Widespread Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia Treated with Topical Interferon Alpha-2b

Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia: Changes in the Standard of Care 2003 to 2022

PURPOSE

The aim of this review was to elucidate treatment preferences for ocular surface squamous neoplasia and to examine the changes in treatment modalities over the past 2 decades.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to members of The Cornea Society, Ocular Microbiology and Immunology Group, and 4 international corneal specialist listservs. Questions examined medical and surgical treatment preferences, and results were compared with surveys administered in 2003 and 2012.

RESULTS

A total of 285 individuals responded to the survey; 90% of respondents were self-classified as corneal specialists. Seventy-three percent reported using primary topical monotherapy to treat ocular surface squamous neoplasia as compared with 58% in 2012 ( P = 0.008). Compared with 2003, the percentage use of topical interferon significantly increased ( P < 0.0001) from 14% to 55%, 5-fluorouracil increased ( P < 0.0001) from 5% to 23%, and mitomycin C decreased ( P < 0.0001) from 76% to 19% as a primary monotherapy. The frequency of performing excision without the use of postoperative adjunctive medical therapy decreased significantly ( P < 0.0001), from 66% to 26% for lesions <2 mm, 64% to 12% for lesions between 2 and 8 mm, and 47% to 5% for lesions >8 mm from 2003 to 2022. More clinicians initiated topical immuno/chemotherapy without performing a biopsy as compared to 2003 (31% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results demonstrate a paradigm shift in the management of ocular surface squamous neoplasia. The use of primary medical therapy as a first approach has significantly increased, with a reduction in the frequency of performing surgical excision alone.

Ocular surface squamous neoplasia with 360° limbal involvement: a study of 130 patients

PURPOSE

To describe the risk factors, clinical features and management outcomes of ocular surface squamous neoplasia (OSSN) with 360° of limbal involvement (360-OSSN) and compare with segmental limbal involvement (SL-OSSN).

METHODS

Retrospective comparative study of 360-OSSN vs SL-OSSN. All 360-OSSN and every 10th patient with SL-OSSN during the study period (2012-2020) were included. Lesions with uncertain diagnosis were excluded.

RESULTS

Of 1250 patients diagnosed with OSSN during the study period, 30 (2%) had 360-OSSN. A total of 100 patients of OSSN with SL-OSSN were included for comparison. 360-OSSN patients more often had longer duration of symptoms (mean, 17 vs 8 months; p, 0.003), prior misdiagnosis (17% vs 6%, p, 0.13) and prior intervention (47% vs 13%; p, 0.0002) than patients with SL-OSSN. 360-OSSN had higher incidence of scleral fixity (57% vs 16%; p < 0.0001), corneal/scleral melt (17% vs 0%; p, 0.0005), intraocular tumor extension (17% vs 0%; p, 0.003), orbital tumor extension (33% vs 1%; p < 0.0001), and advanced T stage at presentation (Tis: 37% vs 76%, T1: 0% vs 15%; T2: 7% vs 4%; T3: 27% vs 4%; T4: 30% vs 1%; p < 0.001). Over a mean follow-up of 14 months, lymph node metastasis (8% vs 0%; p, 0.05) and distant metastasis (4% vs 0%; p, 0.23) were more common in 360-OSSN group compared to SL-OSSN group.

CONCLUSION

Risk factors of 360-OSSN include prolonged symptoms, prior misdiagnosis and prior intervention. It represents an advanced form of disease with propensity for corneo-scleral melt and invasive disease which requires aggressive management.