1
|
Pophali PA, Morton LM, Parsons SK, Hodgson D, Thanarajasingam G, Thompson C, Habermann TM, Savage KJ. Critical gaps in understanding treatment outcomes in adolescents and young adults with lymphoma: A review of current data. EJHAEM 2023; 4:927-933. [PMID: 38024619 PMCID: PMC10660371 DOI: 10.1002/jha2.778] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with lymphoma experience treatment-related effects in the short and long term that impact their quality of life and survivorship experience. The effort to improve outcomes for AYA lymphoma survivors requires understanding the available literature, identifying current knowledge deficits, designing better clinical trials incorporating the patient perspective, using novel tools to bridge data gaps and building survivorship guidelines that translate research to clinical practice. This review article summarizes the current state of lymphoma treatment-related outcomes in AYAs and provides future direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priyanka A. Pophali
- Division of HematologyMedical Oncology and Palliative CareUniversity of Wisconsin, Carbone Cancer CenterMadisonWisconsinUSA
| | - Lindsay M. Morton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaMarylandUSA
| | - Susan K. Parsons
- Department of MedicineDivision of Hematology/OncologyTufts Medical Centerand the Tufts University School of MedicineBostonMassachusettsUSA
| | - David Hodgson
- Department of Radiation OncologyPrincess Margaret HospitalTorontoOntarioCanada
| | | | | | | | - Kerry J. Savage
- Centre for Lymphoid CancerBritish Columbia CancerVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Antunes MB, Cardeal SP, Magalhães M, Vale-Fernandes E, Barreiro M, Sá R, Sousa M. Preservation of fertility in female patients with hematologic diseases. Blood Rev 2023; 62:101115. [PMID: 37562987 DOI: 10.1016/j.blre.2023.101115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Recent developments of assisted reproduction techniques turned possible to avoid the infertility consequences of oncologic treatments, but fertility preservation (FP) has been somewhat neglected in women with hematologic diseases undergoing gonadotoxic treatments. For these specific cases, the current options for FP include the cryopreservation of embryos, mature oocytes and ovarian tissue, and oocyte in-vitro maturation. We intend to make patients and clinicians aware of this important and relevant issue, and provide hematologists, assisted reproduction physicians and patients, with updated tools to guide decisions for FP. The physicians of the units responsible for female FP should always be available to decide on the best-individualized FP option in strict collaboration with hematologists. With a wide range of options for FP tailored to each case, a greater level of training and information is needed among clinicians, so that patients proposed to gonadotoxic treatments can be previously advised for FP techniques in hematological conditions. ABBREVIATED ABSTRACT: Recent developments of assisted reproduction techniques turned possible to preserve the fertility of women with hematologic diseases undergoing gonadotoxic treatments. Current options for fertility preservation in women with hematologic diseases are presented. It is imperative to offer fertility preservation to all women before starting any gonadotoxic treatment and in some cases after treatment. Fertility preservation methods enable to later achieve the desired pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marika Bini Antunes
- Department of Clinical Hematology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo do Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal; UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine/ITR-Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Sara Pinto Cardeal
- Laboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| | - Manuel Magalhães
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine/ITR-Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal; Department of Oncology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo do Professor Abel Salazar, 4099-001 Porto, Portugal
| | - Emídio Vale-Fernandes
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine/ITR-Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal; Centro de Procriação Medicamente Assistida, Centro Materno-Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo da Maternidade, 4050-371, Porto, Portugal
| | - Márcia Barreiro
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine/ITR-Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal; Centro de Procriação Medicamente Assistida, Centro Materno-Infantil do Norte, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo da Maternidade, 4050-371, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Rosália Sá
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine/ITR-Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal; Laboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| | - Mário Sousa
