1
|
Zhuang X, Chen R, Liang A, Yao J, Wang Z, Chen Y, Zheng K, Lu P, Zhang L, Cao D. Multimodal imaging analysis for the impact of retinal peripheral lesions on central neurovascular structure and retinal function in type 2 diabetes with diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol 2023; 107:1496-1501. [PMID: 35772851 DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2022-321297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the possible role of peripheral lesions (PLs) detected by ultrawide field (UWF) imaging system on central neurovascular structure and retinal function. METHODS Ninety-seven diabetic patients were included in this cross-sectional study using UWF pseudocolour colour imaging with Optos Daytona (Optos, PLC). UWF images were graded as with predominantly peripheral lesions (PPLs) and without PPL. Macular neurovascular alterations and retinal function were measured by optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) and RETeval device, respectively. Central microcirculation and retinal function were compared between eyes with and without PPL. RESULTS The study evaluated 186 eyes (97 patients; 43 females (44.3%)), including 92 eyes without PPL and 94 eyes with PPL. Central retinal vessel density was comparable between eyes with and without PPL. Delayed implicit time and decreased pupil area ratio were found in the PPL group compared with eyes without PPL, and this difference remained unchanged after adjusting for systemic factors (all p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that retinal function is worse in diabetic eyes with PPL. These findings challenged the conventional ETDRS protocols which ignored peripheral retina in determining DR severity. Furthermore, combining UWF imaging with RETeval system to detect more retinal abnormalities may be helpful in DR management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuenan Zhuang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ruoyu Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Anyi Liang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jie Yao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Zicheng Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- School of Medicine, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yesheng Chen
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kangyan Zheng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China
| | - Peiyao Lu
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Liang Zhang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Dan Cao
- Department of Ophthalmology, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Cardiovascular Institute, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lu L, Ausayakhun S, Ausayakuhn S, Khunsongkiet P, Apivatthakakul A, Sun CQ, Kim TN, Lee M, Tsui E, Sutra P, Keenan JD. Diagnostic accuracy of handheld fundus photography: A comparative study of three commercially available cameras. PLOS DIGITAL HEALTH 2022; 1:e0000131. [PMID: 36812561 PMCID: PMC9931246 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of handheld fundus cameras in detecting diabetic retinopathy (DR), diabetic macular edema (DME), and macular degeneration. Participants in the study, conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Hospital in Northern Thailand between September 2018 and May 2019, underwent an ophthalmologist examination as well as mydriatic fundus photography with three handheld fundus cameras (iNview, Peek Retina, Pictor Plus). Photographs were graded and adjudicated by masked ophthalmologists. Outcome measures included the sensitivity and specificity of each fundus camera for detecting DR, DME, and macular degeneration, relative to ophthalmologist examination. Fundus photographs of 355 eyes from 185 participants were captured with each of the three retinal cameras. Of the 355 eyes, 102 had DR, 71 had DME, and 89 had macular degeneration on ophthalmologist examination. The Pictor Plus was the most sensitive camera for each of the diseases (73-77%) and also achieved relatively high specificity (77-91%). The Peek Retina was the most specific (96-99%), although in part due to its low sensitivity (6-18%). The iNview had slightly lower estimates of sensitivity (55-72%) and specificity (86-90%) compared to the Pictor Plus. These findings demonstrated that the handheld cameras achieved high specificity but variable sensitivities in detecting DR, DME, and macular degeneration. The Pictor Plus, iNview, and Peek Retina would have distinct advantages and disadvantages when applied for utilization in tele-ophthalmology retinal screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louisa Lu
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Somsanguan Ausayakhun
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
- CMU Lasik Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Sakarin Ausayakuhn
- Sriphat Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | | | - Atitaya Apivatthakakul
- Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Catherine Q. Sun
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Tyson N. Kim
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Michele Lee
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Edmund Tsui
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Plern Sutra
