1
|
Wolf F, Nielsen J, Saliger J, Hennecken E, Kröber P, Eschweiler M, Folkerts AK, Karbe H, Zimmer P. Multimodal agility-based exercise training (MAT) versus strength and endurance training (SET) to improve multiple sclerosis-related fatigue and fatigability during inpatient rehabilitation: a randomized controlled pilot and feasibility study [ReFEx]. BMC Neurol 2023; 23:388. [PMID: 37898772 PMCID: PMC10612282 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03436-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multimodal agility-based exercise training (MAT) is a group-based exercise training framework for persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) with a potential to impact fatigue and fatigability. In a mixed-methods design, this study evaluated the feasibility of implementing MAT in an inpatient rehabilitation setting and the feasibility of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) study protocol with 'traditional' strength and endurance training (SET) as an active control condition. Secondarily, preliminary outcome data was acquired. METHODS PwMS with low to moderate disability and self-reported fatigue were randomly allocated to either MAT or SET when starting inpatient rehabilitation (4-6 weeks). The MAT-participants exercised in a group following a MAT-manual (sessions were gym- (5x/week) and pool-based (3x/week)). SET-participants exercised individually 5x/week on a cycle ergometer, and 3x/week on strength training machines. Feasibility assessments focused on processes, resources, management, time, and scientific domains. Assessed clinical outcomes at admission and discharge included perceived fatigue, motor and cognitive fatigability, cognitive performance, motor function, and balance confidence. Perceived fatigue was reassessed 1, 4, and 12 weeks after discharge. Feasibility was determined regarding predetermined progression criteria. RESULTS Twenty-two participants were randomized. Both groups performed the minimum number of sessions (> 18), and retention was adequate (73-91%). SET-participants performed more sessions than MAT-participants (30.8 vs. 22.7) and stayed longer in the facility (34.2 vs. 31.6 days). Non-eligibility of admitted pwMS was high (74% non-eligible), mainly due to high EDSS and inability to attend pool-based sessions. Consequently, recruitment (1.8/month) was slower than the predetermined progression criterium. Baseline assessments took longer than required (only 50% completed within 3 days). Short-term fatigue reduction was similar for both groups. Motor fatigability also improved in both groups, whereas cognitive fatigability deteriorated. In MAT, average improvement in walking endurance (43.9 m) exceeded minimal important change values for individuals (> 26.9 m). CONCLUSIONS Progressing to a definitive RCT necessitates adaptation of eligibility criteria. In the present design it will also be difficult to attain similar dosing of interventions. A multicenter RCT focused only on gym-based MAT might be another option to assess the effect of MAT. The primary outcome measure should be able to measure change in perceived fatigue more robustly. TRIAL REGISTRATION German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00023943, date of registration: 23 September 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Wolf
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany.
- Division of Performance and Health, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany.
| | - Jörn Nielsen
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies, Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jochen Saliger
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany
| | - Eva Hennecken
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philipp Kröber
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Ann-Kristin Folkerts
- Department of Medical Psychology | Neuropsychology and Gender Studies, Center for Neuropsychological Diagnostics and Intervention (CeNDI), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Karbe
- Neurological Rehabilitation Center Godeshoehe GmbH, Bonn, Germany
| | - Philipp Zimmer
- Division of Performance and Health, Institute for Sport and Sport Science, Technical University Dortmund, Dortmund, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tacchino A, Podda J, Bergamaschi V, Pedullà L, Brichetto G. Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: Three digital ingredients to address current and future priorities. Front Hum Neurosci 2023; 17:1130231. [PMID: 36908712 PMCID: PMC9995764 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1130231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological chronic disease with autoimmune demyelinating lesions and one of the most common disability causes in young adults. People with MS (PwMS) experience cognitive impairments (CIs) and clinical evidence shows their presence during all MS stages even in the absence of other symptoms. Cognitive rehabilitation (CR) aims at reducing CI and improving PwMS' awareness of cognitive difficulties faced in their daily living. More defined cognitive profiles, easier treatment access and the need to transfer intervention effects into everyday life activities are aims of utmost relevance for CR in MS. Currently, advanced technologies may pave the way to rethink CR in MS to address the priority of more personalized and effective, accessible and ecological interventions. For this purpose, digital twins, tele-cognitive-rehabilitation and metaverse are the main candidate digital ingredients. Based on scientific evidences, we propose digital twin technology to enhance MS cognitive phenotyping; tele-cognitive-rehabilitation to make feasible the cognitive intervention access to a larger number of PwMS; and metaverse to represent the best choice to train real-world dual- and multi-tasking deficits in virtual daily life environments. Moreover, multi-domain high-frequency big-data collected through tele-cognitive-assessment, tele-cognitive-rehabilitation, and metaverse may be merged to refine artificial intelligence algorithms and obtain increasingly detailed patient's cognitive profile in order to enhance intervention personalization. Here, we present how these digital ingredients and their integration could be crucial to address the current and future needs of CR facilitating the early detection of subtle CI and the delivery of increasingly effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Tacchino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Jessica Podda
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Valeria Bergamaschi
- AISM Rehabilitation Center Liguria, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society (AISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Ludovico Pedullà
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Brichetto
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy.,AISM Rehabilitation Center Liguria, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society (AISM), Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Harrison AM, Safari R, Mercer T, Picariello F, van der Linden ML, White C, Moss-Morris R, Norton S. Which exercise and behavioural interventions show most promise for treating fatigue in multiple sclerosis? A network meta-analysis. Mult Scler 2021; 27:1657-1678. [PMID: 33876986 PMCID: PMC8474304 DOI: 10.1177/1352458521996002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fatigue is a common, debilitating symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS) without a current standardised treatment. OBJECTIVE The aim of this systematic review with network meta-analyses was to estimate the relative effectiveness of both fatigue-targeted and non-targeted exercise, behavioural and combined (behavioural and exercise) interventions. METHODS Nine electronic databases up to August 2018 were searched, and 113 trials (n = 6909) were included: 34 were fatigue-targeted and 79 non-fatigue-targeted trials. Intervention characteristics were extracted using the Template for Intervention Description and Replication guidelines. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE. RESULTS Pairwise meta-analyses showed that exercise interventions demonstrated moderate to large effects across subtypes regardless of treatment target, with the largest effect for balance exercise (SMD = 0.84). Cognitive behavioural therapies (CBTs) showed moderate to large effects (SMD = 0.60), with fatigue-targeted treatments showing larger effects than those targeting distress. Network meta-analysis showed that balance exercise performed significantly better compared to other exercise and behavioural intervention subtypes, except CBT. CBT was estimated to be superior to energy conservation and other behavioural interventions. Combined exercise also had a moderate to large effect. CONCLUSION Treatment recommendations for balance and combined exercise are tentative as the certainty of the evidence was moderate. The certainty of the evidence for CBT was high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony M Harrison
