1
|
Cassar N, Geoghegan J, Hoti E. Shifting concepts in the management of colorectal liver metastases. Surgeon 2022; 20:363-372. [PMID: 34998701 DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2021] [Revised: 11/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Management of patients with colorectal liver metastases has evolved considerably due to a better understanding of the biology of the disease with concurrent improvements in surgical techniques, oncological strategies and radiological interventions. This review article examines the factors that have contributed to this radical change. Management will be discussed in relation to chemotherapy, surgery and interventional radiology. The addition of chemotherapy and biological agents has greatly extended the reach and scope of surgery. Parenchymal sparing resections, repeat resections, two stage hepatectomy and Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein ligation are all available to the hepatobiliary surgeon who deals with colorectal liver metastases. Interventional radiology techniques like liver venous deprivation may also replace established surgical practice. Whilst traditionally it was thought that only a few liver metastases could be treated effectively, nowadays tumour number is no longer a limiting factor provided enough functioning liver can be spared and the patient can tolerate the operation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel Cassar
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4 D04 T6F4, Ireland.
| | - Justin Geoghegan
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4 D04 T6F4, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, St Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4 D04 T6F4, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Silveira Júnior S, Tustumi F, Magalhães DDP, Jeismann VB, Fonseca GM, Kruger JAP, Coelho FF, Herman P. The impact of multivisceral liver resection on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colorectal liver metastasis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2022; 77:100099. [PMID: 36122500 PMCID: PMC9489954 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2022.100099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Revised: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The impact of Multivisceral Liver Resection (MLR) on the outcome of patients with Colorectal Liver Metastasis (CRLM) is unclear. The present systematic review aimed to compare patients with CRLM who underwent MLR versus standard hepatectomy regarding short- and long-term outcomes. MLR is a feasible procedure but has a higher risk of major complications. MLR did not negatively affect long-term survival, suggesting that an extended resection is an option for potentially curative treatment for selected patients with CRLM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sérgio Silveira Júnior
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Francisco Tustumi
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Daniel de Paiva Magalhães
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
| | - Vagner Birk Jeismann
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Gilton Marques Fonseca
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Jaime Arthur Pirola Kruger
- Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo (ICESP), Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Fabricio Ferreira Coelho
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Divisão de Cirurgia do Aparelho Digestivo, Departamento de Gastroenterologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (HCFMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baimas-George M, Tschuor C, Watson M, Sulzer J, Salibi P, Iannitti D, Martinie JB, Baker E, Clavien PA, Vrochides D. Current trends in vena cava reconstructive techniques with major liver resection: a systematic review. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 406:25-38. [PMID: 32979105 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01989-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Historically, invasion of the inferior vena cava (IVC) represented advanced and often unresectable hepatic disease. With surgical and anesthetic innovations, IVC resection and reconstruction have become feasible in selected patients. This review assesses technical variations in reconstructive techniques and post-operative management. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was performed according to PRISMA. Inclusion criteria were (i) peer-reviewed articles in English; (ii) at least three cases; (iii) hepatic IVC resection and reconstruction (January 2015-March 2020). Primary outcomes were reconstructive technique, anti-thrombotic regimen, post-operative IVC patency, and infection. Secondary outcomes included post-operative complications and malignant disease survival. RESULTS Fourteen articles were included allowing for investigation of 351 individual patients. Analysis demonstrated significant heterogeneity in surgical reconstructive technique, anti-thrombotic management, and post-operative monitoring of patency. There was increased utilization of ex vivo approaches and decreased use of venovenous bypass compared with previously published reviews. CONCLUSION This review of literature published between 2015 and 2020 reveals persistent heterogeneity of hepatic IVC reconstructive techniques and peri-operative management. Increased utilization of ex vivo approaches and decreased use of venovenous bypass point towards improved operative techniques, peri-operative management, and anesthesia. In order to gain evidence for consensus on management, a registry would be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Baimas-George
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Christoph Tschuor
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.,Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Watson
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Jesse Sulzer
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Patrick Salibi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - David Iannitti
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - John B Martinie
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Erin Baker
