1
|
Villagrán-García M, Farina A, Muñiz-Castrillo S, Wucher V, Dhairi M, Timestit N, Ciano-Petersen NL, Vogrig A, Picard G, Benaiteau M, Psimaras D, Petrova AV, Alberto T, Aupy J, Giry M, Rogemond V, Desestret V, Joubert B, Honnorat J. Revisiting anti-Hu paraneoplastic autoimmunity: phenotypic characterization and cancer diagnosis. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad247. [PMID: 37794924 PMCID: PMC10546956 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcad247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Anti-Hu are the most frequent antibodies in paraneoplastic neurological syndromes, mainly associated with an often limited stage small cell lung cancer. The clinical presentation is pleomorphic, frequently multifocal. Although the predominant phenotypes are well characterized, how different neurological syndromes associate is unclear. Likewise, no specific study assessed the performance of new-generation CT and PET scanners for cancer screening in these patients. Herein, we aimed to describe the clinical pattern and cancer screening in a retrospective cohort of 466 patients with anti-Hu autoimmunity from the French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes registry. Clinical presentation, cancer screening and diagnosis were analysed. Among the 466 patients, 220 (54%) had multifocal neurological involvement. A hierarchical cluster analysis grouped the patients into (i) mainly limbic encephalitis, (ii) predominantly peripheral neuropathy and (iii) broad involvement of the nervous system (mixed group). Compared with limbic encephalitis and mixed groups, patients in the neuropathy group more frequently had a chronic onset of symptoms (29 versus 13 and 17%), elevated CSF proteins (83 versus 47 and 67%) and died from cancer progression (67 versus 15 and 28%; all P < 0.05). No significant difference in overall survival was observed between groups. Dysautonomia and brainstem signs were associated with a higher risk of death from the neurological cause; cancer diagnosis was the main predictor of all-cause death, especially when diagnosed within 2 years from clinical onset (all P < 0.05). Three hundred and forty-nine (75%) patients had cancer: in 295 (84%) neurological symptoms preceded tumour diagnosis, being lung cancer in 262 (89%), thereof small cell lung cancer in 227 (87%). First CT scan revealed lung cancer in 205/241 (85%), and PET scan shortened the interval to diagnosis when the initial CT scan was negative [7 months (1-66) in 27 patients versus 14 months (2-45) in 6; P < 0.001]. Although cancer diagnosis mostly occurred within 2 years from clinical onset, 13/295 (4%) patients exceeded that threshold. Conversely, 33 patients (7%) were 'cancer-free' after 2 years of follow-up. However, 13/33 (39%) had initial suspicious imaging findings that spontaneously regressed. In conclusion, although anti-Hu autoimmunity clinical presentation is mostly multifocal, we observed patients with a predominant limbic syndrome or isolated sensory neuropathy. Early implementation of PET scan shortens the interval to cancer diagnosis, which was the strongest predictor of death, especially if diagnosed ≤2 years from clinical onset. As cancer was diagnosed >2 years after clinical onset in few patients, screening should be extended up to 5 years. In addition, tumour regression was suspected in a substantial proportion of 'cancer-free' patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Macarena Villagrán-García
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- MeLiS-UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, INSERM U1314, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Antonio Farina
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- MeLiS-UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, INSERM U1314, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69008, France
- Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Florence 50139, Italy
| | - Sergio Muñiz-Castrillo
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
| | - Valentin Wucher
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- MeLiS-UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, INSERM U1314, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Maroua Dhairi
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
| | - Noémie Timestit
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- Department of Biostatistics, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon 69424, France
| | - Nicolás Lundahl Ciano-Petersen
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA) and Platform of Nanomedicine (BIONAND), Málaga 29590, Spain
| | - Alberto Vogrig
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- Clinical Neurology, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASU FC), Udine 33100, Italy
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine Medical School, Udine 33100, Italy
| | - Géraldine Picard
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
| | - Marie Benaiteau
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
| | - Dimitri Psimaras
- AP-HP, Hospital Group Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neurology 2 Department Mazarin, Paris 75013, France
- Inserm, CNRS, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Paris 75013, France
| | | | - Tifanie Alberto
- Department of Neurology, CRC SEP, Centre Hospitalier of Lille, Lille 59000, France
| | - Jérôme Aupy
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier of Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33000, France
- CNRS, IMN, UMR 5293, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux 33076, France
| | - Marine Giry
- AP-HP, Hospital Group Pitié-Salpêtrière, Neurology 2 Department Mazarin, Paris 75013, France
- Inserm, CNRS, Paris Brain Institute, Institut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Paris 75013, France
| | - Véronique Rogemond
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- MeLiS-UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, INSERM U1314, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Virginie Desestret
