A first-in-human phase I study of a novel MDM2/p53 inhibitor alrizomadlin in advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

The mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) oncogene exerts oncogenic activities in many cancers and represents a potential therapeutic target. This trial evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of alrizomadlin (APG-115), a novel MDM2/p53 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with histologically confirmed advanced solid tumors who had progressed to standard treatment or lacked effective therapies were recruited. Alrizomadlin was administered once daily every other day for 21 days of a 28-day cycle until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 21 patients were enrolled and treated with alrizomadlin; 57.1% were male and the median age was 47 (25-60) years. The maximum tolerated dose of alrizomadlin was 150 mg and the recommended phase II dose was 100 mg. One patient in the 200-mg cohort experienced dose-limiting toxicity of thrombocytopenia and febrile neutropenia. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events were thrombocytopenia (33.3%), lymphocytopenia (33.3%), neutropenia (23.8%), and anemia (23.8%). Alrizomadlin demonstrated approximately linear pharmacokinetics (dose range 100-200 mg) and was associated with increased plasma macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1, indicative of p53 pathway activation. Of the 20 assessable patients, 2 [10%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2% to 31.7%] patients achieved partial response and 10 (50%, 95% CI 27.2% to 72.8%) showed stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 6.1 (95% CI 1.7-10.4) months, which was significantly longer in patients with wild-type versus mutant TP53 (7.9 versus 2.2 months, respectively; P < 0.001). Among patients with MDM2 amplification and wild-type TP53, the overall response rate was 25% (2/8) and the disease control rate was 100% (8/8).

CONCLUSIONS

Alrizomadlin had an acceptable safety profile and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in MDM2-amplified and TP53 wild-type tumors. This study supports further exploration of alrizomadlin with recommended doses of 100 mg q.o.d. in 21 days on and 7 days off regimen.

Current unmet needs in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma, the relevance of progression-free survival as clinical endpoint, and expectations for future clinical trial design: an international Delphi consensus report

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a common presentation of liposarcoma. Despite established diagnostic and treatment guidelines for DDLPS, critical clinical gaps remain driven by diagnostic challenges, symptom burden and the lack of targeted, safe and effective treatments. The objective of this study was to gather expert opinions from Europe and the United States on the management, unmet needs and expectations for clinical trial design as well as the value of progression-free survival (PFS) in this disease. Other aims included raising awareness and educate key stakeholders across healthcare systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An international panel of 12 sarcoma key opinion leaders (KOLs) was recruited. The study consisted of two rounds of surveys with pre-defined statements. Experts scored each statement on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus agreement was defined as ≥75% of experts scoring a statement with ≥7. Revised statements were discussed in a consensus meeting.

RESULTS

Consensus was reached on 43 of 55 pre-defined statements across disease burden, treatment paradigm, unmet needs, value of PFS and its association with overall survival (OS), and cross-over trial design. Twelve statements were deprioritised or merged with other statements. There were no statements where experts disagreed.

CONCLUSION

This study constitutes the first international Delphi panel on DDLPS. It aimed to explore KOL perception of the disease burden and unmet need in DDLPS, the value of PFS, and its potential translation to OS benefit, as well as the relevance of a cross-over trial design for DDLPS therapies. Results indicate an alignment across Europe and the United States regarding DDLPS management, unmet needs, and expectations for clinical trials. Raising awareness of critical clinical gaps in relation to DDLPS can contribute to improving patient outcomes and supporting the development of innovative treatments.

Well-differentiated liposarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: Systemic treatment options for two sibling neoplasms

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) account for 60 % of all liposarcomas, reflecting the heterogeneity of this type of sarcoma. Genetically, both types of liposarcomas are characterized by the amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes, which indicates an important molecular event with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. In both localized WDLPS and DDLPS of the retroperitoneum and the extremities, between 25 % and 30 % of patients have local or distant recurrence, even when perioperatively treated, with clear margins present. The systemic treatment of WDLPS and DDLPS remains a challenge, with anthracyclines as the gold standard for first-line treatment. Several regimens have been tested with modest results regarding their efficacy. Herein we discuss the systemic treatment options for WDLPS and DDLPS and review their reported clinical efficacy results.

The Predictive Role of the Histopathological Scoring System in Adipose Tumors-Lipoma, Atypical Lipomatous Tumor, and Liposarcoma

Lipomatous tumors are the most frequent soft tissue neoplasms. Sometimes their differential diagnosis is difficult to perform only by microscopic analysis. This study aims to create a histopathological scoring system and highlight the impact of intratumoral microvascular density. This study was conducted over 10 years. We analyzed the main pathogenic pathways (MDM2 and CDK4), as well as the tumor microvascularization (CD31 and CD34) by immunohistochemical tests. We also analyzed the status of the MDM2 gene by CISH. These data, together with the clinical and histopathological information, were statistically analyzed by appropriate tests. We identified 112 eligible cases, with most of the patients being in their sixth decade of life, with a slight predominance of the female sex. We found important associations like tumor location linked to nuclear pleomorphism severity and microvascularization density correlated with atypia severity. Also, we observed that a maximum diameter of a tumor of at least 69 mm is associated with the presence of tumor necrosis. The score designed in this study shows an increased sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of lipomas (100%, respectively, 97%), atypical lipomatous tumors (93.8%, respectively, 82.3%), and liposarcomas (100%, respectively, 90.5%). This present study enhances the present data by bringing to attention the histopathological score with a role in differential diagnosis, as well as in the prediction of immunohistochemical and genetic tests. Also, we highlighted the importance of microvascular density, especially in the diagnosis of liposarcomas.

