Effectiveness and Safety of Combination Therapy of Transarterial Chemoembolization and Apatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Chinese Population: A Meta-Analysis

Comparative efficacy and safety of molecular targeted agents combined with transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis

Objective

At present, several molecular targeted agents(MTAs) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have been employed to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this meta-analysis, we compared the efficacy and safety of different MTAs combined with TACE to enable effective decision-making for the clinical treatment of unresectable HCC.

Methods

Pubmed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were retrieved to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different MTAs combined with TACE in cohort studies and randomized controlled trials. The hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to investigate the impact of various therapies on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival. However, the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), adverse events (AEs), and ≥grade-3 adverse events (≥G3-AEs) were calculated using odd ratios and 95% CIs. The node-splitting approach was used to test the heterogeneity. The funnel plot was utilized to analyze the publication bias. Additionally, according to the ranking plots, we ranked various treatments.

Results

A total of 45 studies involving 10,774 patients with 8 treatment strategies were included in our network meta-analysis. Our network meta-analysis showed that apatinib+TACE provided the highest OS (62.2%), ORR (44.7%), and DCR (45.6%), while and lenvatinib+TACE offered the best PFS (78.9%). Besides, there was no statistically significant difference in AEs and ≥G3-AEs among treatment options.

Conclusion

Apatinib+TACE demonstrated the best OS, ORR, and DCR with no additional AEs and ≥G3-AEs. Therefore, for the treatment scheme of MTAs combined with TACE, apatinib+TACE may be the best option for patients with unresectable HCC.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023388609.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib/placebo in first-line treatment for intermediate and advanced primary liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Apatinib is a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). For decades, sorafenib has been a classic first-line treatment option for patients with HCC. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib/placebo as first-line treatment for intermediate and advanced primary liver cancer (PLC). Methods: A literature search was performed via PubMed, Web of Science, CENTRAL, Embase, CNKI, VIP, and CBM. Data extraction from databases of other languages is not restricted. The Cochrane risk of bias tool, modified Jadad scale, Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS), and non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I) tool were employed to evaluate methodological qualities in original studies. Influence analysis was applied to assess the reliability of pooled results. Publication bias was evaluated using the funnel plot with Begg's test and Egger's test. Results: Seven studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and one clinical controlled trial (CCT) were used for comparing apatinib with placebo, and two retrospective clinical studies (RCSs) were used for comparing apatinib with sorafenib. Apatinib led to higher overall effects in objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and mean survival time (MST) over placebo (RR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.46-2.81, p < 0.0001, I² = 0%; RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 1.04-1.33, p = 0.009, I² = 45.8%; SMD = 2.63; 95% CI = 1.47-3.78, p < 0.0001, I² = 92.7%, respectively). Compared to sorafenib, apatinib showed no superiority in ORR and DCR but was inferior in the 6-month and 1-year survival rate (RR = 1.99, 95% CI = 0.85-4.65, p = 0.111, I² = 68.3%; RR = 1.04, 95% CI = 0.73-1.47, p = 0.840, I² = 0.0%; RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.42-0.97, p = 0.036, I² = 0.0%; RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.29-0.79, p < 0.0001, I² = 0.0%, respectively). Apatinib had similar adverse effects over placebo but possessed a greater incidence rate of proteinuria and hypertension over sorafenib. Conclusion: In the first-line setting, apatinib might be an alternative treatment approach for patients with intermediate and advanced PLC. Sorafenib alone showed a better survival rate within 1 year and a lower incidence rate in hypertension and proteinuria than apatinib monotherapy.

Efficacy of Transarterial Chemoembolization Combined with Molecular Targeted Agents for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Liver cancer is the second most common cause of cancer-related death, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent subtype. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has recently been widely used for unresectable HCC (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a network meta-analysis to assess and compare the response of different agents in an uHCC setting. According to our results, TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC, with the highest ranking based on OS, PFS, and DCR rates and the second-best ranking based on ORR rates.

Abstract

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is the mainstay treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, studies investigating different combinations of agents have shown inconsistent results. Here, we used network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare different agents across 41 studies (36 cohort studies and five RCTs) in 11,540 patients. Multiple RCTs and cohort studies were searched to evaluate TACE combined with different TKIs. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and tumor response. NMA used a random-effects consistency model to pool evidence from direct and indirect comparisons. Hazard ratio (HR) and relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were analyzed. Further, heterogeneity and publication bias analyses were performed and agents were ranked. TACE plus lenvatinib provided the maximal OS (Rank probability: 0.7559), PFS (Rank probability: 0.8595), CR (Rank probability: 0.4179), and DCR (Rank probability: 0.3857). TACE plus anlotinib demonstrated the highest PR (p = 0.62649) and ORR (p = 0.51158). SD was more often associated with TACE plus sorafenib (Rank probability: 0.601685). TACE plus lenvatinib provides optimal treatment for uHCC based on the highest ranking of OS, PFS, and DCR rates. However, given the lack of statistically significant OS benefit, shared decision making should include other TKIs as acceptable alternatives.

Drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization followed by apatinib is effective and safe in treating hepatocellular carcinoma patients with BCLC stage C

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) followed by apatinib in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C.

METHODS

Totally, 110 HCC patients with BCLC stage C treated with DEB-TACE followed by apatinib were consecutively enrolled. Treatment response (including complete response rate (CR), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR)), survival data (progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS)), and adverse events were documented during the follow-up.