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
| | - Bastien Joubert
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- MeLiS-UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, INSERM U1314, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69008, France
| | - Jérôme Honnorat
- French Reference Centre on Paraneoplastic Neurological Syndromes and Autoimmune Encephalitis, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Neurologique, Bron 69677, France
- MeLiS-UCBL-CNRS UMR 5284, INSERM U1314, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon 69008, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thiis-Evensen E, Boyar Cetinkaya R. Incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasms in Norway 1993-2021. J Neuroendocrinol 2023; 35:e13264. [PMID: 36988112 DOI: 10.1111/jne.13264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) has increased over the last decades. The prevalence of NENs has to a lesser extent been previously reported. We wanted to study the trends in incidence and prevalence of NEN in Norway from 1993 to 2021 through the Cancer Registry of Norway. This registry, which covers the whole population, has been found to be 99% complete. The neoplasms were classified as neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). From 1993 to 2021 altogether 10.288 NETs and 13,982 (1.756 outside the lungs) NECs were diagnosed. The incidence of NETs increased from 3.72 to 9.97 per 100,000 per year, corresponding to a 268% increase, p < .001. The largest increase in incidence for NETs was found for pancreas (338%), lung (330%) and small intestine (303%). For NECs there was no change in the incidence, from 9.74 to 9.95 per 100,000 per year, p = .4, but there was an increase in the incidence of NECs originating from the skin (Merkel cell carcinoma) (287%), p < .001, and the GI tract (200%), p = .03. There were no changes in stage distribution at diagnosis for NETs and NECs. The prevalence for NENs increased 666% during the study period, NETs increased from 10.77 to 99.37 per 100.000 (927%), p < .001. For NECs the increase was from 7.4 to 21.56 per 100.000 (291%), p < .001. GI-NECs increased the most from 0.005 to 0.94 (1880%), p = .002. In conclusion, there was a substantial increase in incidence and prevalence of neuroendocrine neoplasms in Norway from 1993 to 2021. This is the first study to report complete prevalence of NENs for a whole nation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Espen Thiis-Evensen
- Center for Neuroendocrine Tumors, Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luecke S, Fottner C, Lahner H, Jann H, Zolnowski D, Quietzsch D, Grabowski P, Cremer B, Maasberg S, Pape UF, Mueller HH, Gress TM, Rinke A. Treatment Approaches and Outcome of Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasia Grade 3 in German Real-World Clinical Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:2718. [PMID: 35681701 PMCID: PMC9179270 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine neoplasia grade 3 (NEN G3) represents a rare and heterogeneous cancer type with a poor prognosis. The aim of our study was to analyze real-world data from the German NET Registry with a focus on therapeutic and prognostic aspects. METHODS NEN G3 patients were identified within the German NET Registry. Demographic data and data on treatments and outcomes were retrieved. Univariate analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier-method. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Of 445 included patients, 318 (71.5%) were diagnosed at stage IV. Well-differentiated morphology (NET G3) was described in 31.7%, 60% of cases were classified as neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and the median Ki67 value was 50%. First-line treatment comprised chemotherapy in 43.8%, with differences in the choice of regimen with regard to NET or NEC, and surgery in 41.6% of patients. Median overall survival for the entire cohort was 31 months. Stage, performance status and Ki67 were significant prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS The survival data of our national registry compare favorably to population-based data, probably mainly because of a relatively low median Ki67 of 50%. Nevertheless, the best first- and second-line approaches for specific subgroups remain unclear, and an international effort to fill these gaps is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Luecke
- UKGM Marburg, Department of Gastroenterology, Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany; (S.L.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Christian Fottner
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Endocrinology, University Hospital Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Harald Lahner
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University Hospital of Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Henning Jann
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Campus Virchow Klinikum, University Medicine Charité, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | | | - Detlef Quietzsch
- Praxis Dr. med. habil. Diener, 09376 Oelsnitz/Erzgebirge, Germany;
| | - Patricia Grabowski
- Klinikum Havelhöhe, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Institute of Medical Immunology, MVZ Oncology, University Medicine Charité, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Birgit Cremer
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Cologne, 50923 Cologne, Germany;
| | - Sebastian Maasberg
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany; (S.M.); (U.-F.P.)
| | - Ulrich-Frank Pape
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik St. Georg, 20099 Hamburg, Germany; (S.M.); (U.-F.P.)
| | - Hans-Helge Mueller
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany;
| | - Thomas Matthias Gress
- UKGM Marburg, Department of Gastroenterology, Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany; (S.L.); (T.M.G.)
