Esophageal Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma with Inconsistent Response to Treatment in the Primary and Metastatic Lesions

Clinicopathological Characteristics, Survival and Prognostic Factors in Gastrointestinal Large Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Gastrointestinal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (GILCNEC) has a low incidence but high malignancy and poor prognosis. The main purpose of this study was to thoroughly investigate its clinicopathological features, survival and prognostic factors.

METHODS

Information on patients with GILCNEC was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result program, and prognostic factors were analyzed by analyzing clinicopathological data and survival functions. Finally, multivariate analysis was applied to identify independent risk factors associated with survival.

RESULTS

A total of 531 individuals were screened in our study from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result database. The primary sites are mainly from the following: esophagus in 39 (7.3%) patients, stomach in 72 (13.6%) patients, hepatobiliary in 51 (9.6%) patients, pancreas in 97 (18.3%) patients, small intestines in 27 (5.1%), and colorectum in 245 (46.1%) patients. Esophagus, stomach, pancreas, and colorectum large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) were more common in males ( P = 0.001). Esophagus LCNEC had inferior overall survival (OS), whereas small intestine LCNEC was associated with better OS. The results of multivariate analysis showed that the American Joint Committee on Cancer Sixth Edition stage, surgery, and radiotherapy were independent prognostic indicators of OS in patients with GILCNEC ( P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognosis of patients with GILCNEC varies depending on the primary tumor site. American Joint Committee on Cancer Sixth Edition stage, surgery, and radiotherapy are independent prognostic factors of patients with GILCNEC. Although surgery and radiotherapy can prolong the survival of patients with GILCNEC, their prognosis remains poor, and further prospectively designed multicenter clinical studies are needed to indicate the decision for clinicians.

Anlotinib plus camrelizumab achieved long-term survival in a patient with metastatic esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) is a rare cancer with an extremely poor prognosis. The average overall survival of patients with metastatic disease is only 1 year. The efficacy of anti-angiogenic agents combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors remains unknown.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 64-year-old man, initially diagnosed with esophageal NEC, underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and esophagectomy. Although the patient remained disease-free for 11 months, eventually the tumor progressed and did not respond to three lines of combined therapy (etoposide plus carboplatin with local radiotherapy, albumin-bound paclitaxel plus durvalumab, and irinotecan plus nedaplatin). The patient then received anlotinib plus camrelizumab, and a dramatic regression was observed (confirmed by positron emission tomography-computed tomography). The patient has been disease-free for over 29 months and has survived for over 4 years since diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Combined therapy with anti-angiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors may be a promising strategy for esophageal NEC, although more evidence is warranted to validate its efficacy.

High-grade large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine carcinomas are extremely rare in the esophagus as they represent less than 0.04% of all neuroendocrine tumors. To date, only 14 cases of poorly differentiated, high-grade esophageal NEC have been described in the literature. The majority of these patients presented with typical dysphagia symptoms. Due to its rarity, no standardized guidelines have been proposed to treat esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma, although general recommendations suggest surgery with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy as the treatment of choice.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 67-year-old previously healthy White male presented with a year-long intermittent nonspecific retrosternal discomfort, with the absence of any other symptoms. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed an ulcerative mass in his lower esophagus, with concern of malignancy. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy revealed poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of the esophagus with metastasis to a diaphragmatic lymph node. He was treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery, and he has been in remission for over 5 years.

CONCLUSION

Here, we review the literature and report a unique case of a patient with a vague presentation of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma as he enters his sixth year of survival following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

Incidence, treatment, and survival analysis in esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma population

BACKGROUND

As a subtype of esophageal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ENENs), esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma (ENEC) is rare. ENEC can be poorly differentiated and highly aggressive. This study aims to illustrate the incidence, treatment, and prognosis of ENEC by using a population-based database.

METHODS

We collected clinicopathological data [1975-2016] of ENEC, esophageal adenocarcinoma (EACA), and esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESqCC) from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and analyzed their incidence, treatment, and prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 60,238 cases were in our study cohort, including ENEC (n=686), EACA (n=26,575), and ESqCC (n=32,977). The incidence of ENEC in 2016 was 0.044 per 100,000 persons. The tumor grade of ENEC was significantly higher than that of EACA and ESqCC (P<0.001). Both cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) of ENEC were significantly worse than those of EACA and ESqCC (P<0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant improvement of CSS and OS by surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy (all P<0.001). Besides, compared with monotherapies, combinational therapies brought more benefits to both CSS and OS of patients with ENEC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our population-based evidence revealed that ENEC, as a rare cancer, had a worse prognosis, compared with EACA and ESqCC. Surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy can all improve the prognosis of ENEC patients. Combinational therapy can yield a better prognosis than monotherapy.

Population-based analysis of esophageal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma between 2004 and 2015

Background

Esophageal large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (ELCNC) seems a rarely gastrointestinal malignancy. By far, its clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis have not been deeply studied.

Methods

The data of patients having ELCNC was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, then assessed and compared with information from patients with esophageal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (ESCNC) or esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We used univariate and multivariate analyses to accurately detect independent prognostic factors.

Results

The data of 36 patients for ELCNC were obtained between 2004 and 2015. Compared with patients with ESCNC and ESCC, the mean survival time of ECLNC patients was worse than those with ESCC, while similar to ESCNC. Thus, ELCNC had significantly different clinicopathological characteristics compared to ESCNC and ESCC. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that age (P=0.001) and M stage (P=0.004) were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusions

ELCNC is a rare subtype of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinoma. The clinicopathological features differ from those of other esophageal carcinomas. Prognosis may be closely related to age and M stage.

The clinicopathologic features and prognosis of esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas: a single-center study of 53 resection cases

Background

Esophageal neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are exceedingly rare and poorly understood. The aims of the retrospective study were to delineate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of patients with the disease.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study containing 53 patients of esophageal NECs in our center from 2002 through 2018. Patients were assigned to the pure esophageal NECs group and the esophageal NECs mixed with squamous carcinoma and/or esophageal adenocarcinoma (MiNECs) group. Demographic, clinical, pathologic and prognostic factors were recorded and analyzed.

Results

Of the 53 patients, elderly male patients were predominant. Dysphagia was the most common symptom (45/53, 84.9%). Most tumors were centered in the middle esophagus (36/53,67.9%).Ulcerated appearance was frequently seen in the pure NECs (56.8%), and the tumors in the MiNECs group mostly represented elevated types (57.9%). Synaptophysin (38/45, 84.4%), chromogranin A (21/38, 55.3%) and CD56(23/27, 85.2%) have been proven to be positive markers for NECs. Most patients (46/53, 86.8%) received surgery combined with chemotherapy. Though the pathologic stages were alike (P = 0.129), the median survival time was 3.53 years for the pure NECs group and 7 years for the MiNECs group. In multivariate analysis, pathologic stage (RR = 1.938, P = 0.045) and age (RR = 2.410, P = 0.028) were independent prognostic factors for patients with MiNECs. The prognosis of patients with pure NECs was independent from any factors.

Conclusions

Careful endoscopic examination could help distinguish pure NECs from MiNECs. NECs were aggressive, but a relative better prognosis for patients with MiNECs. Surgery should be performed if applicable, and chemotherapy might be helpful.