Socioeconomic status and pediatric cochlear implant usage during COVID-19

OBJECTIVE

COVID-19 (COVID) delayed access to speech and hearing services. The objective of this study was to identify interactions between socioeconomic status (SES) and cochlear implant (CI) usage during COVID.

METHODS

Consecutive pediatric patients (age 0-17) with CI and audiology visits between 2019 and 2022 at a tertiary care children's hospital were reviewed. Age, sex, race, insurance type, and proxy measures for SES using zip code were recorded. Hours spent with CI on and in different listening environments were compared between pre-COVID (1/1/2019-12/31/2019), COVID (4/1/2020-3/31/2021), and most recent (6/1/2021-5/31/2022) time periods.

RESULTS

Most patients were male (32/59, 54 % ears of 48 patients) and White, non-Hispanic (45/59, 76 %). Median age at implant was 2.0 years (range:0.6-12.2). There were no significant differences in hours spent with CI on during COVID compared with pre-COVID. However, children spent more time listening to louder noises (70-79 dB and ≥80 dB) recently compared with during COVID (p = 0.01 and 0.006, respectively). During COVID, children living in areas with greater educational attainment showed smaller reductions in total hours with CI on (β = 0.1, p = 0.02) and hours listening to speech in noise (β = 0.03, p = 0.005) compared with pre-COVID. In the most recent time period, children of minority race (β = -3.94 p = 0.008) and those who were older at implant (β = -0.630, p = 0.02) were more likely to experience reductions in total hours with CI on compared with during COVID.

CONCLUSION

Interventions which mitigate barriers of implant use and promote rich listening home-environments for at risk populations should be implemented during challenging future social and environmental conditions.

Influence of listening environment on usage patterns in cochlear implant patients with single-sided deafness

OBJECTIVE

To compare cochlear implant (CI) data logging of patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (biSNHL) in various acoustic environments and study the implications of data logging on auditory performance.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case control study.

METHODS

Adult CI patients with SSD or biSNHL from 2010 to 2021 with usage data collected at 3-, 6-, and 12-months following device activation were identified. The CI listening environment was defined as speech in noise, speech in quiet, quiet, music or noise. Auditory performance was measured using the CNC word, AzBio sentence tests and the Tinnitus Handicap Index (THI).

RESULTS

60 adults with SSD or biSNHL were included. CI patients with biSNHL wore their devices more than those with SSD at 3-months post-activation (11.18 versus 8.97 hours/day, p = 0.04), though there were no significant differences at 6-12 months. Device usage was highest in the speech in quiet environment. In SSD CI users, there was a positive correlation (p = 0.03) between device use and CNC scores at 12-months and an improvement in THI scores at 12-months (p = 0.0004).

CONCLUSIONS

CI users with SSD and biSNHL have comparable duration of device usage at longer follow-up periods with greatest device usage recorded in speech in quiet environments.

Children with cochlear implant and additional disabilities benefit from consistent device use

OBJECTIVES

Although the prevalence of additional disabilities (AD) in children with a cochlear implant (CI) is high, children with such disabilities are often excluded from clinical studies, or their specific characteristics are only partially included. The literature shows that several factors need to be considered in evaluating auditory and language development in CI children with AD, including demographic variables as well as the severity and type of disability. Current findings on device use in children show correlations with auditory and language outcome, but little is known about device use specifically in children with AD. The purpose of this study was to determine the auditory and language outcome of CI children with AD and to analyse their datalogging-based daily device use, both 1 year and 2 years after implantation. In addition, any potential correlations between outcome and device use were to be identified.

METHODS

A cohort of 32 CI children with 5 different types of AD were included in this retrospective analysis. The children's auditory and language outcome was assessed by the parental questionnaires LittlEARS and ELFRA and by the professional observation tool CAP (Categories of Auditory Performance) 1 and 2 years after implantation. Longitudinal device use was analysed by using the CI system-integrated data-logging; daily duration of CI use, number of coil disconnections and exposure to different listening scenes were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, the cohort's auditory and language performance showed significant progress over time, while reduced abilities became more obvious after 2 years of CI experience. The mean daily duration of CI use increased significantly from 7.8 ± 2.8 to 8.2 ± 2.7 h after 2 years. High numbers of daily coil disconnections were detected, with a significant mean decrease from 83.4 ± 73.1 to 66.3 ± 54.6 whereas the percentage exposure to different listening environments was widely stable over time. Significant rank correlations were identified between outcomes measured by ELFRA and CAP with daily duration of CI use, numbers of coil disconnections and percentage of exposure to speech-characterised listening scenes.

