Meta-Analysis of the Effect of the Clinical Pathway Applied to Patients with Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in China

Evaluation of previous management against a developed clinical pathway for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center

The study aims to evaluate previous management of CRSwNP patients in Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC) against a developed CP.Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) has high economic burden and impacts patient's quality of life. Implementation of clinical pathway (CP) can standardize care while optimizing resources.Analytical cross-sectionalThis study utilized medical records of 103 CRSwNP patients at UKMMC otorhinolaryngology clinic from 2010 to 2015. Patients were divided into groups who underwent or did not undergo surgery. Information was obtained regarding sociodemographic, follow-ups, pharmaceutical regimes, and treatment cost. Cost analysis was done using top-down analysis and activity-based costing and CP was formulated. Cost was calculated using year 2020 rates to adjust for inflation. (United States Dollars [USD]1 = Ringgit Malaysia [RM] 4.2015)Study showed non-CP patients were undertreated compared to CP. This affects clinical outcomes as optimal treatment demanded by CP was not achieved. Total cost for non-CP, non-surgery patients were lower (USD660) compared to CP (USD780) due to under treatment and shorter follow-ups. Meanwhile, total cost for non-CP surgery patients were higher (USD3600) compared to CP (USD2706) due to longer visit durations and hospital stays. Non-CP surgery group underwent lengthy follow-up duration (20.7 months) prior to operation compared to 12 months expected in CP.Study showed non-CP patients were undertreated compared to CP. We identified aspects which resulted in resource wastage and unnecessary burden to our healthcare system. This study enables development of a written CP by fine-tuning various aspects of CP which could be applied to our future practice.

Effects of Clinical Pathways on Cesarean Sections in China: Length of Stay and Direct Hospitalization Cost Based on Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Controlled Clinical Trials

The cesarean section (CS) on maternal request increased sharply in China, bringing pressure to medical resources and national insurance. We assessed the use of clinical pathways (CPWs) for CS compared with conventional medical care by outcomes of length of stay (LOS) in hospital and direct hospitalization cost (DHC). Four Chinese electronic databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, CQVIP, and SinoMed, were explored to December 2020 for the full-text papers published in Chinese. Literature that quantitatively assessed the effects of CPW on LOS or DHC were eligible for inclusion. The weighted mean differences (WMDs) were pooled. Twenty-five articles were included in our analysis, with a total sample of 7761 women. These studies were performed from 2004 to 2017 and reported from 2005 to 2018. The synthesized results showed a shorter LOS (in days) (WMD = −1.37, 95% CI: −1.48 to −1.26) and a less DHC (CNY¥) (WMD = −520.46, 95% CI: −554.06 to −503.63) in the CPW group, comparing with that of conventional care. With the need for CS on the rise, the introduction of CPW could effectively reduce LOS and DHC, thereby releasing the medical resources and insurance pressure.