RESULTS

CR, ORR and DCR were 25.5%, 77.2% and 79.1% at 3 months, then were 29.1%, 59.1% and 71.0% at 6 months, respectively. Regarding survival, median PFS (95%CI) was 6.3 (5.0-7.7) months, meanwhile 1-year and 2-year PFS were 19.8% and 3.3%, respectively; median OS (95%CI) was 16.9 (10.2-23.7) months, then 1-year, 2-year and 3-year OS were 66.5%, 34.7% and 14.2%, respectively. Further subgroup analysis indicated that nodule size, Child-Pugh stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score and level of portal vein invasion were negatively correlated with PFS or OS, which were further validated by univariate and multivariate Cox's regression analysis. Most adverse events by DEB-TACE and apatinib treatment were mild and well-tolerable.

CONCLUSION

DEB-TACE followed by apatinib is effective and safe in treating BCLC stage C HCC patients, indicating its role as an acceptable option in HCC management.

The Efficacy and Prognostic Factors of the Combination of TACE and Apatinib for the Treatment of BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objective: Apatinib is a inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2. To explore the efficacy and prognostic factors of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with apatinib in the treatment of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC C) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods: Clinical data of 146 HCC patients with BCLC stage C admitted to our hospital were collected and analyzed retrospectively, of which 76 cases were treated with TACE combined with apatinib (TACE-apatinib) and 70 with TACE alone. The tumor response, survival time, and adverse events were compared between the two groups, and the factors affecting the prognosis were analyzed.

Results: The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) in the TACE-apatinib group were higher than in the TACE-alone group (ORR: 42.10 vs. 25.71%, P = 0.03; DCR: 84.21 vs. 55.71%, P = 0.001). The median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) in the TACE-apatinib group were longer than in the TACE-alone group (TTP: 5.5 vs. 3.7 months, P = 0.02; OS: 10.0 vs. 6.2 months, P = 0.01). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that tumor size, Child-Pugh class, and the presence of the portal vein tumor thrombus affect the prognosis of patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that TACE-apatinib therapy resulted in a higher OS in patients with tumor size <10 cm, without portal vein tumor thrombus, and with Child-Pugh class A (P < 0.05). The likelihood of adverse events (hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, oral ulcer) was significantly higher in the increased in the TACE-apatinib group than in the TACE alone group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: TACE-apatinib is an effective and safe method for the treatment of BCLC stage C HCC. Tumor size, Child-Pugh class, and portal vein tumor thrombus affect survival time in HCC patients with BCLC stage C.

Advances in locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy

Locoregional therapies (LRTs) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represented by ablation and TACE has become the main means for the clinical treatment of unresectable HCC. Among these, TACE is used throughout the stage Ib to IIIb of HCC treatment. In recent years, immunotherapy led by immune checkpoint inhibitors has become a hot direction in clinical research. At the same time, targeted drugs such as Sorafenib and Apatinib have played an important role in the treatment and complementary therapy of advanced HCC, and their clinical application has been quite mature. HCC is the sixth most common malignant tumor in the world. When it comes to its treatment, different therapies have different indications, and their individual efficacies are not satisfactory, which makes the exploration of the use of combination therapy in HCC treatment become a new trend. In this paper, the status of the three therapies and the progress of their combined application are briefly reviewed.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy versus radiofrequency ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and toxicity between small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and those treated with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

Methods

We searched databases for relevant clinical studies. The primary outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS) at 1 and 2 years, freedom from local progression (FFLP) rate at 2 years, and complications.

Results

Five cohorts from 5 retrospective studies and 4,814 patients with HCC were included. Pooled OS at 2 years was significantly lower for SBRT than for RFA [odds ratio (OR): 0.63; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51-0.79; P<0.0001], but the pooled FFLP rate at 2 years was higher for SBRT than for RFA (OR: 1.66; 95% CI: 1.05-2.61; P=0.03). In addition, there was no significant difference in the local and liver toxicities of the two treatments. The contradictory conclusion between the OS and FFLP outcome may be attributed to the difference in radiological dose and location, but there were no uniform criteria to illustrate the radiological dose and location in the included studies.

Conclusions

SBRT had a higher local control ratio but poorer prognosis than RFA in patients with small HCC. The local toxicity was comparable in both treatments. Further trials should be designed with uniform standards for SBRT and RFA treatments.

Adjuvant apatinib treatment after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a phase II trial

Background

Survival after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) still remains poor. Apatinib, a vascular endothelial cell growth factor receptor 2 inhibitor, has been shown to be safe and effective in patients with advanced HCC, so in the present study its efficacy and safety in the adjuvant setting was explored.

Methods

In this single-center, open-label phase II trial, the patients received apatinib (500 mg/day) until they experienced disease recurrence or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS); the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

From a total of 49 patients who were screened between August 2017 and December 2018, 30 study participants received apatinib. According to the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan classification of PVTT, there were 7, 11, and 12 participants with Vp1, Vp2, and Vp3, respectively. The median duration of treatment was 4.8 months [interquartile range (IQR): 2.0-8.8], and the median dose of apatinib was 339.7 mg/day (IQR: 267.7-500 mg/day). The median follow-up was 14.3 months (IQR: 12.3-19.3). The median RFS was 7.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 5.7-9.5 months]. The 1-year RFS rate and the 1-year OS rate were 36.1% and 93.3%, respectively. A total of 29 (96.7%) patients experienced adverse events, and 14 (46.7%) had grade 3 or 4 adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred.

Conclusions

Apatinib was well tolerated in patients after resection of HCC with PVTT. The median RFS in this group was improved compared with that previously reported.

Trial registration

No.: NCT03261791 (ClinicalTrials.gov).