CONCLUSION

The auditory and language outcome in CI children with AD is variable, but it progresses over time. Children benefit from a consistent daily device use as well as from a high exposure to speech-characterised environments. Device use should be monitored constantly, with particular focus on daily duration of CI use and, in particular, on the number of coil disconnections if children have a severe motor impairment. Objective data-logging is an important addition to outcome assessment by testing, observations and parental questionnaires. Although assessment in children with AD is a major challenge for professionals, comprehensive assessment is needed to improve cochlear implant services with special adaption to children with AD, and this should include audiological, development-related and psychosocial information. A unified system to classify types of disabilities could help to improve procedures for analysing different outcomes.

Ecological Momentary Assessment to Obtain Signal Processing Technology Preference in Cochlear Implant Users

Background: To assess the performance of cochlear implant users, speech comprehension benefits are generally measured in controlled sound room environments of the laboratory. For field-based assessment of preference, questionnaires are generally used. Since questionnaires are typically administered at the end of an experimental period, they can be inaccurate due to retrospective recall. An alternative known as ecological momentary assessment (EMA) has begun to be used for clinical research. The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility of using EMA to obtain in-the-moment responses from cochlear implant users describing their technology preference in specific acoustic listening situations. Methods: Over a two-week period, eleven adult cochlear implant users compared two listening programs containing different sound processing technologies during everyday take-home use. Their task was to compare and vote for their preferred program. Results: A total of 205 votes were collected from acoustic environments that were classified into six listening scenes. The analysis yielded different patterns of voting among the subjects. Two subjects had a consistent preference for one sound processing technology across all acoustic scenes, three subjects changed their preference based on the acoustic scene, and six subjects had no conclusive preference for either technology. Conclusion: Results show that EMA is suitable for quantifying real-world self-reported preference, showing inter-subject variability in different listening environments. However, there is uncertainty that patients will not provide sufficient spontaneous feedback. One improvement for future research is a participant forced prompt to improve response rates.

Effect of Test Realism on Speech-in-noise Outcomes in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users

OBJECTIVES

First, to evaluate the effect of laboratory-based test realism on speech intelligibility outcomes of cochlear implant users. Second, to conduct an exploratory investigation of speech intelligibility of cochlear implant users, including bilateral benefit, under realistic laboratory conditions.

DESIGN

For the first goal, the authors measured speech intelligibility scores of 15 bilateral cochlear implant recipients under three different test realism levels at two different signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs). The levels included (1) standard Bamford-Kowal-Bench-like sentences with spatially separated standard babble noise; (2) standard Bamford-Kowal-Bench-like sentences with three-dimensional recordings of actual situations; and (3) a variation of the second realism level where the sentences were obtained from natural effortful conversations. For the second goal, speech intelligibility of the realistic speech material was measured in six different acoustic scenes with realistic signal-to-noise ratios ranging from -5.8 dB to 3.2 dB.

RESULTS

Speech intelligibility was consistently highest in the most artificial (standard) test and lowest in the most realistic test. The effect of the realistic noise and that of the realistic speech material resulted in distinct SNR-dependent performance shifts with respect to their baselines. Speech intelligibility in realistic laboratory conditions was in general low, with mean scores around 60% at the highest SNR. Bilateral benefit provided on average a 7% benefit over unilateral speech understanding in the better-performing ear.

CONCLUSIONS

The results obtained here suggest that standard speech-in-noise tests overestimate the performance of cochlear implant recipients in the real world. To address this limitation, future assessments need to improve the realism over current tests by considering the realism of both, the speech and the noise materials. Likewise, speech intelligibility data under realistic conditions suggest that, insofar as these results can be considered representative of real-life performance, conversational speech and noise levels common to cochlear implant recipients are challenging in terms of speech intelligibility, with average scores around 60%. The findings and limitations are discussed alongside the factors affecting speech intelligibility.

