1
|
The Sun Is Still Shining: Nature of Industry Payments to Transplant Surgeons From 2014 to 2019. Transplant Direct 2022; 8:e1325. [PMID: 35474656 PMCID: PMC9030039 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Methods. Results. Conclusions. Precis: The Open Payments Program (OPP), established in 2013, mandates that medical device and pharmaceutical manufacturers submit record of any financial incentive given to physicians to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This study aims to characterize these payments to transplant surgeons over the first six years of OPP data.
Collapse
|
2
|
Ureteral reconstruction for complex strictures: a review of the current literature. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 53:2211-2219. [PMID: 34524628 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-02985-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Frequently employed procedures for ureteral reconstruction include balloon dilation, pyeloplasty and ureteral re-implants. However, these procedures do not work for complex ureteral disease. The goal of this literature review is to report on techniques and success rates for the following techniques: buccal graft ureteroplasty, appendiceal interposition, transureteroureterostomy, ileal ureter and autotransplantation. METHODS A comprehensive literature search for English-language original and review articles was conducted using PubMed. The following terms were queried: "ureteral reconstruction", "buccal graft", "appendiceal interposition", "ileal ureter", "transureteroureterostomy", "autotransplantation". RESULTS Procedures involving the buccal mucosa or appendix offer minimally invasive techniques and low morbidity with good short-term success. Drawbacks to appendiceal interposition include the availability and length of appendix, and 10-20% of patients may have insufficient appendix upon intra-operative assessment. Transureteroureterostomy is typically limited to extensive exonerations due to concerns of injury to the contralateral kidney, even with reported success rates > 90%. Ileal ureter may carry a risk of metabolic acidosis in patients with renal insufficiency along with bowel-related complications. Ileal ureter and autotransplantation are reserved for the most severe cases due to their high morbidity but do offer options for the complex patient. CONCLUSION Ureteral stricture disease not amenable to pyeloplasty, ureteroureterostomy or ureteroneocystostomy offers a challenge to urologist. Careful patient selection with pre-operative assessment of renal and bladder is vital to a successful operation with minimal complications.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rammohan A, Rela M. Robotic donor hepatectomy: Are we there yet? World J Gastrointest Surg 2021; 13:668-677. [PMID: 34354800 PMCID: PMC8316848 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i7.668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) the safety of the live donor (LD) is of paramount importance. Despite all efforts, the morbidity rates approach 25%-40% with conventional open donor hepatectomy (DH) operations. However, most of these complications are related to the operative wound and despite increased self- esteem and satisfaction in various quality of life analyses on LD, the most common grievance is that of the scar. Performing safe and precise DH through a conventional laparoscopic approach is a formidable task with a precipitous learning curve for the whole team. Due to the ramifications the donor operation carries for the donor, the recipient, the transplant team and for the LDLT program in general, the development and acceptance of minimally invasive DH (MIDH) has been slow. The robotic surgical system overcomes the reduced visualization, restricted range of motion and physiological tremor associated with laparoscopic surgery and allows for a comparatively easier transition from technical feasibility to reproducibility. However, many questions especially with regards to standardization of surgical technique, comparison of outcomes, understanding of the learning curve, etc. remain unanswered. The aim of this review is to provide insights into the evolution of MIDH and highlight the current status of robotic DH, appreciating the existing challenges and its future role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashwin Rammohan
- Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai 600044, India
| | - Mohamed Rela
- Institute of Liver Disease & Transplantation, Dr. Rela Institute & Medical Centre, Bharath Institute of Higher Education & Research, Chennai 600044, India
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhu X, Zhao Y, Han X, Li Y, Zhang P, Wang S, Li G, Xiang C. Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Kidney Transplantation: Preliminary Clinical Experiences from China. Adv Ther 2021; 38:1677-1689. [PMID: 33580484 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-021-01639-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report on the pioneering clinical experiences of six cases of extraperitoneal laparoscopic kidney transplantation in China. METHODS For the first time in clinical practice, a customised, controllable double-circulation cooling device was used to protect the transplanted kidney. Of the six patients, two underwent an allograft renal transplantation because they had been diagnosed with uraemia and were on maintenance haemodialysis. The other four patients underwent kidney autotransplantation because of a central renal tumour. RESULTS The extraperitoneal laparoscopic kidney transplantations were successfully completed between 2017 and 2018. The operative time for the two patients undergoing the allograft transplantation was 3-3.5 h. The time for venous anastomosis was approximately 53-65 min, and the time for arterial anastomosis was approximately 25-30 min. The creatinine level was 90-80 μmol/L after surgery. The operative time of the four patients who underwent autotransplantation was 9.4-17.5 h. The times of venous and arterial anastomosis were 58-90 min and 35-48 min, respectively. The follow-up B-mode ultrasound after surgery showed good blood supply in the spared nephron. A renal graft was removed from one patient 6 months after surgery because of renal atrophy and dysfunction caused by poor blood supply. Five patients (two undergoing allografting and three undergoing autografting) completed the 12-month follow-up, and their renal graft function was good. CONCLUSIONS Extraperitoneal laparoscopic kidney transplantation, either allograft or autologous transplantation, is a safe and feasible procedure with a good chance of survival for the transplanted kidney. A customised cooling device is effective and practical during laparoscopic kidney transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuhui Zhu
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Yongwei Zhao
- Department of Urology, Taian City Central Hospital, Taian, 271000, Shangdong, People's Republic of China
- School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiuwu Han
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
| | - Yansheng Li
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Peng Zhang
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Siyuan Wang
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Gao Li
- Institute of Urology, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunhong Xiang
