Examination of Treatment Satisfaction Instruments in Psoriasis: 2017 Results from the Psoriasis Working Group of the International Dermatology Outcome Measures (IDEOM)

Tapinarof cream 1% once daily for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Patient-reported outcomes from the PSOARING 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Tapinarof cream 1% once daily demonstrated significant efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated in two 12-week, phase 3 pivotal trials in adults with mild-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess long-term, health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction with tapinarof.

METHODS

Patients completing the 12-week trials were eligible for 40 weeks of open-label tapinarof based on Physician Global Assessment score in PSOARING 3, with a 4-week follow-up. Dermatology Life Quality Index was assessed at every visit; Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire responses were assessed at week 40 or early termination.

RESULTS

Seven hundred sixty-three (91.6%) eligible patients enrolled; 78.5% completed the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. DLQI scores improved and were maintained. By week 40, 68.0% of patients had a DLQI of 0 or 1, indicating no impact of psoriasis on health-related quality of life. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed with all Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire questions assessing confidence in tapinarof and satisfaction with efficacy (62.9%-85.8%), application ease and cosmetic elegance (79.9%-96.3%), and preference for tapinarof versus prior psoriasis therapies (55.3%-81.7%).

LIMITATIONS

Open-label; no control; may not be generalizable to all forms of psoriasis.

CONCLUSIONS

Continued and durable improvements in health-related quality of life, high rates of patient satisfaction, and positive perceptions of tapinarof cream were demonstrated.

Bimekizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background:

Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, and is a promising drug for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Objectives:

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in treating patients with psoriasis and to determine the optimal maintenance dosing schedules of bimekizumab.

Methods and design:

Eligible trials were identified from PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Chinese medical databases. Only double-blind, randomized, active comparator, or placebo-controlled trials of bimekizumab treatment on patients with psoriasis were included in this study.

Results:

Five studies were identified, which included 2473 patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. The results indicated that bimekizumab had better efficacy than placebo or active comparator for Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 [risk ratio (RR) = 29.29, 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.30–83.30, 1.06–2.19], PASI 100 (RR = 59.87, 2.06; 95% CI = 15.06–237.99, 1.12–3.79), and Investigator’s Global Assessment scores of 0 or 1 (IGA 0/1) (RR = 21.55, 1.36; 95% CI = 9.25–50.19, 1.02–1.81). Faster onset of clinically meaningful responses was observed with bimekizumab compared with both active comparators (RR = 2.59; 95% CI = 1.32–5.10) and placebo (RR = 40.46; 95% CI = 13.19–124.13), with PASI 75 response observed at week 4 after one dose. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the reduction of PASI scores between 320 mg q4w dosage and q8w dosage (RR = 1.00; 95% CI = 0.96–1.03). Rates of patients with adverse events (AEs) were comparable in the bimekizumab and active comparator groups (RR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.01–1.26), and oral candidiasis was one of the most common treatment-emergent AEs.

Conclusion:

The results of this meta-analysis suggest that bimekizumab is more efficacious and has a rapid onset of action than active comparators and placebo in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. After 16 weeks of initial maintenance treatment, both bimekizumab maintenance dosing schedules (320 mg every 4 and 8 weeks) had similar efficacy.

Polyaphron Dispersion Technology, A Novel Topical Formulation and Delivery System Combining Drug Penetration, Local Tolerability and Convenience of Application

Topical formulation and delivery technologies for pharmaceutical application should simultaneously address efficacy, safety and convenience of therapy. This has historically proven to be challenging, since formulation features that drive efficacy often have undesirable consequences for safety and convenience and vice versa. Polyaphron dispersion (PAD) technology is a novel topical formulation and drug delivery system developed with the purpose of preserving these key attributes. PAD formulations are typically oil-in-water dispersions consisting of oil droplets encapsulated in a multi-molecular shell structure. This shell structure protects potentially unstable active molecules solubilized in the oil from hydrolytic degradation. Example data are presented of enhanced drug penetration from PAD formulations, including dermal delivery of calcipotriene, betamethasone dipropionate and tacrolimus as well as ocular delivery of ciclosporin A. Local tolerability is an important safety parameter for topical formulations, where high levels of surfactants can cause skin irritation. In this regard, a key benefit of PAD formulations is the inherent reduced requirement for surfactants to generate stable formulations compared to conventional emulsion systems. Patients with chronic diseases with topical manifestations such as psoriasis or atopic dermatitis have been reported to miss up to 70% of planned topical applications, mainly due to a lack of satisfaction with their therapy. Patients generally prefer light, moisturizing, non-greasy and quickly absorbed vehicles that are simple to use on all body parts. PAD formulations can generally be designed to meet these criteria. In conclusion, PAD technology provides high flexibility in topical drug design and can be applied to several body locations without compromising efficacy, safety or convenience of therapy.

