Impact of exercise training associated with enalapril treatment on blood pressure variability and renal dysfunctions in an experimental model of arterial hypertension and postmenopause

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of the concurrent exercise training (CET) associated with the enalapril maleate on blood pressure variability (BPV) and renal profile in an experimental model of arterial hypertension (AH) and postmenopause.

METHODS

Female ovariectomized spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were distributed into 4 groups (n = 8/group): sedentary (SO), sedentary + enalapril (SOE), trained (TO) and trained + enalapril (TOE). Both enalapril (3mg/kg) and CET (3 days/week) were conducted during 8 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) was directly recorded for BPV analyses. Renal function, morphology, inflammation and oxidative stress were assessed.

RESULTS

The SOE, TO e TOE groups presented decreased systolic BP compared with SO. Both trained groups (TO and TOE) presented lower BPV and increased baroreflex sensitivity (TO: 0.76 ± 0.20 and TOE: 1.02 ± 0.40 vs. SO: 0.40 ± 0.07 ms/mmHg) compared with SO group, with additional improvements in TOE group. Creatinine and IL-6 levels were reduced in SOE, TO and TOE compared with SO group, while IL-10 was increased only in TOE group (vs. SO). Enalapril combined with CET promote reduction in lipoperoxidation (TOE: 1.37 ± 0.26 vs. SO: 2.08 ± 0.48 and SOE: 1.84 ± 0.35 μmol/mg protein) and hydrogen peroxide (TOE: 1.89 ± 0.40 vs. SO: 3.70 ± 0.19 and SOE: 2.73 ± 0.70 μM), as well as increase in catalase activity (vs. sedentary groups). The tubulointerstitial injury was lower in interventions groups (SOE, TO and TOE vs. SO), with potentialized benefits in the trained groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Enalapril combined with CET attenuated BPV and baroreflex dysfunctions, probably impacting on end-organ damage, as demonstrated by attenuation in the AH-induced renal inflammations, oxidative stress and morphofunctional impairments in postmenopausal rats.

Vascular Endothelial Function Is Associated with eGFR Slope in Female and Non-Smoking Male Individuals with Cardiovascular Risk Factors: A Pilot Study on the Predictive Value of FMD for Renal Prognosis

AIMS

It is known that there are sex differences in vascular endothelial function and the development of chronic kidney diseases; however, it remains unclear whether sex differences influence the association between vascular endothelial function and renal prognosis.

METHODS

To clarify the relationship between vascular endothelial function and longitudinal eGFR changes in male and female patients with cardiovascular risk factors, we retrospectively evaluated 341 patients (176 males and 165 females) with cardiovascular risk factors in whom vascular function was assessed by flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) and in whom 24-month longitudinal eGFR values were recorded after the vascular function examinations. Associations of values of FMD and baPWV with values of eGFR slope were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS

Simple regression analysis showed that the value of FMD was positively associated with eGFR slope in females (p=0.001) and non-smoking males (p=0.033) but not in smoking males. Multiple regression analysis showed that the value of FMD remains a positive contributor for eGFR slope in females (p=0.001) and non-smoking males (p=0.045) but not in smoking males. In contrast, values of baPWV had no significant association with eGFR slope regardless of sex and cigarette smoking.

CONCLUSIONS

In individuals with cardiovascular risk factors, evaluation of vascular endothelial function enables prediction of renal prognosis in females and non-smoking males.

Amlodipine in the current management of hypertension

Hypertension is the leading cause of death worldwide, affecting 1.4 billion people. Treatment options include the widely used calcium channel blockers, among which amlodipine, a dihydropyridine, has unique characteristics that distinguish it from other drugs within this class. This review aims to provide an updated overview of the evidence supporting the use of amlodipine over the past 30 years and highlights its cardiovascular benefits in current hypertension management. Amlodipine has low renal clearance (7 mL/min/mg) and long half-life (35-50 h) and duration of action, which allows it to sustain its anti-hypertensive effect for more than 24 h following a single dose. Additionally, blood pressure (BP) control is maintained even when a dose has been missed, providing continuous protection in case of incidental noncompliance. It has proven to reduce BP variability and successfully lower BP. Amlodipine also controls BP in patients with a systolic/diastolic BP of 130/80 mm Hg or higher, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease without worsening glycemic or kidney function. Additionally, amlodipine is a wise choice for older adults due to its ability to control BP and protect against stroke and myocardial infarction. Side effects of amlodipine include edema, palpitations, dizziness, and flushing, which are more common with the higher dose of 10 mg. Amlodipine is cost effective and predicted to be cost saving when compared with usual care.

