Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Management of the Axilla in Primary Breast Carcinoma

The Value of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in the Pre-Operative Assessment of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Patients

This paper reviews the role of fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in assessing the axilla prior to definitive surgery or neoadjuvant therapy in breast cancer patients. The radiological criteria for biopsy are discussed and pathological techniques and pitfalls illustrated. The sensitivity and specificity of the technique and the clinical utility are addressed, with particular reference to the current controversies in the management of the axilla in the light of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0011 trial results. The low morbidity procedure of FNAB is recommended when the radiological and clinical features suggest a high yield from the abnormal axillary nodes, with consideration of core biopsy if an expected positive result is not obtained or the circumstances require tissue for ancillary studies. In conclusion, FNAB of the axilla is a highly sensitive procedure which can offer further valuable information to assist in clinical decision making. The technique is of particular value in the setting of a large primary tumour size and multiple enlarged nodes. A summary flow chart is provided to facilitate pre-operative management of the axilla and to encourage a universal approach.

Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology of Breast Lesions Using the International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System and Rapid On-Site Evaluation: A Single-Institute Experience

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is rapidly emerging as the leading cause of cancer in Indian women. Robust cytopathology and histopathology services are required to tackle this growing burden. The use of rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytopathology, which offers structured protocols, are expected to improve breast cytopathology reporting.

METHODS

We retrieved the cytopathology slides, categorized them by the IAC Yokohama System and histopathology data of all the patients who had been investigated for breast lesions from September 2016 to December 2018, and compared the cytopathology and histopathology. Risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance metrics, like sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, accuracy, and area under the curve were computed.

RESULTS

A total of 1,147 FNABs were evaluated, of which 442 (38.5%) underwent ROSE and 624 (54.4%) histopathology. Reported using IAC categories, our cohort recorded 4.9% inadequate, 65.3% benign, 7.8% atypical, 3.3% suspicious for malignancy, and 18.7% malignant lesions. The overall sensitivity and specificity for identifying in situ and malignant lesions were 99.1% and 99.3%, respectively, and were substantially improved by ROSE. ROSE improved the concordance between cytopathology and histopathology from 76.9% to 90.2%, by reducing inadequate (p < 0.001) cases. The ROM increased along a gradient from inadequate to malignant categories, with the gradient being sharpened by ROSE. The false negativity rate was 0.7% and false positivity rate 0%.

CONCLUSION

Incorporating ROSE and the IAC Yokohama System for breast cytopathology reporting improves accurate diagnosis of breast lesions, prevents missed diagnoses, and provides reliable estimates of ROM. These protocols also aid in standardizing a reproducible system for monitoring and auditing of breast pathology services, identify areas that need strengthening, and improve training at pathology centers.

Imaging Updates to Breast Cancer Lymph Node Management

Metastatic lymph node involvement in breast cancer is a key determinant of the overall stage of disease and prognosis. Historically, lymph node status was determined by surgery first, with adjuvant treatments determined based on the results of the final surgical pathologic analysis. While this sequence is still applicable in many cases, neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NST) is increasingly being administered as the initial treatment. In cases that demonstrate good therapeutic response to drug therapies, NST may permit the option to perform less radical surgeries subsequently. Current breast cancer treatment has become multidisciplinary, with overlapping roles from the different disciplines. As surgery may be postponed, imaging and image-guided lymph node interventions have gained importance as the primary means of lymph node assessment. Imaging enables evaluation of all regional nodal basins, including locations where surgery is not usually performed. By differentiating limited versus extensive nodal involvement, imaging findings help determine whether initial treatment should be surgical or medical. If medical treatment with NST is indicated, imaging is performed to monitor the in vivo nodal response to drug therapy and ultimately to help determine the surgical technique to perform on the basis of the final imaging findings after NST. The authors discuss the imaging features of nodal metastases and the indications and techniques for the various image-guided procedures. The relative usefulness and shortcomings of the various imaging examinations are reviewed to discuss how they can be applied when biopsy results are not available. The role of imaging in the multidisciplinary team approach is emphasized based on past clinical trials of lymph node management and recent evolving knowledge of breast cancer staging. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Prospective Comparison of Intraoperative Touch Imprint Cytology and Frozen Section Histology on Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Early Breast Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Since the late 1970s, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been used for several solid malignancies to identify lymph node metastases. This procedure is associated with less surgical morbidity than complete lymphadenectomy. Recent evidence suggests that axillary lymphadenectomy is not required for breast sentinel nodes with micrometastases (≤2 mm). Current clinical management of sentinel nodes indicates that only macrometastases (>2 mm) should be detected intraoperatively. In Japan, an intraoperative histopathological frozen section (FS) method is used to identify lymph node metastases, but this method takes more than 30 min and requires complex techniques and expensive equipment. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) is an easier, less expensive, and faster method, but its sensitivity has been shown to be low.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine if TIC is more useful than FS in identifying macrometastases in sentinel lymph nodes in preoperative node-negative breast cancer operations.

METHODS

A prospective review of 49 consecutive patients with node-negative breast cancer treated with SLNB and intraoperative TIC and FS between November 2017 and June 2019 was performed. TIC samples were stained using Papanicolaou and Diff-Quick stains. Results were compared with routine postoperative paraffin sections.

RESULTS

With TIC, the Papanicolaou stain took a mean of 12 min, and the Diff-Quick stain took a mean of 10 min. Results of both TIC stain methods were the same. In contrast, the FS method took a mean of 80 min (including the transfer of specimens to a different hospital with the necessary equipment). TIC confirmed macrometastases in 5 cases. All macrometastases were diagnosed equally by the 2 techniques. Both the sensitivity and specificity of TIC were 100% for detection of macrometastases.

CONCLUSION

TIC of SLNB for breast cancer is an easy and useful method for the detection of macrometastases of breast sentinel nodes.

The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytopathology

The International Academy of Cytology (IAC) gathered together a group of cytopathologists expert in breast cytology who, working with clinicians expert in breast diagnostics and management, have developed the IAC Yokohama System for Reporting Breast Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy (FNAB) Cytology. The project was initiated with the first cytopathology group meeting in Yokohama at the 2016 International Congress of Cytology. This IAC Yokohama System defines five categories for reporting breast cytology, each with a clear descriptive term for the category, a definition, a risk of malignancy (ROM) and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathology features of each of the lesions within each category will be presented more fully in a subsequent atlas. The System emphasizes that the crucial requirements for diagnostic breast FNAB cytology are a high standard for the performance of the FNAB and for the making of direct smears, and well-trained experienced cytopathologists to interpret the material. The performance indicators of breast FNAB, including specificity and sensitivity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and ROM stated in this article have been derived from the recent literature. The current practice of breast FNAB has evolved with the increasing use of ultrasound guidance and rapid on-site evaluation. Two recent publications have shown a range of ROM for the insufficient/inadequate category of 2.6-4.8%, benign 1.4-2.3%, atypical 13-15.7%, suspicious of malignancy 84.6-97.1%, and malignant 99.0-100%. The management algorithm in the System provides options because there are variations in the management of breast lesions using FNAB and core-needle biopsy in those countries utilizing the "triple test" of clinical, imaging, and FNAB assessment, and also variations in the availability of CNB and imaging in low- and middle-income countries. The System will stimulate further discussion and research, particularly in the cytological diagnostic features of specific lesions within each category and in management recommendations. This will lead to continuing improvements in the care of patients with breast lesions and possible modifications to the IAC Yokohama System.