Cochlear implant: More hearing better speech performance

BACKGROUND

Datalogging feature of the cochlear implant audio processor has been utilized to calculate the average daily wearing hours for cochlear implant devices by patients.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the relationship between the time use of cochlear implant audio processor and speech development as well as to identify the lowest acceptable duration of audio processor use to achieve an acceptable language development.

METHODS

A retrospective study design including prelingual thirty-four ears (24 patients) who received the same electrode array of cochlear implant with 2 years follow up. The audiological and speech evaluations were done for all patients postoperatively and the last postoperative follow-up visit was used for analysis in this study.

RESULTS

The average daily use of the audio processor was 11.3 ± 2.7 h per day. The pure tone average was 30.55 ± 4.64 dB whereas the speech reception threshold was 30.88 ± 6.12 dB. The average speech discrimination score at 65 dB was 68.59 ± 16.80%. A significant positive correlation (r = 0.54, p value = 0.0009) was found between the daily use of the audio processor and the speech discrimination score. The lowest wearing time needed to have more than 60% of the speech discrimination score was 8.3 h/day.

CONCLUSION

The present study revealed a positive correlation between the daily duration of the audio processor usage and speech performance. Moreover, we found that pediatric patients need to use their cochlear implant device for at least 8.3 h/day to achieve acceptable language development.

Do Acoustic Environment Characteristics Affect the Lexical Development of Children With Cochlear Implants? A Longitudinal Study Before and After Cochlear Implant Activation

Purpose This study investigates the acoustic environment of children with cochlear implants (CIs) and the relationship between exposure to speech, in noise and in quiet, and the children's lexical production up to 1 year after CI activation, while controlling for the effect of early individual differences in receptive vocabulary growth. Method Eighteen children with CIs were observed at 3, 6, and 12 months after CI activation. Children's spontaneous word production during interaction with their mothers (types and tokens) and their expressive and receptive vocabulary size were considered. The characteristics of the acoustic environments in terms of acoustic scenes (speech in noise or in quiet, quiet, noise, music, and other) and of loudness ranges were assessed using data logging of the children's devices. Results Data analysis showed that both the number of tokens and the number of types produced 1 year after CI activation were affected by the children's exposure to speech in quiet with a loudness range between 40 and 69 dB. Expressive vocabulary size and types were affected by the receptive vocabulary knowledge that the children achieved over the first 3 months after CI activation. Conclusions Our data support the role of speech environment and individual differences in early comprehension on lexical production. The importance of exposure to speech with particular characteristics for the lexical development of children with CIs and the implications for clinical practice are discussed.

Remote check test battery for cochlear implant recipients: proof of concept study

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate the remote check test battery, designed for self-administration by cochlear implant (CI) recipients, parents/caregivers, to determine if the results give adequate information for clinicians to decide the necessity of an appointment and to capture suggestions for improvement. (2) To gauge acceptance of remote monitoring by CI-recipients and their parents/caregivers.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicentre, un-blinded, non-randomized, single-subject, repeated-measures evaluation. The test battery includes an implant-site photograph, impedance measurements, datalogs, questionnaires, speech perception and aided threshold tests. Clinicians reviewed test battery results, followed by a clinical appointment with each CI-recipient, and reported if the battery identified all the issues. Study sample: n = 93 CI-recipients (73 adults, 20 children) and 28 clinicians.

RESULTS

The test battery identified 94% (615/656) of all issues. The test battery and clinician observations agreed in 99% (92/93) of cases on the need for a clinic visit. For 68% (63/93) of cases, the test battery identified all clinician observed issues. The majority (77%, 72/93) of recipients would be satisfied if clinic visits were based on their test battery results. A significantly high proportion agreed that remote monitoring was more convenient than clinic visits and could result in travel, time and cost reductions.

CONCLUSION

This is the first comprehensive test battery designed for CI-recipient remote monitoring.

Age-related language performance and device use in children with very early bilateral cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVES

Paediatric cochlear implantation within the first year of life results in better outcome in auditory and language skills. Beside individual, audiological and social factors, quantity and quality of daily cochlear implant (CI) use also seem to be an influencing factor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate children's early receptive and expressive language performance considering bilingual language development as well as quantity and quality of daily CI use and intraoperative objective measurements.