- UMIB-Unit for Multidisciplinary Research in Biomedicine/ITR-Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health, Porto, Portugal; Laboratory of Cell Biology, Department of Microscopy, ICBAS-School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Porto, Rua Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Minoia C, Viviani S, Silvestris E, Palini S, Parissone F, De Palma G, Fedina A, Cormio G, Guarini A, Gini G, Montano L, Merli F, Peccatori FA. Fertility preservation and monitoring in adult patients diagnosed with lymphoma: consensus-based practical recommendations by the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi & Società Italiana della Riproduzione Umana. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1252433. [PMID: 37766870 PMCID: PMC10520955 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1252433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Fertility preservation (FP) and monitoring has considerable relevance in the multidisciplinary approach to cancer patients. In these consensus-based practical recommendations, the scientific societies Fondazione Italiana Linfomi (FIL) and Società Italiana della Riproduzione Umana (SIRU) reviewed the main aspects and identified the optimal paths which aim to preserve and monitor fertility in patients diagnosed with lymphoma at the different phases of the disease and during long-term survivorship. Methods For the Panel, eleven experts were selected for their expertise in research and clinical practice on onco-fertility and lymphoma. The Panel's activity was supervised by a chairman. A series of rank-ordering key questions were proposed according to their clinical relevance and discussed among the Panel, focusing on patients diagnosed with non-Hodgkin's lymphomas and Hodgkin lymphoma. Agreement among all the Panelists on the content and terminology of the statements was evaluated by a web-based questionnaire according to the Delphi methodology. Results From the literature review a total of 78 questions or sentences, divided into the 6 areas of interest, were identified. By applying the Gwet's AC, k was: Section 1: 0,934 (Very good); Section 2: 0,958 (Very good); Section 3: 0,863 (Very good); Section 4: 0,649 (Good); Section 5: 0,936 (Very good); Section 6 raw agreement 100%. Two rounds of Delphi allowed to provide the maximum agreement. All statements were newly discussed in a round robin way and confirmed for the drafting of the final recommendations. Discussion These recommendations would be useful for onco-hematologists, gynecologists, urologists, and general practice physicians who take care of young lymphoma patients to guarantee an evidence-based oncofertility assessment and treatment during the oncologic pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carla Minoia
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Simonetta Viviani
- Division of Onco-Hematology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Simone Palini
- Physiopathology of Reproduction Unit, Cervesi Hospital, Cattolica, Italy
| | - Francesca Parissone
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Università di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe De Palma
- Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Anna Fedina
- Data Office Fondazione Italiana Linfomi, Alessandria, Italy
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- IRCCS Istituto Tumori Departiment of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Hematology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, Bari, Italy
| | - Guido Gini
- Clinic of Hematology Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Luigi Montano
- Andrology Unit and Service of Lifestyle Medicine in UroAndrology, Local Health Authority (ASL), Salerno, Italy
| | - Francesco Merli
- Hematology Unit, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voytko MS, Klimontov VV, Pospelova TI, Shebunyaeva YY, Fazullina ON. [Endocrine disorders after combined chemoradiotherapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma survivors]. PROBLEMY ENDOKRINOLOGII 2023; 69:16-23. [PMID: 37448267 DOI: 10.14341/probl13124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) is one of the most common malignant lymphoproliferative diseases. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy used in the treatment of LH induce a number of toxic effects leading to dysfunction of endocrine system. Hormonal disorders in HL and their relationships with the therapy used remain to be clarified. AIM To assess disorders of the endocrine function of thyroid, parathyroid glands and gonads in HL survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS Screening of endocrine dysfunction of the thyroid, parathyroid glands and gonads was performed in 160 adult patients with HL, 55 men and 105 women, at remission stage induced by chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Forty healthy subjects, matched by age, were acted as control. The levels of TSH, T3, free T4, PTH, FSH, LH, free testosterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S), and sex-hormone binding globulin (SHBG) were measured in blood serum by ELISA. