Biomarkers of disease recurrence in stage I testicular germ cell tumours

Stage I testicular cancer is a disease restricted to the testicle. After orchiectomy, patients are considered to be without disease; however, the tumour is prone to relapse in ~4-50% of patients. Current predictive markers of relapse, which are tumour size and invasion to rete testis (in seminoma) or lymphovascular invasion (in non-seminoma), have limited clinical utility and are unable to correctly predict relapse in a substantial proportion of patients. Adjuvant therapeutic strategies based on available biomarkers can lead to overtreatment of 50-85% of patients. Discovery and implementation of novel biomarkers into treatment decision making will help to reduce the burden of adjuvant treatments and improve patient selection for adjuvant therapy.

Total embedding of spermatic cord and hilar soft tissue in orchiectomy for seminoma: does the extensive sampling improve pathologic risk factors?

Pure seminomas represent the majority of testicular germ cell tumors and accurate diagnosis and staging require an accurate sampling of radical orchiectomy specimens. The aim of our study is to find the most informative gross sampling method for orchiectomy specimens. We performed the extensive sampling of 88 radical orchiectomy specimens embedding in their entirety testicular hilum, rete testis, hilar soft tissue, and spermatic cord. We examined the impact of this procedure on tumor stage, prognostic parameters (lymphovascular invasion and infiltration of rete testis, epididymis, tunica vaginalis, and spermatic cord), and their relationship with recurrence. Eighty-eight seminomas from 88 radical orchiectomies were sampled. Seventy-seven cases (87.5%) presented as clinical stage I and 11 cases (12.5%) as clinical stage II. The follow-up period range was 18-54 months and 82 patients (93.2%) had a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Tumor size ranged from 0.4 to 16 cm (mean 3.6) requiring a mean of 7.1 sections for entire tumoral sampling. Epididymis required 2 to 8 sections (mean 3.3), and hilum and hilar soft tissues 2 to 9 sections (mean 3.4). Epididymal infiltration and lymphovascular invasion resulted significant at multivariate analysis generating a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve with area under curve of 0.778. All the other parameters (except for pagetoid rete testis infiltration) were significant to predict metastasis only at univariate analysis. Extensive sampling of radical orchiectomy specimens does not improve the accuracy of staging in pure seminomas. Lymphovascular invasion and epididymal infiltration are useful to predict metastasis.

Two cycles of adjuvant carboplatin for clinical stage 1 testicular seminoma in New Zealand centres: A retrospective analysis of efficacy and long-term events

Background

Adjuvant carboplatin reduces relapse risk in clinical stage 1 (CS1) seminoma, though there is a paucity of long‐term safety data.

Aim

Our objective was to report long‐term outcomes of two cycles of adjuvant carboplatin dosed at area under the time–concentration curve (AUC) of 7.

Methods and results

We performed a retrospective analysis on treatment and outcomes of patients with CS1 seminoma who received adjuvant carboplatin from 2000 to 2016 at our centres in the Midland Region, New Zealand. Of 159 patients, median age 39 years, 153 received two cycles of carboplatin: 147 dosed at AUC7 and 6 at AUC6. Six patients had one cycle of carboplatin AUC7. One patient relapsed at 22 months and died of bleomycin pneumonitis 2 months after achieving a complete response with BEP chemotherapy. Neither RTI (present in 21.3%) nor tumor size >4 cm (in 43.3%) was predictive of relapse. Median follow‐up was 106 months. At 15 years, outcomes were: relapse‐free survival 99.4%, overall survival 91.4%, disease‐specific survival 100%, subsequent malignant neoplasm rate 7.6%, and second testicular germ cell tumor rate 3.85%. One patient had persistent grade 1 thrombocytopenia at 46 months.

Conclusions

These data add to the body of evidence that two cycles of carboplatin AUC7 is safe and effective adjuvant treatment for CS1 seminoma.

Patterns of relapse and treatment outcome after active surveillance or adjuvant carboplatin for stage I seminoma: a retrospective study of the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group

PURPOSE

Active surveillance (AS) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) with carboplatin are valid alternatives for managing stage I seminoma, and most relapses can be cured with cisplatin-based chemotherapy. However, some reports suggest that AC may modify the classical pattern of recurrences.

METHODS

We analyzed all relapses observed in a series of 879 patients with stage I seminoma included in 4 consecutive studies of the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group. After a median follow-up of 67 months, recurrences were detected in 56/467 (12%) low-risk cases on AS and 13/412 (3%) high-risk cases after AC (p < 0.001). The objective was to describe clinical features, treatment and outcome. Univariate comparisons were performed between both groups.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between relapses on AS and those after AC in terms of time to relapse (13 vs 17 months), size (26 vs 27 mm), location (retroperitoneum in 88% vs 85%), and method of detection (computed tomography in 77% vs 69%). Treatment consisted of chemotherapy (etoposide + cisplatin ± bleomycin) in 89% and 92%, respectively. Late relapses (after > 3 years) were seen in 11% vs 7.7% (p = NS) and second or successive recurrences in 1.8 vs 23% (p < 0.05). With a median follow-up of 130 moths, two patients died of seminoma-unrelated causes (AS group) and the rest are alive and disease-free.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of a risk-adapted treatment of stage I seminoma, the administration of two courses of AC in patients with tumor size > 4 cm and/or rete testis invasion is associated with a higher incidence of second recurrences but does not significantly modify the pattern of relapses or their outcome.

Defining risk of micrometastatic disease and tumor recurrence in patients with stage I testicular germ cell tumors

There is controversy in the management of patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous germ cell tumor (NSGCT). Some experts recommend surveillance for all patients regardless of risk factors while others suggest a more risk-adapted approach by using lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and the embryonal component in the primary tumor to select patients most likely to benefit from primary treatment [retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) or chemotherapy]. With the surveillance for all strategy, only patients who relapse are treated. While this minimizes the over treatment, problem associated with the risk adapted approach, this exposes young men to the effects of full induction cisplatin-based chemotherapy when these men could have received fewer cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) or a curative primary RPLND. The challenge is identifying these men who are most likely to benefit from upfront treatment more precisely. This paper explores the currently risk adapted approaches as well as promising emerging biomarkers (microRNA) that, in early data, appear to more accurately predict the presence of microscopic disease in the retroperitoneum over conventional markers.