METHODS

The retrospective analysis included data from 35 very early bilaterally cochlear-implanted children (age at CI M = 8.4 ± 1.5 months). Language performance was assessed by the German standardised test SETK-2 (age at testing M = 29.4 ± 4.0 months). The CI system-integrated data-logging was analysed with regard to daily CoilOn-time, CoilOff and exposure to classified listening scenes. Intraoperatively measured thresholds of evoked compound action potentials (T-ECAPs) were analysed to ensure CI functionality.

RESULTS

The cohort showed language performance within the normal range for word comprehension, sentence comprehension and word production, level of sentence production was reduced. Overall, bilingual children performed less well than monolingual children. Intraoperative T-ECAPs were recorded for the total cohort and no anomalies were detected. Children used their CI for about 8.7 ± 1.4 h per day, most of this time spent in a quiet environment (38%). Word production was significantly correlated with the daily duration of CI use (CoilOn-time) and with exposure to the listening environment Speech. No correlation was found between number of daily coil disconnections (CoilOff) and language performance.

CONCLUSION

Very early bilateral cochlear implantation may result in age-appropriate language skills already at the age of 2 years. Monolingualism seems to a better condition for early language development with CI than bilingualism. Especially for word production, the daily duration of CI use and exposure time in a speech-characterised environment seem to be additional positive factors. Monitoring the data-logs should be one important focus of professionals during the postoperative rehabilitation process to detect potential benefits and risks. These findings should be integrated into rehabilitative therapy and parent counselling.

Cochlear Implant Use Remains Consistent Over Time in Children With Single-Sided Deafness

OBJECTIVES

To measure the acceptance of a cochlear implant by children with single-sided deafness (SSD) using datalogging technology in the cochlear implant processor.

DESIGN

Datalogs from follow-up clinical audiology appointments for 23 children with SSD were extracted from their cochlear implant processors ranging from 1 to 8 visits (M = 3.74, SD = 1.79). The number of hours the cochlear implant was in use per day, the number of times the coil disconnected from the internal device, and the percentage of daily cochlear implant use in different auditory environments were collected from the datalogs. Linear mixed-effects regressions were used to analyze the relationship between age, hearing experience, cochlear implant use, and coil-offs per day. Nonlinear regressions were conducted to evaluate cochlear implant use in different environments.

RESULTS

Children with SSD wore their cochlear implants for 6.22 (SD = 2.81; range = 0.0004 to 14.74) hours per day on average. No significant change in cochlear implant use was seen as the children grew older or gained more hearing experience. As hearing experience increased, the number of coil-offs per day was reduced. Preschoolers spent more time in "music" and "speech" and less time in "noise" and "quiet" than older and younger children while older children spent more time in "speech-in-noise."

CONCLUSIONS

Children with SSD consistently wear their cochlear implants. However, the auditory environments to which they are exposed vary over time. Regular cochlear implant use by this population suggests that it does not detract from a normal-hearing ear and that children with SSD appreciate access to bilateral input.

Does Auditory Environment Predict Speech Perception Outcomes in Elderly Cochlear Implant Patients?

INTRODUCTION

Cochlear implantation (CI) is a reliable and safe means by which sensorineural hearing loss can be ameliorated in the elderly population. However, a high degree of variation exists in postimplantation hearing outcomes for which some modifiable factors of the daily natural auditory environment may be contributory. In this study, we analyze the relationship between cochlear implant patient age, natural auditory environment, and postimplantation speech perception among older adults.

METHODS

Data log from automatic environment classification enabled sound processors of postlingually deafened CI recipients ≥50 years old (n = 115) were obtained retrospectively and analyzed for time spent (hours per day) in listening environment and loudness (SPL dB). Speech perception testing was assessed in a subset of patients (n = 27) using open-set word recognition in quiet Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant in the short and intermediate postoperative period.

