Revascularization versus Medical Management of Coronary Artery Disease in Prerenal Transplant Patients: A Meta-Analysis

The Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Impact of Systematic Screening of Kidney Transplant Candidates by Cardiac Computed Tomography: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Although cardiovascular screening of kidney transplant candidates is recommended, the optimal approach is debated. Previous studies show that noninvasive imaging provides prognostic information, but systematic screening may have less recognized effects, such as additional investigations, incidental findings, procedural complications, and delay of transplantation. To address this, we characterized the diagnostic yield and clinical implications of systematic screening for cardiovascular disease using cardiac computed tomography (CT) in potential kidney transplant candidates.

METHODS

This was a single-center, observational cohort study including all potential kidney transplant candidates >40 years of age or with diabetes or on dialysis treatment for >5 years, systematically referred to cardiac computed tomography (CT; non-contrast CT and coronary CT angiography) between 2014 and 2019 before evaluation for kidney transplantation at Aarhus University Hospital. Patient records were examined for data on baseline characteristics, additional investigations and complications, plasma creatinine, dialysis initiation, time until wait-listing, and incidental findings.

RESULTS

Of 473 patients who underwent cardiac CT, additional cardiac investigations were performed in 156 (33%), and 32 (7%) were revascularized. Twenty-two patients had significant incidental nonvascular findings on cardiac CT. No patient was rejected for transplantation based on cardiac CT. In patients not yet on dialysis, the slope in the estimated glomerular filtration rate decline did not change significantly after coronary CT angiography.

CONCLUSION

Screening by cardiac CT led to additional cardiac investigations in one-third of patients; only a few patients were revascularized, with unknown benefits in asymptomatic patients. Cardiac CT was safe in this population; however, the clinical consequences of the screening were limited.

Cardiac imaging for the assessment of patients being evaluated for kidney transplantation

Cardiac risk assessment before kidney transplantation has become widely accepted. However, the optimal patient selection and screening tool for cardiac assessment remain controversial. Clinicians face several challenges in this process, including the ever-growing pre-transplant population, aging transplant candidates, increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease, and scarcity of donor organs. Optimizing the cardiovascular risk profile in kidney transplant candidates is necessary to better appropriate limited donor organs and improve patient outcomes. Increasing waiting times from the initial evaluation for transplant candidacy to the actual transplant raises questions regarding re-testing and re-stratification of risk. In this review, we summarize and discuss the current literature on cardiac evaluation prior to kidney transplantation. We also propose simple evidence-based evaluation algorithms for initial and follow-up CAD surveillance in patients being wait-listed for kidney transplantation.

Coronary Revascularization Versus Optimal Medical Therapy in Renal Transplant Candidates With Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly prevalent in patients with chronic kidney disease and is a common cause of mortality in end‐stage renal disease. Thus, patients with end‐stage renal disease are routinely screened for CAD before renal transplantation. The usefulness of revascularization before transplantation remains unclear. We hypothesize that there is no difference in all‐cause and cardiovascular mortality in waitlisted renal transplant candidates with CAD who underwent revascularization versus those treated with optimal medical therapy before transplantation.

Methods and Results

This meta‐analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analyses guidelines. MEDLINE, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the modified Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome of interest was all‐cause mortality. Eight studies comprising 945 patients were included (36% women, mean age 56 years). There was no difference in all‐cause mortality (risk ratio [RR], 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63–2.12), cardiovascular mortality (RR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.29–1.89]), or major adverse cardiovascular events (RR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.30–2.07]) when comparing renal transplant candidates with CAD who underwent revascularization versus those who were on optimal medical therapy before renal transplant.

Conclusions

This meta‐analysis demonstrates that revascularization is not superior to optimal medical therapy in reducing all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, or major adverse cardiovascular events in waitlisted kidney transplant candidates with CAD who eventually underwent kidney transplantation.

Preoperative Cardiovascular Assessment of the Renal Transplant Recipient: A Narrative Review

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a high prevalence of cardiovascular disease; it is the leading cause of death in these patients and the optimisation of their cardiovascular health may improve their post-transplant outcomes. Patients awaiting renal transplant often spend significant amounts of time on the waiting list allowing for the assessment and optimisation of their cardiovascular system. Coronary artery disease (CAD) is commonly seen in these patients and we explore the possible functional and anatomical investigations that can help assess and manage CAD in renal transplant candidates. We also discuss other aspects of cardiovascular assessment and management including arrhythmias, impaired ventricular function, valvular disease, lifestyle and pulmonary arterial hypertension. We hope that this review can form a basis for centres hoping to implement an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for renal transplantation.