Long-Term Results of Vitrectomy for Macular Holes after Failure of Vitreolysis

Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap Technique: Is It the Best Option for Macular Holes?

Surgical treatment is generally necessary to repair full-thickness macular holes (FTMH). Although vitrectomy with or without internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling remains the standard surgical technique, the inverted ILM flap procedure has increasingly assumed a role in the primary surgical repair of FTMHs. Some vitreoretinal surgeons reserve this technique to treat large or myopic holes, whereas others use it routinely in all cases. This paper is a comprehensive review of the current scientific evidence on the anatomical and functional outcomes of the inverted ILM flap technique in the repair of macular holes, following the International Vitreomacular Traction Study (IVTS) group classification.

Prognostic Factors Associated with Ocriplasmin Efficacy for the Treatment of Symptomatic Vitreomacular Adhesion and Full-thickness Macular Hole: Analysis from Four Studies

Purpose

To assess the effect of patient baseline characteristics on the efficacy of ocriplasmin treatment for symptomatic vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) with full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) from phase 3/4 studies.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic VMA and FTMH at baseline and receiving ocriplasmin treatment 125 μg were pooled from the MIVI-TRUST, OASIS, and ORBIT studies. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate whether patient baseline characteristics were predictors of having VMA resolution by Day 28 and FTMH closure by Month 6.

Results

Two hundred and seventy-four patients receiving ocriplasmin treatment were assessed. Overall, 22.6% (62/274) of the patients experienced both VMA resolution by Day 28 and non-surgical FTMH closure by Month 6. Patients with FTMH ≤250 µm at baseline had a significantly higher success rate compared to those with FTMH >400 µm (29.9% [41/137] vs 2.2% [1/48]; P = 0.009). In patients with VMA resolution by Day 28, both small FTMH size (P = 0.001) and FTMH width at RPE (P = 0.012) were significantly associated with a higher FTMH closure rate. Patients with VMA resolution had higher rates of FTMH closure. Previously identified baseline predictive factors, including age, lens status, or presence of epiretinal membrane (ERM) were not found to be predictive of both VMA release and FTMH closure.

Conclusion

The analysis revealed that FMTH ≤250 µm was the only factor predictive for achieving both pharmacological VMA resolution by Day 28 and nonsurgical FTMH closure by Month 6; neither lens status or presence of ERM, previously identified baseline characteristics favoring VMA resolution, showed statistically significant predictive power for both outcomes.

Short-Term Results of Ocriplasmin Versus Prompt Vitrectomy for Macular Hole. Which Performs Better?

In this retrospective study, we compared the anatomical and functional changes in patients with vitreomacular traction associated with macular holes between the following groups: (1) Patients who were treated with a single intravitreal injection of ocriplasmin (the OCRIALONE group); (2) those who failed the ocriplasmin treatment and underwent vitrectomy one month later (the OCRIVIT group); and (3) patients who directly underwent par plana vitrectomy (VITREALONE group). A total of 38 patients, 19 in the OCRIALONE group + OCRIVIT group (seven and 12 patients, respectively) and 19 in the VITREALONE group with focal vitreomacular adhesion associated with macular holes were evaluated with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. Functional examinations included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and microperimetry analysis. Visual function changes were compared between the OCRIALONE group + OCRIVIT group and VITREALONE group up to three months. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis compared the OCRIVIT group and the VITREALONE group. BCVA values and the mean retinal sensitivity showed statistically significant improvement in all groups (p < 0.001). Specifically, the retinal sensitivity values at the end of the follow-up were significantly higher in the OCRIALONE group + OCRIVIT group than in the VITREALONE group. These functional findings were also confirmed when the statistical analysis was conducted between the OCRIVIT group and the VITREALONE group. Although the OCRIALONE group + OCRIVIT group exhibited faster retinal thinning than the VITREALONE group (p = 0.006), the analysis of the OCRIVIT group versus the VITREALONE group did not show any statistically significant difference. The better functional results and similar anatomical findings suggest that ocriplasmin can be used as a first-line treatment, and that prompt pars plana vitrectomy as primary surgery does not provide better outcomes in comparison with pars plana vitrectomy after ocriplasmin injection.

Morphological Reconstitution and Persistent Changes After Intravitreal Ocriplasmin for Vitreomacular Traction and Macular Hole

Purpose: To assess the long-term anatomical and functional findings in patients with symptomatic vitreomacular traction (VMT), with or without full thickness macular hole (FTMH), after eye treatment with intravitreal ocriplasmin injection (IOI). Methods: This longitudinal case series includes 51 eyes from 51 symptomatic patients with VMT (<800 μm) who received a single IOI (Jetrea^® 0.125 mg); 21 cases with an FTMH (<400 μm) were included. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography findings were recorded before IOI, and 1 day to 24 months thereafter. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: Mean adhesion size before injection was 345 ± 146 μm. In 34 eyes (67%), complete release of VMT was observed; whereas VMT persisted in 17 eyes (33%). The latter included 15 of the 21 eyes (71%) with FTMH, 15 of which underwent pars plana vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling. BCVA improved from (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [logMAR]) 0.41 ± 0.03 before injection to 0.32 ± 0.03 after 1 month and 0.23 ± 0.05 after 6 months and remained stable thereafter (0.24 ± 0.06 after 24 months of follow-up). Forty-five percent of the eyes presented submacular deposits soon after IOI that were not functionally relevant; 61% completely resolved by 12 months. Except floaters that disappeared within 48 h, no other adverse events were reported during follow-up. Conclusions: Treatment with ocriplasmin in a real-life setting showed an overall efficacy of 67% in patients with symptomatic VMT, with better results evident in the absence of an FTMH (70% vs. 62% VMT release) and a visual gain for over 2 years.