- Department of Clinical and Health Psychology,
Leeds Teaching Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Reza Safari
- Health and Social Care Research Centre, College
of Health, Psychology and Social Care, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| | - Tom Mercer
- Centre for Health, Activity and Rehabilitation
Research, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Federica Picariello
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of
Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London,
UK
| | | | - Claire White
- School of Population Health & Environmental
Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King’s College London,
London, UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of
Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London,
UK
| | - Sam Norton
- Health Psychology Section, Institute of
Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London,
UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Podda J, Tacchino A, Pedullà L, Monti Bragadin M, Battaglia MA, Brichetto G. Focus on neglected features of cognitive rehabilitation in MS: Setting and mode of the treatment. Mult Scler 2020; 28:1009-1019. [PMID: 33045916 PMCID: PMC9131413 DOI: 10.1177/1352458520966300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Cognitive rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis (MS) aims at reducing patients’
cognitive impairments, improving their awareness and ability to take cognitive
difficulties into account in their daily living. However, at this moment, more
high-quality randomized trials are needed to draw conclusion about the
effectiveness of cognitive interventions in MS. Although existing studies
provide clear descriptions of intervention key ingredients (e.g. targeted
cognitive domain as well as treatment frequency and duration) and the practical
details needed to manage these key elements (e.g. restorative approaches,
compensatory strategies, or environmental modifications), other crucial aspects
received less attention in rehabilitation research. The aim of this topical
review is to try to elucidate some critical issues that were only partly
addressed and analyzed by the scientific literature: setting (center-based vs
home-based) and mode (individual vs group) of the cognitive rehabilitation
treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Podda
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Andrea Tacchino
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Ludovico Pedullà
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy
| | - Margherita Monti Bragadin
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy/AISM Rehabilitation Center, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society, Genoa, Italy
| | - Mario Alberto Battaglia
- Department of Physiopathology, Experimental Medicine and Public Health, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giampaolo Brichetto
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation (FISM), Genoa, Italy/AISM Rehabilitation Center, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Society, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Treatment and management of cognitive dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. Nat Rev Neurol 2020; 16:319-332. [PMID: 32372033 DOI: 10.1038/s41582-020-0355-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Cognitive impairment is a common and devastating manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS). Although disease-modifying therapies have been efficacious for reducing relapse rates in MS, such treatments are ineffective for treating cognitive dysfunction. Alternative treatment approaches for mitigating cognitive problems are greatly needed in this population. To date, cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training have been identified as possible candidates for treating MS-related cognitive impairment; however, cognitive dysfunction is still often considered to be poorly managed in patients with MS. This Review provides a comprehensive overview of recent developments in the treatment and management of cognitive impairment in people with MS. We describe the theoretical rationales, current states of the science, field-wide challenges and recent advances in cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training for treating MS-related cognitive impairment. We also discuss future directions for research into the treatment of cognitive impairment in MS that should set the stage for the inclusion of cognitive rehabilitation and exercise training into clinical practice within the next decade.
Collapse
|
6
|
Dana A, Rafiee S, Gholami A. Motor reaction time and accuracy in patients with multiple sclerosis: effects of an active computerized training program. Neurol Sci 2019; 40:1849-1854. [PMID: 31055729 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-03892-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to determine the difference of motor reaction time and accuracy between the patients with moderate multiple sclerosis (MS) and healthy subjects and to determine whether a specified cognitive-motor training can improve the speed and accuracy of information processing in patients with MS. A total of 205 patients (30% males) and 276 age-/gender-matched healthy subjects (31% males) were included in the study. Furthermore, using a stratified randomization method, patients with MS were randomly assigned to one of two groups: active information processing training (AIPT) (n = 49) or post-control (n = 55). The AIPT group was asked to complete a computerized visual-manual training program and the post-control group asked to complete the same task without an increase in difficulty. Before and after the intervention phase, the simple, choice, and semantic reaction times and accuracies of all participants were evaluated using the VLS measurement battery. Our results demonstrated that the case and control group were significantly different in terms of the simple, choice, and semantic motor reaction times and accuracies. Compared with the pre-intervention phase, the AIPT and control group's performances in the post-intervention phase were considerably improved in simple, choice, and semantic motor reaction times and choice and semantic motor reaction accuracies. The results also showed that the AIPT group performed significantly better than the post-control group in terms of simple and choice motor reaction times. We showed the positive effects of training on the performance of patients with MS in motor reaction time and accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Dana
- Department of Physical Education, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Saleh Rafiee
- Sport Science Research Institute of Iran (SSRI)
- , Tehran, Iran
| | - Amin Gholami
- Sport Science Research Institute of Iran (SSRI)
- , Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|