RESULTS

The mean subject age was 70 years (range, 53-99 years). Average daily implant use was 10.8 h and was not significantly correlated with age (p = 0.23, Spearman's rho). Age was positively correlated with the percentage of hours spent at <40 and 40-50 dB and negatively correlated to proportional CI use at higher volume (60-70, 70-80, and >80 dB; rs = 0.21, 0.20, -0.20, -0.35, -0.43; p = 0.021, 0.036, 0.033, <0.001, <0.001, respectively). Age was positively correlated with CI use in the quiet scene (rs = 0.26, p = 0.006) and negatively correlated with scenes containing speech and noise (rs = -0.19, -0.25; p = 0.046, 0.007). Total hours of device use and time spent at <40, 40-50 dB, and quiet environments were significantly correlated with improved CNC word scores (rs = 0.48, 0.48, 0.51; p = 0.01, 0.01, <0.01, Spearman's rho). While all speech (speech in noise + speech) was not significantly correlated to improvements in speech perception, a medium effect size was observed (rs = 0.37, p = 0.057).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

This study supports a relationship between auditory environment and age, with older CI recipients spending a greater proportion of time in quiet. Older CI users demonstrated greater improvements in speech perception with longer daily device use. Additional examination of the relationship between auditory environment and speech perception is necessary to conclusively guide future auditory rehabilitation efforts.

Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-sided Deafness: Outcomes and Device Use

OBJECTIVE

To describe our experience with adults undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) for treatment of single-sided deafness (SSD).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Fifty-three adults with SSD.

INTERVENTIONS

Unilateral CI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech perception testing in quiet and noise, tinnitus suppression, and device usage from datalogs.

RESULTS

The mean age at CI was 53.2 years (SD 11.9). The mean duration of deafness was 4.0 years (SD 7.8). The most common etiology was idiopathic sudden SNHL (50%). Word recognition improved from 8.7% (SD 15) preoperatively to 61.8% (SD 20) at a mean follow-up of 3.3 years (SD 1.8) (p < 0.0001). Adaptive speech recognition testing in the "binaural with CI" condition (speech directed toward the front and noise toward the normal hearing ear) revealed a significant improvement by 2.6-dB SNR compared to the preoperative unaided condition (p = 0.0002) and by 3.6-dB SNR compared to when a device to route sound to the contralateral side was used (p < 0.0001). Tinnitus suppression was reported to be complete in 23 patients (43%) and improved in 20 patients (38%) while the device was on. The addition of the CI did not lead to a decrement in hearing performance in any spatial configuration. Device usage averaged 8.7 (SD 3.7) hours/day.

CONCLUSIONS

Cochlear implantation in adult SSD patients can suppress tinnitus and achieve speech perception outcomes comparable with CI in conventional candidates. Modest improvements in spatial hearing were also observed and primarily attributable to the head shadow effect. Careful patient selection and counseling regarding potential benefits are important to optimize outcomes.

Comparison of Speech Recognition and Localization Ability in Single-sided Deaf Patients Implanted With Different Cochlear Implant Electrode Array Designs

OBJECTIVE

Choice of electrode array (EA) design and differences in outcome are major concerns both to patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) and to surgeons before cochlear implant (CI) surgery. The present work investigates the effects of EA design on 1) insertion depths, and 2) audiological outcomes of SSD CI recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic center.

PATIENTS

Forty patients with acquired SSD matched according to duration of deafness MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:: Fourteen CI recipients were implanted with a perimodiolar electrode (cochlear perimodiolar [CPM]), 12 with a shorter lateral wall electrode (cochlear lateral wall [CLW]), and 14 with a longer lateral wall electrode array (medEl lateral wall [MLW]). Postoperative rotational tomography was evaluated to determine cochlear size and EA angle of insertion depth (AID). Binaural speech comprehension in noise (in three configuration presentations) and localization ability were assessed 12 months postoperatively with CI.

RESULTS

AID was significantly deeper in MLW (mean 527.94 degrees) compared with the CPM (mean 366.35 degrees) and CLW groups (mean 367.01 degrees). No significant difference in AID was seen between the CPM and CLW groups (difference 0.66 degrees). Cochlear sizes revealed no significant differences between any groups. All three groups showed significant improvement in head shadow effect (difference on average CPM: 6.3 dB SPL, CLW 5 dB SPL, and MLW 4.05 dB SPL) and localization ability at 12 months postoperatively (difference on average CPM: 19.72 degrees, CLW: 24 degrees, and MLW: 12.9 degrees). No significant difference in the extent of audiological benefit was observed between any groups.

