Influence of the Body Mass Index and its Effect on Tumor Characteristics and Survival among a Population with Access to Surgical Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Influence of preoperative body mass index on prognosis for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy

PURPOSE

The impact of body mass index (BMI) on patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) is controversial. Increasing evidence suggests an age-dependent relationship between obesity and outcomes for some solid organ tumors. Herein, we aimed to assess the prognostic value of preoperative BMI in UTUC patients treated with RNU in Taiwan.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-center study of 468 UTUC patients undergoing RNU during January 2010-December 2017, with preoperative BMI classification and subgroup analysis based on ages of < or ≥ 70 years. All UTUC patients underwent RNU and bladder cuff excision. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed. Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression model were used for data analysis.

RESULTS

The median follow-up duration was 36 months. Patients with higher versus lower BMI (cutoff: 25 kg/m2) showed no differences in OS; older patients had poor OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-2.40; p < 0.001). Older age was an independent predictor of poor OS in multivariate Cox regression analysis (p = 0.001). Younger patients with higher BMI (p = 0.02) had better DFS than older patients with no BMI-related survival differences. Higher BMI was an independent predictor of favorable DFS in younger patients in multivariate Cox regression analysis (HR, 0.53; 95% CI 0.28-0.99; p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

Younger UTUC patients with higher BMI were independently associated with a favorable DFS.

Oncologic outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a literature review

Background and Objective

Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for non-metastatic upper tract urothelial cancer. We sought to provide a comprehensive review of reported oncologic outcomes of the RNU procedure and of factors that might impact these outcomes.

Methods

A non-systematic review of the literature was conducted by performing an electronic literature search using PubMed with "radical nephroureterectomy" and "oncologic outcomes" as free text search terms. Both original articles and systematic reviews were considered. Search was limited to articles in English that were published in the last 20 years.

Key Content and Findings

Open and laparoscopic RNU offer comparable oncologic outcomes. In more recent years, the discussion has de facto shifted towards the "oncological safety" of robotic RNU, which also seems to offer comparable oncologic outcomes. Several studies have looked at the impact of different treatment-, patient- and tumor-related factors. Among treatment-related factors, attention has been given to diagnostic ureteroscopy and the risk of intravesical recurrence. Surgical wait time and perioperative blood transfusion have also been studied. Perioperative chemotherapy, specifically adjuvant therapy, was shown to improve survival. Among patient-related factors, baseline chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, body mass index, and systemic inflammation have gained recent attention. Some tumor related factors, such as stage, grade, location, and multifocality may negatively impact survival outcomes. Lymphovascular invasion and histologic variants are clinically significant pathological findings.

Conclusions

RNU is a procedure with measured long-term oncologic outcomes. Minimally invasive techniques have gained an established role as they seem to offer comparable oncologic "safety", although special attention is needed in relation to the method of bladder cuff excision. Robotic RNU is gaining popularity, and while evidence remains limited, the current literature supports the oncologic safety of this procedure. Several factors, which can be categorized as treatment-related, patient-related, and tumor-related, might impact the oncologic outcomes of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. These factors can provide crucial information to stratify patients based on their relative risk of disease recurrence and mortality which may guide clinical decision-making.

The Prognostic Value of Body Mass Index in Patients With Urothelial Carcinoma After Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background:

The clinical evidence of body mass index (BMI) for survival has increased in urothelial carcinoma (UC). This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of BMI on the oncologic outcomes of patients with UC after surgery.

Methods:

The systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using Pubmed, Embase and Cochrane Library. We collected hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) on cancer specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) from the studies including upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and urothelial carcinoma of bladder (UCB).

Results:

A total of 13 studies comprising over 12,200 patients were enrolled in the quantitative synthesis. Compared with normal weight, overweight was associated with better CSS (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95) and RFS (HR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78-0.96). Meanwhile, we found that obese patients had worse CSS (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 1.03-1.26), OS (HR = 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.44) and RFS (HR = 1.24, 95% CI: 1.12-1.37). We observed that underweight was associated with inferior CSS (HR = 1.87, 95% CI: 1.54-2.26) in UTUC patients.

Conclusions:

Overweight was a protective factor for patients with UC after surgery, while obesity and underweight predicted unfavorable survival. Individual BMI may be considered for prognostication after surgeries and patient stratification for clinical trials.

The prognostic value of tumor architecture in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is a lack of consensus regarding the prognostic value of tumor architecture (sessile vs. papillary) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). The aim of the present study was to analyze the current evidence regarding the prognostic role of tumor architecture in patients undergoing RNU for UTUC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases was performed for citations published prior to February 2020. Cumulative analyses of hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were conducted for the survival outcomes by Stata 12.0 software.

RESULTS

We retrieved 17 studies (including 8,146 patients) evaluating the effect of tumor architecture on oncologic outcomes in patients treated with RNU. According to our final results, sessile tumor architecture had a significant correlation with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.31-1.55, P < .001), overall survival (OS) (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.24-1.58, P < .001), recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.35-1.53, P < .001), and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.11-1.45, P = 0.001). The funnel plot test indicated that there was no significant publication bias in the meta-analysis. Besides, the findings of this study were found to be reliable by our sensitivity and subgroup analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Sessile tumor architecture correlates with a significantly worse survival outcome compared with papillary tumor architecture, and it can be used as a valuable biomarker for monitoring prognoses of UTUC patients.