1
|
Crowley F, Broderick S, Francis JH, O'Cearbhaill RE, Canestraro J. Ocular side effects of anticancer agents used in the treatment of gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 188:147-157. [PMID: 38964252 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/31/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
The treatment landscape of gynecologic cancers has expanded in recent years to include targeted and immune-based therapies. These therapies often have ocular side effects not seen with conventional chemotherapies, some of which can cause significant visual impairment if not recognized in a timely fashion. Clinicians must know how to appropriately identify, mitigate, and treat these ocular adverse events. Management often involves working with an interdisciplinary team of eye specialists, and it is important to know when to refer patients for specialized care. Proactive identification of eye specialists, especially in rural and community settings where access to care can be limited, may be necessary. Here, we discuss the management of common ocular toxicities seen with novel anticancer agents used to treat gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fionnuala Crowley
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Care, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| | | | - Jasmine H Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Gynecologic Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA.
| | - Julia Canestraro
- Department of Hematology Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA; Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Francis JH, Canestraro J, Abramson DH. Re: Thibault et al.: Drug-induced uveitis related to checkpoint inhibitors and MAP-kinase inhibitors (Ophthalmology. 2024;131:249-251). Ophthalmology 2024; 131:e31-e32. [PMID: 38678467 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024] Open
|
3
|
Diamantopoulos PT, Anastasopoulou A, Dimopoulou M, Samarkos M, Gogas H. Challenges in the treatment of melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with sickle cell disease: case report and review of the literature. Ther Adv Hematol 2023; 14:20406207231155991. [PMID: 36936358 PMCID: PMC10021083 DOI: 10.1177/20406207231155991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) suffer from complications due to anemia, inflammation, and vaso-occlusion. Factors that trigger sickling and/or inflammation may initiate such complications, while treatment with hydroxyurea (HU) reduces their emergence and prolongs survival. On the contrary, inhibition of the BRAF-MEK-ERK pathway with BRAF and MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) has revolutionized treatment of melanoma but their use has been correlated with inflammatory adverse events. Thus, treatment of patients with SCD with BRAF/MEKi may be quite challenging and pyrexia in those patients should be managed as a medical emergency. In this article, intrigued by the case of a 36-year-old female patient with S/β-thal under HU who was treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for melanoma, we analyze the mechanisms underlying inflammation and vaso-occlusion in SCD, the mechanisms of pyrexia and inflammation induced by BRAF/MEKi, their potential interconnections, the shared role of the inflammasome in these two entities, and the protective effect of HU in SCD. Since SCD is the most common inheritable blood disorder, the administration of BRAF/MEKi for melanoma in patients with SCD may be a rather common challenge. Thus, proper treatment with HU may pave the way for an uneventful management of such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amalia Anastasopoulou
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laikon
General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens,
Greece
| | | | - Michalis Samarkos
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laikon
General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens,
Greece
| | - Helen Gogas
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Laikon
General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens,
Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foulsham W, Edghill BZ, Julia Canestraro O, Makker V, Konner J, Abramson DH, Francis JH. Central retinal vein occlusion in the setting of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibition. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022; 27:101657. [PMID: 35845747 PMCID: PMC9284313 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report a case of central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) in a patient being treated with a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor. Observations A 54-year-old female patient with endometrial cancer presented with CRVO and cystoid macular edema while receiving lenvatinib/pembrolizumab combination therapy. The patient received treatment with intravitreal bevacizumab, after which her visual acuity improved markedly, permitting the continuation of her chemotherapy regimen without recurrence of ocular adverse events. Conclusions and Importance Like mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, FGFR inhibitors have the potential to be associated with retinal vein occlusion. In this case, visual recovery was possible with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, and toxicity did not recur with drug reinitiation and continuation over five years of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Foulsham
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benjeil Z. Edghill
- Ophthalmology Service, Advantage Care Physicians, Staten Island, NY, USA
| | - O.D. Julia Canestraro
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Department of Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jason Konner
- Department of Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - David H. Abramson
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Corresponding author. Ophthalmic Oncology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Fauviaux E, Promelle V, Boucenna V, Jany B, Errera MH, Delbarre M, Boucenna W. [Ocular toxicity of targeted therapies with MEK inhibitors and BRAF inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic cutaneous melanoma]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2022; 45:612-618. [PMID: 35501194 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2021.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cutaneous melanoma is a malignant tumor, which develops from dermal melanocytes. Targeted therapies have changed the therapeutic management of metastatic melanoma and improved the survival rate. Among the various targeted therapies, MEK inhibitors and BRAF inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy, but they may lead to ocular toxicity. The goal of this study was to assess the incidence of ocular complications caused by the use of MEK inhibitors and BRAF inhibitors and to report their clinical features and therapeutic management. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective, observational, descriptive, single center study was conducted between May 2015 and December 2019 and included all patients with metastatic cutaneous melanomas treated with MEK inhibitors and BRAF inhibitors in whom ophthalmic toxicity was suspected. The data collected were demographic data (age, sex), the type of MEK inhibitors and BRAF inhibitors used, the length of time from melanoma diagnosis, mean duration of ophthalmological follow-up, time differential between starting therapy and the emergence of ocular complications, initial and final logMAR visual acuity, biomicroscopic examination of the anterior segment, dilatated fundus examination, and treatment administered. RESULTS Fifty-four eyes of 27 patients with a mean age of 61.3±14.3 were included. The mean time delay between melanoma diagnosis and initiation of treatment was 23.2±8 months. Twenty patients (74%) were treated with a combination of MEK inhibitors and BRAF inhibitors (trametinib/dabrafenib), 5 patients (19%) were treated with MEK inhibitor monotherapy (cobimetinib), and 2 patients (7%) were treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy (vemurafenib). The mean duration of ophthalmological follow-up was 77.8±29 days, and the delay between the start of therapy and the emergence of symptoms was 87.2±78 days. The mean initial visual acuity was 0.075±0.13 logMAR, and the final visual acuity was 0.01±0.03 logMAR. Twelve patients (44%) developed ocular complications due to the targeted therapy. In the patients who received combination trametinib/dabrafenib, 5 patients (18.5%) developed clinical signs of uveitis, from acute anterior uveietis to panuveitis, and 2 patients (7.4%) developed bilateral central serous chorioretinopathy; in the patients who received cobimetinib, 4 patients (14.8%) developed bilateral central serous chorioretinopathy; and one patient (3.7%) who received vemurafenib developed acute anterior uveitis. For these 12 patients with ophthalmic side effects, temporary discontinuation of therapy was chosen for six patients (22.2%), three patients (11.1%) received half the initial dose, and for three patients (11.1%), normal dosing was continued. CONCLUSION The two main side effects of targeted therapies are uveitis for BRAF inhibitors and central serous chorioretinopathy for MEK inhibitors. A multidisciplinary approach including ophthalmologists, dermatologists and oncologists is essential in order to adapt treatment in the advent of these ocular complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Fauviaux
- Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 1, rond-point du professeur Christian-Cabrol, 80054 Amiens, France.
