking towards a sensor. The algorithm first extracts features from a point cloud and forwards them to an artificial neural network (ANN) to obtain an estimation of body weight. Besides the algorithm for the estimation, this paper further presents an open-access dataset based on measurements from a trauma room in a hospital as well as data from visitors of a public event. In total, the dataset contains 439 measurements. The article illustrates the efficiency of the approach with experiments with persons lying down in a hospital, standing persons, and walking persons. Applicable scenarios for the presented algorithm are body weight-related dosing of emergency patients.