CONCLUSION

No effect on binaural benefit was apparent from the selection of the three EA designs in SSD CI recipients. Further studies focusing on subjective results, sound quality, and music perception depending on EA design in SSD CI recipients are needed.

Longitudinal outcomes of cochlear implantation and bimodal hearing in a large group of adults: A multicenter clinical study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate speech understanding outcomes in a large adult cohort who demonstrated poor hearing performance with well fit hearing aids in the unilateral and bilateral or bimodal listening conditions at preimplant, 3-, 6- and 12-months.

SUBJECTS

Post-linguistically deafened adults (N = 100) with bilateral moderate-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss and limited functional benefit from well fit bilateral hearing aids.

METHOD

A multicenter, prospective, repeated-measures, within-subject controlled study was conducted. All subjects were implanted with a Slim Modiolar cochlear implant and were required to use bimodal stimulation (cochlear implant and hearing aid in contralateral ear) for 6-months postimplant and optionally to 12-months. Evaluations included: speech recognition for monosyllabic consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) words in quiet; AzBio sentences in coincident noise (at +5 and +10 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)), in implant ear and bimodal conditions. All speech tests were performed at preimplant and 6-months postimplant for primary endpoint outcomes, and a subset of speech tests at 3- and 12-months.

RESULTS

In the implant ear only, at 3-, 6- and 12-months postimplant, 84%, 93% and 97% of subjects respectively, demonstrated significantly improved monosyllabic word scores in quiet compared to preimplant hearing aid scores (p < 0.05). At 12-months, a mean gain of 51% points, for monosyllabic words and 32% points for sentences in noise was observed (p < 0.001). In the bimodal condition, at 6-months postimplant, 87% of subjects demonstrated significantly improved monosyllabic word scores in quiet compared to preimplant bilateral hearing aid scores (p < 0.05). At 6-months, a mean gain of 40% points, for monosyllabic words was observed (p < 0.001). Speech scores for sentences in noise significantly improved for the bimodal condition at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.001). In addition to speech scores for the implanted ear, bimodal condition scores demonstrated further increments, especially for sentences in noise at 6- and 12-months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Results support that bimodal hearing is superior to bilateral hearing aids in this cohort of bilateral moderate-to-profound adult hearing aid users. Our study cohort demonstrated significant improvements for speech scores for the cochlear implant (CI) ear only and bimodal conditions compared to the baseline preimplant unilateral and bilateral hearing aid conditions respectively. The greatest gain in performance was in the first three months of device use with incremental improvement through 12 months. These findings indicate that when hearing aids fit to National Acoustics Laboratory (NAL-1) targets do not provide the necessary audibility needed for speech recognition, referral for CI-candidacy evaluation is strongly recommended.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clintrial.govNCT03007472. Registered 01/02/2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03007472?term=clinical+evaluation+of+the+nucleus+CI532&draw=2&rank=2.

Cochlear implant datalogging accurately characterizes children's 'auditory scenes'

Objectives: This study sought to determine if children's auditory environments are accurately captured by the automatic scene classification embedded in cochlear implant (CI) processors and to quantify the amount of electronic device use in these environments. Methods: Seven children with CIs, 36.71 (SD = 11.94) months old, participated in this study. Three of the children were male and four were female. Eleven datalogs, containing outcomes from Cochlear's™ Nucleus^® 6 (Cochlear Corporation, Australia) CI scene classification algorithm, and seven day-long audio recordings collected with a Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA; LENA Research Foundation, USA) recorder were obtained for analysis. Results: Results from the scene classification algorithm were strongly correlated with categories determined through human coding (ICC = .86, CI = [-0.2, 1], F(5,5.1) = 5.9, P = 0.04) but some differences emerged. Scene classification identified more 'Quiet' (t(8.2) = 4.1, P = 0.003) than human coders, while humans identified more 'Speech' (t(10.6) = -2.4, P = 0.04). On average, 8% (SD = 5.8) of the children's day was spent in electronic sound, which was primarily produced by mobile devices (39.7%). Discussion: While CI scene classification software reflects children's natural auditory environments, it is important to consider how different scenes are defined when interpreting results. An electronic sounds category should be considered given how often children are exposed to such sounds.