| | - Anja Rinke
- UKGM Marburg, Department of Gastroenterology, Philipps University Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany; (S.L.); (T.M.G.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ni J, Zhang X, Wang H, Si X, Xu Y, Zhao J, Chen M, Zhang L, Wang M. Clinical characteristics and prognostic model for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer: A retrospective study over an 8-year period. Thorac Cancer 2021; 13:539-548. [PMID: 34970848 PMCID: PMC8841711 DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.14289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive neuroendocrine tumor with a short replication time and a rapid growth rate. Prognostic factors for SCLC in clinical practice are scarce. Retrospective analysis of 8‐year extensive‐stage SCLC data from the Department Respiratory and Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital (Beijing, China) was performed to develop a risk prediction model that can facilitate the identification of extensive‐stage SCLC with differing prognosis in clinical practice. Methods A retrospective analysis of data from patients with extensive‐stage SCLC at a single‐center from January 2013 to January 2021, including age, sex, ECOG physical score, immunohistochemistry (CgA, Syn, CD56, TTF1, and Ki67), staging, treatment regimen, laboratory examinations, and survival period, was performed. Clinical variables with potential prognostic significance were screened by univariate Cox analysis. Next, multifactor Cox risk prediction regression analysis was performed to establish an extensive‐stage SCLC risk prognostic model. Survival curves and ROC curves for high and low risk groups were plotted according to risk scores. Nomogram and calibration curves were developed to assess the accuracy of the risk prediction model. Results This study included 300 patients who were diagnosed with extensive‐stage SCLC at our center from January 2013 to January 2021. The most common first presentation was respiratory symptoms, especially cough (162, 54%). The most common extra‐thoracic metastatic organs were bone (36.3%), liver (24.7%), brain (15.7%), and adrenal glands (15.7%). A total of 99% of patients received first‐line systemic therapy, with 86.3% of patients treated with platinum‐etoposide and 10.7% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with platinum‐etoposide backbone. First‐line progression‐free survival was up to 198 days, and the median OS was 439 days. After Cox regression screening and backward stepwise selection, “time from initial therapy to relapse or progression (PFS1), liver metastases, adrenal metastases, M stage and first‐line treatment pattern” were retained to establish a prognostic model with an AUC value of 0.763. The prognostic model was shown as a nomogram with good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusions The first‐line treatment of SCLC patients admitted to our hospital in the past 8 years was relatively standardized, and the progression‐free survival and OS were slightly longer than those reported in the literature. We developed a prognostic risk score model for extensive‐stage SCLC to calculate individual survival in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Ni
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaotong Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hanping Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoyan Si
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Xu
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Zhao
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Minjiang Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mengzhao Wang
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dingemans AMC, Früh M, Ardizzoni A, Besse B, Faivre-Finn C, Hendriks LE, Lantuejoul S, Peters S, Reguart N, Rudin CM, De Ruysscher D, Van Schil PE, Vansteenkiste J, Reck M. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up ☆. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:839-853. [PMID: 33864941 PMCID: PMC9464246 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.03.207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 239] [Impact Index Per Article: 79.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A.-M. C. Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Respiratory Medicine, Rotterdam
- Department of Pulmonology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - M. Früh
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - A. Ardizzoni
- Division of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - B. Besse
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif
- Paris-Saclay University, Orsay, France
| | - C. Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester & The Christie, NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - L. E. Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonology, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S. Lantuejoul
- Department of Biopathology, Centre Léon Bérard, Grenoble Alpes University, Lyon, France
| | - S. Peters
- Department of Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - N. Reguart
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clínic and Translational Genomics and Targeted Therapeutics in Solid Tumors, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - C. M. Rudin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - D. De Ruysscher
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - P. E. Van Schil
- Department of Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - J. Vansteenkiste
- Department of Respiratory Oncology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M. Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Airway Research Center North, German Center for Lung Research, Lung Clinic, Grosshansdorf, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents about 15% of all lung cancers and is marked by an exceptionally high proliferative rate, strong predilection for early metastasis and poor prognosis. SCLC is strongly associated with exposure to tobacco carcinogens. Most patients have metastatic disease at diagnosis, with only one-third having earlier-stage disease that is amenable to potentially curative multimodality therapy. Genomic profiling of SCLC reveals extensive chromosomal rearrangements and a high mutation burden, almost always including functional inactivation of the tumour suppressor genes TP53 and RB1. Analyses of both human SCLC and murine models have defined subtypes of disease based on the relative expression of dominant transcriptional regulators and have also revealed substantial intratumoural heterogeneity. Aspects of this heterogeneity have been implicated in tumour evolution, metastasis and acquired therapeutic resistance. Although clinical progress in SCLC treatment has been notoriously slow, a better understanding of the biology of disease has uncovered novel vulnerabilities that might be amenable to targeted therapeutic approaches. The recent introduction of immune checkpoint blockade into the treatment of patients with SCLC is offering new hope, with a small subset of patients deriving prolonged benefit. Strategies to direct targeted therapies to those patients who are most likely to respond and to extend the durable benefit of effective antitumour immunity to a greater fraction of patients are urgently needed and are now being actively explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles M Rudin
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Druckenmiller Center for Lung Cancer Research, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Elisabeth Brambilla
- Institute for Advanced Biosciences, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Julien Sage
- Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|