Platelet-Rich Plasma Diffusion in Achilles Tendon: Relationship with Therapeutic Outcomes

ICON 2020-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: A Systematic Review of Outcome Measures Reported in Clinical Trials of Achilles Tendinopathy

BACKGROUND

Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

DATA SOURCES

Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series.

RESULTS

9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain.

CONCLUSION

233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42020156763.

Evidence for the use of PRP in chronic midsubstance Achilles tendinopathy: A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have been proposed as an additional therapy in the treatment of chronic midsubstance Achilles tendinopathy (AT). The use of PRP injections as pharmacological treatment added to a conservative approach has gained growing interest, but the efficacy remains highly debated. The varying methodological quality of the available studies may contribute to these contradictory results. The aim of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to establish the existing evidence of PRP injections for chronic midsubstance AT on the functional outcome, with a risk of bias assessment of each included study.

METHODS

According to the PRISMA guidelines systematic searches were performed in Embase, the Cochrane library and Pubmed on June 12, 2020 for relevant literature. Only clinical trials comparing PRP injections with placebo, additional to an eccentric training program, in midsubstance AT were included. The primary outcome was Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles (VISA-A) score at 3, 6 and 12 months post-injection. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (Rob 2). As secondary outcome we assessed reported changes in tendon structure after PRP injections.

RESULTS

A total of 367 studies were identified with the initial database search. Finally, four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) met inclusion criteria for systematic review and meta-analysis with data of 170 patients available for pooling. Results showed no difference in clinical outcome between the PRP and placebo group at different points in time using the VISA-A score as outcome parameter (3 months 0.23 (CI -0.45, 0.91); 6 months 0.83 (CI -0.26, 1.92); 12 months 0.83 (CI -0.77, 2.44)). The bias analysis showed a low or intermediate risk of bias profile for all studies which supports the good methodological quality of each included article. Finally, it is unclear whether PRP injections cause an improvement in tendon structure. However, no direct relationship between tendon structure and clinical presentation of AT could be found.

CONCLUSION

PRP has no clear additional value in management of chronic midsubstance Achilles tendinopathy and therefore should not be used as a first-line treatment option.