Hearing Care Providers' Perspectives on the Utility of Datalogging Information

Purpose The aim of the study was to learn (a) how datalogging information is being used in clinical practice by hearing care providers (HCPs) in the United States and (b) HCPs' opinions about how information collected through the hearing aids could be broadened in clinical application. Method A mixed-method approach was undertaken consisting of an online quantitative survey and qualitative structured telephone interviews. Survey data were analyzed using descriptives and chi-square analyses. The interview data were transcribed and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Results In total, 154 HCPs completed the survey, of whom 10 also completed an interview. Survey data showed that most HCPs use datalogging for conventional applications, such as counseling and fine-tuning during a hearing aid trial. Interview data highlighted four additional desirable datalogging features: (a) data about the sound environment, (b) details about operational aspects of hearing aid use, (c) data about use and nonuse, and (d) automated diagnosis of a hearing aid malfunction. HCPs also envisaged using datalogging in novel ways, such as for demonstrating hearing aid value and supporting decision making. Conclusions Today, datalogging is primarily used as a tool for counseling clients about hours and patterns of hearing aid use and for troubleshooting and fine-tuning. However, HCPs suggested novel and more ambitious uses of datalogging such as for sending alerts about nonuse, for automated diagnosis of a hearing aid malfunction, and for helping the client in their decision making. It remains to be seen whether in the future these will be implemented into clinical practice.

Child- and Environment-Related Factors Influencing Daily Cochlear Implant Use: A Datalog Study

OBJECTIVES

To understand the varying levels of daily cochlear implant (CI) use in children, previous studies have investigated factors that may be of influence. The objective of this study was to investigate the degree with which new child-related and environment-related characteristics were associated with consistent CI use.

DESIGN

The design of this study was retrospective. Data were reviewed of 81 children (51% females, mean age 6.4 years with a range of 1.3 to 17.7 years) who received a CI between 2012 and 2019. Developmental status, quantified burden of comorbidity, hearing experience, and hearing environment were investigated for correlation with consistency in daily CI use. The CIs datalog was used to objectively record the wearing times. Associations were examined using univariate correlation analyses and a linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

On average, the CI was worn 8.6 hr per day and 59% of the children wore it more than 8 hr daily. The latter children's hearing performance was significantly higher than that of the others. Consistency in CI use correlated significantly with the child-related characteristics chronological age, nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, pre CI acoustic experience, CI experience, and one of the environment related characteristics "parental communication mode." In a multivariate linear regression model, consistency in CI use was significantly dependent on nonverbal IQ and parental communication mode. These together accounted for 47% of the variation in daily CI use.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that children with lower nonverbal IQ scores and low exposure to oral communication by their parents are at risk of inconsistent CI use.

Healthy aging in elderly cochlear implant recipients: a multinational observational study

Background

Given an increase in the aging population and its impact on healthcare systems, policy makers for provision of health and social services are aiming to keep older adults in good health for longer, in other words towards ‘healthy aging’. Our study objective is to show that rehabilitation with cochlear implant treatment in the elderly with hearing impairment improves the overall health-related quality of life and general well-being that translate into healthy aging.

Methods

The multicentre, prospective, repeated measures, single-subject, clinical observational study will accrue 100 elderly, first-time, unilateral CI recipients (≥ 60 years) and analyze changes on specific measurement tools over ca. 20 months from preimplant to postimplant. Evaluations will consist of details collected through case history and interview questionnaires by clinicians, data logging, self-report questionnaires completed by the recipients and a series of commonly used audiometric measures and geriatric assessment tools. The primary indicator of changes in overall quality of life will be the HUI-3.

Discussion

The protocol is designed to make use of measurement tools that have already been applied to the hearing-impaired population in order to compare effects of CI rehabilitation in adults immediately before their implantation, (pre-implant) and after gaining 1–1.5 years of experience (post-implant). The broad approach will lead to a greater understanding of how useful hearing impacts the quality of life in elderly individuals, and thus improves potentials for healthy aging. Outcomes will be described and analyzed in detail.

Trial registration

This research has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/), 7 March 2017 under the n° NCT03072862.