Clinical Trial Register: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03802344.

Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic, immune-mediated disease, with prominent skin and joint manifestations, associated with several comorbidities. In the past few decades, advances in the knowledge of psoriasis pathogenesis have driven the development of highly effective targeted biologic therapies, transforming the treatment landscape of psoriasis. Bimekizumab is a humanized antibody that selectively binds and neutralizes the biologic functions of interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. This article reviews the current knowledge about bimekizumab in psoriasis treatment. The results obtained in the phase 3 studies (BE VIVID, BE READY, BE RADIANT, BE SURE) corroborate the high levels of efficacy of bimekizumab seen in previous studies, and show superior efficacy over adalimumab, ustekinumab, and secukinumab in direct comparative studies. In all phase 3 trials, bimekizumab was also well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to the other biologic drugs tested, except for a higher frequency of oral candidiasis. Dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F is a highly effective therapeutic option for the treatment of psoriasis, both for naïve patients and for those resistant to previous biologic treatments.

Satisfaction and attitudes toward systemic treatments for psoriasis: A cross-sectional study

In psoriasis patients, satisfaction and patients' attitude toward treatment are heterogeneous depending on several factors and remain poorly investigated, although the availability of several new targeted therapeutic options. A multicentre cross-sectional investigation was conducted to estimate treatment satisfaction and attitudes (awareness, trust, and therapeutic alliance) in a large population of adult psoriasis patients undergoing a systemic biologic or non-biologic agent for moderate-to-severe plaque-type psoriasis. Patients' satisfaction was measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication II questionnaire and patients' attitudes toward treatment were evaluated using a Lickert scale. Results were related to patients' and treatment characteristics and therapeutic outcomes. The study included 899 psoriasis patients and demonstrated high-treatment satisfaction and positive attitudes toward systemic treatments, with greater influence of the perceived efficacy and the type of treatment. Biologic treatments and, in particular anti-IL17 agents showed higher results. More efforts in developing tools facilitating communication and exploring important aspects of patients' view are needed.

Bimekizumab versus ustekinumab for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (BE VIVID): efficacy and safety from a 52-week, multicentre, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

There is an unmet need for a treatment for psoriasis that results in complete skin clearance with a reliably quick response. Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17F in addition to IL-17A. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab with placebo and ustekinumab in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks.

METHODS

BE VIVID was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active comparator and placebo controlled phase 3 trial done across 105 sites (clinics, hospitals, research units, and private practices) in 11 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Adults aged 18 years or older with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] score ≥12, ≥10% body surface area affected by psoriasis, and Investigator's Global Assessment [IGA] score ≥3 on a five point scale) were included. Randomisation was stratified by geographical region and previous exposure to biologics; patients, investigators, and sponsors were masked to treatment assignment. Patients were randomly assigned (4:2:1) using an interactive response technology to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg (baseline weight-dependent dosing) at weeks 0 and 4, then every 12 weeks, or placebo every 4 weeks. At week 16, patients receiving placebo switched to bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks. All study treatments were administered as two subcutaneous injections. Coprimary endpoints were the proportion of patients with 90% improvement in the PASI (PASI90) and the proportion of patients with an IGA response of clear or almost clear (score 0 or 1) at week 16 (non-responder imputation). Efficacy analyses included the intention-to-treat population; safety analysis included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03370133 (completed).

FINDINGS

Between Dec 6, 2017, and Dec 13, 2019, 735 patients were screened and 567 were enrolled and randomly assigned (bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks n=321, ustekinumab 45 mg or 90 mg every 12 weeks n=163, placebo n=83). At week 16, 273 (85%) of 321 patients in the bimekizumab group had PASI90 versus 81 (50%) of 163 in the ustekinumab group (risk difference 35 [95% CI 27-43]; p<0·0001) and four (5%) of 83 in the placebo group (risk difference 80 [74-86]; p<0·0001). At week 16, 270 (84%) patients in the bimekizumab group had an IGA response versus 87 (53%) in the ustekinumab group (risk difference 30 [95% CI 22-39]; p<0·0001) and four (5%) in the placebo group (risk difference 79 [73-85]; p<0·0001). Over 52 weeks, serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 24 (6%) of 395 patients in the bimekizumab group (including those who switched from placebo at week 16) and 13 (8%) of 163 in the ustekinumab group.

INTERPRETATION

Bimekizumab was more efficacious than ustekinumab and placebo in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. The bimekizumab safety profile was consistent with that observed in previous studies.

FUNDING

UCB Pharma.