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery & Transplantation, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive; Suite 600, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Júnior SS, Coelho FF, Tustumi F, Cassenote AJF, Jeismann VB, Fonseca GM, Kruger JAP, Ernani L, Cecconello I, Herman P. Combined liver and multivisceral resections: A comparative analysis of short and long-term outcomes. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1435-1443. [PMID: 32779219 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND En bloc liver and adjacent organs resections are technically demanding procedures. Few case series and nonmatched comparative studies reported the outcomes of multivisceral liver resections (MLRs). OBJECTIVES To compare the short and long-term outcomes of patients submitted MLRs with those submitted to isolated hepatectomies. METHODS From a prospective database, a case-matched 1:2 study was performed comparing MLRs and isolated hepatectomy. Additionally, a risk analysis was performed to evaluate the association between MLRs and perioperative morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival. RESULTS Fifty-three MLRs were compared with 106 matched controls. Patients undergoing MLRs had longer operative time (430 [320-525] vs 360 [270-440] minutes, P = .005); higher estimated blood loss (600 [400-800] vs 400 [100-600] mL; P = .011); longer hospital stay (8 [6-14] vs 7 [5-9] days; P = .003); and higher postoperative mortality (9.4% vs 1.9%, P = .042). Number of resected organs was not an independent prognostic factor for perioperative major complications (odds ratio [OR], 1 organ = 1.8 [0.54-6.05]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 4.0 [0.35-13.84]) or perioperative mortality (OR, 1, organ = 5.2 [0.91-29.51]; OR ≥ 2, organs = 6.5 [0.52-79.60]). No differences in overall (P = .771) and disease-free survival (P = .28) were observed. CONCLUSION MLRs are feasible with acceptable morbidity but relatively high perioperative mortality. MLRs did not negatively affect long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sérgio S Júnior
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Fabricio F Coelho
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Francisco Tustumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Alex J F Cassenote
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Vagner B Jeismann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Gilton M Fonseca
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Jaime A P Kruger
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Lucas Ernani
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ivan Cecconello
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Paulo Herman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo Medical School, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kazaryan AM, Aghayan DL, Fretland ÅA, Semikov VI, Shulutko AM, Edwin B. Laparoscopic liver resection with simultaneous diaphragm resection. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2020; 8:214. [PMID: 32309361 PMCID: PMC7154494 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2020.01.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Background Liver resection or ablation remains the only curative treatment for patients with colorectal metastases. Simultaneous resection of tumors in the liver with invasion to the diaphragm is challenging and controversial. Therefore, we wanted to assess the safety of simultaneous laparoscopic liver and diaphragm resection (SLLDR) in a large single center. Methods Patients who underwent primary laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) for colorectal liver metastases at Oslo University Hospital between 2008 and 2019 were included in this study. Patients who underwent SLLDR (group 1) were compared to patients who underwent LLR only (group 2). Perioperative and oncologic outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 467 patients were identified, of whom 12 patients needed a simultaneous diaphragm resection (group 1) while 455 underwent laparoscopic liver surgery alone (group 2). The conversion rate was 16.7% in group 1 and 2.4% in group 2 (P=0.040). In 10 of 12 (83.3%) cases the diaphragm resection was performed en bloc with the liver tumor. There was no significant difference in operative time, blood loss, resection margins, hospital stay or postoperative complications. One patient died within 30 postoperative days (0.2%) in group 2 and none in group 1. Overall survival was not statistically different between the groups. Conclusions In selected patients, SLLDR can be performed safely with good surgical and oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Airazat M Kazaryan
- Department of Surgery, Øsfold Hospital Trust, Grålum, Norway.,Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Surgery N1, Yerevan State Medical University after M. Heratsi, Yerevan, Armenia.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | - Vasiliy I Semikov
- Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Alexander M Shulutko
- Department of Faculty Surgery N2, I.M.Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital-Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen Z, Leng J, Gao G, Zhang L, Yang Y. Direct inpatient costs and influencing factors for patients with rectal cancer with low anterior resection: a retrospective observational study at a three-tertiary hospital in Beijing, China. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e023116. [PMID: 30567822 PMCID: PMC6303600 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Revised: 10/13/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of the study was to investigate the direct inpatient cost and analyse influencing factors for patients with rectal cancer with low anterior resection in Beijing, China. DESIGN A retrospective observational study. SETTING The study was conducted at a three-tertiary oncology institution. PARTICIPANTS A total of 448 patients who underwent low anterior resection and were diagnosed with rectal cancer from January 2015 to December 2016 at Peking University Cancer Hospital were retrospectively identified. Demographic, clinical and cost data were determined. RESULTS The median inpatient cost was¥89 064, with a wide range (¥46 711-¥191 329) due to considerable differences in consumables. The material cost accounted for 52.19% and was the highest among all the cost components. Colostomy (OR 4.17; 95% CI 1.79 to 9.71), complications of hypertension (OR 5.30; 95% CI 1.94 to 14.42) and combined with other tumours (OR 2.92; 95% CI 1.12 to 7.60) were risk factors for higher cost, while clinical pathway (OR 0.10; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.35), real-time settlement (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.10 to 0.68) and combined with cardiovascular disease (OR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.52) were protective determinants. CONCLUSIONS This approach is an effective way to relieve the economic burden of patients with cancer by promoting the clinical pathway, optimising the payment scheme and controlling the complication. Further research focused on the full-cost investigation in different stages of rectal cancer based on a longitudinal design is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhishui Chen
- Department of Medical Insurance, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
| | - Jiahua Leng
- Department of Medical Insurance, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
- Department of GI Cancer Center Surgery Unit III, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
| | - Guangying Gao
- Institute of Health Management and Education, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lianhai Zhang
- Department of GI Cancer Center Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
| | - Yang Yang
- Department of GI Cancer Center Surgery Unit I, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|