Brightline-1: phase II/III trial of the MDM2-p53 antagonist BI 907828 versus doxorubicin in patients with advanced DDLPS

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a rare, aggressive liposarcoma associated with poor prognosis. First-line treatment for advanced/metastatic DDLPS is systemic chemotherapy, but efficacy is poor and toxicities substantial. Most DDLPS tumors have amplification of the MDM2 gene, which encodes a negative regulator of the p53 suppressor protein. BI 907828 is a highly potent, oral MDM2-p53 antagonist that inhibits the interaction between p53 and MDM2, thereby restoring p53 activity. BI 907828 has shown promising activity in preclinical studies and in a phase Ia/Ib study in patients with solid tumors, particularly those with DDLPS. This manuscript describes the rationale and design of an ongoing multicenter, randomized, phase II/III trial (Brightline-1; NCT05218499) evaluating BI 907828 versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced DDLPS.

Prognosis of Liposarcoma Patients in Modern ERA: Single-Center Experience

Objective  Liposarcomas are relatively rare tumors. Prognostic and predictive factors and treatment options are limited. We herein presented our 10-year experience with liposarcomas. Materials and Methods  Adult patients with liposarcoma treated between 2005 and 2015 in our center were included. Demographic and clinicopathologic features of patients were retrieved from patient files. Statistical Analyses  Outcomes in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed along with potential prognostic factors using Kaplan-Meier analyses. Results  A total of 88 patients were included. The median age was 52. Rates of well-differentiated (WDLS), dedifferentiated (DDLS), myxoid (MLS), and pleomorphic liposarcomas (PLS) were 42, 9.1, 37.5, and 4.5%, respectively. Only 10% of patients had high-grade tumors and 93% had localized disease. Ninety-six percent of patients ( n  = 84) underwent surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 16 patients. The most common regimen was ifosfamide-doxorubicin. Recurrences were observed in 30 patients, 21 had local, and 9 had distant metastasis. Five-year DFS of patients with the localized disease was 68%. All patients with PLS had relapses and those had the highest distant relapse rates among all subtypes. Multivariate analysis showed T stage and grade were associated with DFS. Five-year OS of the entire population was 68%. Five-year OS was 79, 76, 50, and 0% in WDLS, MLS, DDLS, and PLS, respectively ( p  = 0.002). Conclusion  Management of liposarcomas is still challenging. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment. Novel effective therapies are needed, particularly in advanced disease settings.

Prognosis and survival of patients diagnosed with well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The main objective is to establish the overall survival and disease-free survival profiles regarding the patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma, making a comparison based on the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes. The secondary objectives are to descriptively analyze the clinical characteristics of said patients and to identify and analyze other independent variables that might modify these survival profiles significantly.

METHODS

An observational and analytical study was performed using a retrospective historical cohort that was followed prospectively. The inclusion criteria consisted of: the procedure of liposarcoma located in the retroperitoneum, the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes, between January of 2002 and May of 2019. As a result, 32 patients took part in this study's sample. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to summarise the results and log-rank test was used in the comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The overall survival at 5 years was around 59%. No differences were found between the patients with a well-differentiated subtype compared to the dedifferentiated ones (p = 0.834). The disease-free survival at 2 years was 59% regarding the well-differentiated and 26% regarding the dedifferentiated, with these differences being statistically significant (p = 0.005). None of the other studied variables modified these survival profiles significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas show less disease-free survival than well-differentiated liposarcomas. However, regarding overall survival no differences can be claimed.

Post-Systemic Chemotherapy Prognoses of Recurrent/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients with Retroperitoneal/Intra-Abdominal Origin vs. Those with Extremities/Trunk Origin

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefit of systemic chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) compared to its benefits for other primary lesions has not been known or sufficiently evaluated.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of the STS patients who consulted a department of medical oncology in Tokyo between June 2011 and March 2018, and we extracted the cases of patients with primary sites at the retroperitoneum/intra-abdomen (cohort R) or extremities/trunk (cohort E) who received systemic chemotherapy in a recurrent/metastatic setting, comparing the cohorts' characteristics, chemotherapy details, and prognoses.