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by DEXA. RESULTS Hypothyroidism (25%), hyperparathyroidism (15.6%) and hypogonadism (29% of men and 25.3% of women) were the most prevalent endocrine disorders in LH survivors. Hypothyroidism was significantly more common in patients after chemoradiotherapy than in those who received only chemotherapy (χ2=9.4, р=0.002). In patients with hyperparathyroidism, there were negative correlations between PTH levels and BMD in the lumbar spine (r=-0.74, p=0.00002) and in the femoral neck (r=-0.66, p=0.0003). Men with HL demonstrated lower free testosterone concentrations when compared to control (p=0.04); LH and FSH levels were elevated (p=0.0004 and p=0.04, respectively). In men with HL the levels of DHEA-S were reduced (p=0.0009). The increased SHBG concentrations were revealed in 13 (23.6%) men. Women of reproductive age with HL had higher levels of LH in the luteal phase (p=0.05) and FSH in the follicular phase (p=0.02) than controls. CONCLUSION The data indicate a high prevalence of the dysfunctions of thyroid, parathyroid glands, and gonads in HL survivors. Screening for endocrine disorders in these patients is highly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M S Voytko
- Novosibirsk State Medical University; City Clinical Hospital No. 2
| | - V V Klimontov
- Novosibirsk State Medical University; Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology - Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
| | - T I Pospelova
- Novosibirsk State Medical University; City Clinical Hospital No. 2
| | | | - O N Fazullina
- Research Institute of Clinical and Experimental Lymphology - Branch of the Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Investigation of the female infertility risk associated with anti-cancer therapy. CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE FEDERATION OF SPANISH ONCOLOGY SOCIETIES AND OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE OF MEXICO 2023:10.1007/s12094-023-03087-8. [PMID: 36689055 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03087-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Female infertility is a significant health issue worldwide with a rising incidence. Anti-cancer therapy is one of the most important reasons for increasing infertility. Although anti-cancer treatment increases the rate of survival, it decreases the quality of life through its side effects. The most substantial side effects are sexual dysfunction and infertility. Breast cancer is the most common cancer. The first-line treatment of breast cancer is chemotherapy by alkylating agents like cyclophosphamide, which leads to infertility. For instance, persistent chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea among breast cancer patients could affect almost half of the patients that undergo such therapy. However, some agents or therapeutic methods can ameliorate these intoxicating effects. Chemotherapy plus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist, in breast cancer patients, can not only improve overall survival but also reduce ovarian toxicity. Age plays an essential role in chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea. Chemotherapy at a younger age can reduce the risk of infertility. Gynecological cancers including uterine and ovarian cancer, which have high mortality rates, are the most related cancers to infertility. Surgery is the primary treatment of gynecological cancers. Studies demonstrated that fertility-sparing surgery is a better option than radical surgery. In addition, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is mostly a better option than primary cytoreductive surgery in terms of survival and fertility. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have recently played a major role in treating various cancer types. However, ICIs are associated with hypophysitis, which affects ovaries and can lead to infertility. There are some options for ovarian preservation such as embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian transposition, ovarian tissue cryopreservation, and ovarian suppression by GnRH agonists. Anti-müllerian hormone level can be utilized to monitor the ovarian reserve. Moreover, to avoid fertility loss, approaches such as using transplantation of human placenta mesenchymal stem cells, administrating anti-inflammatory agents and hormone therapy are under investigation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Valsamakis G, Valtetsiotis K, Charmandari E, Lambrinoudaki I, Vlahos NF. GnRH Analogues as a Co-Treatment to Therapy in Women of Reproductive Age with Cancer and Fertility Preservation. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23042287. [PMID: 35216409 PMCID: PMC8875398 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, we analyzed existing literature regarding the use of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists, antagonists) as a co-treatment to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is a growing interest in their application as a prophylaxis to gonadotoxicity caused by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy due to their ovarian suppressive effects, making them a potential option to treat infertility caused by such chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. They could be used in conjunction with other fertility preservation options to synergistically maximize their effects. GnRH analogues may be a valuable prophylactic agent against chemotherapeutic infertility by inhibiting rapid cellular turnover on growing follicles that contain types of cells unintentionally targeted during anti-cancer treatments. These could create a prepubertal-like effect in adult women, limiting the gonadotoxicity to the lower levels that young girls have. The use of GnRH agonists was found to be effective in hematological and breast cancer treatment whereas for ovarian endometrial and cervical cancers the evidence is still limited. Studies on GnRH antagonists, as well as the combination of both agonists and antagonists, were limited. GnRH antagonists have a similar protective effect to that of agonists as they preserve or at least alleviate the follicle degradation during chemo-radiation treatment. Their use may be preferred in cases where treatment is imminent (as their effects are almost immediate) and whenever the GnRH agonist-induced flare-up effect may be contra-indicated. The combination treatment of agonists and antagonists has primarily been studied in animal models so far, especially rats. Factors that may play a role in determining their efficacy as a chemoprotective agent that limits gonadal damage, include the type and stage of cancer, the use of alkylating agents, age of patient and prior ovarian reserve. The data for the use of GnRH antagonist alone or in combination with GnRH agonist is still very limited. Moreover, studies evaluating the impact of this treatment on the ovarian reserve as measured by Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels are still sparse. Further studies with strict criteria regarding ovarian reserve and fertility outcomes are needed to confirm or reject their role as a gonadal protecting agent during chemo-radiation treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Valsamakis
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Konstantinos Valtetsiotis
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
| | - Evangelia Charmandari
- First University Department of Paediatrics, Aghia Sophia Childrens Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 152 33 Athens, Greece;
| | - Irene Lambrinoudaki
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
| | - Nikolaos F. Vlahos
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Female Oncofertility: Current Understandings, Therapeutic Approaches, Controversies, and Future Perspectives. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10235690. [PMID: 34884393 PMCID: PMC8658080 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10235690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2021] [Revised: 11/25/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in early detection and oncological therapies have ameliorated the survival rate of young cancer patients. Yet, ovarian impairment induced by chemotherapy and radiotherapy is still a challenging issue. This review, based on clinical and lab-based studies, summarizes the evidence of gonadotoxicity of chemoradiotherapy, the recent approaches, ongoing controversies, and future perspectives of fertility preservation (FP) in female patients who have experienced chemo- or radio-therapy. Existing data indicate that chemotherapeutic agents induce DNA alterations and massive follicle activation via the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt signaling pathway. Meanwhile, the radiation causes ionizing damage, leading to germ cell loss. In addition to the well-established methods, numerous therapeutic approaches have been suggested, including minimizing the follicle loss in cryopreserved ovarian grafts after transplantation, in vitro activation or in vitro growing of follicles, artificial ovarian development, or fertoprotective adjuvant to prevent ovarian damage from chemotherapy. Some reports have revealed positive outcomes from these therapies, whereas others have demonstrated conflictions. Future perspectives are improving the live birth rate of FP, especially in patients with adverse ovarian reserve, eliminating the risk of malignancy reintroducing, and increasing society’s awareness of FP importance.