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jeremy D. Keenan
- Francis I. Proctor Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Agarwal D, Udeh B, Campbell J, Bena J, Rachitskaya A. Follow-Up Appointment Delay in Diabetic Macular Edema Patients. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2021; 52:200-206. [PMID: 34039185 DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20210330-04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE To evaluate a novel measure of compliance, follow-up appointment delay, and assess its relationship with clinical and sociodemographic factors in patients undergoing treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME). PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a comparative case series of patients treated for DME. The novel measure of compliance - the time in days from the intended day of return and actual day of return, or follow-up appointment delay - was studied and compared to a traditional measure: the percentage of visits missed. These were correlated with clinical and sociodemographic characteristics: best-corrected visual acuity, hemoglobin A1C percent (HbA1c), median household income, smoking status, type of insurance held, marital status, gender, and age. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted. RESULTS One hundred fifty-five patients (212 eyes) were included in the study. The median times between recommended and actual appointments was 5.0 days (range: 2.0-14.0 days). The mean percentage of visits missed was 31.7% (± 13.3%). The two measures of compliance were positively associated, but the correlation was moderate (r = 0.44). Non-white race, lack of bilateral injections, and higher baseline HBA1c were significant predictors of a median time greater than 7 days between the intended and actual follow-up dates. CONCLUSIONS The current study identified a novel method of measuring compliance of DME patients seen by retina specialists and has identified non-white race, lack for bilateral treatment, and poorer glycemic control as risk factors for noncompliance. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2021;52:200-206.].
Collapse
|
4
|
Tey KY, Teo K, Tan ACS, Devarajan K, Tan B, Tan J, Schmetterer L, Ang M. Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic retinopathy: a review of current applications. EYE AND VISION 2019; 6:37. [PMID: 31832448 PMCID: PMC6859616 DOI: 10.1186/s40662-019-0160-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/14/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Background Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a leading cause of vision loss in adults. Currently, the standard imaging technique to monitor and prognosticate DR and diabetic maculopathy is dye-based angiography. With the introduction of optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), it may serve as a potential rapid, non-invasive imaging modality as an adjunct. Main text Recent studies on the role of OCTA in DR include the use of vascular parameters e.g., vessel density, intercapillary spacing, vessel diameter index, length of vessels based on skeletonised OCTA, the total length of vessels, vascular architecture and area of the foveal avascular zone. These quantitative measures may be able to detect changes with the severity and progress of DR for clinical research. OCTA may also serve as a non-invasive imaging method to detect diabetic macula ischemia, which may help predict visual prognosis. However, there are many limitations of OCTA in DR, such as difficulty in segmentation between superficial and deep capillary plexus; and its use in diabetic macula edema where the presence of cystic spaces may affect image results. Future applications of OCTA in the anterior segment include detection of anterior segment ischemia and iris neovascularisation associated with proliferative DR and risk of neovascular glaucoma. Conclusion OCTA may potentially serve as a useful non-invasive imaging tool in the diagnosis and monitoring of diabetic retinopathy and maculopathy in the future. Future studies may demonstrate how quantitative OCTA measures may have a role in detecting early retinal changes in patients with diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Yuan Tey
- Hobart Clinical School, Level 3, 43 Collins Street, Hobart, TAS 7000 Australia
| | - Kelvin Teo
- 2Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore, 168751 Singapore
| | - Anna C S Tan
- 2Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore, 168751 Singapore
| | - Kavya Devarajan
- 3Singapore Eye Research Institute, 20 College Road Discovery Tower, Level 6 The Academia, Singapore, 169856 Singapore
| | - Bingyao Tan
- 3Singapore Eye Research Institute, 20 College Road Discovery Tower, Level 6 The Academia, Singapore, 169856 Singapore
| | - Jacqueline Tan
- 3Singapore Eye Research Institute, 20 College Road Discovery Tower, Level 6 The Academia, Singapore, 169856 Singapore
| | - Leopold Schmetterer
- 3Singapore Eye Research Institute, 20 College Road Discovery Tower, Level 6 The Academia, Singapore, 169856 Singapore
| | - Marcus Ang
- 4Singapore National Eye Centre, 11 Third Hospital Ave, Singapore 168751; Duke-NUS Medical School, 8 College Rd, Singapore, 169857 Singapore
| |
Collapse
|