The application of mixed reality technique in oromaxillo-facial reconstruction with the perforator flap for malignant tumor patients

Objectives

The integration of quantitative imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with mixed reality (MR) technology holds promise for enhancing the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring of cancer. This study compares the characteristics and effects of MR and color Doppler ultrasound (CDU) in the localization of perforator blood vessels in the lower extremities.

Methods

Two techniques were used to locate the perforator vessels in 40 cases of maxillofacial defect repair using perforator flaps from the lower extremities. The number of perforator vessels located in the flap area and the actual number of perforator vessels explored during the surgery were recorded. The recognition rate was calculated and the operation time and blood loss were recorded for each case.

Results

The recognition rates of MR technology and CDU in perforating vessels of the lower limbs were 93.9% and 97.2%, respectively (p > 0.05). The operation time was 52-74 minutes, 65-88 minutes (p > 0.05). The average bleeding volumes were 24 and 56 ml (p < 0.05), respectively. All perforator flaps were alive. One flap had a crisis and recovered after emergency exploratory treatment. Thirty donor sites of the lower extremities were directly sutured, and wounds were closed by abdominal skin grafting in 10 cases.

Conclusion

MR technology for successfully identifying perforator vessels can shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding in the donor site, and reduce trauma to the donor site.

Reconstruction of a Large Composite Hemicraniofacial Defect with Bipedicled DIEP/TRAM Flaps

Head and neck reconstructions are often challenging due to the mix of functional and aesthetic goals. It can be tricky when different tissue types are required to reconstruct each subunit. Craniofacial reconstructions require a large volume of tissue to cover defects that span across a large convex area. The latissimus dorsi muscle flap is a workhorse free flap used frequently by surgeons due to its ability to cover over a large surface area. However, there are unique situations when even the latissimus dorsi muscle is not enough to provide the bulk cover for the craniofacial defect. We present a complex case of a hemicraniofacial reconstruction after a hemifacial orbital exenteration and cranial resection of a large neglected basal cell carcinoma.

The versatility of the reverse superior labial artery flap

BACKGROUND

The reverse superior labial artery flap was introduced in 2015 as a reconstructive option for medial cheek defects. Notably, this flap can be redesigned as a more effective repair tool for large facial defect reconstruction. In this study, we redesigned the reverse superior labial artery flap to include the vascular territories of the infraorbital and transverse facial arteries in larger sizes for the repair of large facial defects.

METHODS

A reverse superior labial artery flap was used to repair large facial defects in 17 patients with a mean age of 74 years. The defects were located in the orbital region and entirely nasal sidewall in patient two, buccal region in patient three, and in lower lip and malar areas in patient five. The flap sizes ranged from 3.5 × 10 to 7 × 15 cm. A sensory examination was performed on the flaps at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The mean follow-up period was 12 months.

RESULTS

All flaps survived without partial or total loss. In a small number of flaps minor complications such as venous congestion, epidermolysis, and dehiscence were seen. No functional disability was observed in the lower eyelid or lower lip, and the esthetic appearance was evaluated as satisfactory by the patients. In all the flaps, the protective sensation was recovered in the postoperative 12th month.

CONCLUSIONS

The reverse superior labial artery flap has an extensive arc of rotation, a reliable vascular pedicle, and a large cutaneous paddle. Therefore, this flap may be a versatile surgical repair tool for large cheek defects.

Comparison of Donor Site Morbidity Between Anterolateral Thigh and Radial Forearm Free Flaps for Head and Neck Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis aimed to provide an up-to-date comparison of donor site morbidity (DSM) between patients who underwent head and neck reconstruction with Anterolateral thigh (ALT) and radial forearm free (RFF) flaps. We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to identify studies that compared DSM between ALT and RFF patients. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of each DSM between ALT and RFF patients was estimated using a random- or fixed-effect model depending on the degree of interstudy heterogeneity. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed if substantial heterogeneity was detected. Eighteen cohort studies with 1,018 patients (535 ALT and 483 RFF patients) were included. Compared with RFF, ALT were associated with lower risks of wound dehiscence (OR = 0.2, 95%CI: 0.10-0.42, P < 0.01), strength impairment (OR = 0.18, 95%CI: 0.07-0.47, P < 0.01), and movement impairment (OR = 0.19, 95%CI:0.07-0.49, P < 0.01). A subgroup analysis showed that ALT were associated with a lower risk of donor site numbness among patients undergoing tongue reconstruction (OR = 0.05, 95%CI: 0.01-0.25, P < 0.01), but not among all patients undergoing head and neck reconstruction. The pooled ORs of other DSMs demonstrated no significant difference between ALT and RFF patients. ALT are superior to RFF for head and neck reconstruction in terms of donor site wound dehiscence, strength impairment, movement impairment, and for tongue reconstruction specifically in terms of donor site numbness. No significant differences in the incidence of donor site hematoma/seroma, infection, or dissatisfaction with donor site appearance were identified between ALT and RFF patients.

Ossification of the Vascular Pedicle After Microsurgical Soft Tissue Transfer of the Lateral Upper Arm Free Flap

Reconstruction of intraoral defects is one of the main aspects of head and neck cancer treatment. Since the advent of microvascular surgery in this field, free flap tissue transfer has become a common procedure, and various flaps have been described for soft tissue reconstruction. The lateral upper arm free flap is one of the most frequently used flaps for intraoral defect coverage. This article describes ossification of the corresponding vascular pedicle after soft tissue transfer with the lateral upper arm free flap and microsurgical anastomosis in oral cancer treatment. Similar findings in the context of the lateral upper arm free flap have never been reported in the literature; however, it is important for surgeons to know that pedicle ossification can occur. This knowledge may be helpful to avoid erroneous diagnosis of the ossification as a sign of tumor relapse/recurrence as well as to anticipate potential difficulties in the surgical approach in cases requiring reentry of the reconstructed region, for example, in relapse/recurrence of head and neck cancer.

Reconstruction technique following total laryngectomy affects swallowing outcomes

OBJECTIVES

How reconstruction affects function following total laryngectomy is unclear. This study seeks to determine whether reconstruction method is associated with differences in swallowing outcomes.

METHODS

Retrospective review of reconstruction technique in patients undergoing TL was compared by pharyngeal transit time (PTT), patient-reported dysphagia (EAT-10), and diet-tolerated (FOIS).

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients met inclusion criteria, with 40 patients (42.1%) undergoing primary closure and 55 patients (57.9%) undergoing tissue transfer. There was no difference in EAT-10 scores between the groups (P = .09). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving oral diet (FOIS >3) with primary closure (P = .003). Patients undergoing PMC vs free flap had similar rates of g-tube dependency. Primary closure had the shortest PTT (1.89 seconds) compared to free flap (3.47-4.65 seconds) or PMC (5.1 seconds; P = .035).

CONCLUSIONS

When primary closure is achievable, these results suggest improved swallowing outcomes with better tolerance of oral diet and shorter pharyngeal transit times.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.