1
|
Tzaridis S, Friedlander M. Functional Relevance of Hyper-Reflectivity in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2021; 62:6. [PMID: 33661283 PMCID: PMC7937992 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.62.3.6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to quantify hyper-reflective lesions on en face optical coherence tomography (OCT) and study its functional relevance in macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel). Design This was a retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Methods Baseline image and functional data from participants of a phase II clinical trial (NCT01949324) that studied the effect of Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor in patients with MacTel were analyzed. The projection of hyper-reflectivity within different layers on OCT was used to generate an en face view and measure the en face size of hyper-reflectivity. Ellipsoid zone (EZ)-loss was additionally evaluated, and en face images were superimposed onto microperimetry sensitivity maps, allowing to estimate mean retinal sensitivity within areas displaying hyper-reflectivity and EZ-loss, respectively. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and reading speed were also analyzed. Results Fifty-two eyes from 52 patients were analyzed. Hyper-reflectivity was present in 32 eyes (62%), and EZ-loss in 50 (96%) eyes. Mean lesion size was 0.11 mm² (range = 0.01-0.26) for hyper-reflectivity and 0.51 mm² (range = 0.02-1.34) for EZ-loss, and lesion sizes correlated strongly (Spearman r = 0.79, P < 0.001). Although both hyper-reflectivity and EZ-loss were associated with a significant decrease in retinal sensitivity, mean sensitivity thresholds differed significantly between lesions (0.9 dB vs. 16.3 dB; P < 0.001), indicating an almost complete loss of sensitivity in hyper-reflective areas. No correlations were found between the size of hyper-reflectivity and BCVA (r = 0.09) or reading speed (r = -0.17). Conclusions En face OCT can be used to quantify the area of hyper-reflective lesions in MacTel. Hyper-reflectivity in MacTel is associated with severe functional impairment, leading to an almost complete loss of retinal sensitivity as observed on microperimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Tzaridis
- The Lowy Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
- The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, La Jolla, California, United States
| | - Martin Friedlander
- The Lowy Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States
- The Scripps Research Institute, Department of Molecular Medicine, La Jolla, California, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tzaridis S, Herrmann P, Charbel Issa P, Degli Esposti S, Wagner SK, Fruttiger M, Egan C, Rubin G, Holz FG, Heeren TFC. Binocular Inhibition of Reading in Macular Telangiectasia Type 2. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2020; 60:3835-3841. [PMID: 31529080 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.18-26414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the presence of binocular gain in macular telangiectasia type 2 (MacTel) and its correlation to paracentral scotomas. Methods Sixty-eight patients with MacTel were consecutively recruited for a cross-sectional analysis. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reading acuity, and reading speed were tested monocularly and binocularly. Macular retinal sensitivity was examined with fundus-controlled perimetry (microperimetry). Scotomas were quantified by their size, their depth, and their proximity to the fovea. Results Binocular reading speed and acuity were lower than monocular reading speed and acuity in the functionally better eye (142 vs. 159 words per minute and 0.43 vs. 0.28 log reading acuity determination, P < 0.001). Magnitude of binocular inhibition of reading speed was correlated to the degree of interocular functional difference (R2 = 0.61, P < 0.001). This correlation was not found for reading acuity or BCVA (R2 < 0.03). Binocular reading speed was negatively correlated to size of right and left eye scotomas, with bigger effect size for left eye scotomas. The magnitude of binocular inhibition was correlated to size of left eye scotomas, but not of right eye scotomas. When both eyes had similar scotoma characteristics, the right eye was more frequently the better reading eye. Conclusions We provide evidence for the presence of binocular inhibition of reading performance in MacTel, likely due to binocular rivalry. This may result from the characteristic paracentral scotomas in noncorresponding retinal fields and, in particular, a disruptive projection of scotomas in reading direction arising from the left eyes. Patients may benefit from occluding one eye while reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Tzaridis
- University of Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany
| | | | - Peter Charbel Issa
- Oxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, and Nuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Simona Degli Esposti
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Siegfried K Wagner
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.,University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Marcus Fruttiger
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.,University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Egan
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom.,University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Rubin
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frank G Holz
- University of Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tjebo F C Heeren
- University of Bonn, Department of Ophthalmology, Bonn, Germany.,Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.,University College London Institute of Ophthalmology, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|