Correlation between B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide in a Large Japanese Population at Risk of Stage A Heart Failure

Evaluation of the A2B Score for Prediction of Survival in Patients With Heart Failure in a Nationwide Cohort in Japan

BACKGROUND

Although a tool for sharing patient prognosis among all medical staff is desirable in heart failure (HF) cases, only a few simple HF prognostic scores are available. We previously presented the A2B score, a simple user-friendly HF risk score, and validated it in a small single-center cohort. In the present study, we validated it in a larger nationwide cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We examined the 2-year mortality in relation to the A2B scores in 3483 patients from a Japanese nationwide cohort and attempted to stratify their prognoses according to the scores. The A2B score was determined by assigning points for age, anemia, and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) level at discharge: age (<65 years, 0; 65-74 years, 1; ≥75 years, 2), anemia (hemoglobin ≥12 g/dL, 0; 10-11.9 g/dL, 1; <10 g/dL, 2), and BNP (<200 pg/mL, 0; 200-499 pg/mL, 1; ≥500 pg/mL, 2). Hemoglobin and BNP levels were applied to the data at discharge. The 2-year survival rates for A2B scores 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 were 94.1%, 83.2%, 74.1%, 63.5%, 51.6%, and 41.5%, respectively; the mortality rate increased by ≈10% for each point increase (c-index, 0.702). The A2B score was applicable in HF cases with reduced or preserved ejection fraction and remained useful when BNP was substituted with N-terminal proBNP (c-index, 0.749, 0.676, and 0.682, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The A2B score showed a good prognostic value for HF in a large population even when BNP was replaced with N-terminal proBNP.

Prognostic effects of cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients classified according to physical frailty: A propensity score-matched analysis of a nationwide prospective cohort study

Background

Research regarding cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients and frailty remains lacking. Here, the effects of CR on the 2-year prognosis of HF patients were examined according to their frailty status.

Methods

This multicenter prospective cohort study enrolled patients hospitalized for HF. Patients who underwent ≥1 session per 2 weeks of CR within 3 months after discharge were categorized in the CR group. Patients were divided in a non-frailty (≤8 points) and physical frailty group (≥9 points) based on their FLAGSHIP frailty score. The score is based on HF prognosis, with a higher score indicating worsened physical frailty. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare survival rates between the two groups according to their physical frailty status. Endpoints included HF re-hospitalization and all-cause mortality during a 2-year follow-up period.

Results

Of 2697 patients included in the analysis, 285 and 95 matched pairs were distributed in the non-frailty and physical frailty groups, respectively, after propensity-score matching. CR was associated with lower incidence of HF rehospitalization in both non-frailty (hazard ratio 0.65; 95% confidence interval 0.44-0.96; p = 0.032) and physical frailty (0.54; 0.32-0.90; p = 0.019) groups. CR was not associated with all-cause mortality in either group (log-rank test, p > 0.05).

Conclusion

These findings suggest the effects of CR on reduced HF rehospitalization, regardless of physical frailty status.

New Conversion Formula Between B-Type Natriuretic Peptide and N-Terminal-Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide - Analysis From a Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Although B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal (NT)-proBNP are commonly used markers of heart failure, a simple conversion formula between these peptides has not yet been developed for clinical use.Methods and Results: A total of 9,394 samples were obtained from Nara Medical University, Jichi Medical University, and Osaka University. We randomly selected 70% for a derivation set to investigate a conversion formula from BNP to NT-proBNP using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and body mass index (BMI); the remaining 30% was used as the internal validation set and we used a cohort study from Nara Medical University as an external validation set. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a new conversion formula: log NT-proBNP = 1.21 + 1.03 × log BNP - 0.009 × BMI - 0.007 × eGFR (r²=0.900, P<0.0001). The correlation coefficients between the actual and converted values of log NT-proBNP in the internal and external validation sets were 0.942 (P<0.0001) and 0.891 (P<0.0001), respectively. We applied this formula to samples obtained from patients administered with sacubitril/valsartan. After treatment initiation, NT-proBNP levels decreased and actual BNP levels increased. However, the calculated BNP levels decreased roughly parallel to the NT-proBNP levels.

CONCLUSIONS

This new and simple conversion formula of BNP and NT-proBNP with eGFR and BMI is potentially useful in clinical practice.

Intracardiac conduction time as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: Results of the BIO|SELECT pilot study

Background

Quadripolar left ventricular (LV) leads are capable of sensing and pacing the left ventricle from 4 different electrodes, which may potentially improve patient response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Objective

We measured 3 different time intervals: right ventricular (RV)-sensed to LV-sensed during intrinsic rhythm (RVs-LVs), RV-paced to LV-sensed (RVp-LVs), and LV-paced to LV-sensed (LVp-LVs, between distal [LV1] and proximal pole on a quadripolar LV lead), and assessed their association with CRT response in terms of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) and a composite benefit index (CBI) comprising LVESV, LV ejection fraction (LVEF), brain natriuretic peptide level, and NYHA class.

Methods

A CRT-defibrillator system with quadripolar LV lead was implanted in 196 patients (mean age 69 years, mean LVEF 30%, left bundle-branch block [LBBB] 58%). Conduction intervals were measured before hospital discharge. At baseline and 7-month follow-up, echocardiographic and other components of CBI were determined.

Results

The mean RVs-LV1s, RVp-LV1s, and LVp-LVs delays were 68 ± 38 ms, 132 ± 34 ms, and 99 ± 31 ms, respectively. From baseline to 7 months, LVESV decreased by 17.3% ± 28.6%. The RVs-LV1s interval correlated stronger with CBI (R² = 0.12, P < .00001) than with LVESV change (R² = 0.05, P = .006). In contrast, RVp-LV1s did not correlate and LVp-LVs correlated only weakly with CRT response. The subgroup of patients (44%) with LBBB and RVs-LV1s above the lower quartile (≥34 ms) showed the greatest response to CRT.

Conclusion

The RVs-LVs interval during intrinsic rhythm is relevant for CRT success, whereas RVp-LVs and LVp-LVs intervals did not predict CRT response.