Collapse
|
8
|
Brancati S, Gozzo L, Longo L, Vitale DC, Russo G, Drago F. Fertility Preservation in Female Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Clinical and Regulatory Issue. Front Oncol 2021; 11:641450. [PMID: 33796467 PMCID: PMC8008167 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation represents one important goal of cancer patients’ management due to the high impact on health and quality of life of survivors. The available preventive measures cannot be performed in all patients and are not feasible in all health-care facilities. Therefore, the pharmacological treatment with GnRHa has become a valuable non-invasive and well-tolerated alternative, especially in those who cannot access to cryopreservation options due to clinical and/or logistic issues. Supporting data demonstrate a significant advantage for the survivors who received GnRHa in the long-term maintenance of ovarian function and preservation of fertility. The prevention of the risk of ovarian failure with GnRHa is a typical off-label use, defined as the administration of a medicinal product not in accordance with the authorized product information. Italy has officially recognized the off-label use of GnRHa in adult women at risk of premature and permanent menopause following chemotherapy. However, fertility preservation still represents an unmet medical need in adolescents who cannot access to other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Brancati
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Lucia Gozzo
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Laura Longo
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Daniela Cristina Vitale
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanna Russo
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Filippo Drago
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Centre for Research and Consultancy in HTA and drug Regulatory Affairs (CERD), University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moura GAD, Monteiro PB. Cytotoxic Activity of Antineoplastic Agents on Fertility: A Systematic Review. REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRÍCIA 2020; 42:759-768. [PMID: 33254272 PMCID: PMC10309244 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1713911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the long-term effects of antineoplastic treatments on patient fertility. SELECTION OF STUDIES The studies were selected through the New PubMed, Scielo and Lilacs databases along with references used for the creation of the present work. For the selection of studies, articles published between the periods from January 1, 2015 to April 6, 2020 in the English, Portuguese and Spanish languages were used. As inclusion criteria: cohort studies and studies conducted in vitro. As exclusion criteria: review articles, reported cases, studies that do not address thematic reproduction, studies that do not address the cancer theme, articles that used animals, articles that address the preservation of fertility and articles in duplicate in the bases. DATA COLLECTION The collected data included: age of the patient at the beginning of treatment, type of neoplasm, type of antineoplastic treatment, chemotherapy used, radiotherapy dosage, radiotherapy site, effect of antineoplastic agents on fertility and number of patients in the study. DATA SYNTHESIS Thirty studies were evaluated, antineoplastic chemotherapy agents and radiotherapy modulate serum hormone levels, reduces germ cell quantities and correlated with an increase in sterility rates. The effects mentioned occur in patients in the prepubertal and postpubertal age. CONCLUSION Antineoplastic treatments have cytotoxic effects on the germ cells leading to hormonal modulation, and pubertal status does not interfere with the cytotoxic action of therapies.
Collapse
|
10
|
Silvestris E, Cormio G, Skrypets T, Dellino M, Paradiso AV, Guarini A, Minoia C. Novel aspects on gonadotoxicity and fertility preservation in lymphoproliferative neoplasms. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 151:102981. [PMID: 32485429 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 05/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The topic of fertility preservation in patients with a lymphoproliferative disease offers new aspects of debate, due to the introduction of novel chemotherapeutic regimens and small molecules in the clinical landscape. Cancer related infertility is mostly dependent on gonadotoxic treatments and fertile female patients are today addressed to the oocyte cryopreservation or to ovarian cortex fragment cryopreservation. These methods present advantages and disadvantages, which will be discussed in the present review, together with the options for male patients. The recent discovery of functional ovarian stem cells (OCSs) in woman ovarian cortex, opens new avenues offering a innovative procedure for fertility preservation through as model of regenerative medicine. Here, we review the gonadotoxic potential of "classical" chemotherapeutic treatments as well as of "novel" targeted therapies actually employed for lymphoproliferative neoplasms in young patients and revisit both the today available and future chances to preserve and restore fertility after the cancer healing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica Silvestris
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Gennaro Cormio
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" 70124 Bari, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
| | - Tetiana Skrypets
- Haematology Unit, National Cancer Center, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale O. Flacco 65, Bari, Italy; Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy.
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II" 70124 Bari, Italy.
| | - Angelo Virgilio Paradiso
- Institutional BioBank, Experimental Oncology and Biobank Management Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy.
| | - Attilio Guarini
- Haematology Unit, National Cancer Center, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale O. Flacco 65, Bari, Italy.
| | - Carla Minoia
- Haematology Unit, National Cancer Center, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", viale O. Flacco 65, Bari, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|