| | - V Promelle
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences University of Toronto, the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Équipe CHIMERE EA 7516, université de Picardie Jules-Verne, Amiens, France.
| | - V Boucenna
- Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Espagne.
| | - B Jany
- Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 1, rond-point du professeur Christian-Cabrol, 80054 Amiens, France.
| | - M H Errera
- Sorbonne Universités, Centre hospitalier national d'ophtalmologie 15-20, Paris, France; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA, États-Unis.
| | - M Delbarre
- Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital d'instruction des armées Percy, 101, avenue Henri-Barbusse, 92140 Clamart, France.
| | - W Boucenna
- Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, 1, rond-point du professeur Christian-Cabrol, 80054 Amiens, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chi P, Qin LX, Camacho N, Kelly CM, D'Angelo SP, Dickson MA, Gounder MM, Keohan ML, Movva S, Nacev BA, Rosenbaum E, Thornton KA, Crago AM, Francis JH, Martindale M, Phelan HT, Biniakewitz MD, Lee CJ, Singer S, Hwang S, Berger MF, Chen Y, Antonescu CR, Tap WD. Phase Ib Trial of the Combination of Imatinib and Binimetinib in Patients with Advanced Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:1507-1517. [PMID: 35110417 PMCID: PMC9012681 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-21-3909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 01/06/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This phase Ib trial was designed to evaluate the safety and early efficacy signal of the combination of imatinib and binimetinib in patients with imatinib-resistant advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS This trial used a standard 3 + 3 design to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled on an expansion cohort at the RP2D enriching for succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient GISTs to explore potential efficacy. RESULTS The trial enrolled nine patients in the dose-escalation cohort and 14 in the dose-expansion cohort including six with SDH-deficient GISTs. Imatinib 400 mg daily with binimetinib 45 mg twice daily was established as the RP2D. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was asymptomatic grade 4 creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation. The most common non-DLT grade 3/4 toxicity was asymptomatic CPK elevation (69.6%). Other common ≥grade 2 toxicities included peripheral edema (17.4%), acneiform rash (21.7%), anemia (30.4%), hypophosphatemia (39.1%), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increase (17.4%). Two serious adverse events occurred (grade 2 dropped head syndrome and grade 3 central retinal vein occlusion). No unexpected toxicities were observed. Limited clinical activity was observed in KIT-mutant GIST. For SDH-deficient GISTs, one of five had confirmed RECIST1.1 partial response (PR). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) in patients with SDH-deficient GIST was 45.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 15.8-not estimable (NE)]; the median overall survival (mOS) was not reached (95% CI, 31.6 months-NE). One patient with a refractory metastatic SDH-deficient GIST had an exceptional pathologic response and durable clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS The combination of imatinib and binimetinib is safe with manageable toxicity and has encouraging activity in SDH-deficient but not imatinib-refractory KIT/PDGFRA-mutant GISTs. The observed clinical benefits provide a motivation for a larger trial of the combination strategy in SDH-deficient GISTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Chi
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Niedzica Camacho
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ciara M. Kelly
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sandra P. D'Angelo
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Mark A. Dickson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Mrinal M. Gounder
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Mary L. Keohan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sujana Movva
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Benjamin A. Nacev
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Evan Rosenbaum
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Katherine A. Thornton
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Aimee M. Crago
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Jasmine H. Francis
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Moriah Martindale
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Haley T. Phelan
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | | - Cindy J. Lee
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Samuel Singer
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | - Sinchun Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Michael F. Berger
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Yu Chen
- Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| | | | - William D. Tap
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kahn AM, Blenman KR, Sonis ST, Lustberg MB. Strategies to mitigate the toxicity of cancer therapeutics. Adv Cancer Res 2022; 155:215-244. [DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2022.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
8
|
Zhang R, Hariprasad SM, Sanchez G, Mantopoulos D. Friends or Foes? An Update on Retinal Toxicities of Systemic Medications. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2021; 52:302-306. [PMID: 34185583 DOI: 10.3928/23258160-20210528-01] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Francis JH, Canestraro J, Abramson DH. Re: Magone et al.: Ocular adverse effects of infigratinib, a new fibroblast growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (Ophthalmology. 2021;128:624-626). Ophthalmology 2021; 128:e43-e44. [PMID: 34167830 DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2021.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|