One-Year Results of Fixed Aflibercept Treatment Regime in Type 3 Neovascularization

Functional and structural characteristics in patients with type 3 macular neovascularisation treated with anti-VEGF. Three-year results in real world settings

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the long-term anatomical and functional outcomes of anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor intravitreal injections (anti-VEGF IVI) in patients with type 3 macular neovascularisation (MNV) in real-world settings.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with type 3 MNV who received anti-VEGF IVI between 2013 and 2020. Primary outcomes were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT). Secondary outcome was the development of new-onset of foveal-involving geographic atrophy (GA) and disciform scars.

RESULTS

We identified 59 eyes from 48 British patients that met the inclusion criteria. Treatment with anti- VEGF IVI resulted in a statistically significant reduction in median CMT, which was maintained throughout the study period. At 36 months, 24 eyes showed more than 50 μm reduction in CMT, 7 eyes remained stable and only 2 eyes showed an increase in CMT by more than 50μm compared to the baseline. At year three, deterioration was noticed in most eyes (52.78%) and vision remained stable or improved in 47.22% of the eyes. However, the median BCVA was not statistically significant different compared to baseline. During the study period new onset of macula-involving atrophy or scar was noted in 10.2% and 4.3% of the eyes, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this real-world study, anatomic and functional improvement were recorded 12-months post anti-VEGF IVI in type 3 MNV. Despite sustained anatomical improvement, vision returned back to baseline levels at 36-months. The development of GA and macular scar was only partially responsible for this outcome suggesting a more severe nature of this form of nAMD.

Long-term effect of fluid volumes during the maintenance phase in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: results from Fight Retinal Blindness!

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of macular fluid volumes (subretinal fluid [SRF], intraretinal fluid [IRF], and pigment epithelium detachment [PED]) after initial treatment on functional and structural outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration in a real-world cohort from Fight Retinal Blindness!

METHODS

Treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients from Fight Retinal Blindness! (Zürich, Switzerland) were included. Macular fluid on optical coherence tomography was automatically quantified using an approved artificial intelligence algorithm. Follow-up of macular fluid, number of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatments, effect of fluid volumes after initial treatment (high, top 25%; low, bottom 75%) on best-corrected visual acuity, and development of macular atrophy and fibrosis was investigated over 48 months.

RESULTS

A total of 209 eyes (mean age, 78.3 years) were included. Patients with high IRF volumes after initial treatment differed by -2.6 (p = 0.021) and -7.4 letters (p = 0.007) at months 12 and 48, respectively. Eyes with high IRF received significantly more treatments (+1.6 [p < 0.001] and +5.3 [p = 0.002] at months 12 and 48, respectively). Patients with high SRF or PED had comparable best-corrected visual acuity outcomes but received significantly more treatments for SRF (+2.4 [p < 0.001] and +11.4 [p < 0.001] at months 12 and 48, respectively) and PED (+1.2 [p = 0.001] and +7.8 [p < 0.001] at months 12 and 48, respectively).

DISCUSSION

Patients with high macular fluid after initial treatment are at risk of losing vision that may not be compensable with higher treatment frequency for IRF. Higher treatment frequency for SRF and PED may result in comparable treatment outcomes. Quantification of macular fluid in all compartments is essential to detect eyes at risk of aggressive disease.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor monotherapy or combined with verteporfin photodynamic therapy for retinal angiomatous proliferation: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Purpose: To assess functional and anatomical outcomes of intravitreal anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy versus combined with verteporfin Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) for Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation (RAP). Methods: Studies reporting outcomes of intravitreal anti-VEGF monotherapy and/or in combination with verteporfin PDT in RAP eyes with a follow-up ≥ 12 months were searched. The primary outcome was the mean change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 12 months. Mean change in central macular thickness (CMT) and mean number of injections were considered as secondary outcomes. The mean difference (MD) between pre- and post-treatment values was calculated along with 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). Meta-regressions were performed to assess the influence of anti-VEGF number of injections on BCVA and CMT outcomes. Results: Thirty-four studies were included. A mean gain of 5.16 letters (95% CI = 3.30-7.01) and 10.38 letters (95% CI = 8.02-12.75) was shown in the anti-VEGF group and combined group, respectively (anti-VEGF group vs. combined group, p < 0.01). A mean CMT reduction of 132.45 µm (95% CI = from -154.99 to -109.90) and 213.93 µm (95% CI = from -280.04 to -147.83) was shown in the anti-VEGF group and combined group, respectively (anti-VEGF group vs. combined group, p < 0.02). A mean of 4.9 injections (95% CI = 4.2-5.6) and 2.8 injections (95% CI = 1.3-4.4) were administered over a 12-month period in the anti-VEGF group and combined group, respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed no influence of injection number on visual and CMT outcomes. High heterogeneity was found across studies for both functional and anatomical outcomes. Conclusion: A combined approach with anti-VEGF and PDT could provide better functional and anatomical outcomes in RAP eyes compared with anti-VEGF monotherapy.