Endoscopic Ultrasound Features of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1-Related versus Sporadic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Although pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PNENs) are relatively rare tumors, their number is increasing with advances in diagnostic imaging modalities. Even small lesions that are difficult to detect using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging can now be detected with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Contrast-enhanced EUS is useful, and not only diagnosis but also malignancy detection has become possible by evaluating the vascularity of tumors. Pathological diagnosis using EUS with fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is useful when diagnostic imaging is difficult. EUS-FNA can also be used to evaluate the grade of malignancy. Pooling the data of the studies that compared the PNENs grading between EUS-FNA samples and surgical specimens showed a concordance rate of 77.5% (κ-statistic = 0.65, 95% confidence interval = 0.59–0.71, p < 0.01). Stratified analysis for small tumor size (2 cm) showed that the concordance rate was 84.5% and the kappa correlation index was 0.59 (95% confidence interval = 0.43–0.74, p < 0.01). The evolution of ultrasound imaging technologies such as contrast-enhanced and elastography and the artificial intelligence that analyzes them, the evolution of needles, and genetic analysis, will further develop the diagnosis and treatment of PNENs in the future.

A Direct Comparison of Patients With Hereditary and Sporadic Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Evaluation of Clinical Course, Prognostic Factors and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

INTRODUCTION

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) in hereditary syndromes pose a significant challenge to clinicians. The rarity of these syndromes and PNETs itself make it difficult to directly compare them with sporadic PNETs. Despite research suggesting differences between these two entities, the same approach is used in hereditary and sporadic PNETs.

METHODS

We included 63 patients with hereditary PNET (GpNET) and 145 with sporadic PNET (SpNET) in a retrospective observational study. Clinical and genetic data were collected in two Polish endocrine departments from January 2004 to February 2020. Only patients with confirmed germline mutations were included in the GpNET cohort. We attempted to establish prognostic factors of metastases and overall survival in both groups and genotype-phenotype correlations in the GpNET group.

RESULTS

Patients with GpNET were younger and diagnosed earlier, whereas their tumors were smaller and more frequently multifocal compared with patients with SpNET. Metastases occurred more frequently in the SpNET group, and their appearance was associated with tumor size in both groups. GpNET patients had longer overall survival (OS). OS was affected by age, age at diagnosis, sex, grade, stage, tumor diameter, occurrence and localization of metastases, type of treatment, and comorbidities. In the MEN1 group, carriers of frameshift with STOP codon, splice site, and missense mutations tended to have less advanced disease, while patients with mutations in exon 2 tended to have metastases more frequently.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct comparisons of GpNET and SpNET demonstrate significant differences in the clinical courses of both entities, which should force different approaches. A larger group of patients with GpNET should be assessed to confirm genotype-phenotype correlations.

Comprehensive treatment of rare multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: A case report

BACKGROUND

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is a rare hereditary disorder caused by mutations of the MEN1 gene. It is characterized by hyperparathyroidism and involves the pancreas, anterior pituitary, duodenum, and adrenal gland. Here, we report a 40-year-old male patient with MEN1 who first manifested as thymic carcinoid, then primary hyperparathyroidism and prolactinoma, and a decade later pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

CASE SUMMARY

The patient underwent a thymectomy because of the thymic carcinoid 10 years prior and a prolactinoma resection 2 years prior. His sister suffered from prolactinoma. His parents displayed a typical triad of amenorrhea, galactorrhea, and infertility. Computed tomography revealed a strong signal in the upper portion of the left lobes and posterior portion of the right lobes of the thyroid and irregular soft tissue densities of the pancreatic body. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging further showed strong ¹⁸F-flurodeoxyglucose uptake in the tail of the pancreatic body and segment IV of the liver. The patient underwent pancreatic body tail resection, pancreatic head mass enucleation, and ultrasound-guided radio-frequency ablation for liver cancer. Pathology results reported neuroendocrine tumor grade 2. Whole exome sequencing revealed a verified pathogenic mutation c.378G>A (p.Trp126*) in the MEN1 gene. The diagnosis of MEN1 was confirmed. At the 1.5-year follow-up, the patient appeared healthy without any sign of reoccurrence.

CONCLUSION

The present case may add some insight into the diagnosis and treatment of patients with MEN1.