RESULTS

Of all 337 STS patients, we enrolled 49 patients in cohort R and 75 patients in cohort E. Liposarcoma was more frequently observed in cohort R (51.0%) than cohort E (22.7%). The median chemotherapy treatment line was two lines (range: 1-6) in cohort R and three lines (range: 1-9) in cohort E. The doxorubicin usage rates differed in recurrent/metastatic settings (90.0% in cohort R and 55.0% in cohort E), due mainly to the higher rate of a perioperative chemotherapy treatment history in cohort E (52.0% vs. 6.1% in cohort R). The median overall survival from the start of salvage chemotherapy was 31.9 months (cohort R; 95%CI: 20.9-42.8) and 27.1 months (cohort E; 95%CI: 21.6-32.5) (p=0.549).

CONCLUSION

There were differences in the distributions of pathology and antitumor drugs used in a salvage setting between retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal and extremities/trunk STS patients in recurrent/metastatic settings, but the prognoses with salvage chemotherapy were similar in the two cohorts.

Prognosis and survival of patients diagnosed with well-differentiated and dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcoma

OBJECTIVES

The main objective is to establish the overall survival and disease-free survival profiles regarding the patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma, making a comparison based on the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes. The secondary objectives are to descriptively analyze the clinical characteristics of said patients and to identify and analyze other independent variables that might modify these survival profiles significantly.

METHODS

An observational and analytical study was performed using a retrospective historical cohort that was followed prospectively. The inclusion criteria consisted of: the procedure of liposarcoma located in the retroperitoneum, the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated histological subtypes, between January 2002 and May 2019. As a result, 32 patients took part in this study's sample. Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to summarize the results and log-rank test was used in the comparative analysis.

RESULTS

The overall survival at 5 years was around 59%. No differences were found between the patients with a well-differentiated subtype compared to the dedifferentiated ones (p=0.834). The disease-free survival at 2 years was 59% regarding the well-differentiated and 26% regarding the dedifferentiated, with these differences being statistically significant (p=0.005). None of the other studied variables modified these survival profiles significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

Dedifferentiated retroperitoneal liposarcomas show less disease-free survival than well-differentiated liposarcomas. However, regarding overall survival no differences can be claimed.

Survival analysis and treatment strategies for limb liposarcoma patients with metastasis at presentation

Limited data exist on patients with limb liposarcoma (LLS) with metastasis at presentation Moreover, the potential prognostic factors of this patient population are poorly documented because of its rarity. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with metastatic LLS.All patients with LLS with metastasis at presentation from 1975 to 2016 were identified by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The following clinical data were derived from this clinical database: age, sex, histologic grade, subtype, size of tumor, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, vital status, cause of death, and survival duration. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed to calculate median survival time and draw survivorship curves. Cox-proportional hazards regression model was used to reveal the statistical independence between various variables.The present study collected 184 cases from SEER database for survival analysis. Mean age was 57.8 years with 63.6% (n = 117) men. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of this population were 27.8% and 30.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age, tumor grade, and surgery were significantly correlated with survival. Sex and tumor size did not reach significant predictor status of survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that age at diagnosis <60, low tumor grade, and local surgery were significantly correlated with improved OS and CSS.Patients with LLS with metastasis at diagnosis experienced quite poor prognosis. Currently, surgery for the primary tumor significantly prolonged the survival of those patients, whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy need to be further confirmed.

A case of retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma successfully treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent surgery

Background

Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RPLS) is the most commonly observed soft tissue sarcoma in the retroperitoneal space. Although the beneficial effect of chemotherapy for RPLS is controversial, there are some reports that have shown a considerable tumor-suppressive effect of chemotherapy in RPLS. We demonstrate a case of dedifferentiated RPLS, which was initially considered inoperable but was successfully treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent curative resection.

Case presentation

A 59-year-old female was referred to our hospital with a chief complaint of right lower quadrant abdominal pain. Abdominal computed tomography revealed a large retroperitoneal tumor with a maximum diameter of 11 cm. The tumor involved retroperitoneal major vasculatures, such as the right common iliac vein and artery, as well as the right psoas muscle and femoral nerve. The right ureter was also involved and obstructed by the tumor. A biopsy was performed through the retroperitoneal route, and the tumor was diagnosed as a dedifferentiated liposarcoma with the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grade 3. Because the tumor was highly invasive and complete resection was not feasible, we decided to administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI). After completing 6 courses of AI, the tumor size was considerably reduced, and we decided to perform surgery with curative intent. Before laparotomy, femoro-femoral arterial bypass was performed to prepare for the right common iliac artery resection. Thereafter, the patient underwent laparotomy and tumor resection combined with right nephrectomy, resection of the right common iliac artery and vein, and resection of the right psoas muscle and femoral nerve. The postoperative course was uneventful, although the patient needed a walking brace to support her gait. The pathological findings indicated a 99% disappearance of tumor cells. The patient was healthy without any complaints after 1 year of surgery, and a follow-up CT scan revealed no tumor recurrence.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that showed a nearly complete pathological response to AI in dedifferentiated RPLS, which was subsequently completely resected.