- Department of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100043, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Winocour S, Tarassoli S, Chu CK, Liu J, Clemens MW, Selber JC. Comparing Outcomes of Robotically Assisted Latissimus Dorsi Harvest to the Traditional Open Approach in Breast Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 146:1221-1225. [PMID: 33234946 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest permits harvest of the latissimus dorsi muscle without a back incision, as compared to the traditional open technique. The authors hypothesized that robotic harvest has lower donor-site complication rates, decreased opioid requirements, and a shorter length of stay than the traditional open technique. METHODS A retrospective review was performed of all consecutive pedicled latissimus dorsi flaps for breast reconstruction between 2011 and 2015. All procedures were conducted by two surgeons who performed both robotic and open cases. RESULTS Fifty-two patients were identified; 25 underwent robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest and 27 underwent the open technique. Demographic data between the two groups were similar. Median length of stay for robotic harvest was shorter than that for the traditional technique (2 days versus 3 days; p = 0.031). Postoperative morphine requirement was less in the robotic compared to the traditional technique, but the difference was not significant (158 mg versus 184 mg; p = 0.826). Seroma rate was higher in the robotic group (16 percent versus 0 percent; p = 0.034). The mean duration of surgery was longer in the robotic cohort (388 minutes versus 311 minutes; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates robotically assisted latissimus dorsi harvest as an effective alternative to the traditional open technique in select patients. Advantages of robotic harvest include no back scar, a shorter length of stay, and lower opioid requirements, although the difference was not significant; disadvantages include longer operative time and a higher seroma rate. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Winocour
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
| | - Sam Tarassoli
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
| | - Carrie K Chu
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
| | - Jun Liu
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
| | - Mark W Clemens
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
| | - Jesse C Selber
- From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gianardi D, Bianchini M, Palmeri M, Di Franco G, Morelli L. Is there a role of robotic surgery in abdominal organs transplantations? J Robot Surg 2019; 14:677-678. [PMID: 31531754 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01002-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Desirée Gianardi
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, 56124, Italy.
| | - Matteo Bianchini
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, 56124, Italy
| | - Matteo Palmeri
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, 56124, Italy
| | - Gregorio Di Franco
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, 56124, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- General Surgery Unit, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, 56124, Italy
- EndoCAS (Centre for Computer Assisted Surgery), University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a growing phenomenon, and will soon facilitate wide-scale changes in many professions, including medical education. In order for medical educators to be properly prepared for AI, they will need to have at least a fundamental knowledge of AI in relation to learning and teaching, and the extent to which it will impact on medical education. This Guide begins by introducing the broad concepts of AI by using fairly well-known examples to illustrate AI's implications within the context of education. It then considers the impact of AI on medicine and the implications of this impact for educators trying to educate future doctors. Drawing on these strands, it then identifies AI's direct impact on the methodology and content of medical education, in an attempt to prepare medical educators for the changing demands and opportunities that are about to face them because of AI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Masters
- Sultan Qaboos University , Muscat , Sultanate of Oman
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Robotic pancreas transplantation is a novel procedure that aims to reduce surgical invasiveness, and thereby limit complications related to the surgical access. Given that few centers are providing robotic transplantation, this review serves as a state of the science article to outline early experiences and highlight areas for future research. RECENT FINDINGS Pancreas transplantation results in relatively high rates of wound and other surgical complications that are known to deleteriously impact outcomes. The minimally invasive, robotic-assisted approach decreases wound complications. Because of the obesity epidemic, overweight and obese status is encountered in an increasing number of transplant candidates. These candidates are subject to increased wound-related complications and most benefit from a robotic approach. The first clinical reports on laparoscopic, robotic-assisted kidney and pancreas transplantation indicate a significant decrease in wound complications and excellent outcomes in obese patients otherwise denied access to transplantation. SUMMARY With excellent results achieved in surgically challenging patients and further accumulation of experience, laparoscopic, robotic-assisted pancreas and kidney transplantation may evolve to a new standard approach.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stiegler P, Bausys A, Leber B, Strupas K, Schemmer P. Impact of Melatonin in Solid Organ Transplantation-Is It Time for Clinical Trials? A Comprehensive Review. Int J Mol Sci 2018; 19:ijms19113509. [PMID: 30413018 PMCID: PMC6274782 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19113509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2018] [Revised: 11/05/2018] [Accepted: 11/06/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Solid organ transplantation is the "gold standard" for patients with end-stage organ disease. However, the supply of donor organs is critical, with an increased organ shortage over the last few years resulting in a significant mortality of patients on waiting lists. New strategies to overcome the shortage of organs are urgently needed. Some experimental studies focus on melatonin to improve the donor pool and to protect the graft; however, current research has not reached the clinical level. Therefore, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the data available, indicating that clinical evaluation is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Stiegler
- Department General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
- Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
| | - Augustinas Bausys
- Department General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
- Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania.
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Vilnius 08660, Lithuania.
| | - Bettina Leber
- Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
| | - Kestutis Strupas
- Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius 03101, Lithuania.
| | - Peter Schemmer
- Department General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
- Transplant Center Graz, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|