Impact of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability on hypertensive-mediated target organ damage and future cardiovascular events: the Campania salute network

BACKGROUND

Exaggerated variability of blood pressure (BP) poses additional stress on cardiovascular system independent of BP average value, increasing risk of target organ damage (HMOD) and cardiovascular events. We assessed the impact of visit-to-visit variability (VVV) of BP on development of cardiovascular events and HMOD.

METHODS

Standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variability of mean SBP and DBP were calculated in 3555 patients from the Campania Salute Network registry, with available echocardiogram and more than six visits during follow-up. Values from the first visit were excluded. The impact of VVV of BP on cardiovascular events, and mediation of HMOD were assessed at final visit.

RESULTS

Mean number of visits was 11 ± 6 with mean interval between visits of 9.1 ± 3.7 months. Mean visit-to-visit SD during follow-up was 13 ± 5 for systolic and 8 ± 3 mmHg for DBP; coefficients of variability were 9.7 ± 3.5 and of 9.6 ± 3.2, respectively. In multivariable analysis, left ventricular mass at follow-up was correlated with systolic VVV of BP independently of significant effect of age, BMI, mean SBP during follow-up and initial left ventricular mass. Follow-up GFR was inversely associated with systolic and diastolic VVV, independently of significant effect of age, mean glucose and SBP during follow-up, and initial GFR. In Cox regression, high VVV of BP was also associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.06, P = 0.015), independently of significant effect of HMOD.

CONCLUSION

VVV is associated with prevalent HMOD and development of cardiovascular events, independently of mean BP value during follow-up and HMOD.

Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and renal outcomes: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials

AIMS

There is conflicting evidence on whether in treated hypertensive patients the risk of renal outcomes is associated with visit-to-visit SBP variability. Furthermore, limited evidence is available on how important is SBP variability for prediction of renal outcomes compared with on-treatment mean SBP. We addressed these issues in 28 790 participants of the Ongoing Treatment Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global End point Trial and Telmisartan Randomized AssessmeNt Study in ACE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease trials.

METHODS AND RESULTS

SBP variability was expressed as the coefficient of variation of the mean with which it showed no relationship. SBP variability and mean values were obtained from five visits during the first 2 years of treatment after the end of the titration phase. Incidence of several renal outcomes (end-stage renal disease, doubling of serum creatinine, new microalbuminuria, new macroalbuminuria and their composite) was calculated from the third year of treatment onward. Patients were divided in quintiles of SBP-coefficient of variation (SBP-CV) or mean SBP, which exhibited superimposable mean blood pressure and SBP-CV values, respectively. A progressive increase of SBP-CV was not accompanied by a parallel increase in a widely adjusted (baseline and on-treatment confounders) risk of most renal outcomes (end-stage renal disease, new macroalbuminuria, new microalbuminuria and their composite) in the subsequent on-treatment years. In contrast, the adjusted risk of most renal outcomes increased progressively from the lowest to the highest quintile of on-treatment mean SBP. Progression from lowest to highest mean on-treatment SBP, but not SBP-CV, was also associated with a less frequent return to normoalbuminuria in patients with initial micro or macroalbuminuria. Renal outcome prediction was slightly improved by the combined use of SBP-CV and mean SBP quintiles.

CONCLUSION

Visit-to-visit SBP variability had no major predictive value for the risk of renal outcomes, which, in contrast, was sensitively predicted by mean on-treatment SBP. A further slight increase in prediction of renal outcomes was seen by combining on-treatment mean SBP and variability.

Preoperative outpatient blood pressure variability predicts postoperative mortality, readmission and morbidity after surgery

BACKGROUND

Outpatient blood pressure variability (BPV) predicts hospitalization and death in non-surgical patients independently of hypertension. We hypothesized that preoperative BPV predicts postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

We assessed 22,233 veterans undergoing CABG, colectomy, hip replacement, pancreatectomy, carotid endarterectomy or AV-fistula with ≥10 outpatient BP's over three preoperative years. Calculating BPV as SD of systolic or diastolic BP, we used logistic regression considering demographics, comorbidities, and pre-admission cardiovascular medications to estimate odds ratios for 90-day mortality or readmission, MI, CVA, renal failure, and wound infection, choosing the lowest 5%ile of systolic/diastolic BPV for reference.

RESULTS

Covariate-adjusted ORs for adverse outcomes increased as BPV increased. For instance, the highest 5%ile of systolic BPV had covariate-adjusted ORs of 2.96 and 1.78 for 90-day mortality and readmission. Systolic and diastolic BPV trended together but affected outcomes independently.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative BPV predicts postoperative outcomes. BPV should be considered in individualized risk assessment and subgroup risk stratification.