Data logging variables and speech perception in prelingually deafened pediatric cochlear implant users

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relationship among objectively gathered data logging measurements, patient-related variables, and speech recognition performance of pediatric CI users.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty-two prelingually implanted children who have the ability to perform word discrimination test were included in this study. To reveal the relationship between speech perception abilities and auditory exposure, seven data logging variables were analyzed: "on-air," "off-air," "coil-off," "speech," "speech in noise," "music" and "noise. In addition, implantation age (months) and CI usage duration (months) were taken into account. Finally, it was investigated the differences between unilateral, sequential bilateral, and simultaneous bilateral CI users in terms of all study variables.

RESULTS

The average on-air time ranged between 10.52 and 12.30 in the groups. In the case of sequential implantation, smaller on-air and higher coil off values were observed with the second CI. In the case of simultaneous bilateral implantation, data logging measurements were almost the same in both implants. WRS was significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with on-air time (r = 0.62), coil-off count (r = -0.48), chronological age (r = 0.48), and CI duration (r = 0.44). Multiple linear regression model was fit to predict the WRS, with on-air time, CI duration, and chronological age as predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The critical importance of early intervention and long-term use of CI is well-established in the literature and is also corroborated by our findings. However, the key findings of the present study are that consistent CI use and the quality of daily listening environment also exerted a major and positive effect on the speech recognition performance of pediatric CI users. Therefore, during the monitoring of pediatric CI recipients, it is important to know the device usage data in order to detect problems in the early stages after CI.

Datalogging Statistics and Speech Recognition During the First Year of Use in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients

OBJECTIVE

To examine device datalogging characteristics and postoperative speech recognition performance in adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study examining datalogging characteristics throughout the first year of device use and postoperative speech recognition outcomes measured at 1 year.

PATIENTS

One hundred seventy-seven adults who received a Cochlear CI.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Average values for environmental scene classification (hours of device use per day, and percent of hours per day in quiet, noise, and speech) as reported by Cochlear datalogging over the first year of device use. Speech recognition was assessed at 1 year postactivation.

RESULTS

During the first year of devices use, CI listeners >80 years of age used their device significantly less (average = 10.97 h/d) than the youngest adult listeners (18-30 yrs), who used their device an average of 13.29 hours/d. There was no consistent effect of age on the number of hours a CI user listened to speech in noise each day. Correlational and regression analyses suggest that the number of average hours of device use is the primary factor that accounts for variance observed in postoperative consonant-nucleus-consonant word scores.

CONCLUSION

Results suggest that the average number of hours listening to speech in noise is not related to postoperative performance, but the average number of hours of device use per day is correlated with postoperative performance. Further research is needed to determine if these findings are merely correlational or causal in nature.

Data Logging Evidence of Cochlear Implant Use in Single-Sided and Bilateral Deafness

Purpose: This study analyses data logs in order to investigate the usage pattern of cochlear implant (CI) recipients with single-sided deafness (SSD-CI) and bilaterally deaf, uni- or bilaterally implanted CI recipients (Uni-CI and Bil-CI). Data logging is available from SCAN, an automated auditory scene classifier which categorizes auditory input into 6 listening environments. Methods: CI usage data were retrospectively available from data logs of 206 CI recipients using the Nucleus 6 system obtained between January 2013 and June 2015. For all recipients, we analysed time on air and time spent in the listening environments. For statistical analysis, we matched the CI recipients according to age and duration of CI experience and classified them into 4 age groups. Results: SSD-CI showed a similar time on air compared to Uni- and Bil-CI. Usage behaviour of SSD-CI was comparable to Uni- and Bil-CI regarding exposure to music, speech in quiet and speech in noise. With increasing age, exposure to quiet increased and exposure to music decreased across all CI recipient groups in relation to time on air. Conclusion: In total, the CI usage pattern of SSD-CI is comparable for the majority of listening environments and age groups to that of Uni- and Bil-CI. The results of our study show that SSD-CI benefit equally from CI implantation.

Use of 3D Volume Rendering Based on High-Resolution Computed Tomography Temporal Bone in Patients with Cochlear Implants

Case series

Patients: Male, 50 • Male, 3 • Female, 55

Final Diagnosis: Malposition of the array

Symptoms: Deafness

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: Cochlear Implant 3D rendering

Specialty: Audiology