A Challenging Prenatal QF-PCR Rapid Aneuploidy Test Result Caused by a Maternally Inherited Triplication within Chromosome Xq26.2

Confusing finding of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction analysis in invasive prenatal genetic diagnosis: A case report

BACKGROUND

Quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) is a rapid prenatal diagnostic method for abnormalities on chromosomes 21, 18, and 13 and sex chromosomal aneuploidy. However, the value of QF-PCR in diagnosing chromosomal structural abnormalities is limited. In this article, we report a confusing QF-PCR finding in a pregnant woman who underwent amniocentesis.

CASE SUMMARY

The short tandem repeat marker AMXY (Xp22.2/Yp11.2) located on the sex chromosome exhibited a trisomic biallelic pattern, indicating that the karyotype of the fetus might be 47,XYY. Chromosome analysis performed on cultured amniocytes showed a normal male karyotype of the fetus. Copy number variation sequencing confirmed a 500 kb duplication at Yp11.2-Yp11.2 (chrY:6610001_ 7110000) and a 250 kb duplication at Yp11.2-Yp11.2 (chrY:7110001_7360000).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the comprehensive application of different methods could achieve a higher detection rate and accuracy for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal disorders through chromosomal testing.

Detection of partial deletion and mosaicism using quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction: Case reports and a review of the literature

Background

Aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y can be detected by the quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF‐PCR) performed with short tandem repeat (STR) markers. Although QF‐PCR is designed to detect whole chromosome trisomy, the partial deletion or mosaic of chromosomes may also be detected.

Methods

Partial deletion or mosaic of chromosomes in three cases was detected by QF‐PCR. Karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis(CMA) were performed. We further reviewed the clinical utility of QF‐PCR in detecting mosaicisms and deletions/duplications.

Results

QF‐PCR demonstrated structurally abnormal 21, X, and Y chromosomes in primary amniotic cells. QF‐PCR results in these three cases showed abnormal peak height/peak area, which could not be interpreted according to the kit instructions. QF‐PCR results suggested that there were partial deletions or mosaicism, which were confirmed by karyotyping and CMA.

Conclusion

In addition to detecting trisomies of whole chromosomes, QF‐PCR can also detect deletion and mosaicism of chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y, which could suggest the presence of copy number variants (CNVs). Additional testing with genetic technologies, such as karyotyping or microarrays, is recommended when an uninformative pattern is suspected.

An experience in prenatal diagnosis via QF-PCR of a female child with a 9.9 Mb pure deletion at 18p11.32-11.22

Quantitative Fluorescent - Polymerase Chain Reaction (QF-PCR) is a rapid prenatal diagnosis test for 21, 18, 13 and sex chromosomal aneuploidy detection. However, it could not detect partial trisomy or partial monosomy of those chromosomes. Here, we report a 19-month-old Vietnamese female with a 9.9 Mb pure deletion of chromosome 18 at 18p11.32-11.22 confirmed by next generation sequencing. The patient was short statured with facial dysmorphic features as well as motor skill and speech delays. First trimester screening showed high risk of trisomy 21 with only increased nuchal translucency (NT 3.9 mm) by ultrasound as an indication. Prenatal diagnosis by QF-PCR from amniotic DNA revealed normal disomy. Noticeably, two short tandem repeat (STR) markers D18S391 and D18S976 located on 18p exhibited uninformative patterns (one peak). Thus, our case suggested that the combination of both D18S391 and D18S976 markers with uninformative patterns in QF-PCR for prenatal diagnosis and increased NT in the first trimester ultrasound may be a significant indication of 18p monosomy.